Finland - YkkösliigaMustapekka AreenaData current as of 05 November 2026

PK-35 vs KTP: match statistics

PK-35 crest
PK-35
0 : 3half-time 0:1
KTP crest
KTP

PK-35 vs KTP: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

PK-35 played KTP in Ykkösliiga (Finland). The match was played on 19 September 2026. Venue: Mustapekka Areena. Final score: 0:3.

Current form

PK-35: 3-2-0, 2.20 points/match. KTP: 5-0-0, 3.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

PK-35 scores 1.78 and concedes 0.65 goals per match. KTP scores 1.78 and concedes 0.91. League average: 2.55 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: PK-35 39%, KTP 43%. Over 2.5: PK-35 48%, KTP 48%. League level: BTTS 44%, Over 2.5 46%.

xG, shots and style

KTP has higher xG: 1.71 vs 1.48. PK-35: 11.9 shots per match, KTP: 14.4.

Match halves

PK-35: half-time lead 39%, second-half goals 1.00. KTP: half-time lead 39%, second-half goals 1.09.

Goals by minute

PK-35: 46-60 (11 goals). KTP: 76-90+ (11 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Ykkösliiga: 2.55 goals per match, BTTS 44%, Over 2.5 46%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 2 previous H2H matches were available: 1-0-1. Average goals 1.00, BTTS 0%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

KTP top the table and have won all of their last 5 matches, while PK-35 have recorded 3 wins and 2 draws over the same period. The visitors are highly reliable away from home: they win 73% of their matches, lose just 9%, and concede an average of 0.82 goals, with 73% of their matches ending with a clean sheet. KTP also create slightly more in attack, averaging 1.60 xG and 4.64 shots on target per away match, compared with PK-35’s 1.50 xG and 4.25 shots on target at home. The hosts have remained unbeaten in their last 5 matches and conceded just 2 goals during that run, making a draw a realistic scenario. However, their home record of 42% wins and 42% draws is less convincing than the leaders’ away consistency. An even contest is expected, with KTP holding a slight edge and likely to come closer to securing the win.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The strongest argument for BTTS - No is KTP’s defense: the team has kept a clean sheet in 73% of matches and concedes just 0.82 goals per game on average. Both teams are also in very solid defensive form, as PK-35 and KTP have conceded only 0.4 goals each over their last 5 matches, while BTTS has occurred in just 40% of their games during this period. KTP’s seasonal BTTS rate stands at only 27%, clearly below PK-35’s 58% and the league average of 45%, increasing the likelihood that at least one side will fail to score. PK-35 boasts a strong attack, averaging 2.08 goals and 1.81 xG, but KTP can limit the hosts thanks to their own defensive efficiency. KTP also scores regularly, averaging 1.45 goals, but PK-35 concedes only 1.00 goal per match, so the most likely scenario remains a clean sheet for one of the teams.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

PK-35 score an average of 2.08 goals at home, but KTP concede only 0.82 goals away and keep a clean sheet in 73% of matches, which significantly limits the hosts’ attacking potential. KTP score an average of 1.45 goals, while PK-35 allow opponents 1.00 goal per game, so the projection for the visitors remains close to one goal. In their last five matches, the two teams scored 11 and 10 goals respectively, but each also conceded just 2 goals, confirming their current defensive stability. Season-long xG figures suggest attacking quality, standing at 1.81 for PK-35 and 1.60 for KTP; however, KTP’s highly resilient defensive profile argues against an open game. The Under 3.5 goals line has the edge, as Under 3.5 landed in 75% of PK-35 matches and 82% of KTP matches.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

A draw at half-time followed by a KTP win is the most likely outcome, as both teams often start cautiously: PK-35 were level at the break in 42% of their matches, while KTP did so in 45%. KTP have a very solid defensive structure, keeping a clean sheet in 73% of their matches and conceding just 0.82 goals on average, whereas PK-35 score an average of 2.08 goals but keep a clean sheet in only 17% of matches. The visitors are in excellent form, having won all of their last five matches, scoring an average of 2.0 goals and conceding just 0.4. After half-time, KTP have averaged 1.2 goals over their last five appearances, compared with just 0.6 for PK-35, further supporting the scenario of the visitors securing the win in the second half.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

