Finland - YkkösliigaMustapekka AreenaData current as of 06 September 2026

PK-35 vs MP: match statistics

PK-35 crest
PK-35
2 : 1half-time 1:1
MP crest
MP

PK-35 vs MP: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

PK-35 played MP in Ykkösliiga (Finland). The match was played on 26 June 2026. Venue: Mustapekka Areena. Final score: 2:1.

Current form

PK-35: 3-2-0, 2.20 points/match. MP: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match.

Goal statistics

PK-35 scores 1.45 and concedes 0.55 goals per match. MP scores 0.82 and concedes 1.09. League average: 2.29 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: PK-35 27%, MP 27%. Over 2.5: PK-35 27%, MP 27%. League level: BTTS 38%, Over 2.5 40%.

xG, shots and style

PK-35 has higher xG: 1.40 vs 1.26. PK-35: 11.6 shots per match, MP: 10.2.

Match halves

PK-35: half-time lead 36%, second-half goals 1.00. MP: half-time lead 36%, second-half goals 0.45.

Goals by minute

PK-35: 46-60 (6 goals). MP: 76-90+ (4 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Ykkösliiga: 2.29 goals per match, BTTS 38%, Over 2.5 40%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 1-0-0. Average goals 4.00, BTTS 100%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

PK-35 is the match favorite: they sit 2nd, have 6 wins this season and 16 goals scored, while MP are 7th with 4 wins and 9 goals. In the last 5 matches PK-35 scored 8 goals, with a 3-2-0 record, averaging 2.2 points per game and conceding only 1 goal; MP in their last 5 scored 6 goals, have a 2-1-2 record, averaging 1.4 points per game and conceding 6 goals. At home PK-35 averages 1.6 goals per game, 12 shots and 3.8 on target with a conversion rate of 13%, whereas MP away average only 0.67 goals per game, 10 shots and 4.5 on target but a low conversion of 7% and fail to score in 50% of away matches. xG also slightly favors the hosts: PK-35 home xG is 1.43 versus MP away xG of 1.29, and with similar xG against (1.37 vs 1.38) the hosts’ better finishing is decisive. Considering league position, average 2.2 points per game vs 1.4, lower loss rate for PK-35 at home (20% vs MP’s 67% away loss rate) and the defensive difference in the last 5 matches (1 conceded vs 6 conceded), I expect a home win.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

I rate 70% for No BTTS and 30% for BTTS - Yes. Seasonally PK-35 has BTTS in 40% of matches, MP only 17%, and the league BTTS average is 38%, while as many as 71% of league games end with at least one team keeping a clean sheet. PK-35 have scored 16 and conceded 6 this season, whereas MP have 9 scored and 12 conceded; in the last 5 matches PK-35 conceded only 1 and scored 8, while MP conceded 6 and scored 6. The xG of both teams is similar (1.23 vs 1.29), but MP register more shots on target (4.5 vs 3.0) with lower conversion (7% versus 10% for PK-35), so they create chances but less often convert them into goals. Given MP's low seasonal BTTS (17%), PK-35's strong recent defensive form and the league's high clean sheet rate, I select the scenario that both teams will not score.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The xG model gives 1.31 xG for PK-35 and 1.35 xG for MP, totaling 2.66 expected goals. In the last 5 matches PK-35 averaged 1.6 goals scored and 0.2 conceded (8 scored, 1 conceded), while MP averaged 1.2 scored and 1.2 conceded (6/6), which increases the likelihood of goals. Seasonal averages show 1.0 goals for the home side and 0.67 for the away side, but xG (1.23 vs 1.29) and shots (10.4 vs 10.0) suggest greater potential than raw goal figures. The Poisson distribution for λ=2.66 yields ~75% for over 1.5, ~50% for over 2.5 and ~28% for over 3.5, and the fact that over 0.5 occurred in 100% of both teams' matches supports a bet on at least two goals. On this basis the strongest and best-justified signal is over 1.5 (line 1.5, side: over).

