Egypt - Egyptian Premier LeagueData current as of 23 July 2026

Pharco vs Haras El Hodood: match statistics

Pharco crest
Pharco
2 : 1half-time 0:1
Haras El Hodood crest
Haras El Hodood

Pharco vs Haras El Hodood: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Pharco play Haras El Hodood in Egyptian Premier League (Egypt). The match date is 13 April 2026 at 17:00. Final score: 2:1.

Current form

Pharco: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match. Haras El Hodood: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match.

Goal statistics

Pharco scores 0.45 and concedes 1.06 goals per match. Haras El Hodood scores 0.79 and concedes 1.45. League average: 2.02 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Pharco 30%, Haras El Hodood 45%. Over 2.5: Pharco 12%, Haras El Hodood 42%. League level: BTTS 47%, Over 2.5 34%.

xG, shots and style

Haras El Hodood has higher xG: 1.25 vs 1.12. Pharco: 9.6 shots per match, Haras El Hodood: 10.6.

Match halves

Pharco: half-time lead 15%, second-half goals 0.24. Haras El Hodood: half-time lead 15%, second-half goals 0.33.

Goals by minute

Pharco: 76-90+ (4 goals). Haras El Hodood: 0-15 (5 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Egyptian Premier League: 2.02 goals per match, BTTS 47%, Over 2.5 34%.

Head-to-head

1 H2H matches: 0-1-0. Average goals 4.00, BTTS 100%.

Match description

The most likely scenario is a draw, as Pharco draws 55% of home matches and fails to score in 73% of home games, which frequently results in low scores. At home Pharco averages only 0.27 goals per game with an xG of 1.08, while conceding 0.82 goals on average and keeping a clean sheet in 45% of matches, indicating a solid but not particularly productive defense. Visitors Haras El Hodood have better shooting efficiency (6% conversion vs 3% for Pharco) and score on average 0.55 goals away (xG 1.06), but they concede as many as 1.64 goals on the road (xG against 1.66) and have only 18% clean sheets. In the last 5 matches Pharco scored 2 and conceded 6 (PPG 0.6), while Haras scored 3 and conceded 8 (PPG 0.4), giving the hosts a slight form advantage. Considering Pharco’s low offensive efficiency and Haras’s defensive vulnerability away, I assess the probability of a draw at 50%, home win 30% and away win 20%.

Half-by-half

0 : 1
1st half
2 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

61Possession (%)39
PharcoHaras El Hodood
17Shots7
PharcoHaras El Hodood
8Shots on target2
PharcoHaras El Hodood
2.07xG0.96
PharcoHaras El Hodood
8Corners2
PharcoHaras El Hodood
61Dangerous attacks52
PharcoHaras El Hodood
8Fouls17
PharcoHaras El Hodood
1Cards3
PharcoHaras El Hodood

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

PharcoHaras El Hodood
0.45Goals scored / match0.79
PharcoHaras El Hodood
1.06Goals conceded / match1.45
PharcoHaras El Hodood
43%Average possession46%
PharcoHaras El Hodood
2.85Shots on target / match2.91
PharcoHaras El Hodood

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

9.61Shots per match10.61
PharcoHaras El Hodood
2.85Shots on target2.91
PharcoHaras El Hodood
4.7%Shot conversion7.4%
PharcoHaras El Hodood
43%Possession46%
PharcoHaras El Hodood
1.12xG for1.25
PharcoHaras El Hodood
1.44xG against1.48
PharcoHaras El Hodood

Shooting quality

Pharco: BalancedHaras El Hodood: Balanced
PharcoHaras El Hodood
Accuracy (shots on target)30%27%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.160.27

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Pharco
DLLLW
Season result split
12% W39% R48% P
Season (W-D-L)
4-13-16
0.76 pts / match · goal difference -20
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-3
0.80 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
2-7-7
Last 5 at home
1-1-3
WLDLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.4Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 1.05Opponent xG: 1.29BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 20%
Haras El Hodood
LDWLL
Season result split
15% W33% R52% P
Season (W-D-L)
5-11-17
0.79 pts / match · goal difference -22
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-3
0.80 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
2-3-10
Last 5 away
1-1-3
LLDWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 1.8xG: 1.81Opponent xG: 1.21BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Haras El Hodood is 76% better for: goals scored per match.

0.45 goals / match - Pharco · 0.79 goals / match - Haras El Hodood

Pharco is 37% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.06 goals / match - Pharco · 1.45 goals / match - Haras El Hodood

Pharco scoring profile: mixed

Pharco scores in 36% of matches (12 of 33 matches), while Haras El Hodood keeps a clean sheet in 30% (10 of 33 matches).

Haras El Hodood scoring profile: strong

Haras El Hodood scores in 58% of matches (19 of 33 matches), while Pharco keeps a clean sheet in 24% (8 of 33 matches).

15Goals scored (season)26
PharcoHaras El Hodood
35Goals conceded (season)48
PharcoHaras El Hodood
1.52Average goals in match2.24
PharcoHaras El Hodood
2Goals scored (last 5)5
PharcoHaras El Hodood
4Goals conceded (last 5)9
PharcoHaras El Hodood

How often they score at least...

36%1 goal58%
PharcoHaras El Hodood
9%2 goals21%
PharcoHaras El Hodood
0%3 goals0%
PharcoHaras El Hodood
0%4 goals0%
PharcoHaras El Hodood

How often they concede at least...

