Indonesia - Liga 2Data current as of 06 September 2026

Persiku Kudus vs Kendal Tornado: match statistics

Persiku Kudus crest
Persiku Kudus
1 : 0half-time 0:0
Kendal Tornado crest
Kendal Tornado

Persiku Kudus vs Kendal Tornado: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Persiku Kudus played Kendal Tornado in Liga 2 (Indonesia). The match was played on 4 April 2026. Final score: 1:0.

Current form

Persiku Kudus: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match. Kendal Tornado: 3-2-0, 2.20 points/match.

Goal statistics

Persiku Kudus scores 1.32 and concedes 1.45 goals per match. Kendal Tornado scores 1.75 and concedes 0.67. League average: 2.66 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Persiku Kudus 55%, Kendal Tornado 42%. Over 2.5: Persiku Kudus 55%, Kendal Tornado 58%. League level: BTTS 49%, Over 2.5 47%.

xG, shots and style

Kendal Tornado has higher xG: 1.42 vs 1.23. Persiku Kudus: 9.4 shots per match, Kendal Tornado: 8.9.

Match halves

Persiku Kudus: half-time lead 23%, second-half goals 0.86. Kendal Tornado: half-time lead 42%, second-half goals 1.25.

Goals by minute

Persiku Kudus: 76-90+ (11 goals). Kendal Tornado: 61-75 (7 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Liga 2: 2.66 goals per match, BTTS 49%, Over 2.5 47%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-1-0. Average goals 0.00, BTTS 0%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

I predict an away win. Kendal Tornado average 2.2 points per match in their last 5 games versus Persik’s 1.6, and in that period they scored 10 goals (2.0 per match) compared to Persik’s 7 goals (1.4 per match). Hosts, however, have 29 goals this season against Kendal’s 17, which is their biggest advantage, but they concede on average 1.6 goals at home. The visitors display a more stable defense — conceding 1.0 goal away on average and keeping 50% clean sheets versus the hosts’ 20%; additionally they register more shots on target (5 per match vs 4) and their average away xG of 1.22 is close to the home side’s xG of 1.28. Given the visitors’ better form and defense I assign them a 45% probability, draw 30% and home win 25%.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

I favor the 'no' scenario (Both Teams To Score - No) because Persiku concedes only 0.43 goals per match on average and keeps a clean sheet in 57% of games, while Kendal has a season BTTS rate of only 25%. Persiku scores 1.86 goals per match (xG 1.50) and registers 6.43 shots on target, whereas Kendal averages 1.00 goals (xG 1.22) and 5.0 shots on target with a lower conversion rate of 14% versus the home side's 19%. In the last 5 matches Kendal scored 10 goals (2.0 per game) and Persiku had BTTS in 60% of those five fixtures, but seasonal profiles (clean sheets 57% and 50% and a league with 59% clean-sheet matches) point to a more frequent absence of mutual scoring. xG comparison shows Persiku allows 1.04 xG per match and Kendal 1.21 xG, so Persiku's low average goals conceded (0.43) and Kendal's low season BTTS (25%) outweigh the visitors' short-term form. Therefore I assign BTTS probabilities: 'no' 65% and 'yes' 35%.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Persiku Kudus averages 1.86 goals per home match while Kendal Tornado average 1.00 goals away; xG is 1.50 for Persiku and 1.22 for Kendal, giving a clear offensive edge to the home side. Persiku at home have 71% of matches over 1.5 goals, and Kendal 50% away — therefore I estimate a high probability of Over 1.5 at 72%. Over 2.5 is also supported: Persiku 57% and Kendal 50% seasonally, the league averages 2.67 goals per game, and in the last 5 matches Persiku scored 7 goals while Kendal scored 10, hence an Over 2.5 rating of 56%. The xG model calculated as the average of the home attack xG (1.50) and xG against for the visitors (1.21) yields ~1.36 expected goals for Persiku and ~1.13 for Kendal (sum 2.49), which best supports Over 1.5 as the strongest betting signal.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The most likely scenario is X/1 (draw at half-time, home win) with a 34% probability. Persiku wins 57% of home matches and remains unbeaten at home (winPercentage_home=57.0%, losePercentage_home=0.0%), while the overall full-time distribution shows a 57% chance of a home victory and 43% of a draw (drawPercentage_home=43.0%). Draws at half-time occur frequently: the home side were level at the break in 57% of cases (drawingAtHTPercentage_home=57.0%), with both teams conceding on average no goals before half-time (concededAVGHT_home=0.0, concededAVGHT_away=0.0) and seasonCSPercentageHT at 100.0% for each. After the break Persiku is noticeably more productive: they average 1.29 goals in the second half (scored_2hg_avg_home=1.29) versus 0.5 for Kendal, have a higher home xG (xG_for_avg_home=1.5 vs xG_for_avg_away=1.22) and more on-target shots (6.43 vs 5.0), which increases the likelihood that following an HT draw the home side will decide the match.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
1 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

