United States - MLS Next ProProvidence ParkData current as of 19 October 2026

Portland Timbers II vs Whitecaps II: match statistics

Portland Timbers II vs Whitecaps II: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Portland Timbers II played Whitecaps II in MLS Next Pro (United States). The match was played on 7 September 2026. Venue: Providence Park. Final score: 0:0.

Current form

Portland Timbers II: 3-2-0, 2.20 points/match. Whitecaps II: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match.

Goal statistics

Portland Timbers II scores 1.40 and concedes 1.08 goals per match. Whitecaps II scores 1.56 and concedes 2.16. League average: 3.33 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Portland Timbers II 40%, Whitecaps II 76%. Over 2.5: Portland Timbers II 56%, Whitecaps II 72%. League level: BTTS 62%, Over 2.5 66%.

xG, shots and style

xG is very similar for both teams. Portland Timbers II: 14.1 shots per match, Whitecaps II: 12.9.

Match halves

Portland Timbers II: half-time lead 16%, second-half goals 1.04. Whitecaps II: half-time lead 20%, second-half goals 0.92.

Goals by minute

Portland Timbers II: 61-75 (10 goals). Whitecaps II: 61-75 (8 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

MLS Next Pro: 3.33 goals per match, BTTS 62%, Over 2.5 66%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 5 previous H2H matches were available: 2-2-1. Average goals 1.80, BTTS 40%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Portland Timbers II sit 2nd, while Whitecaps II are only 25th, with the gap further confirmed by their overall season records: 14 home wins compared to 7 away victories. Timbers II have remained unbeaten in their last five matches, collecting 11 points and conceding just 4 goals during that period, whereas Whitecaps II have lost 2 of their last 5 games and conceded 11 goals in those matches. At home, the hosts create significantly more chances, averaging 17.08 shots and an xG of 1.97, compared to 11.83 shots and an xG of 1.43 for the visitors away from home. Whitecaps II’s biggest weakness is their away defence: they concede an average of 2.67 goals per match, have lost 83% of such fixtures and are yet to record a single win. Portland also keep a clean sheet in 42% of their home games, so the superior chance quality and the visitors’ very poor away form point to a home win.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The case for both teams to score is clear: BTTS has occurred in 69% of Portland Timbers II matches this season and as many as 83% of Whitecaps II fixtures, compared with the league average of 62%. Whitecaps II have failed to keep a clean sheet in 92% of matches and concede an average of 2.67 goals, while Portland score 1.92 goals at home with an xG of 1.89. The visitors also have solid attacking arguments, averaging 1.17 goals with an xG of 1.43, while the hosts concede an average of 1.69 goals. In Whitecaps II’s last five matches, both teams scored in 100% of cases, with the team scoring 13 and conceding 11 goals. Portland’s improved recent defensive record, with only 4 goals conceded in five matches, reduces confidence in the pick, but the scale of the visitors’ defensive problems and the high frequency of BTTS support the BTTS - Yes scenario.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Portland average 1.92 goals per match, while Whitecaps concede as many as 2.67, which clearly strengthens the outlook for goals from the hosts. Both teams have kept a clean sheet in only 8% of their matches, while at least one goal was scored in 92% of their games. The 1.5 line was covered in 92% of Portland’s matches and 83% of Whitecaps’ fixtures, while in their last five appearances, both teams went over 2.5 goals in 80% of cases. In addition, Whitecaps have scored 13 and conceded 11 goals in their last five matches, so even with Portland’s recent defensive strength, the risk of a very tight match remains limited. The strongest selection remains Over 1.5, as just two goals are needed to cover it, while the projected total is 3.60.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Portland Timbers II hold a clear seasonal advantage: they average 1.92 goals scored, while Whitecaps II concede as many as 2.67 goals per match, with the hosts winning 54% of their games compared with 0% for their opponents. Before the break, Portland were leading in 38% of matches and averaged 0.85 goals, whereas Whitecaps II had not led at half-time in any game and were trailing after 45 minutes in 58% of matches. The hosts also create better chances, as reflected by an xG of 1.89 versus 1.43 and an average of 5.31 shots on target compared with the visitors’ 3.92. Whitecaps II’s recent form calls for caution, as they scored 2.6 goals per match in their last five outings but conceded 2.2 at the same time. The most logical scenario, therefore, is Portland leading at the break and holding on to the win through to the final whistle.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

42Possession (%)58
Portland Timbers IIWhitecaps II
17Shots13
Portland Timbers IIWhitecaps II
3Shots on target2
Portland Timbers IIWhitecaps II
1.6xG1.39
Portland Timbers IIWhitecaps II
7Corners4
Portland Timbers IIWhitecaps II
44Dangerous attacks60
Portland Timbers IIWhitecaps II
17Fouls12
Portland Timbers IIWhitecaps II
1Cards0
Portland Timbers IIWhitecaps II

Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Portland Timbers IIWhitecaps II
1.4Goals scored / match1.56
Portland Timbers IIWhitecaps II
1.08Goals conceded / match2.16
Portland Timbers IIWhitecaps II
Portland Timbers IIWhitecaps II
45%Average possession49%
Portland Timbers IIWhitecaps II
5.04Shots on target / match4.64
Portland Timbers IIWhitecaps II

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

14.08Shots per match12.92
Portland Timbers IIWhitecaps II
5.04Shots on target4.64
Portland Timbers IIWhitecaps II
9.9%Shot conversion12.1%
Portland Timbers IIWhitecaps II
45%Possession49%
Portland Timbers IIWhitecaps II
1.67xG for1.67
Portland Timbers IIWhitecaps II
1.38xG against1.81
Portland Timbers IIWhitecaps II

Shooting quality

Portland Timbers II: AttackingWhitecaps II: Balanced
Portland Timbers IIWhitecaps II
Accuracy (shots on target)36%36%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.13
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.280.34

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Portland Timbers II is 57% better for: last-5 form.

2.2 pts / match - Portland Timbers II · 1.4 pts / match - Whitecaps II

Portland Timbers II
WDWDW
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
56% W28% D16% L
Season (W-D-L)
14-7-4
1.96 pts / match · goal difference +8
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-2-0
2.20 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
5-5-2
Last 5 at home
3-1-1
WLWDW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.8Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 1.62Opponent xG: 1.42BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 80%
Whitecaps II
DLLWW
Season result split
28% W12% D60% L
Season (W-D-L)
7-3-15
0.96 pts / match · goal difference -15
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
0-2-10
Last 5 away
0-1-4
LLDLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.6Goals conceded: 2.2xG: 1.78Opponent xG: 1.99BTTS: 100%Over 2.5: 80%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Whitecaps II is 11% better for: goals scored per match.

1.4 goals / match - Portland Timbers II · 1.56 goals / match - Whitecaps II

Portland Timbers II is 100% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.08 goals / match - Portland Timbers II · 2.16 goals / match - Whitecaps II

Portland Timbers II scoring profile: very strong

Portland Timbers II scores in 76% of matches (19 of 25 matches), while Whitecaps II keeps a clean sheet in 8% (2 of 25 matches).

Whitecaps II scoring profile: strong

Whitecaps II scores in 80% of matches (20 of 25 matches), while Portland Timbers II keeps a clean sheet in 52% (13 of 25 matches).

35Goals scored (season)39
Portland Timbers IIWhitecaps II
27Goals conceded (season)54
Portland Timbers IIWhitecaps II
2.48Average goals in match3.72
Portland Timbers IIWhitecaps II
9Goals scored (last 5)13
Portland Timbers IIWhitecaps II
4Goals conceded (last 5)11
Portland Timbers IIWhitecaps II

How often they score at least...

76%1 goal80%
Portland Timbers IIWhitecaps II
52%2 goals48%
Portland Timbers IIWhitecaps II
12%3 goals16%
Portland Timbers IIWhitecaps II
0%4 goals8%
Portland Timbers IIWhitecaps II

How often they concede at least...

48%1 goal92%
Portland Timbers IIWhitecaps II
28%2 goals60%
Portland Timbers IIWhitecaps II
20%3 goals36%
Portland Timbers IIWhitecaps II
8%4 goals20%
Portland Timbers IIWhitecaps II

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

40%
Portland Timbers II - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.10 of 25 matches
62%
League average

Goal patterns

20%BTTS at half-time32%
Portland Timbers IIWhitecaps II
12%BTTS in both halves12%
Portland Timbers IIWhitecaps II
24%Scored in both halves20%
Portland Timbers IIWhitecaps II

BTTS and goal count

40%Min. 3 goals and BTTS68%
Portland Timbers IIWhitecaps II
16%Min. 3 goals without BTTS4%
Portland Timbers IIWhitecaps II
60%BTTS - last 5100%
Portland Timbers IIWhitecaps II

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

56%Min. 1 goal before half-time72%
Portland Timbers IIWhitecaps II
24%Min. 2 goals before half-time60%
Portland Timbers IIWhitecaps II
8%Min. 3 goals before half-time28%
Portland Timbers IIWhitecaps II

2nd half

76%Min. 1 goal after half-time84%
Portland Timbers IIWhitecaps II
60%Min. 2 goals after half-time64%
Portland Timbers IIWhitecaps II
24%Min. 3 goals after half-time40%
Portland Timbers IIWhitecaps II

Match halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Portland Timbers II is 8% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.08 pts / match - Portland Timbers II · 1 pts / match - Whitecaps II

Portland Timbers II - half-time state
16% leading60% draw24% trailing
Whitecaps II - half-time state
20% leading40% draw40% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.08Points per match (1st half)1
Portland Timbers IIWhitecaps II
0.36Goals scored (1st half)0.64
Portland Timbers IIWhitecaps II
0.52Goals conceded (1st half)1
Portland Timbers IIWhitecaps II
0.88Average goals (1st half)1.64
Portland Timbers IIWhitecaps II
60%Clean sheet before half-time40%
Portland Timbers IIWhitecaps II
64%No goal before half-time56%
Portland Timbers IIWhitecaps II

