Proxy vs Tersana: match statistics
Proxy vs Tersana: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Proxy played Tersana in Second Division (Egypt). The match was played on 4 September 2026. Final score: 2:0.
Current form
Proxy: 0-0-2, 0.00 points/match. Tersana: 1-1-0, 2.00 points/match.
Goal statistics
Proxy scores 0.00 and concedes 2.00 goals per match. Tersana scores 0.50 and concedes 0.00. League average: 1.88 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Proxy 0%, Tersana 0%. Over 2.5: Proxy 50%, Tersana 0%. League level: BTTS 40%, Over 2.5 32%.
xG, shots and style
Proxy has higher xG: 1.47 vs 1.27. Proxy: 13.5 shots per match, Tersana: 9.0.
Match halves
Proxy: half-time lead 0%, second-half goals 0.00. Tersana: half-time lead 50%, second-half goals 0.00.
Goals by minute
Proxy: 0-15 (0 goals). Tersana: 31-45+ (1 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Second Division: 1.88 goals per match, BTTS 40%, Over 2.5 32%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 2 previous H2H matches were available: 0-2-0. Average goals 4.00, BTTS 100%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Tersana remain unbeaten this season, recording as many as 4 draws and just 1 win in their last five matches, which significantly increases the likelihood of a share of the points. The visitors are very solid defensively away from home: they have not conceded a goal, kept a clean sheet in 100% of their matches, and allow opponents an xG of 1.48. Proxy have lost both of their league games so far and are yet to score at home despite averaging 17 shots, 5 shots on target, and an xG of 1.93. The hosts enjoy more possession, averaging 60%, but their 0% finishing efficiency could once again limit their return. Tersana average just 1 goal away from home with an xG of 1.12, so their defensive advantage points more towards a low-scoring draw than a confident away win.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
The BTTS - No pick is primarily supported by the league’s very low-scoring profile, with an average of 1.85 goals per match and only 40% of games featuring goals from both teams. Both teams have recorded 100% of matches with a clean sheet and 0% BTTS in the current season data, although the sample appears to be very small. Tersana have averaged only 0.8 goals scored over their last 5 matches, with an xG of 0.87, while the home side have posted a very strong defensive xG against figure of 0.53. Proxy have conceded an average of 1.4 goals in their last 5 appearances, but Tersana kept a clean sheet in 3 of those 5 matches and conceded just 0.6 goals per game. Both teams recorded 40% BTTS across their last five matches, which does not outweigh the indicators suggesting that at least one side may fail to score.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
The league profile clearly favors low-scoring outcomes: the average is only 1.85 goals per match, while the 2.5-goal line has been surpassed in just 35% of games. In their last five matches, Proxy averaged 1.0 goals scored and 1.4 conceded, whereas Tersana scored 0.8 and allowed opponents 0.6 goals. The quality of chances created is also limited, with average xG from the last five appearances standing at 1.14 for the home side and 0.87 for the visitors. Only 20% of Tersana’s matches exceeded 2.5 goals during this period, while both teams scored in just 40% of games. Under 3.5 offers the greatest edge, as the projected total of 1.80 goals leaves a wide margin even for a 2:1 scoreline.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
The strongest scenario is a draw at half-time and after the final whistle, as Tersana have drawn 80% of their last five matches without losing any of them. The visitors were level at the break in 80% of that sample, compared with 60% for Proxy, while the hosts scored just 0.4 goals before half-time and conceded as many as 1.0. Tersana play very cautiously after the interval: their last five matches produced an average of just 0.4 goals in the second half, with 100% of those periods ending level. The league’s low-scoring nature is confirmed by an average of 1.85 goals per match and 85% of games in which one side kept a clean sheet, limiting the likelihood of a decisive result. Proxy have a slightly better attacking xG, 1.43 compared with 1.12, but Tersana compensate with a solid defence, recording an xG conceded of 1.48 alongside a strong tendency to draw.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Proxy | Tersana | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 22% | 44% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.14 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.00 | 0.13 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Proxy scores in 0% of matches (0 of 2 matches), while Tersana keeps a clean sheet in 100% (2 of 2 matches).
Tersana scores in 50% of matches (1 of 2 matches), while Proxy keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 2 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Proxy
Over / Under - Tersana
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Proxy - second-half results
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Tersana - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 50% of matches and wins 50%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.00 | 0.50 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.5 | 0.5 |
| Average goals in match | 1.5 | 0.5 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 50% |
| 2 goals | 50% | 0% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 0% | 50% |
| No goal | 100% | 100% |
| Goal difference | -3 | -1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 2.00 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.5 | 0.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Average goals in match | 0.5 | 0.0 |
| 1 goal | 50% | 0% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 0% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 100% | 100% |
| No goal | 50% | 100% |
| Goal difference | +1 | 0 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Concedes most in 0-15 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (1 goal). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Proxy
Tersana
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Second Division).
Teams vs league
| Proxy | Liga | Tersana | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 2.00 | 1.88 | ▼ 0.50 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 0% | 40% | ▼ 0% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 50% | 32% | ▼ 0% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 0% | 40% | ▲ 100% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 100% | 48% | ▲ 50% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 50% | 72% | ▼ 0% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Other recorded players
Away team
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
- ProxyGoalAllasana Doumbia
- ProxyGoalAllasana Doumbia
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (2): Proxy 0 - 2 - 0 Tersana. Average goals 4.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Proxy vs Tersana?
The Second Division match finished Proxy 2:0 Tersana. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Proxy and Tersana?
In the last 2 head-to-head matches Proxy won 0, Tersana won 0 and 2 ended level. These games averaged 4.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Proxy vs Tersana?
Proxy score 0.00 goals per game on average and Tersana 0.50. The Second Division average is 1.88 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 32% of games. Both teams score in 0% of Proxy's matches and 0% of Tersana's.
What form are Proxy and Tersana in?
Over the last 5 games Proxy have a 0-0-2 record (0.00 points per game) and Tersana 1-1-0 (2.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Proxy vs Tersana?
The statistical background for Proxy vs Tersana — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.