50Possession (%)50
Persiku KudusKendal Tornado
9Shots10
Persiku KudusKendal Tornado
2Shots on target3
Persiku KudusKendal Tornado
0.9xG1.07
Persiku KudusKendal Tornado
5Corners6
Persiku KudusKendal Tornado
26Dangerous attacks32
Persiku KudusKendal Tornado
-1Fouls-1
Persiku KudusKendal Tornado
0Cards3
Persiku KudusKendal Tornado

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Persiku KudusKendal Tornado
1.32Goals scored / match1.75
Persiku KudusKendal Tornado
1.45Goals conceded / match0.67
Persiku KudusKendal Tornado
51%Average possession49%
Persiku KudusKendal Tornado
3.77Shots on target / match5.42
Persiku KudusKendal Tornado

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

9.36Shots per match8.92
Persiku KudusKendal Tornado
3.77Shots on target5.42
Persiku KudusKendal Tornado
14.1%Shot conversion19.6%
Persiku KudusKendal Tornado
51%Possession49%
Persiku KudusKendal Tornado
1.23xG for1.42
Persiku KudusKendal Tornado
1.28xG against1.06
Persiku KudusKendal Tornado

Shooting quality

Persiku Kudus: Efficient finishingKendal Tornado: Efficient finishing
Persiku KudusKendal Tornado
Accuracy (shots on target)40%61%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.130.16
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.350.32

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Kendal Tornado is 38% better for: last-5 form.

1.6 pts / match - Persiku Kudus · 2.2 pts / match - Kendal Tornado

Persiku Kudus
LDWWD
Season result split
27% W23% R50% P
Season (W-D-L)
6-5-11
1.05 pts / match · goal difference -3
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-2-1
1.60 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
3-2-5
Last 5 at home
2-1-2
DLWLW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 1.77Opponent xG: 0.90BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 40%
Kendal Tornado
WWDWD
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
50% W33% R17% P
Season (W-D-L)
6-4-2
1.83 pts / match · goal difference +13
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-2-0
2.20 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
1-1-2
Last 5 away
1-1-2
LLWD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.0Goals conceded: 0.4xG: 1.37Opponent xG: 1.15BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Kendal Tornado is 33% better for: goals scored per match.

1.32 goals / match - Persiku Kudus · 1.75 goals / match - Kendal Tornado

Kendal Tornado is 116% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.45 goals / match - Persiku Kudus · 0.67 goals / match - Kendal Tornado

Persiku Kudus scoring profile: mixed

Persiku Kudus scores in 68% of matches (15 of 22 matches), while Kendal Tornado keeps a clean sheet in 50% (6 of 12 matches).

Kendal Tornado scoring profile: strong

Kendal Tornado scores in 67% of matches (8 of 12 matches), while Persiku Kudus keeps a clean sheet in 23% (5 of 22 matches).

29Goals scored (season)21
Persiku KudusKendal Tornado
32Goals conceded (season)8
Persiku KudusKendal Tornado
2.77Average goals in match2.42
Persiku KudusKendal Tornado
7Goals scored (last 5)10
Persiku KudusKendal Tornado
4Goals conceded (last 5)2
Persiku KudusKendal Tornado

How often they score at least...

68%1 goal67%
Persiku KudusKendal Tornado
32%2 goals50%
Persiku KudusKendal Tornado
18%3 goals33%
Persiku KudusKendal Tornado
14%4 goals25%
Persiku KudusKendal Tornado

How often they concede at least...

77%1 goal50%
Persiku KudusKendal Tornado
41%2 goals8%
Persiku KudusKendal Tornado
18%3 goals8%
Persiku KudusKendal Tornado
9%4 goals0%
Persiku KudusKendal Tornado

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

49%
League average

Goal patterns

18%BTTS at half-time0%
Persiku KudusKendal Tornado
0%BTTS in both halves0%
Persiku KudusKendal Tornado
23%Scored in both halves33%
Persiku KudusKendal Tornado

BTTS and goal count

41%Min. 3 goals and BTTS33%
Persiku KudusKendal Tornado
14%Min. 3 goals without BTTS25%
Persiku KudusKendal Tornado
60%BTTS - last 540%
Persiku KudusKendal Tornado

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

59%Min. 1 goal before half-time42%
Persiku KudusKendal Tornado
32%Min. 2 goals before half-time8%
Persiku KudusKendal Tornado
5%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
Persiku KudusKendal Tornado

2nd half

86%Min. 1 goal after half-time75%
Persiku KudusKendal Tornado
59%Min. 2 goals after half-time67%
Persiku KudusKendal Tornado
23%Min. 3 goals after half-time25%
Persiku KudusKendal Tornado

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Kendal Tornado is 49% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.23 pts / match - Persiku Kudus · 1.83 pts / match - Kendal Tornado

