Uruguay - Primera DivisiónParque Abraham PaladinoData current as of 30 August 2026

Progreso vs Danubio: match statistics

Progreso crest
Progreso
1 : 0half-time 0:0
Danubio crest
Danubio

Progreso vs Danubio: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Progreso played Danubio in Primera División (Uruguay). The match was played on 30 August 2026. Venue: Parque Abraham Paladino. Final score: 1:0.

Current form

Progreso: 1-0-4, 0.60 points/match. Danubio: 0-3-2, 0.60 points/match.

Goal statistics

Progreso scores 0.72 and concedes 1.52 goals per match. Danubio scores 0.88 and concedes 1.24. League average: 2.36 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Progreso 40%, Danubio 48%. Over 2.5: Progreso 40%, Danubio 40%. League level: BTTS 50%, Over 2.5 45%.

xG, shots and style

Danubio has higher xG: 1.25 vs 1.15. Progreso: 8.5 shots per match, Danubio: 9.7.

Match halves

Progreso: half-time lead 12%, second-half goals 0.40. Danubio: half-time lead 28%, second-half goals 0.40.

Goals by minute

Progreso: 76-90+ (7 goals). Danubio: 0-15 (5 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Primera División: 2.36 goals per match, BTTS 50%, Over 2.5 45%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 5 previous H2H matches were available: 2-2-1. Average goals 2.20, BTTS 60%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Both teams are in very poor offensive form: Progreso and Danubio have scored just 2 goals each in their last five matches. The hosts have a marginally higher attacking potential at home, averaging 0.83 goals with an xG of 1.17, compared with Danubio’s 0.77 goals and xG of 1.05 away from home. However, Progreso lose as many as 67% of their home matches and keep a clean sheet in only 8% of them, which limits the value of home advantage. Danubio share the points more often on the road, drawing 38% of their away fixtures, while their last five matches have produced 3 draws and only 2 defeats. Similar defensive figures—an average of 1.67 goals conceded by Progreso at home and 1.62 by Danubio away—point to an evenly matched contest with a strong chance of a draw.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The strongest signal for BTTS - No does not come from current form: both Progreso and Danubio have scored 2 goals in their last 5 matches, averaging just 0.4 per game, while BTTS occurred in only 20% of those matches for each team. Danubio also has a low seasonal away-goals average of 0.77 and failed to score in 46% of its matches, clearly increasing the likelihood of at least one side drawing a blank. Progreso is more solid defensively at home, conceding an average of 0.83 goals and keeping a clean sheet in 33% of matches. Although the hosts create more chances, with an xG of 1.46 and 4.33 shots on target per match compared with Danubio’s 1.05 and 2.54, their own scoring output remains limited to 1.0 goal per game. Seasonal BTTS rates of 50% for Progreso and 46% for Danubio are only moderate, while the recent attacking form of both teams points more strongly towards a scenario in which at least one team fails to score.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The last five matches involving both teams have been clearly low-scoring: Progreso and Danubio each scored 0.4 goals per game during this period, and only 20% of their matches went Over 2.5 goals. Across the entire season, 83% of Progreso’s matches have finished Under 3.5 goals, compared with 69% for Danubio, significantly limiting the likelihood of a four-goal scenario. Danubio generates just 1.05 xG on average and records 2.54 shots on target per match, while the hosts keep a clean sheet in 33% of their appearances. Progreso has greater attacking potential, averaging 1.46 xG against 1.44 xG conceded by their opponents, but their recent finishing remains poor. The 2.0-goal projection provides the clearest edge in favor of Under 3.5 goals.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The strongest scenario is a draw at half-time and a draw at full-time, as Progreso were level at the break in 50% of their matches, compared with 54% for Danubio. The first halves are expected to be very cautious: the hosts average 0.58 goals scored and 0.33 conceded before the break, while the corresponding figures for the visitors are 0.38 and 0.38. In their last five matches, both teams were level after the opening 45 minutes in 3 of 5 cases, while Progreso and Danubio averaged just 0.2 and 0.4 goals respectively before half-time. Progreso hold a slight edge in chance creation quality, with an xG of 1.46 compared with Danubio’s 1.05, but their recent form includes 4 defeats in 5 matches, whereas the visitors have drawn 3 of their last 5 games. Progreso’s high season draw rate of 58%, along with Danubio’s 38%, further supports the forecast of an evenly contested finish.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
1 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

