United States - MLSProvidence ParkData current as of 15 October 2026

Portland Timbers vs Colorado Rapids: match statistics

Reasoning:

Full analysis and pick in the app

Check the betting analysis, pick, value bet and full reasoning for this match.

Check analysis and pick

Portland Timbers vs Colorado Rapids: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Portland Timbers play Colorado Rapids in MLS (United States). The match date is 18 October 2026. Venue: Providence Park.

Current form

Portland Timbers: 0-2-3, 0.40 points/match. Colorado Rapids: 1-3-1, 1.20 points/match.

Goal statistics

Portland Timbers scores 1.82 and concedes 1.93 goals per match. Colorado Rapids scores 1.39 and concedes 1.39. League average: 3.26 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Portland Timbers 79%, Colorado Rapids 46%. Over 2.5: Portland Timbers 75%, Colorado Rapids 46%. League level: BTTS 64%, Over 2.5 64%.

xG, shots and style

Portland Timbers has higher xG: 1.54 vs 1.38. Portland Timbers: 13.5 shots per match, Colorado Rapids: 12.2.

Match halves

Portland Timbers: half-time lead 29%, second-half goals 0.96. Colorado Rapids: half-time lead 39%, second-half goals 0.75.

Goals by minute

Portland Timbers: 76-90+ (13 goals). Colorado Rapids: 76-90+ (8 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

MLS: 3.26 goals per match, BTTS 64%, Over 2.5 64%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-0-1. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 0%.

Before the match

1X2 odds

(2.27)
(3.98)
(2.94)

Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Portland TimbersColorado Rapids
1.82Goals scored / match1.39
Portland TimbersColorado Rapids
1.93Goals conceded / match1.39
Portland TimbersColorado Rapids
Portland TimbersColorado Rapids
51%Average possession56%
Portland TimbersColorado Rapids
4.54Shots on target / match4.39
Portland TimbersColorado Rapids

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

13.5Shots per match12.21
Portland TimbersColorado Rapids
4.54Shots on target4.39
Portland TimbersColorado Rapids
13.5%Shot conversion11.4%
Portland TimbersColorado Rapids
51%Possession56%
Portland TimbersColorado Rapids
1.54xG for1.38
Portland TimbersColorado Rapids
1.8xG against1.28
Portland TimbersColorado Rapids

Shooting quality

Portland Timbers: Efficient finishingColorado Rapids: Balanced
Portland TimbersColorado Rapids
Accuracy (shots on target)34%36%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.400.32

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Colorado Rapids is 200% better for: last-5 form.

0.4 pts / match - Portland Timbers · 1.2 pts / match - Colorado Rapids

Portland Timbers
DLLLD
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
32% W21% D46% L
Season (W-D-L)
9-6-13
1.18 pts / match · goal difference -3
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-2-3
0.40 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
7-3-4
Last 5 at home
2-1-2
WLWDL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 2.2xG: 1.77Opponent xG: 1.32BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 80%
Colorado Rapids
DWDLD
Season result split
39% W14% D46% L
Season (W-D-L)
11-4-13
1.32 pts / match · goal difference 0
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-3-1
1.20 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
2-2-10
Last 5 away
0-1-4
LLLDL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 1.57Opponent xG: 1.36BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 40%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Portland Timbers is 31% better for: goals scored per match.

1.82 goals / match - Portland Timbers · 1.39 goals / match - Colorado Rapids

Colorado Rapids is 39% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.93 goals / match - Portland Timbers · 1.39 goals / match - Colorado Rapids

Portland Timbers scoring profile: very strong

Portland Timbers scores in 82% of matches (23 of 28 matches), while Colorado Rapids keeps a clean sheet in 32% (9 of 28 matches).

Colorado Rapids scoring profile: very strong

Colorado Rapids scores in 75% of matches (21 of 28 matches), while Portland Timbers keeps a clean sheet in 4% (1 of 28 matches).

51Goals scored (season)39
Portland TimbersColorado Rapids
54Goals conceded (season)39
Portland TimbersColorado Rapids
3.75Average goals in match2.79
Portland TimbersColorado Rapids
7Goals scored (last 5)8
Portland TimbersColorado Rapids
11Goals conceded (last 5)8
Portland TimbersColorado Rapids

How often they score at least...

82%1 goal75%
Portland TimbersColorado Rapids
54%2 goals32%
Portland TimbersColorado Rapids
21%3 goals14%
Portland TimbersColorado Rapids
11%4 goals11%
Portland TimbersColorado Rapids

How often they concede at least...

