Portland Timbers II vs Whitecaps II: match statistics
Portland Timbers II vs Whitecaps II: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Portland Timbers II played Whitecaps II in MLS Next Pro (United States). The match was played on 7 September 2026. Venue: Providence Park. Final score: 0:0.
Current form
Portland Timbers II: 3-2-0, 2.20 points/match. Whitecaps II: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match.
Goal statistics
Portland Timbers II scores 1.40 and concedes 1.08 goals per match. Whitecaps II scores 1.56 and concedes 2.16. League average: 3.33 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Portland Timbers II 40%, Whitecaps II 76%. Over 2.5: Portland Timbers II 56%, Whitecaps II 72%. League level: BTTS 62%, Over 2.5 66%.
xG, shots and style
xG is very similar for both teams. Portland Timbers II: 14.1 shots per match, Whitecaps II: 12.9.
Match halves
Portland Timbers II: half-time lead 16%, second-half goals 1.04. Whitecaps II: half-time lead 20%, second-half goals 0.92.
Goals by minute
Portland Timbers II: 61-75 (10 goals). Whitecaps II: 61-75 (8 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
MLS Next Pro: 3.33 goals per match, BTTS 62%, Over 2.5 66%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 5 previous H2H matches were available: 2-2-1. Average goals 1.80, BTTS 40%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Portland Timbers II sit 2nd, while Whitecaps II are only 25th, with the gap further confirmed by their overall season records: 14 home wins compared to 7 away victories. Timbers II have remained unbeaten in their last five matches, collecting 11 points and conceding just 4 goals during that period, whereas Whitecaps II have lost 2 of their last 5 games and conceded 11 goals in those matches. At home, the hosts create significantly more chances, averaging 17.08 shots and an xG of 1.97, compared to 11.83 shots and an xG of 1.43 for the visitors away from home. Whitecaps II’s biggest weakness is their away defence: they concede an average of 2.67 goals per match, have lost 83% of such fixtures and are yet to record a single win. Portland also keep a clean sheet in 42% of their home games, so the superior chance quality and the visitors’ very poor away form point to a home win.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
The case for both teams to score is clear: BTTS has occurred in 69% of Portland Timbers II matches this season and as many as 83% of Whitecaps II fixtures, compared with the league average of 62%. Whitecaps II have failed to keep a clean sheet in 92% of matches and concede an average of 2.67 goals, while Portland score 1.92 goals at home with an xG of 1.89. The visitors also have solid attacking arguments, averaging 1.17 goals with an xG of 1.43, while the hosts concede an average of 1.69 goals. In Whitecaps II’s last five matches, both teams scored in 100% of cases, with the team scoring 13 and conceding 11 goals. Portland’s improved recent defensive record, with only 4 goals conceded in five matches, reduces confidence in the pick, but the scale of the visitors’ defensive problems and the high frequency of BTTS support the BTTS - Yes scenario.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Portland average 1.92 goals per match, while Whitecaps concede as many as 2.67, which clearly strengthens the outlook for goals from the hosts. Both teams have kept a clean sheet in only 8% of their matches, while at least one goal was scored in 92% of their games. The 1.5 line was covered in 92% of Portland’s matches and 83% of Whitecaps’ fixtures, while in their last five appearances, both teams went over 2.5 goals in 80% of cases. In addition, Whitecaps have scored 13 and conceded 11 goals in their last five matches, so even with Portland’s recent defensive strength, the risk of a very tight match remains limited. The strongest selection remains Over 1.5, as just two goals are needed to cover it, while the projected total is 3.60.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Portland Timbers II hold a clear seasonal advantage: they average 1.92 goals scored, while Whitecaps II concede as many as 2.67 goals per match, with the hosts winning 54% of their games compared with 0% for their opponents. Before the break, Portland were leading in 38% of matches and averaged 0.85 goals, whereas Whitecaps II had not led at half-time in any game and were trailing after 45 minutes in 58% of matches. The hosts also create better chances, as reflected by an xG of 1.89 versus 1.43 and an average of 5.31 shots on target compared with the visitors’ 3.92. Whitecaps II’s recent form calls for caution, as they scored 2.6 goals per match in their last five outings but conceded 2.2 at the same time. The most logical scenario, therefore, is Portland leading at the break and holding on to the win through to the final whistle.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Portland Timbers II | Whitecaps II | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 36% | 36% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.13 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.28 | 0.34 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Portland Timbers II is 57% better for: last-5 form.
2.2 pts / match - Portland Timbers II · 1.4 pts / match - Whitecaps II
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Whitecaps II is 11% better for: goals scored per match.
1.4 goals / match - Portland Timbers II · 1.56 goals / match - Whitecaps II
Portland Timbers II is 100% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.08 goals / match - Portland Timbers II · 2.16 goals / match - Whitecaps II
Portland Timbers II scores in 76% of matches (19 of 25 matches), while Whitecaps II keeps a clean sheet in 8% (2 of 25 matches).
Whitecaps II scores in 80% of matches (20 of 25 matches), while Portland Timbers II keeps a clean sheet in 52% (13 of 25 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Portland Timbers II
Over / Under - Whitecaps II
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Portland Timbers II is 8% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.08 pts / match - Portland Timbers II · 1 pts / match - Whitecaps II
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Portland Timbers II - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 16% of matches and wins 56%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Whitecaps II - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 20% of matches and wins 28%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.20 | 2.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 1.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 0.2 |
| Average goals in match | 1.2 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 80% |
| No goal | 40% | 20% |
| Goal difference | 0 | +5 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.40 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.2 | 1.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.2 | 1.0 |
| Average goals in match | 2.4 | 2.4 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 100% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 60% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 40% |
| No goal | 20% | 20% |
| Goal difference | 0 | +2 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (10 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (8 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (13). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Portland Timbers II
Whitecaps II
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (MLS Next Pro).
Teams vs league
| Portland Timbers II | Liga | Whitecaps II | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 2.48 | 3.33 | ▲ 3.72 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 40% | 62% | ▲ 76% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 56% | 66% | ▲ 72% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 52% | 21% | ▼ 8% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 56% | 76% | ▼ 72% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 76% | 85% | • 84% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (5): Portland Timbers II 2 - 2 - 1 Whitecaps II. Average goals 1.80, both teams scored in 40% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Portland Timbers II vs Whitecaps II?
The MLS Next Pro match finished Portland Timbers II 0:0 Whitecaps II. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Portland Timbers II and Whitecaps II?
In the last 5 head-to-head matches Portland Timbers II won 2, Whitecaps II won 1 and 2 ended level. These games averaged 1.80 goals, with both teams scoring in 40% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Portland Timbers II vs Whitecaps II?
Portland Timbers II score 1.40 goals per game on average and Whitecaps II 1.56. The MLS Next Pro average is 3.33 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 66% of games. Both teams score in 40% of Portland Timbers II's matches and 76% of Whitecaps II's.
What form are Portland Timbers II and Whitecaps II in?
Over the last 5 games Portland Timbers II have a 3-2-0 record (2.20 points per game) and Whitecaps II 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Portland Timbers II vs Whitecaps II?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.