After half-time (2nd half)

1.96Points per match (2nd half)1
Portland Timbers IIWhitecaps II
1.04Goals scored (2nd half)0.92
Portland Timbers IIWhitecaps II
0.56Goals conceded (2nd half)1.16
Portland Timbers IIWhitecaps II
1.6Average goals (2nd half)2.08
Portland Timbers IIWhitecaps II
64%Clean sheet after half-time20%
Portland Timbers IIWhitecaps II
36%No goal after half-time44%
Portland Timbers IIWhitecaps II

Portland Timbers II - second-half results

56% W28% D16% L
27
Half-time points
9
Half-time goals
-4
Goal difference (1st half)
49
Second-half points
+12
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.08
PPG before half-time
Lead holding350%

Leads at half-time in 16% of matches and wins 56%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Whitecaps II - second-half results

24% W28% D48% L
25
Half-time points
16
Half-time goals
-9
Goal difference (1st half)
25
Second-half points
-6
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding140%

Leads at half-time in 20% of matches and wins 28%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Portland Timbers II - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.202.20
Goals scored / match0.61.2
Goals conceded / match0.60.2
Average goals in match1.21.4
1 goal80%80%
2 goals40%60%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet40%80%
No goal40%20%
Goal difference0+5
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 40% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 3
Whitecaps II - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.401.40
Goals scored / match1.21.4
Goals conceded / match1.21.0
Average goals in match2.42.4
1 goal100%80%
2 goals100%80%
3 goals40%60%
Clean sheet20%40%
No goal20%20%
Goal difference0+2
Half-time: 40% leading - 20% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 60% - Half-time goals total: 6

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Portland Timbers II
ScoredConceded
3
3
0-15
3
6
16-30
3
4
31-45
8
4
46-60
10
5
61-75
8
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (10 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.

Whitecaps II
ScoredConceded
6
9
0-15
6
6
16-30
4
10
31-45
7
13
46-60
8
7
61-75
8
9
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (8 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (13). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.10
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.8 : 1.3
Estimated goal split
home : away
93%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
58%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-42%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
61%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
5%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 20 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Portland Timbers II

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.29
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.03
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+2.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.27
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.30
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
74%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
76%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.24
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.7
Late goals
23% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 9% come in the first quarter-hour.
23%

Whitecaps II

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.14
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.46
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.7 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.11
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.35
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
110%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
114%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.44
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
21% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 15% come in the first quarter-hour.
21%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (MLS Next Pro).

Teams vs league

Portland Timbers IILigaWhitecaps II
Average goals in match▼ 2.483.33▲ 3.72
Both teams scored▼ 40%62%▲ 76%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▼ 56%66%▲ 72%
Clean sheets▲ 52%21%▼ 8%
Goal before half-time▼ 56%76%▼ 72%
Goal after half-time▼ 76%85%• 84%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.33
Average goals per match
62%
Both teams scored
66%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
21%
Clean sheets
1.90
Home goals / match
1.42
Away goals / match
+34%
Home attack advantage
+25%
Home defence advantage
+20%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
76%
1 goal
45%
2 goals
18%
3 goals
5%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
85%
1 goal
58%
2 goals
28%
3 goals
10%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Portland Timbers IIYellow cardNicklas Lund
  2. Portland Timbers IISubstitutionOn: Connor FergusonOff: Benjamin Barjolo
  3. Portland Timbers IISubstitutionOn: Daniel NunezOff: Noah Santos
  4. Whitecaps IISubstitutionOn: Sahil DeoOff: Manav Badwal

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (5): Portland Timbers II 2 - 2 - 1 Whitecaps II. Average goals 1.80, both teams scored in 40% matches.

Whitecaps II
0 : 1
Portland Timbers II
Portland Timbers II
0 : 0
Whitecaps II
Vancouver Whitecaps FC II
4 : 1
Portland Timbers II
Portland Timbers II
1 : 0
Vancouver Whitecaps FC II
Vancouver Whitecaps FC II
1 : 1
Portland Timbers II

FAQ

What was the result of Portland Timbers II vs Whitecaps II?

The MLS Next Pro match finished Portland Timbers II 0:0 Whitecaps II. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Portland Timbers II and Whitecaps II?

In the last 5 head-to-head matches Portland Timbers II won 2, Whitecaps II won 1 and 2 ended level. These games averaged 1.80 goals, with both teams scoring in 40% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Portland Timbers II vs Whitecaps II?

Portland Timbers II score 1.40 goals per game on average and Whitecaps II 1.56. The MLS Next Pro average is 3.33 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 66% of games. Both teams score in 40% of Portland Timbers II's matches and 76% of Whitecaps II's.

What form are Portland Timbers II and Whitecaps II in?

Over the last 5 games Portland Timbers II have a 3-2-0 record (2.20 points per game) and Whitecaps II 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Portland Timbers II vs Whitecaps II?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.