Portland Timbers II vs Whitecaps II: match statistics
Full analysis and pick in the app
Check the betting analysis, pick, value bet and full reasoning for this match.
Portland Timbers II vs Whitecaps II: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Portland Timbers II play Whitecaps II in MLS Next Pro (United States). The match date is 7 September 2026. Venue: Providence Park.
Current form
Portland Timbers II: 3-2-0, 2.20 points/match. Whitecaps II: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match.
Goal statistics
Portland Timbers II scores 1.40 and concedes 1.08 goals per match. Whitecaps II scores 1.56 and concedes 2.16. League average: 3.33 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Portland Timbers II 40%, Whitecaps II 76%. Over 2.5: Portland Timbers II 56%, Whitecaps II 72%. League level: BTTS 62%, Over 2.5 67%.
xG, shots and style
xG is very similar for both teams. Portland Timbers II: 14.1 shots per match, Whitecaps II: 12.9.
Match halves
Portland Timbers II: half-time lead 16%, second-half goals 1.04. Whitecaps II: half-time lead 20%, second-half goals 0.92.
Goals by minute
Portland Timbers II: 61-75 (10 goals). Whitecaps II: 61-75 (8 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
MLS Next Pro: 3.33 goals per match, BTTS 62%, Over 2.5 67%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 5 previous H2H matches were available: 2-2-1. Average goals 1.80, BTTS 40%.
Before the match
1X2 odds
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Portland Timbers II | Whitecaps II | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 36% | 36% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.13 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.28 | 0.34 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Portland Timbers II is 57% better for: last-5 form.
2.2 pts / match - Portland Timbers II · 1.4 pts / match - Whitecaps II
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Whitecaps II is 11% better for: goals scored per match.
1.4 goals / match - Portland Timbers II · 1.56 goals / match - Whitecaps II
Portland Timbers II is 100% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.08 goals / match - Portland Timbers II · 2.16 goals / match - Whitecaps II
Portland Timbers II scores in 76% of matches (19 of 25 matches), while Whitecaps II keeps a clean sheet in 8% (2 of 25 matches).
Whitecaps II scores in 80% of matches (20 of 25 matches), while Portland Timbers II keeps a clean sheet in 52% (13 of 25 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Portland Timbers II
Over / Under - Whitecaps II
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Portland Timbers II is 8% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.08 pts / match - Portland Timbers II · 1 pts / match - Whitecaps II
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Portland Timbers II - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 16% of matches and wins 56%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Whitecaps II - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 20% of matches and wins 28%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.20 | 2.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 1.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 0.2 |
| Average goals in match | 1.2 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 80% |
| No goal | 40% | 20% |
| Goal difference | 0 | +5 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.40 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.2 | 1.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.2 | 1.0 |
| Average goals in match | 2.4 | 2.4 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 100% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 60% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 40% |
| No goal | 20% | 20% |
| Goal difference | 0 | +2 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (10 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (8 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (13). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Portland Timbers II
Whitecaps II
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (MLS Next Pro).
Teams vs league
| Portland Timbers II | Liga | Whitecaps II | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 2.48 | 3.33 | ▲ 3.72 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 40% | 62% | ▲ 76% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 56% | 67% | ▲ 72% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 52% | 21% | ▼ 8% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 56% | 77% | ▼ 72% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 76% | 85% | • 84% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (5): Portland Timbers II 2 - 2 - 1 Whitecaps II. Average goals 1.80, both teams scored in 40% matches.
FAQ
When do Portland Timbers II and Whitecaps II play?
Portland Timbers II face Whitecaps II on 7 September 2026 in MLS Next Pro at Providence Park. The exact kick-off time in your timezone is shown at the top of the match page.
What is the head-to-head record between Portland Timbers II and Whitecaps II?
In the last 5 head-to-head matches Portland Timbers II won 2, Whitecaps II won 1 and 2 ended level. These games averaged 1.80 goals, with both teams scoring in 40% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Portland Timbers II vs Whitecaps II?
Portland Timbers II score 1.40 goals per game on average and Whitecaps II 1.56. The MLS Next Pro average is 3.33 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 67% of games. Both teams score in 40% of Portland Timbers II's matches and 76% of Whitecaps II's.
What form are Portland Timbers II and Whitecaps II in?
Over the last 5 games Portland Timbers II have a 3-2-0 record (2.20 points per game) and Whitecaps II 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Portland Timbers II vs Whitecaps II?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.