Italy - Serie C Group CStadio Comunale Donato CurcioData current as of 18 October 2026

Picerno vs Inter II: match statistics

Picerno crest
Picerno
4 : 1half-time 2:0
Inter II crest
Inter II

Picerno vs Inter II: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Picerno played Inter II in Serie C Group C (Italy). The match was played on 7 September 2026. Venue: Stadio Comunale Donato Curcio. Final score: 4:1.

Current form

Picerno: 2-0-0, 3.00 points/match. Inter II: 1-1-0, 2.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

Picerno scores 2.50 and concedes 1.00 goals per match. Inter II scores 1.50 and concedes 1.00. League average: 3.03 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Picerno 50%, Inter II 100%. Over 2.5: Picerno 50%, Inter II 50%. League level: BTTS 55%, Over 2.5 55%.

xG, shots and style

Picerno has higher xG: 1.92 vs 1.56. Picerno: 16.5 shots per match, Inter II: 13.0.

Match halves

Picerno: half-time lead 50%, second-half goals 1.50. Inter II: half-time lead 50%, second-half goals 0.50.

Goals by minute

Picerno: 0-15 (1 goals). Inter II: 31-45+ (2 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Serie C Group C: 3.03 goals per match, BTTS 55%, Over 2.5 55%.

Head-to-head

No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Picerno remain unbeaten in their last five matches, winning 3 and drawing 2, while Inter II have suffered 2 defeats over the same period and collected only 1 point per game on average. The hosts are more clinical at home, scoring an average of 3 goals with a 23% shot-conversion rate, compared with Inter II’s 2 goals and 13% conversion rate away from home. Picerno also create slightly better chances, recording an xG of 1.65 compared with the visitors’ 1.56, while averaging 6 shots on target per match against 4 for their opponents. Inter II are only marginally more capable of controlling possession, but their 16 shots per away match do not translate into sufficient efficiency. Neither defence has kept a clean sheet yet, so the visitors have a case for scoring, but current form and superior finishing favour Picerno.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The signal for both teams to score is clear, as Picerno and Inter II have each recorded BTTS at 100% so far, with neither team keeping a clean sheet. Although this figure drops to 60% for both sides across their last five matches, Picerno have averaged 1.6 goals scored, while Inter II have conceded 1.2 goals per game. The hosts create chances worth an average of 1.40 xG, compared with 1.50 xG for the visitors, while their opponents have also allowed elevated xG figures of 1.35 and 1.26, respectively. Inter II have averaged 2.0 goals per match this season, while Picerno have conceded 1.0, meaning that despite the visitors' weaker recent finishing, their goal remains likely. BTTS is also more frequent than the league average of 65%, making a goal for each side more likely than a match in which at least one team fails to score.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Picerno create chances worth an average of 1.55 xG at home, while Inter II allow 1.51 xG away, pointing to approximately 1.45 goals for the hosts. The visitors generate 1.56 xG per match, whereas Picerno’s defence allows 1.04 xG, which supports their projection of 1.15 goals. In all available league matches, both teams have consistently scored and conceded at least one goal, with a minimum of 2 goals scored in each game. Caution around the 2.5 line is warranted by the last five matches, in which Over 2.5 goals landed in only 40% of Picerno’s games and 20% of Inter II’s. The strongest signal is therefore Over 1.5, as the projected total of 2.60 goals provides a clear margin above that line.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The strongest scenario is a draw at half-time followed by a Picerno win, as the hosts were level after 45 minutes in 3 of their last 5 matches, compared with 2 of 5 for Inter II. During this period, both teams scored and conceded an average of 0.6 goals before the break, indicating an evenly matched, cautious start. After the interval, Picerno clearly improves: they score an average of 1.0 goals and concede just 0.2, while Inter II score only 0.2 and allow opponents 0.6. Overall match form also supports the hosts, who won 60% of their last five games and lost none, compared with just 20% wins and 40% defeats for Inter II. Although the average xG figures are very similar—1.55 for Picerno and 1.56 for the visitors—the hosts’ greater efficiency in the second halves points towards a turnaround after the break.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

2 : 0
1st half
2 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

50Possession (%)50
PicernoInter II
13Shots10
PicernoInter II
7Shots on target5
PicernoInter II
1.9xG1.69
PicernoInter II
7Corners5
PicernoInter II
81Dangerous attacks97
PicernoInter II
9Fouls15
PicernoInter II
4Cards4
PicernoInter II

Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

2.5Goals scored / match1.5
PicernoInter II
1Goals conceded / match1
PicernoInter II
40%Average possession41%
PicernoInter II
5.5Shots on target / match4.5
PicernoInter II

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

16.5Shots per match13
PicernoInter II
5.5Shots on target4.5
PicernoInter II
15.2%Shot conversion11.5%
PicernoInter II
40%Possession41%
PicernoInter II
1.92xG for1.56
PicernoInter II
1.5xG against1.27
PicernoInter II

Shooting quality

Picerno: Counter-attackingInter II: Balanced
PicernoInter II
Accuracy (shots on target)33%35%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.450.33

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Picerno is 50% better for: last-5 form.

3 pts / match - Picerno · 2 pts / match - Inter II

Picerno
WW
5 wins in a row
Season result split
100% W0% D0% L
Season (W-D-L)
2-0-0
3.00 pts / match · goal difference +3
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-0-0
3.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
1-0-0
Last 5 at home
1-0-0
W
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.5Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.92Opponent xG: 1.50BTTS: 50%Over 2.5: 50%
Inter II
WD
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
50% W50% D0% L
Season (W-D-L)
1-1-0
2.00 pts / match · goal difference +1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-0
2.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
1-0-0
Last 5 away
1-0-0
W
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.5Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.56Opponent xG: 1.27BTTS: 100%Over 2.5: 50%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Picerno is 67% better for: goals scored per match.

2.5 goals / match - Picerno · 1.5 goals / match - Inter II

Picerno scoring profile: very strong

Picerno scores in 100% of matches (2 of 2 matches), while Inter II keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 2 matches).

Inter II scoring profile: very strong

Inter II scores in 100% of matches (2 of 2 matches), while Picerno keeps a clean sheet in 50% (1 of 2 matches).

5Goals scored (season)3
PicernoInter II
2Goals conceded (season)2
PicernoInter II
3.5Average goals in match2.5
PicernoInter II
5Goals scored (last 5)3
PicernoInter II
2Goals conceded (last 5)2
PicernoInter II

How often they score at least...

100%1 goal100%
PicernoInter II
100%2 goals50%
PicernoInter II
50%3 goals0%
PicernoInter II
0%4 goals0%
PicernoInter II

How often they concede at least...

50%1 goal100%
PicernoInter II
50%2 goals0%
PicernoInter II
0%3 goals0%
PicernoInter II
0%4 goals0%
PicernoInter II

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

50%BTTS at half-time0%
PicernoInter II
50%BTTS in both halves0%
PicernoInter II
100%Scored in both halves0%
PicernoInter II

BTTS and goal count

50%Min. 3 goals and BTTS50%
PicernoInter II
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
PicernoInter II
50%BTTS - last 5100%
PicernoInter II

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

100%Min. 1 goal before half-time100%
PicernoInter II
50%Min. 2 goals before half-time50%
PicernoInter II
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
PicernoInter II

2nd half

100%Min. 1 goal after half-time100%
PicernoInter II
50%Min. 2 goals after half-time0%
PicernoInter II
50%Min. 3 goals after half-time0%
PicernoInter II

Match halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Picerno is 33% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

2 pts / match - Picerno · 1.5 pts / match - Inter II

Picerno - half-time state
50% leading50% draw0% trailing
Inter II - half-time state
50% leading0% draw50% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

2Points per match (1st half)1.5
PicernoInter II
1Goals scored (1st half)1
PicernoInter II
0.5Goals conceded (1st half)0.5
PicernoInter II
1.5Average goals (1st half)1.5
PicernoInter II
50%Clean sheet before half-time50%
PicernoInter II
0%No goal before half-time50%
PicernoInter II

After half-time (2nd half)

3Points per match (2nd half)1.5
PicernoInter II
1.5Goals scored (2nd half)0.5
PicernoInter II
0.5Goals conceded (2nd half)0.5
PicernoInter II
2Average goals (2nd half)1
PicernoInter II
50%Clean sheet after half-time50%
PicernoInter II
0%No goal after half-time50%
PicernoInter II

