Italy - Serie C Group CStadio Comunale Donato CurcioData current as of 16 October 2026

Picerno vs Cosenza: match statistics

Picerno crest
Picerno
1 : 2half-time 1:1
Cosenza crest
Cosenza

Picerno vs Cosenza: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Picerno played Cosenza in Serie C Group C (Italy). The match was played on 12 October 2026. Venue: Stadio Comunale Donato Curcio. Final score: 1:2.

Current form

Picerno: 1-0-4, 0.60 points/match. Cosenza: 0-2-3, 0.40 points/match.

Goal statistics

Picerno scores 2.00 and concedes 1.88 goals per match. Cosenza scores 0.63 and concedes 2.25. League average: 2.83 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Picerno 75%, Cosenza 50%. Over 2.5: Picerno 75%, Cosenza 50%. League level: BTTS 53%, Over 2.5 52%.

xG, shots and style

Picerno has higher xG: 1.54 vs 1.40. Picerno: 12.0 shots per match, Cosenza: 10.9.

Match halves

Picerno: half-time lead 38%, second-half goals 1.13. Cosenza: half-time lead 13%, second-half goals 0.25.

Goals by minute

Picerno: 31-45+ (4 goals). Cosenza: 16-30 (2 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Serie C Group C: 2.83 goals per match, BTTS 53%, Over 2.5 52%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 2 previous H2H matches were available: 1-0-1. Average goals 2.50, BTTS 50%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Picerno have won 3 of their 4 home matches, while Cosenza have lost all 4 of their away games, clearly favouring the hosts. Picerno average 2.75 goals per game at home, while Cosenza concede 3.25 on the road; the gap in shooting efficiency is also significant: 24% versus 7%. The visitors average just 0.75 goals away from home and have failed to score in half of those matches, although their away xG of 1.47 suggests they can create chances. The hosts also have a weakness: they concede an average of 2 goals at home and have let in as many as 12 in their last 5 matches. Although Picerno have lost 4 of their last 5 games, Cosenza’s run of 4 consecutive away defeats and the hosts’ edge in finishing make a Picerno win the most likely outcome.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Both teams have recorded BTTS in 50% of their matches, so their results to date do not favor the scenario of goals at both ends. Cosenza average 0.75 goals away from home, and have averaged just 0.6 goals in their last 5 matches, scoring only twice. Picerno are also ineffective at home, averaging 0.5 goals, although Cosenza’s defense concede as many as 3.25 goals per away match. This defensive weakness increases the likelihood of Picerno scoring, but does not resolve the doubts over Cosenza’s own attacking efficiency. Therefore, BTTS - No is marginally more likely: this means at least one team will fail to score, not necessarily that the match will end 0-0.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The strongest signal is for at least 2 goals: in both Picerno and Cosenza matches, the 1.5 line was surpassed in 75% of games. Cosenza concede an average of 3.25 goals in the away matches analyzed, boosting Picerno’s chances despite their modest average of 0.5 goals scored at home. The hosts’ attacking potential looks stronger in the chance-creation data: their average xG is 1.33, and they have scored 1.4 goals per game across their last 5 matches. Higher lines are less reliable, as over 2.5 goals landed in 25% of Picerno’s home matches, compared with 75% of Cosenza’s away matches. Therefore, with a projected total of 2.85 goals, Over 1.5 is the safest pick.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

A draw at half-time appears most likely: in Picerno’s four home matches and Cosenza’s four away matches so far, this outcome has occurred twice in each case, and the visitors have yet to lead at the break. Cosenza’s poor defensive record away from home supports a potential second-half turnaround in the hosts’ favour, with an average of 3.25 goals conceded per match, including 2.25 after half-time. In their last five matches, Cosenza have averaged just 0.2 goals in the second half and lost that half in four of them, increasing the chances of Picerno settling the match after the break. However, X/1 is not a certainty: Picerno have yet to win at home and average only 0.5 goals there, so a draw at full-time remains a significant alternative.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

1 : 1
1st half
0 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

66Possession (%)34
PicernoCosenza
9Shots12
PicernoCosenza
3Shots on target6
PicernoCosenza
1.39xG1.77
PicernoCosenza
2Corners6
PicernoCosenza
84Dangerous attacks81
PicernoCosenza
23Fouls12
PicernoCosenza
3Cards2
PicernoCosenza

Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

2Goals scored / match0.63
PicernoCosenza
1.88Goals conceded / match2.25
PicernoCosenza
48%Average possession49%
PicernoCosenza
4.63Shots on target / match4.13
PicernoCosenza

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

12Shots per match10.88
PicernoCosenza
4.63Shots on target4.13
PicernoCosenza
16.7%Shot conversion5.7%
PicernoCosenza
48%Possession49%
PicernoCosenza
1.54xG for1.4
PicernoCosenza
1.67xG against1.52
PicernoCosenza

Shooting quality

Picerno: Efficient finishingCosenza: Balanced
PicernoCosenza
Accuracy (shots on target)39%38%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.130.13
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.430.15

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Picerno is 50% better for: last-5 form.

0.6 pts / match - Picerno · 0.4 pts / match - Cosenza

Picerno
LLLWL
Season result split
50% W0% D50% L
Season (W-D-L)
4-0-4
1.50 pts / match · goal difference +1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-0-4
0.60 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
3-0-1
Last 5 at home
3-0-1
WWLW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 2.4xG: 1.32Opponent xG: 1.73BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 80%
Cosenza
DLDLL
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
0% W25% D75% L
Season (W-D-L)
0-2-6
0.25 pts / match · goal difference -13
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-2-3
0.40 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
0-0-4
Last 5 away
0-0-4
LLLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.6Goals conceded: 1.8xG: 1.51Opponent xG: 1.45BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 20%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Picerno is 217% better for: goals scored per match.

2 goals / match - Picerno · 0.63 goals / match - Cosenza

Picerno is 20% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.88 goals / match - Picerno · 2.25 goals / match - Cosenza

Picerno scoring profile: very strong

Picerno scores in 88% of matches (7 of 8 matches), while Cosenza keeps a clean sheet in 13% (1 of 8 matches).

Cosenza scoring profile: strong

Cosenza scores in 50% of matches (4 of 8 matches), while Picerno keeps a clean sheet in 13% (1 of 8 matches).

16Goals scored (season)5
PicernoCosenza
15Goals conceded (season)18
PicernoCosenza
3.88Average goals in match2.88
PicernoCosenza
7Goals scored (last 5)3
PicernoCosenza
12Goals conceded (last 5)9
PicernoCosenza

How often they score at least...

88%1 goal50%
PicernoCosenza
75%2 goals13%
PicernoCosenza
25%3 goals0%
PicernoCosenza
13%4 goals0%
PicernoCosenza

How often they concede at least...

88%1 goal88%
PicernoCosenza
50%2 goals63%
PicernoCosenza
25%3 goals38%
PicernoCosenza
25%4 goals25%
PicernoCosenza

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

25%BTTS at half-time25%
PicernoCosenza
25%BTTS in both halves13%
PicernoCosenza
50%Scored in both halves13%
PicernoCosenza

BTTS and goal count

75%Min. 3 goals and BTTS38%
PicernoCosenza
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS13%
PicernoCosenza
80%BTTS - last 540%
PicernoCosenza

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

88%Min. 1 goal before half-time63%
PicernoCosenza
63%Min. 2 goals before half-time25%
PicernoCosenza
25%Min. 3 goals before half-time13%
PicernoCosenza

2nd half

88%Min. 1 goal after half-time88%
PicernoCosenza
63%Min. 2 goals after half-time63%
PicernoCosenza
63%Min. 3 goals after half-time25%
PicernoCosenza

Match halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Picerno is 57% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.38 pts / match - Picerno · 0.88 pts / match - Cosenza

Picerno - half-time state
38% leading25% draw38% trailing
Cosenza - half-time state
13% leading50% draw38% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.38Points per match (1st half)0.88
PicernoCosenza
0.88Goals scored (1st half)0.38
PicernoCosenza
0.88Goals conceded (1st half)0.63
PicernoCosenza
1.75Average goals (1st half)1
PicernoCosenza
50%Clean sheet before half-time50%
PicernoCosenza
38%No goal before half-time63%
PicernoCosenza

After half-time (2nd half)