0 : 1
1st half
0 : 2
2nd half

Match statistics

31Possession (%)69
PK-35KTP
5Shots18
PK-35KTP
0Shots on target8
PK-35KTP
0.53xG2.23
PK-35KTP
3Corners7
PK-35KTP
28Dangerous attacks75
PK-35KTP
5Fouls10
PK-35KTP
5Cards0
PK-35KTP

Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.78Goals scored / match1.78
PK-35KTP
0.65Goals conceded / match0.91
PK-35KTP
43%Average possession48%
PK-35KTP
4.26Shots on target / match5.3
PK-35KTP

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

11.91Shots per match14.39
PK-35KTP
4.26Shots on target5.3
PK-35KTP
15%Shot conversion12.4%
PK-35KTP
43%Possession48%
PK-35KTP
1.48xG for1.71
PK-35KTP
1.33xG against1.29
PK-35KTP

Shooting quality

PK-35: Counter-attackingKTP: Attacking
PK-35KTP
Accuracy (shots on target)36%37%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.420.34

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

KTP is 36% better for: last-5 form.

2.2 pts / match - PK-35 · 3 pts / match - KTP

PK-35
DWWDW
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
61% W26% D13% L
Season (W-D-L)
14-6-3
2.09 pts / match · goal difference +26
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-2-0
2.20 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
5-5-2
Last 5 at home
1-3-1
DLDWD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.2Goals conceded: 0.4xG: 1.51Opponent xG: 1.34BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 60%
KTP
WWWWW
5 wins in a row
Season result split
74% W13% D13% L
Season (W-D-L)
17-3-3
2.35 pts / match · goal difference +20
Last 5 (W-D-L)
5-0-0
3.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
8-2-1
Last 5 away
4-1-0
WDWWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.0Goals conceded: 0.4xG: 1.44Opponent xG: 1.48BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 60%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

PK-35 is 40% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.65 goals / match - PK-35 · 0.91 goals / match - KTP

PK-35 scoring profile: strong

PK-35 scores in 78% of matches (18 of 23 matches), while KTP keeps a clean sheet in 48% (11 of 23 matches).

KTP scoring profile: strong

KTP scores in 87% of matches (20 of 23 matches), while PK-35 keeps a clean sheet in 52% (12 of 23 matches).

41Goals scored (season)41
PK-35KTP
15Goals conceded (season)21
PK-35KTP
2.43Average goals in match2.7
PK-35KTP
11Goals scored (last 5)10
PK-35KTP
2Goals conceded (last 5)2
PK-35KTP

How often they score at least...

78%1 goal87%
PK-35KTP
43%2 goals57%
PK-35KTP
39%3 goals22%
PK-35KTP
13%4 goals9%
PK-35KTP

How often they concede at least...

48%1 goal52%
PK-35KTP
9%2 goals17%
PK-35KTP
4%3 goals13%
PK-35KTP
4%4 goals4%
PK-35KTP

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

13%BTTS at half-time26%
PK-35KTP
4%BTTS in both halves13%
PK-35KTP
30%Scored in both halves48%
PK-35KTP

BTTS and goal count

26%Min. 3 goals and BTTS43%
PK-35KTP
22%Min. 3 goals without BTTS4%
PK-35KTP
40%BTTS - last 540%
PK-35KTP

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

57%Min. 1 goal before half-time70%
PK-35KTP
35%Min. 2 goals before half-time26%
PK-35KTP
13%Min. 3 goals before half-time17%
PK-35KTP

2nd half

70%Min. 1 goal after half-time83%
PK-35KTP
35%Min. 2 goals after half-time39%
PK-35KTP
22%Min. 3 goals after half-time22%
PK-35KTP

Match halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

PK-35 - half-time state
39% leading48% draw13% trailing
KTP - half-time state
39% leading43% draw17% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.65Points per match (1st half)1.61
PK-35KTP
0.78Goals scored (1st half)0.7
PK-35KTP
0.3Goals conceded (1st half)0.48
PK-35KTP
1.09Average goals (1st half)1.17
PK-35KTP
74%Clean sheet before half-time65%
PK-35KTP
57%No goal before half-time39%
PK-35KTP