96%1 goal68%
Portland TimbersColorado Rapids
64%2 goals43%
Portland TimbersColorado Rapids
25%3 goals29%
Portland TimbersColorado Rapids
7%4 goals0%
Portland TimbersColorado Rapids

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

79%
Portland Timbers - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.22 of 28 matches
64%
League average

Goal patterns

39%BTTS at half-time18%
Portland TimbersColorado Rapids
11%BTTS in both halves0%
Portland TimbersColorado Rapids
43%Scored in both halves18%
Portland TimbersColorado Rapids

BTTS and goal count

71%Min. 3 goals and BTTS39%
Portland TimbersColorado Rapids
4%Min. 3 goals without BTTS7%
Portland TimbersColorado Rapids
80%BTTS - last 580%
Portland TimbersColorado Rapids

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

100%Min. 1 goal before half-time71%
Portland TimbersColorado Rapids
57%Min. 2 goals before half-time32%
Portland TimbersColorado Rapids
29%Min. 3 goals before half-time14%
Portland TimbersColorado Rapids

2nd half

82%Min. 1 goal after half-time79%
Portland TimbersColorado Rapids
50%Min. 2 goals after half-time32%
Portland TimbersColorado Rapids
21%Min. 3 goals after half-time21%
Portland TimbersColorado Rapids

Match halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Colorado Rapids is 40% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.07 pts / match - Portland Timbers · 1.5 pts / match - Colorado Rapids

Portland Timbers - half-time state
29% leading21% draw50% trailing
Colorado Rapids - half-time state
39% leading32% draw29% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.07Points per match (1st half)1.5
Portland TimbersColorado Rapids
0.86Goals scored (1st half)0.64
Portland TimbersColorado Rapids
1.18Goals conceded (1st half)0.54
Portland TimbersColorado Rapids
2.04Average goals (1st half)1.18
Portland TimbersColorado Rapids
18%Clean sheet before half-time64%
Portland TimbersColorado Rapids
43%No goal before half-time46%
Portland TimbersColorado Rapids

After half-time (2nd half)

1.54Points per match (2nd half)1.18
Portland TimbersColorado Rapids
0.96Goals scored (2nd half)0.75
Portland TimbersColorado Rapids
0.75Goals conceded (2nd half)0.86
Portland TimbersColorado Rapids
1.71Average goals (2nd half)1.61
Portland TimbersColorado Rapids
50%Clean sheet after half-time43%
Portland TimbersColorado Rapids
32%No goal after half-time61%
Portland TimbersColorado Rapids

Portland Timbers - second-half results

39% W36% D25% L
30
Half-time points
24
Half-time goals
-9
Goal difference (1st half)
43
Second-half points
+6
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.07
PPG before half-time
Lead holding110%

Leads at half-time in 29% of matches and wins 32%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.4

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Colorado Rapids - second-half results

32% W21% D46% L
42
Half-time points
18
Half-time goals
+3
Goal difference (1st half)
33
Second-half points
-3
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.50
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 39% of matches and wins 39%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.3

Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Portland Timbers - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.801.20
Goals scored / match0.60.8
Goals conceded / match1.40.8
Average goals in match2.01.6
1 goal100%80%
2 goals60%60%
3 goals40%20%
Clean sheet0%40%
No goal60%20%
Goal difference-40
Half-time: 20% leading - 20% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 60% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 3
Colorado Rapids - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match3.000.20
Goals scored / match1.20.4
Goals conceded / match0.01.6
Average goals in match1.22.0
1 goal100%80%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals0%40%
Clean sheet100%20%
No goal0%80%
Goal difference+6-6
Half-time: 100% leading - 0% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 20% draw - 80% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 6

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Portland Timbers
ScoredConceded
7
11
0-15
10
11
16-30
7
11
31-45
5
6
46-60
9
4
61-75
13
11
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (13 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.

Colorado Rapids
ScoredConceded
6
3
0-15
7
6
16-30
5
6
31-45
7
4
46-60
6
8
61-75
8
12
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (8 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.26
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.6 : 1.7
Estimated goal split
home : away
100%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
63%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-39%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
62%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
5%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 20 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Portland Timbers

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.26
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.15
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-6.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.28
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.13
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
98%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
138%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.78
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
25% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 14% come in the first quarter-hour.
25%

Colorado Rapids

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.10
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.10
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-5.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.01
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.11
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
99%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
75%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.12
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
21% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 15% come in the first quarter-hour.
21%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (MLS).

Teams vs league

Portland TimbersLigaColorado Rapids
Average goals in match▲ 3.753.26▼ 2.79
Both teams scored▲ 79%64%▼ 46%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▲ 75%64%▼ 46%
Clean sheets▼ 4%20%▲ 32%
Goal before half-time▲ 100%78%▼ 71%
Goal after half-time• 82%82%▼ 79%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.26
Average goals per match
64%
Both teams scored
64%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
20%
Clean sheets
1.85
Home goals / match
1.40
Away goals / match
+32%
Home attack advantage
+24%
Home defence advantage
+18%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
78%
1 goal
43%
2 goals
19%
3 goals
6%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
82%
1 goal
54%
2 goals
24%
3 goals
11%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Portland Timbers 0 - 0 - 1 Colorado Rapids. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.

FAQ

When do Portland Timbers and Colorado Rapids play?

Portland Timbers face Colorado Rapids on 18 October 2026 in MLS at Providence Park. The exact kick-off time in your timezone is shown at the top of the match page.

What do the goal statistics show before Portland Timbers vs Colorado Rapids?

Portland Timbers score 1.82 goals per game on average and Colorado Rapids 1.39. The MLS average is 3.26 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 64% of games. Both teams score in 79% of Portland Timbers's matches and 46% of Colorado Rapids's.

What form are Portland Timbers and Colorado Rapids in?

Over the last 5 games Portland Timbers have a 0-2-3 record (0.40 points per game) and Colorado Rapids 1-3-1 (1.20 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Portland Timbers vs Colorado Rapids?

The statistical background for Portland Timbers vs Colorado Rapids — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.