50Possession (%)50
ProgresoDanubio
4Shots6
ProgresoDanubio
3Shots on target3
ProgresoDanubio
0.91xG1.13
ProgresoDanubio
4Corners6
ProgresoDanubio
61Dangerous attacks74
ProgresoDanubio
-1Fouls-1
ProgresoDanubio
3Cards4
ProgresoDanubio

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

0.72Goals scored / match0.88
ProgresoDanubio
1.52Goals conceded / match1.24
ProgresoDanubio
47%Average possession52%
ProgresoDanubio
3.16Shots on target / match3.4
ProgresoDanubio

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

8.52Shots per match9.72
ProgresoDanubio
3.16Shots on target3.4
ProgresoDanubio
8.5%Shot conversion9.1%
ProgresoDanubio
47%Possession52%
ProgresoDanubio
1.15xG for1.25
ProgresoDanubio
1.46xG against1.32
ProgresoDanubio

Shooting quality

Progreso: BalancedDanubio: Balanced
ProgresoDanubio
Accuracy (shots on target)37%35%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.130.13
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.230.26

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Progreso
WLLLL
Season result split
16% W16% R68% P
Season (W-D-L)
4-4-17
0.64 pts / match · goal difference -20
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-0-4
0.60 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
2-2-8
Last 5 at home
1-0-4
LLLWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.4Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.04Opponent xG: 1.47BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 20%
Danubio
LDLDD
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
16% W48% R36% P
Season (W-D-L)
4-12-9
0.96 pts / match · goal difference -9
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-3-2
0.60 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
2-5-6
Last 5 away
0-3-2
LDLDD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.4Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 1.25Opponent xG: 1.06BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 20%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Danubio is 22% better for: goals scored per match.

0.72 goals / match - Progreso · 0.88 goals / match - Danubio

Danubio is 23% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.52 goals / match - Progreso · 1.24 goals / match - Danubio

Progreso scoring profile: mixed

Progreso scores in 48% of matches (12 of 25 matches), while Danubio keeps a clean sheet in 28% (7 of 25 matches).

Danubio scoring profile: very strong

Danubio scores in 56% of matches (14 of 25 matches), while Progreso keeps a clean sheet in 8% (2 of 25 matches).

18Goals scored (season)22
ProgresoDanubio
38Goals conceded (season)31
ProgresoDanubio
2.24Average goals in match2.12
ProgresoDanubio
2Goals scored (last 5)2
ProgresoDanubio
6Goals conceded (last 5)4
ProgresoDanubio

How often they score at least...

48%1 goal56%
ProgresoDanubio
20%2 goals24%
ProgresoDanubio
4%3 goals4%
ProgresoDanubio
0%4 goals4%
ProgresoDanubio

How often they concede at least...

92%1 goal72%
ProgresoDanubio
52%2 goals36%
ProgresoDanubio
8%3 goals12%
ProgresoDanubio
0%4 goals4%
ProgresoDanubio

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

50%
League average

Goal patterns

16%BTTS at half-time12%
ProgresoDanubio
8%BTTS in both halves4%
ProgresoDanubio
16%Scored in both halves12%
ProgresoDanubio

BTTS and goal count

36%Min. 3 goals and BTTS32%
ProgresoDanubio
4%Min. 3 goals without BTTS8%
ProgresoDanubio
20%BTTS - last 520%
ProgresoDanubio

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

72%Min. 1 goal before half-time60%
ProgresoDanubio
32%Min. 2 goals before half-time24%
ProgresoDanubio
8%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
ProgresoDanubio

2nd half

76%Min. 1 goal after half-time68%
ProgresoDanubio
28%Min. 2 goals after half-time40%
ProgresoDanubio
4%Min. 3 goals after half-time20%
ProgresoDanubio

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Danubio is 79% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

0.76 pts / match - Progreso · 1.36 pts / match - Danubio

Progreso - half-time state
12% leading40% draw48% trailing
Danubio - half-time state
28% leading52% draw20% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.76Points per match (1st half)1.36
ProgresoDanubio
0.32Goals scored (1st half)0.48
ProgresoDanubio
0.84Goals conceded (1st half)0.36
ProgresoDanubio
1.16Average goals (1st half)0.84
ProgresoDanubio
40%Clean sheet before half-time68%
ProgresoDanubio
72%No goal before half-time60%
ProgresoDanubio