Picerno - second-half results

100% W0% D0% L
4
Half-time points
2
Half-time goals
+1
Goal difference (1st half)
6
Second-half points
+2
Goal difference (2nd half)
2.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding200%

Leads at half-time in 50% of matches and wins 100%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Inter II - second-half results

50% W0% D50% L
3
Half-time points
2
Half-time goals
+1
Goal difference (1st half)
3
Second-half points
0
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.50
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 50% of matches and wins 50%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Picerno - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.003.00
Goals scored / match1.01.5
Goals conceded / match0.50.5
Average goals in match1.52.0
1 goal100%100%
2 goals50%50%
3 goals0%50%
Clean sheet50%50%
No goal0%0%
Goal difference+1+2
Half-time: 50% leading - 50% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 100% won - 0% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 50% - Half-time goals total: 2
Inter II - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.501.50
Goals scored / match1.00.5
Goals conceded / match0.50.5
Average goals in match1.51.0
1 goal100%100%
2 goals50%0%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet50%50%
No goal50%50%
Goal difference+10
Half-time: 50% leading - 0% draw - 50% trailing
2nd half: 50% won - 0% draw - 50% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Picerno
ScoredConceded
1
1
0-15
1
0
16-30
0
0
31-45
1
1
46-60
1
0
61-75
1
0
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (1 goal). Concedes most in 0-15 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

Inter II
ScoredConceded
0
0
0-15
0
0
16-30
2
1
31-45
1
0
46-60
0
1
61-75
0
0
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (2 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.00
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.8 : 1.3
Estimated goal split
home : away
99%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
75%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
100%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
0%
0:0 risk
practically zero
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Picerno

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.42
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+1.08
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+0.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.58
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.50
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
145%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
76%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.5
Late goals
20% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 20% come in the first quarter-hour.
20%

Inter II

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.29
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.21
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.06
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.27
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
115%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
58%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.5
Late goals
0% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
0%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Serie C Group C).

Teams vs league

PicernoLigaInter II
Average goals in match▲ 3.503.03▼ 2.50
Both teams scored▼ 50%55%▲ 100%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▼ 50%55%▼ 50%
Clean sheets▲ 50%22%▼ 0%
Goal before half-time▲ 100%86%▲ 100%
Goal after half-time▲ 100%76%▲ 100%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.03
Average goals per match
55%
Both teams scored
55%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
22%
Clean sheets
1.72
Home goals / match
1.31
Away goals / match
+31%
Home attack advantage
+24%
Home defence advantage
+14%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
86%
1 goal
34%
2 goals
7%
3 goals
0%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
76%
1 goal
45%
2 goals
31%
3 goals
14%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Inter IIYellow cardLeonardo Bovo
  2. PicernoYellow cardSamuel Pugliese
  3. PicernoGoalLeo Abreu
  4. PicernoGoalPaolo Virgilio
  5. Inter IISubstitutionOn: Jan ŻuberekOff: Mattia Mosconi
  6. Inter IISubstitutionOn: Charlys Matheus Lima PontesOff: Leonardo Bovo
  7. PicernoSubstitutionOn: Luca NocerinoOff: Paolo Virgilio
  8. Inter IIGoalRichi AgbonifoAssist: Jan Żuberek
  9. PicernoSubstitutionOn: Mamadou Yaye KanouteOff: Emmanuele Esposito
  10. PicernoSubstitutionOn: Marco PerriOff: Daniele Franco
  11. Inter IISubstitutionOn: Matteo LavelliOff: Jamal Iddrissou
  12. Inter IIYellow cardTommaso Fumagalli
  13. Inter IIRed cardLeonardo Noah Bovio
  14. PicernoRed cardSergio Maselli
  15. PicernoYellow cardGabriele Bellodi

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

FAQ

What was the result of Picerno vs Inter II?

The Serie C Group C match finished Picerno 4:1 Inter II. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Picerno vs Inter II?

Picerno score 2.50 goals per game on average and Inter II 1.50. The Serie C Group C average is 3.03 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 55% of games. Both teams score in 50% of Picerno's matches and 100% of Inter II's.

What form are Picerno and Inter II in?

Over the last 5 games Picerno have a 2-0-0 record (3.00 points per game) and Inter II 1-1-0 (2.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Picerno vs Inter II?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.