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The most likely scenario is PK-35 leading at Half-Time and the hosts winning the match (1/1). PK-35 led at the break in 60% of matches and score on average 0.6 goals before Half-Time versus 0.17 for MP, with a cumulative Half-Time goal balance of 5 for the hosts and 2 for the visitors. Over the whole season PK-35 averages 1.4 points per game versus 1.0 for MP, and in the last 5 fixtures the hosts won 60% of matches compared to 40% for the visitors, which increases the chance of maintaining a lead. After the break in the last 5 matches PK-35 scored on average 1.2 goals and conceded 0.2, while MP scored 0.8 and conceded 1.0, so the hosts more frequently extend their advantage in the second half. Despite similar xG (1.23 for PK-35 vs 1.29 for MP) and a higher number of shots on target for the visitors (4.5 vs 3.0), PK-35’s superior efficiency (conversion 10% vs 7%) and stronger Half-Time metrics justify assigning the highest probability to HT/FT 1/1 (38%).

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

1 : 1
1st half
1 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

59Possession (%)41
PK-35MP
15Shots8
PK-35MP
6Shots on target1
PK-35MP
1.97xG0.8
PK-35MP
12Corners1
PK-35MP
84Dangerous attacks30
PK-35MP
2Fouls3
PK-35MP
3Cards1
PK-35MP

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.45Goals scored / match0.82
PK-35MP
0.55Goals conceded / match1.09
PK-35MP
44%Average possession50%
PK-35MP
3.73Shots on target / match3.82
PK-35MP

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

11.55Shots per match10.18
PK-35MP
3.73Shots on target3.82
PK-35MP
12.6%Shot conversion8%
PK-35MP
44%Possession50%
PK-35MP
1.4xG for1.26
PK-35MP
1.34xG against1.39
PK-35MP

Shooting quality

PK-35: Counter-attackingMP: Balanced
PK-35MP
Accuracy (shots on target)32%38%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.390.21

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

PK-35 is 57% better for: last-5 form.

2.2 pts / match - PK-35 · 1.4 pts / match - MP

PK-35
DWWDW
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
55% W27% R18% P
Season (W-D-L)
6-3-2
1.91 pts / match · goal difference +10
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-2-0
2.20 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
2-2-1
Last 5 at home
2-2-1
WDLWD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 0.2xG: 1.31Opponent xG: 1.43BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 20%
MP
LWWLD
Season result split
36% W9% R55% P
Season (W-D-L)
4-1-6
1.18 pts / match · goal difference -3
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
2-0-4
Last 5 away
2-0-3
LWLWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.27Opponent xG: 1.50BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

PK-35 is 77% better for: goals scored per match.

1.45 goals / match - PK-35 · 0.82 goals / match - MP

PK-35 is 98% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.55 goals / match - PK-35 · 1.09 goals / match - MP

PK-35 scoring profile: strong

PK-35 scores in 64% of matches (7 of 11 matches), while MP keeps a clean sheet in 36% (4 of 11 matches).

MP scoring profile: mixed

MP scores in 64% of matches (7 of 11 matches), while PK-35 keeps a clean sheet in 55% (6 of 11 matches).

16Goals scored (season)9
PK-35MP
6Goals conceded (season)12
PK-35MP
2Average goals in match1.91
PK-35MP
8Goals scored (last 5)6
PK-35MP
1Goals conceded (last 5)6
PK-35MP

How often they score at least...

64%1 goal64%
PK-35MP
27%2 goals18%
PK-35MP
27%3 goals0%
PK-35MP
18%4 goals0%
PK-35MP

How often they concede at least...

45%1 goal64%
PK-35MP
9%2 goals27%
PK-35MP
0%3 goals18%
PK-35MP
0%4 goals0%
PK-35MP

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

9%BTTS at half-time0%
PK-35MP
9%BTTS in both halves0%
PK-35MP
18%Scored in both halves0%
PK-35MP

BTTS and goal count

18%Min. 3 goals and BTTS27%
PK-35MP
9%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
PK-35MP
20%BTTS - last 540%
PK-35MP

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

45%Min. 1 goal before half-time64%
PK-35MP
9%Min. 2 goals before half-time0%
PK-35MP
9%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
PK-35MP

2nd half

55%Min. 1 goal after half-time55%
PK-35MP
36%Min. 2 goals after half-time36%
PK-35MP
27%Min. 3 goals after half-time27%
PK-35MP

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

PK-35 is 13% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.64 pts / match - PK-35 · 1.45 pts / match - MP

