Nigeria - NPFLVärendsvallenData current as of 15 October 2026

Plateau United vs Kano Pillars: match statistics

Plateau United crest
Plateau United
4 : 0half-time 2:0
Kano Pillars crest
Kano Pillars

Plateau United vs Kano Pillars: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Plateau United played Kano Pillars in NPFL (Nigeria). The match was played on 11 October 2026. Venue: Värendsvallen. Final score: 4:0.

Current form

Plateau United: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match. Kano Pillars: 1-4-0, 1.40 points/match.

Goal statistics

Plateau United scores 1.29 and concedes 1.14 goals per match. Kano Pillars scores 1.57 and concedes 1.00. League average: 2.38 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Plateau United 43%, Kano Pillars 71%. Over 2.5: Plateau United 29%, Kano Pillars 43%. League level: BTTS 44%, Over 2.5 40%.

xG, shots and style

Kano Pillars has higher xG: 1.79 vs 1.26. Plateau United: 7.4 shots per match, Kano Pillars: 6.1.

Match halves

Plateau United: half-time lead 29%, second-half goals 1.00. Kano Pillars: half-time lead 57%, second-half goals 0.57.

Goals by minute

Plateau United: 46-60 (3 goals). Kano Pillars: 31-45+ (4 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

NPFL: 2.38 goals per match, BTTS 44%, Over 2.5 40%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 2 previous H2H matches were available: 1-0-1. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 50%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Plateau United have won all 3 of their home matches to date, scoring an average of 2 goals and conceding just 0.33 per game. The hosts create chances worth an average of 1.91 xG and register 6 shots on target per match, while Kano Pillars average 2 shots on target away from home. The visitors remain unbeaten this season and have recorded 2 wins and 3 draws in their last 5 matches, so their consistency should not be underestimated. However, both of Kano Pillars’ away matches so far have ended in draws; they conceded an average of 1.5 goals in those games and have yet to keep a clean sheet. The hosts’ edge in chance quality and defensive solidity at home points to a win for them, although the visitors’ run of draws leaves a significant possibility of the points being shared.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

BTTS occurred in 75% of Plateau United’s matches and 100% of Kano Pillars’ matches, while the figures across their last five games were 60% and 80%, respectively. The hosts score an average of 2.0 goals, while the visitors concede 1.5, giving Plateau a solid foundation to find the net. Kano Pillars score an average of 1.5 goals, and Plateau concede 1.0; moreover, the hosts have kept a clean sheet in only 25% of their matches. Caution is warranted, however, as the visitors average just 2.0 shots on target and the league BTTS rate is 46%. Even so, the overall data points towards both teams scoring.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Plateau United score an average of 2.0 goals at home, while Kano Pillars concede 1.5 goals away, giving the hosts a solid platform to find the net. Matches involving the two teams average 3.0 goals, and the Over 1.5 goals line has landed in 75% and 100% of their matches, respectively. However, each team’s last five matches have averaged 2.8 goals, with Over 2.5 goals landing in just 40% of matches for both sides, so the higher line is not as strongly supported. With a forecast of 1.70 goals for the hosts and 1.05 for the visitors, Over 1.5 goals in the match is the strongest pick.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The strongest signal points to Kano Pillars leading at the break: the visitors were ahead at half-time in both matches included in the season statistics, and did so three times in their last five matches. However, they drew both of those season matches, so their strong first halves did not translate into wins. After the break, Kano averaged no goals scored and conceded 1.5, while Plateau United averaged 1.0 goal in second halves. The 2/X scenario is also supported by the hosts’ record in their last five matches: they were trailing at half-time three times, but scored an average of 1.4 goals after the break. The sample of two matches for the visitors is small, so this outcome has only a slight edge over options ending in a Plateau win.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

2 : 0
1st half
2 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

60Possession (%)40
Plateau UnitedKano Pillars
17Shots4
Plateau UnitedKano Pillars
12Shots on target2
Plateau UnitedKano Pillars
2.5xG0.84
Plateau UnitedKano Pillars
8Corners4
Plateau UnitedKano Pillars
84Dangerous attacks61
Plateau UnitedKano Pillars
-1Fouls-1
Plateau UnitedKano Pillars
-1Cards-1
Plateau UnitedKano Pillars

Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Plateau UnitedKano Pillars
1.29Goals scored / match1.57
Plateau UnitedKano Pillars
1.14Goals conceded / match1
Plateau UnitedKano Pillars
43%Average possession32%
Plateau UnitedKano Pillars
3.14Shots on target / match2.57
Plateau UnitedKano Pillars

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

7.43Shots per match6.14
Plateau UnitedKano Pillars
3.14Shots on target2.57
Plateau UnitedKano Pillars
17.3%Shot conversion25.6%
Plateau UnitedKano Pillars
43%Possession32%
Plateau UnitedKano Pillars
1.26xG for1.79
Plateau UnitedKano Pillars
1.48xG against1.3
Plateau UnitedKano Pillars

Shooting quality

Plateau United: Counter-attackingKano Pillars: Counter-attacking
Plateau UnitedKano Pillars
Accuracy (shots on target)42%42%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.170.29
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.410.61

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Plateau United is 14% better for: last-5 form.

1.6 pts / match - Plateau United · 1.4 pts / match - Kano Pillars

Plateau United
DWDWL
Season result split
43% W29% D29% L
Season (W-D-L)
3-2-2
1.57 pts / match · goal difference +1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-2-1
1.60 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
3-0-0
Last 5 at home
3-0-0
WWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.37Opponent xG: 1.52BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 40%
Kano Pillars
WDDDD
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
29% W71% D0% L
Season (W-D-L)
2-5-0
1.57 pts / match · goal difference +4
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-4-0
1.40 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
0-3-0
Last 5 away
0-3-0
DDD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 0.6xG: 1.79Opponent xG: 1.30BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 20%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Kano Pillars is 22% better for: goals scored per match.

1.29 goals / match - Plateau United · 1.57 goals / match - Kano Pillars

Kano Pillars is 14% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.14 goals / match - Plateau United · 1 goals / match - Kano Pillars

Plateau United scoring profile: strong

Plateau United scores in 71% of matches (5 of 7 matches), while Kano Pillars keeps a clean sheet in 29% (2 of 7 matches).

Kano Pillars scoring profile: strong

Kano Pillars scores in 71% of matches (5 of 7 matches), while Plateau United keeps a clean sheet in 29% (2 of 7 matches).

9Goals scored (season)11
Plateau UnitedKano Pillars
8Goals conceded (season)7
Plateau UnitedKano Pillars
2.43Average goals in match2.57
Plateau UnitedKano Pillars
8Goals scored (last 5)6
Plateau UnitedKano Pillars
6Goals conceded (last 5)3
Plateau UnitedKano Pillars

How often they score at least...

71%1 goal71%
Plateau UnitedKano Pillars
43%2 goals43%
Plateau UnitedKano Pillars
14%3 goals29%
Plateau UnitedKano Pillars
0%4 goals14%
Plateau UnitedKano Pillars

How often they concede at least...

71%1 goal71%
Plateau UnitedKano Pillars
43%2 goals29%
Plateau UnitedKano Pillars
0%3 goals0%
Plateau UnitedKano Pillars
0%4 goals0%
Plateau UnitedKano Pillars

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

44%
League average

Goal patterns

0%BTTS at half-time0%
Plateau UnitedKano Pillars
0%BTTS in both halves0%
Plateau UnitedKano Pillars
0%Scored in both halves29%
Plateau UnitedKano Pillars

BTTS and goal count

29%Min. 3 goals and BTTS43%
Plateau UnitedKano Pillars
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
Plateau UnitedKano Pillars
60%BTTS - last 560%
Plateau UnitedKano Pillars

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

86%Min. 1 goal before half-time71%
Plateau UnitedKano Pillars
14%Min. 2 goals before half-time43%
Plateau UnitedKano Pillars
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
Plateau UnitedKano Pillars

2nd half

71%Min. 1 goal after half-time71%
Plateau UnitedKano Pillars
43%Min. 2 goals after half-time43%
Plateau UnitedKano Pillars
29%Min. 3 goals after half-time29%
Plateau UnitedKano Pillars

Match halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Kano Pillars is 100% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1 pts / match - Plateau United · 2 pts / match - Kano Pillars

Plateau United - half-time state
29% leading14% draw57% trailing
Kano Pillars - half-time state
57% leading29% draw14% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1Points per match (1st half)2
Plateau UnitedKano Pillars
0.29Goals scored (1st half)1
Plateau UnitedKano Pillars
0.71Goals conceded (1st half)0.14
Plateau UnitedKano Pillars
1Average goals (1st half)1.14
Plateau UnitedKano Pillars
43%Clean sheet before half-time86%
Plateau UnitedKano Pillars
71%No goal before half-time43%
Plateau UnitedKano Pillars