1.63Points per match (2nd half)0.25
PicernoCosenza
1.13Goals scored (2nd half)0.25
PicernoCosenza
1Goals conceded (2nd half)1.63
PicernoCosenza
2.13Average goals (2nd half)1.88
PicernoCosenza
25%Clean sheet after half-time13%
PicernoCosenza
25%No goal after half-time75%
PicernoCosenza

Picerno - second-half results

50% W13% D38% L
11
Half-time points
7
Half-time goals
0
Goal difference (1st half)
13
Second-half points
+1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.38
PPG before half-time
Lead holding132%

Leads at half-time in 38% of matches and wins 50%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Cosenza - second-half results

0% W25% D75% L
7
Half-time points
3
Half-time goals
-2
Goal difference (1st half)
2
Second-half points
-11
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.88
PPG before half-time
Lead holding0%

Leads at half-time in 13% of matches and wins 0%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time+1.0

Concedes 1.0 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Picerno - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.800.80
Goals scored / match0.60.8
Goals conceded / match1.21.2
Average goals in match1.82.0
1 goal80%80%
2 goals60%60%
3 goals40%60%
Clean sheet40%20%
No goal60%40%
Goal difference-3-2
Half-time: 20% leading - 20% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 20% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 3
Cosenza - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.200.20
Goals scored / match0.40.2
Goals conceded / match0.41.4
Average goals in match0.81.6
1 goal40%80%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet80%20%
No goal60%80%
Goal difference0-6
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 20% draw - 80% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Picerno
ScoredConceded
1
2
0-15
2
1
16-30
4
4
31-45
3
3
46-60
2
4
61-75
4
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (4 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.

Cosenza
ScoredConceded
1
1
0-15
2
1
16-30
0
3
31-45
1
3
46-60
1
3
61-75
0
7
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (2 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): -7 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.38
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
2.1 : 1.3
Estimated goal split
home : away
119%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
63%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-26%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
44%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
7%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 14 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Picerno

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.13
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.25
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.46
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.21
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
123%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
155%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.90
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
25% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 6% come in the first quarter-hour.
25%

Cosenza

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.12
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-1.50
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+0.3 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.77
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.73
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
52%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
139%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.15
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.1
Late goals
0% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 20% come in the first quarter-hour.
0%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Serie C Group C).

Teams vs league

PicernoLigaCosenza
Average goals in match▲ 3.882.83• 2.88
Both teams scored▲ 75%53%▼ 50%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▲ 75%52%▼ 50%
Clean sheets▼ 13%28%▼ 13%
Goal before half-time▲ 88%74%▼ 63%
Goal after half-time▲ 88%73%▲ 88%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.83
Average goals per match
53%
Both teams scored
52%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
28%
Clean sheets
1.62
Home goals / match
1.21
Away goals / match
+34%
Home attack advantage
+25%
Home defence advantage
+22%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
74%
1 goal
31%
2 goals
14%
3 goals
2%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
73%
1 goal
48%
2 goals
24%
3 goals
10%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. PicernoYellow cardAlessandro Bassoli
  2. CosenzaYellow cardAlessandro Dalmazzi
  3. CosenzaSubstitutionOn: Antonio D'AlenaOff: Mattia Almaviva
  4. PicernoYellow cardGiuseppe Coppola
  5. PicernoYellow cardEmmanuele Esposito
  6. CosenzaYellow cardMatteo Rizzo

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (2): Picerno 1 - 0 - 1 Cosenza. Average goals 2.50, both teams scored in 50% matches.

FAQ

What was the result of Picerno vs Cosenza?

The Serie C Group C match finished Picerno 1:2 Cosenza. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Picerno and Cosenza?

In the last 2 head-to-head matches Picerno won 1, Cosenza won 1 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 2.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Picerno vs Cosenza?

Picerno score 2.00 goals per game on average and Cosenza 0.63. The Serie C Group C average is 2.83 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 52% of games. Both teams score in 75% of Picerno's matches and 50% of Cosenza's.

What form are Picerno and Cosenza in?

Over the last 5 games Picerno have a 1-0-4 record (0.60 points per game) and Cosenza 0-2-3 (0.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Picerno vs Cosenza?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Picerno vs Cosenza: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.