After half-time (2nd half)

0.88Points per match (2nd half)0.88
ProgresoDanubio
0.4Goals scored (2nd half)0.4
ProgresoDanubio
0.68Goals conceded (2nd half)0.88
ProgresoDanubio
1.08Average goals (2nd half)1.28
ProgresoDanubio
40%Clean sheet after half-time40%
ProgresoDanubio
64%No goal after half-time72%
ProgresoDanubio

Progreso - second-half results

16% W40% R44% P
19
Half-time points
8
Half-time goals
-13
Goal difference (1st half)
22
Second-half points
-7
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.76
PPG before half-time
Lead holding133%

Leads at half-time in 12% of matches and wins 16%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.2

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Danubio - second-half results

16% W40% R44% P
34
Half-time points
12
Half-time goals
+3
Goal difference (1st half)
22
Second-half points
-12
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.36
PPG before half-time
Lead holding57%

Leads at half-time in 28% of matches and wins 16%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time+0.5

Concedes 0.5 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Progreso - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.200.40
Goals scored / match0.20.2
Goals conceded / match0.21.0
Average goals in match0.41.2
1 goal40%80%
2 goals0%40%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet80%20%
No goal80%80%
Goal difference0-4
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 40% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1
Danubio - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.200.60
Goals scored / match0.40.0
Goals conceded / match0.20.6
Average goals in match0.60.6
1 goal40%40%
2 goals20%20%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet80%60%
No goal80%100%
Goal difference+1-3
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 60% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Progreso
ScoredConceded
4
6
0-15
1
8
16-30
3
7
31-45
2
5
46-60
1
6
61-75
7
6
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (7 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

Danubio
ScoredConceded
5
1
0-15
4
3
16-30
3
5
31-45
3
6
46-60
3
3
61-75
4
13
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (5 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (13). Late-goal balance (76-90): -9 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.18
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.0 : 1.2
Estimated goal split
home : away
92%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
44%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+1%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
27%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
23%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 4 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Progreso

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.31
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.49
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+2.3 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.43
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.06
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
55%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
146%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.04
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
39% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 22% come in the first quarter-hour.
39%

Danubio

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.07
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.29
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.37
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.08
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
85%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
94%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.36
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.1
Late goals
18% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 23% come in the first quarter-hour.
18%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Primera División).

Teams vs league

ProgresoLigaDanubio
Average goals in match 2.242.36 2.12
Both teams scored 40%50% 48%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 40%45% 40%
Clean sheets 8%29% 28%
Goal before half-time 72%66% 60%
Goal after half-time 76%73% 68%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.36
Average goals per match
50%
Both teams scored
45%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
29%
Clean sheets
1.32
Home goals / match
1.04
Away goals / match
+27%
Home attack advantage
+21%
Home defence advantage
+8%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
66%
1 goal
31%
2 goals
10%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
73%
1 goal
35%
2 goals
14%
3 goals
3%
4 goals

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (5): Progreso 2 - 2 - 1 Danubio. Average goals 2.20, both teams scored in 60% matches.

Danubio
1 : 2
Progreso
Danubio
2 : 2
Progreso
Club Atlético Progreso
1 : 0
Danubio Fútbol Club
Club Atlético Progreso
0 : 1
Danubio Fútbol Club
Danubio Fútbol Club
1 : 1
Club Atlético Progreso

FAQ

What was the result of Progreso vs Danubio?

The Primera División match finished Progreso 1:0 Danubio. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Progreso and Danubio?

In the last 5 head-to-head matches Progreso won 2, Danubio won 1 and 2 ended level. These games averaged 2.20 goals, with both teams scoring in 60% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Progreso vs Danubio?

Progreso score 0.72 goals per game on average and Danubio 0.88. The Primera División average is 2.36 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 45% of games. Both teams score in 40% of Progreso's matches and 48% of Danubio's.

What form are Progreso and Danubio in?

Over the last 5 games Progreso have a 1-0-4 record (0.60 points per game) and Danubio 0-3-2 (0.60 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Progreso vs Danubio?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.