After half-time (2nd half)

1.57Points per match (2nd half)1.14
Plateau UnitedKano Pillars
1Goals scored (2nd half)0.57
Plateau UnitedKano Pillars
0.43Goals conceded (2nd half)0.86
Plateau UnitedKano Pillars
1.43Average goals (2nd half)1.43
Plateau UnitedKano Pillars
57%Clean sheet after half-time43%
Plateau UnitedKano Pillars
57%No goal after half-time57%
Plateau UnitedKano Pillars

Plateau United - second-half results

43% W29% D29% L
7
Half-time points
2
Half-time goals
-3
Goal difference (1st half)
11
Second-half points
+4
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding148%

Leads at half-time in 29% of matches and wins 43%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.3

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Kano Pillars - second-half results

29% W29% D43% L
14
Half-time points
7
Half-time goals
+6
Goal difference (1st half)
8
Second-half points
-2
Goal difference (2nd half)
2.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding51%

Leads at half-time in 57% of matches and wins 29%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time+0.7

Concedes 0.7 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Plateau United - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.801.80
Goals scored / match0.21.4
Goals conceded / match0.60.6
Average goals in match0.82.0
1 goal80%100%
2 goals0%60%
3 goals0%40%
Clean sheet40%40%
No goal80%40%
Goal difference-2+4
Half-time: 20% leading - 20% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 0% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1
Kano Pillars - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.601.60
Goals scored / match0.60.6
Goals conceded / match0.20.4
Average goals in match0.81.0
1 goal60%60%
2 goals20%20%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet80%60%
No goal60%60%
Goal difference+2+1
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Plateau United
ScoredConceded
0
2
0-15
1
1
16-30
1
2
31-45
3
1
46-60
1
1
61-75
3
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (3 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.

Kano Pillars
ScoredConceded
1
0
0-15
2
0
16-30
4
1
31-45
2
2
46-60
0
1
61-75
2
3
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (4 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.50
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.1 : 1.4
Estimated goal split
home : away
105%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
57%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-20%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
50%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
8%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 13 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Plateau United

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.22
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.37
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.7 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.03
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.34
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
78%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
158%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.03
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.7
Late goals
33% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
33%

Kano Pillars

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.49
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.08
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-3.9 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.22
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.30
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
218%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
61%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.17
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.4
Late goals
18% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 9% come in the first quarter-hour.
18%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (NPFL).

Teams vs league

Plateau UnitedLigaKano Pillars
Average goals in match• 2.432.38▲ 2.57
Both teams scored• 43%44%▲ 71%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▼ 29%40%▲ 43%
Clean sheets▼ 29%35%▼ 29%
Goal before half-time▲ 86%69%▲ 71%
Goal after half-time▲ 71%68%▲ 71%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.38
Average goals per match
44%
Both teams scored
40%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
35%
Clean sheets
1.65
Home goals / match
0.72
Away goals / match
+129%
Home attack advantage
+56%
Home defence advantage
+51%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
69%
1 goal
28%
2 goals
8%
3 goals
0%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
68%
1 goal
36%
2 goals
21%
3 goals
7%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Plateau UnitedGoalPaul Samson
  2. Plateau UnitedGoalOjo Ekundayo Solomon
  3. Plateau UnitedGoalSamuel Ayanrinde

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (2): Plateau United 1 - 0 - 1 Kano Pillars. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 50% matches.

FAQ

What was the result of Plateau United vs Kano Pillars?

The NPFL match finished Plateau United 4:0 Kano Pillars. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Plateau United and Kano Pillars?

In the last 2 head-to-head matches Plateau United won 1, Kano Pillars won 1 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 2.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Plateau United vs Kano Pillars?

Plateau United score 1.29 goals per game on average and Kano Pillars 1.57. The NPFL average is 2.38 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 40% of games. Both teams score in 43% of Plateau United's matches and 71% of Kano Pillars's.

What form are Plateau United and Kano Pillars in?

Over the last 5 games Plateau United have a 2-2-1 record (1.60 points per game) and Kano Pillars 1-4-0 (1.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Plateau United vs Kano Pillars?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.