Persiku Kudus - half-time state
23% leading55% draw23% trailing
Kendal Tornado - half-time state
42% leading58% draw0% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.23Points per match (1st half)1.83
Persiku KudusKendal Tornado
0.45Goals scored (1st half)0.5
Persiku KudusKendal Tornado
0.5Goals conceded (1st half)0
Persiku KudusKendal Tornado
0.95Average goals (1st half)0.5
Persiku KudusKendal Tornado
59%Clean sheet before half-time100%
Persiku KudusKendal Tornado
64%No goal before half-time58%
Persiku KudusKendal Tornado

After half-time (2nd half)

1.23Points per match (2nd half)1.5
Persiku KudusKendal Tornado
0.86Goals scored (2nd half)1.25
Persiku KudusKendal Tornado
0.95Goals conceded (2nd half)0.67
Persiku KudusKendal Tornado
1.82Average goals (2nd half)1.92
Persiku KudusKendal Tornado
41%Clean sheet after half-time50%
Persiku KudusKendal Tornado
45%No goal after half-time42%
Persiku KudusKendal Tornado

Persiku Kudus - second-half results

32% W27% R41% P
27
Half-time points
10
Half-time goals
-1
Goal difference (1st half)
27
Second-half points
-2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.23
PPG before half-time
Lead holding117%

Leads at half-time in 23% of matches and wins 27%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.4

Concedes 0.4 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Kendal Tornado - second-half results

33% W50% R17% P
22
Half-time points
6
Half-time goals
+6
Goal difference (1st half)
18
Second-half points
+7
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.83
PPG before half-time
Lead holding119%

Leads at half-time in 42% of matches and wins 50%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.7

Concedes 0.7 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Persiku Kudus - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.802.20
Goals scored / match0.21.2
Goals conceded / match0.60.2
Average goals in match0.81.4
1 goal40%80%
2 goals40%40%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet60%80%
No goal80%20%
Goal difference-2+5
Half-time: 0% leading - 80% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 40% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 1
Kendal Tornado - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.801.80
Goals scored / match0.41.6
Goals conceded / match0.00.4
Average goals in match0.42.0
1 goal40%80%
2 goals0%80%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet100%60%
No goal60%20%
Goal difference+2+6
Half-time: 40% leading - 60% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 60% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Persiku Kudus
ScoredConceded
2
4
0-15
4
1
16-30
4
6
31-45
2
5
46-60
6
6
61-75
11
10
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (11 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

Kendal Tornado
ScoredConceded
2
0
0-15
2
0
16-30
2
0
31-45
4
2
46-60
7
0
61-75
4
6
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (7 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.60
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.0 : 1.6
Estimated goal split
home : away
98%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
49%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
46%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
11%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 9 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Persiku Kudus

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.05
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.08
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-6.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.09
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.17
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
86%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
128%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.55
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.4
Late goals
38% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 7% come in the first quarter-hour.
38%

Kendal Tornado

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.36
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.72
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-9.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.33
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.39
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
155%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
44%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.37
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.8
Late goals
19% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 10% come in the first quarter-hour.
19%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Liga 2).

Teams vs league

Persiku KudusLigaKendal Tornado
Average goals in match 2.772.66 2.42
Both teams scored 55%49% 42%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 55%47% 58%
Clean sheets 23%30% 50%
Goal before half-time 59%68% 42%
Goal after half-time 86%77% 75%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.66
Average goals per match
49%
Both teams scored
47%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
30%
Clean sheets
1.53
Home goals / match
1.13
Away goals / match
+35%
Home attack advantage
+26%
Home defence advantage
+16%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
68%
1 goal
30%
2 goals
9%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
77%
1 goal
45%
2 goals
18%
3 goals
8%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Kendal TornadoYellow cardJuan Pablo Morales Rengifo
  2. Kendal TornadoYellow cardMuhammad Ragil
  3. Kendal TornadoSubstitutionOn: Gufroni Al MarufOff: Bayu Mohamad Fiqri
  4. Kendal TornadoYellow cardMohammad Haykal Alhafiz

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Persiku Kudus 0 - 1 - 0 Kendal Tornado. Average goals 0.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.

FAQ

What was the result of Persiku Kudus vs Kendal Tornado?

The Liga 2 match finished Persiku Kudus 1:0 Kendal Tornado. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Persiku Kudus vs Kendal Tornado?

Persiku Kudus score 1.32 goals per game on average and Kendal Tornado 1.75. The Liga 2 average is 2.66 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 47% of games. Both teams score in 55% of Persiku Kudus's matches and 42% of Kendal Tornado's.

What form are Persiku Kudus and Kendal Tornado in?

Over the last 5 games Persiku Kudus have a 2-2-1 record (1.60 points per game) and Kendal Tornado 3-2-0 (2.20 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Persiku Kudus vs Kendal Tornado?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Persiku Kudus vs Kendal Tornado: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.