76%1 goal70%
PharcoHaras El Hodood
24%2 goals45%
PharcoHaras El Hodood
3%3 goals24%
PharcoHaras El Hodood
3%4 goals6%
PharcoHaras El Hodood

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

47%
League average

Goal patterns

3%BTTS at half-time30%
PharcoHaras El Hodood
3%BTTS in both halves12%
PharcoHaras El Hodood
3%Scored in both halves21%
PharcoHaras El Hodood

BTTS and goal count

12%Min. 3 goals and BTTS36%
PharcoHaras El Hodood
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS6%
PharcoHaras El Hodood
20%BTTS - last 540%
PharcoHaras El Hodood

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

52%Min. 1 goal before half-time76%
PharcoHaras El Hodood
12%Min. 2 goals before half-time39%
PharcoHaras El Hodood
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time15%
PharcoHaras El Hodood

2nd half

67%Min. 1 goal after half-time52%
PharcoHaras El Hodood
18%Min. 2 goals after half-time27%
PharcoHaras El Hodood
3%Min. 3 goals after half-time12%
PharcoHaras El Hodood

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Pharco is 14% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

0.97 pts / match - Pharco · 0.85 pts / match - Haras El Hodood

Pharco - half-time state
15% leading52% draw33% trailing
Haras El Hodood - half-time state
15% leading39% draw45% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.97Points per match (1st half)0.85
PharcoHaras El Hodood
0.21Goals scored (1st half)0.45
PharcoHaras El Hodood
0.42Goals conceded (1st half)0.85
PharcoHaras El Hodood
0.64Average goals (1st half)1.3
PharcoHaras El Hodood
64%Clean sheet before half-time39%
PharcoHaras El Hodood
82%No goal before half-time55%
PharcoHaras El Hodood

After half-time (2nd half)

0.7Points per match (2nd half)1
PharcoHaras El Hodood
0.24Goals scored (2nd half)0.33
PharcoHaras El Hodood
0.64Goals conceded (2nd half)0.61
PharcoHaras El Hodood
0.88Average goals (2nd half)0.94
PharcoHaras El Hodood
42%Clean sheet after half-time64%
PharcoHaras El Hodood
79%No goal after half-time67%
PharcoHaras El Hodood

Pharco - second-half results

9% W42% R48% P
32
Half-time points
7
Half-time goals
-7
Goal difference (1st half)
23
Second-half points
-13
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.97
PPG before half-time
Lead holding80%

Leads at half-time in 15% of matches and wins 12%. Usually protects the lead until full-time.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Haras El Hodood - second-half results

15% W55% R30% P
28
Half-time points
15
Half-time goals
-13
Goal difference (1st half)
33
Second-half points
-9
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.85
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 15% of matches and wins 15%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.2

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Pharco - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.200.40
Goals scored / match0.40.0
Goals conceded / match0.20.6
Average goals in match0.60.6
1 goal40%60%
2 goals20%0%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet80%40%
No goal80%100%
Goal difference+1-3
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 40% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 2
Haras El Hodood - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.801.00
Goals scored / match0.60.4
Goals conceded / match1.20.6
Average goals in match1.81.0
1 goal80%60%
2 goals60%20%
3 goals40%20%
Clean sheet40%60%
No goal40%60%
Goal difference-3-1
Half-time: 20% leading - 20% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Pharco
ScoredConceded
3
4
0-15
2
5
16-30
2
5
31-45
2
5
46-60
2
8
61-75
4
8
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (4 goli). Concedes most in 61-75 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.

Haras El Hodood
ScoredConceded
5
8
0-15
5
7
16-30
5
13
31-45
4
5
46-60
5
3
61-75
2
12
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (5 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (13). Late-goal balance (76-90): -10 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

1.88
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
0.9 : 0.9
Estimated goal split
home : away
93%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
38%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+113%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
21%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
27%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 4 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Pharco

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.32
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.29
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+9.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.67
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.38
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
43%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
108%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.04
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.0
Late goals
27% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 20% come in the first quarter-hour.
27%

Haras El Hodood

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.23
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.43
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+3.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.46
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.03
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
81%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
139%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.01
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.1
Late goals
8% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 19% come in the first quarter-hour.
8%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Egyptian Premier League).

Teams vs league

PharcoLigaHaras El Hodood
Average goals in match 1.522.02 2.24
Both teams scored 30%47% 45%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 12%34% 42%
Clean sheets 24%35% 30%
Goal before half-time 52%58% 76%
Goal after half-time 67%70% 52%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.02
Average goals per match
47%
Both teams scored
34%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
35%
Clean sheets
1.04
Home goals / match
0.98
Away goals / match
+6%
Home attack advantage
+6%
Home defence advantage
+6%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
58%
1 goal
21%
2 goals
7%
3 goals
1%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
70%
1 goal
34%
2 goals
9%
3 goals
3%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Pharco 0 - 1 - 0 Haras El Hodood. Average goals 4.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.

FAQ

What was the result of Pharco vs Haras El Hodood?

The Egyptian Premier League match finished Pharco 2:1 Haras El Hodood. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Pharco vs Haras El Hodood?

Pharco score 0.45 goals per game on average and Haras El Hodood 0.79. The Egyptian Premier League average is 2.02 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 34% of games. Both teams score in 30% of Pharco's matches and 45% of Haras El Hodood's.

What form are Pharco and Haras El Hodood in?

Over the last 5 games Pharco have a 1-1-3 record (0.80 points per game) and Haras El Hodood 1-1-3 (0.80 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Pharco vs Haras El Hodood?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.