After half-time (2nd half)

1.87Points per match (2nd half)2
PK-35KTP
1Goals scored (2nd half)1.09
PK-35KTP
0.35Goals conceded (2nd half)0.43
PK-35KTP
1.35Average goals (2nd half)1.52
PK-35KTP
70%Clean sheet after half-time65%
PK-35KTP
35%No goal after half-time26%
PK-35KTP

PK-35 - second-half results

48% W43% D9% L
38
Half-time points
18
Half-time goals
+11
Goal difference (1st half)
43
Second-half points
+15
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.65
PPG before half-time
Lead holding156%

Leads at half-time in 39% of matches and wins 61%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

KTP - second-half results

57% W30% D13% L
37
Half-time points
16
Half-time goals
+5
Goal difference (1st half)
46
Second-half points
+15
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.61
PPG before half-time
Lead holding190%

Leads at half-time in 39% of matches and wins 74%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

PK-35 - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.201.80
Goals scored / match1.60.6
Goals conceded / match0.20.2
Average goals in match1.80.8
1 goal60%60%
2 goals60%20%
3 goals40%0%
Clean sheet80%80%
No goal40%40%
Goal difference+7+2
Half-time: 60% leading - 40% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 60% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 8
KTP - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.602.20
Goals scored / match0.81.2
Goals conceded / match0.00.4
Average goals in match0.81.6
1 goal80%100%
2 goals0%60%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet100%60%
No goal20%0%
Goal difference+4+4
Half-time: 80% leading - 20% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 40% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 4

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

PK-35
ScoredConceded
9
2
0-15
5
3
16-30
4
2
31-45
11
2
46-60
2
2
61-75
10
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (11 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): +6 - wins late phases.

KTP
ScoredConceded
7
3
0-15
4
2
16-30
5
6
31-45
5
5
46-60
9
2
61-75
11
3
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (11 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +8 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.56
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.3 : 1.2
Estimated goal split
home : away
100%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
41%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-61%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
68%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
3%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 33 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

PK-35

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.15
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.98
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-12.9 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.30
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.68
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
134%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
53%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.11
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
24% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 22% come in the first quarter-hour.
24%

KTP

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.42
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.45
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.7 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.07
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.38
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
146%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
68%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.65
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.4
Late goals
27% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 17% come in the first quarter-hour.
27%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ykkösliiga).

Teams vs league

PK-35LigaKTP
Average goals in match▼ 2.432.55▲ 2.70
Both teams scored▼ 39%44%• 43%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▲ 48%46%▲ 48%
Clean sheets▲ 52%31%▲ 48%
Goal before half-time▼ 57%65%▲ 70%
Goal after half-time▼ 70%73%▲ 83%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.55
Average goals per match
44%
Both teams scored
46%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
31%
Clean sheets
1.33
Home goals / match
1.22
Away goals / match
+9%
Home attack advantage
+8%
Home defence advantage
+6%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
65%
1 goal
30%
2 goals
12%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
73%
1 goal
39%
2 goals
19%
3 goals
10%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. PK-35Red cardShunta Uchiyama
  2. PK-35Yellow cardAlex Ramula
  3. KTPSubstitutionOn: Roni PolatOff: Otto Eloluoto
  4. KTPSubstitutionOn: Onni HänninenOff: Atomu Tanaka
  5. PK-35SubstitutionOn: Ayuub AbdiOff: Eino-Iivari Pitkälä

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (2): PK-35 1 - 0 - 1 KTP. Average goals 1.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.

FAQ

What was the result of PK-35 vs KTP?

The Ykkösliiga match finished PK-35 0:3 KTP. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between PK-35 and KTP?

In the last 2 head-to-head matches PK-35 won 1, KTP won 1 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 1.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before PK-35 vs KTP?

PK-35 score 1.78 goals per game on average and KTP 1.78. The Ykkösliiga average is 2.55 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 46% of games. Both teams score in 39% of PK-35's matches and 43% of KTP's.

What form are PK-35 and KTP in?

Over the last 5 games PK-35 have a 3-2-0 record (2.20 points per game) and KTP 5-0-0 (3.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for PK-35 vs KTP?

The statistical background for PK-35 vs KTP — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.