PK-35 - half-time state
36% leading55% draw9% trailing
MP - half-time state
36% leading36% draw27% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.64Points per match (1st half)1.45
PK-35MP
0.45Goals scored (1st half)0.36
PK-35MP
0.18Goals conceded (1st half)0.27
PK-35MP
0.64Average goals (1st half)0.64
PK-35MP
82%Clean sheet before half-time73%
PK-35MP
64%No goal before half-time64%
PK-35MP

After half-time (2nd half)

1.64Points per match (2nd half)1
PK-35MP
1Goals scored (2nd half)0.45
PK-35MP
0.36Goals conceded (2nd half)0.82
PK-35MP
1.36Average goals (2nd half)1.27
PK-35MP
64%Clean sheet after half-time55%
PK-35MP
55%No goal after half-time73%
PK-35MP

PK-35 - second-half results

36% W55% R9% P
18
Half-time points
5
Half-time goals
+3
Goal difference (1st half)
18
Second-half points
+7
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.64
PPG before half-time
Lead holding153%

Leads at half-time in 36% of matches and wins 55%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

MP - second-half results

18% W45% R36% P
16
Half-time points
4
Half-time goals
+1
Goal difference (1st half)
11
Second-half points
-4
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.45
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 36% of matches and wins 36%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.5

Concedes 0.5 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

PK-35 - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.801.80
Goals scored / match0.41.2
Goals conceded / match0.00.2
Average goals in match0.41.4
1 goal40%60%
2 goals0%40%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet100%80%
No goal60%40%
Goal difference+2+5
Half-time: 40% leading - 60% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 60% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 2
MP - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.601.40
Goals scored / match0.40.8
Goals conceded / match0.21.0
Average goals in match0.61.8
1 goal60%80%
2 goals0%60%
3 goals0%40%
Clean sheet80%40%
No goal60%60%
Goal difference+1-1
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

PK-35
ScoredConceded
3
1
0-15
0
1
16-30
2
0
31-45
6
1
46-60
1
0
61-75
4
3
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (6 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

MP
ScoredConceded
1
2
0-15
1
1
16-30
2
0
31-45
0
4
46-60
1
2
61-75
4
3
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (4 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

1.96
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.3 : 0.7
Estimated goal split
home : away
85%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
27%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+105%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
41%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
13%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 8 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

PK-35

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.06
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.84
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-7.9 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.05
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.79
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
117%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
52%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.29
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.6
Late goals
25% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 19% come in the first quarter-hour.
25%

MP

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.13
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.14
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+1.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.44
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.30
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
78%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
88%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.22
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
44% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 11% come in the first quarter-hour.
44%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ykkösliiga).

Teams vs league

PK-35LigaMP
Average goals in match 2.002.29 1.91
Both teams scored 27%38% 27%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 27%40% 27%
Clean sheets 55%35% 36%
Goal before half-time 45%60% 64%
Goal after half-time 55%67% 55%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.29
Average goals per match
38%
Both teams scored
40%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
35%
Clean sheets
1.24
Home goals / match
1.05
Away goals / match
+18%
Home attack advantage
+15%
Home defence advantage
+6%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
60%
1 goal
22%
2 goals
9%
3 goals
0%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
67%
1 goal
40%
2 goals
22%
3 goals
9%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. PK-35Yellow cardJasper Pikkuhookana
  2. MPYellow cardMilot Kastrati
  3. MPSubstitutionOn: Santtu SeppänenOff: Aoi Chishima
  4. PK-35Yellow cardKaro Räsänen
  5. MPSubstitutionOn: Veikko JanhunenOff: Rohun Kawale
  6. PK-35SubstitutionOn: Otto SalmensuuOff: Irfan Sadik
  7. PK-35Yellow cardTuukka Andberg
  8. MPSubstitutionOn: Kasper SundbergOff: Akseli Tervaniemi
  9. PK-35SubstitutionOn: Alexander ForsströmOff: Emu Kawakita

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: PK-35 1 - 0 - 0 MP. Average goals 4.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.

FAQ

What was the result of PK-35 vs MP?

The Ykkösliiga match finished PK-35 2:1 MP. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before PK-35 vs MP?

PK-35 score 1.45 goals per game on average and MP 0.82. The Ykkösliiga average is 2.29 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 40% of games. Both teams score in 27% of PK-35's matches and 27% of MP's.

What form are PK-35 and MP in?

Over the last 5 games PK-35 have a 3-2-0 record (2.20 points per game) and MP 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for PK-35 vs MP?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for PK-35 vs MP: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.