Indonesia - Liga 1Data current as of 07 September 2026

PSBS Biak Numfor vs PSIM Yogyakarta: match statistics

125%(2.88)
X30%(3.74)
245%(2.10)

PSIM Yogyakarta presents significantly better form and statistics compared to the hosts. PSBS Biak Numfor occupies 16th place in the table with only 27% wins at home and a negative goal difference (-4) at their own stadium. The guests, from the 8th position, have 36% wins on the road and a positive goal difference (+1), as well as a higher average possession (56% vs 50%) and a better shot conversion rate (11% vs 9%). PSBS has not won any of their last 5 home matches, while PSIM has shown solid form in their last 5 away matches with three victories. The hosts' weak form in the last five meetings (only 1 point per match) and low offensive efficiency (45% of matches without scoring a goal at home) further argue for a favorable result for the guests.

PSBS Biak Numfor vs PSIM Yogyakarta: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

PSBS Biak Numfor played PSIM Yogyakarta in Liga 1 (Indonesia). The match was played on 27 February 2026. Final score: 2:4.

Current form

PSBS Biak Numfor: 0-2-3, 0.40 points/match. PSIM Yogyakarta: 0-3-2, 0.60 points/match.

Goal statistics

PSBS Biak Numfor scores 1.09 and concedes 2.05 goals per match. PSIM Yogyakarta scores 1.32 and concedes 1.27. League average: 2.64 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: PSBS Biak Numfor 64%, PSIM Yogyakarta 50%. Over 2.5: PSBS Biak Numfor 73%, PSIM Yogyakarta 50%. League level: BTTS 53%, Over 2.5 51%.

xG, shots and style

PSIM Yogyakarta has higher xG: 1.59 vs 1.30. PSBS Biak Numfor: 11.3 shots per match, PSIM Yogyakarta: 13.1.

Match halves

PSBS Biak Numfor: half-time lead 14%, second-half goals 0.64. PSIM Yogyakarta: half-time lead 18%, second-half goals 0.95.

Goals by minute

PSBS Biak Numfor: 31-45+ (7 goals). PSIM Yogyakarta: 61-75 (9 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Liga 1: 2.64 goals per match, BTTS 53%, Over 2.5 51%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-1-0. Average goals 4.00, BTTS 100%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

PSIM Yogyakarta presents significantly better form and statistics compared to the hosts. PSBS Biak Numfor occupies 16th place in the table with only 27% wins at home and a negative goal difference (-4) at their own stadium. The guests, from the 8th position, have 36% wins on the road and a positive goal difference (+1), as well as a higher average possession (56% vs 50%) and a better shot conversion rate (11% vs 9%). PSBS has not won any of their last 5 home matches, while PSIM has shown solid form in their last 5 away matches with three victories. The hosts' weak form in the last five meetings (only 1 point per match) and low offensive efficiency (45% of matches without scoring a goal at home) further argue for a favorable result for the guests.

View the statistical overview

Half-by-half

1 : 1
1st half
1 : 3
2nd half

Match statistics

47Possession (%)53
PSBS Biak NumforPSIM Yogyakarta
19Shots23
PSBS Biak NumforPSIM Yogyakarta
8Shots on target7
PSBS Biak NumforPSIM Yogyakarta
2.2xG2.46
PSBS Biak NumforPSIM Yogyakarta
7Corners5
PSBS Biak NumforPSIM Yogyakarta
62Dangerous attacks73
PSBS Biak NumforPSIM Yogyakarta
5Fouls15
PSBS Biak NumforPSIM Yogyakarta
2Cards3
PSBS Biak NumforPSIM Yogyakarta

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

PSBS Biak NumforPSIM Yogyakarta
1.09Goals scored / match1.32
PSBS Biak NumforPSIM Yogyakarta
2.05Goals conceded / match1.27
PSBS Biak NumforPSIM Yogyakarta
46%Average possession59%
PSBS Biak NumforPSIM Yogyakarta
3.73Shots on target / match4.55
PSBS Biak NumforPSIM Yogyakarta

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

11.32Shots per match13.09
PSBS Biak NumforPSIM Yogyakarta
3.73Shots on target4.55
PSBS Biak NumforPSIM Yogyakarta
9.6%Shot conversion10.1%
PSBS Biak NumforPSIM Yogyakarta
46%Possession59%
PSBS Biak NumforPSIM Yogyakarta
1.3xG for1.59
PSBS Biak NumforPSIM Yogyakarta
1.74xG against1.42
PSBS Biak NumforPSIM Yogyakarta

Shooting quality

PSBS Biak Numfor: BalancedPSIM Yogyakarta: Balanced
PSBS Biak NumforPSIM Yogyakarta
Accuracy (shots on target)33%35%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.290.29

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

PSIM Yogyakarta is 50% better for: last-5 form.

0.4 pts / match - PSBS Biak Numfor · 0.6 pts / match - PSIM Yogyakarta

PSBS Biak Numfor
LDLLD
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
18% W27% R55% P
Season (W-D-L)
4-6-12
0.82 pts / match · goal difference -21
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-2-3
0.40 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
3-3-5
Last 5 at home
3-0-2
WWLWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.6Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.37Opponent xG: 1.72BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 40%
PSIM Yogyakarta
LLDDD
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
36% W41% R23% P
Season (W-D-L)
8-9-5
1.50 pts / match · goal difference +1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-3-2
0.60 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
4-4-3
Last 5 away
1-2-2
LDWLD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 2.0xG: 1.71Opponent xG: 1.52BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 80%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

PSIM Yogyakarta is 21% better for: goals scored per match.

1.09 goals / match - PSBS Biak Numfor · 1.32 goals / match - PSIM Yogyakarta

PSIM Yogyakarta is 61% better for: goals conceded per match.

2.05 goals / match - PSBS Biak Numfor · 1.27 goals / match - PSIM Yogyakarta

PSBS Biak Numfor scoring profile: strong

PSBS Biak Numfor scores in 64% of matches (14 of 22 matches), while PSIM Yogyakarta keeps a clean sheet in 36% (8 of 22 matches).

PSIM Yogyakarta scoring profile: very strong

PSIM Yogyakarta scores in 77% of matches (17 of 22 matches), while PSBS Biak Numfor keeps a clean sheet in 14% (3 of 22 matches).

24Goals scored (season)29
PSBS Biak NumforPSIM Yogyakarta
45Goals conceded (season)28
PSBS Biak NumforPSIM Yogyakarta
3.14Average goals in match2.59
PSBS Biak NumforPSIM Yogyakarta
3Goals scored (last 5)6
PSBS Biak NumforPSIM Yogyakarta
6Goals conceded (last 5)10
PSBS Biak NumforPSIM Yogyakarta

How often they score at least...

64%1 goal77%
PSBS Biak NumforPSIM Yogyakarta
32%2 goals41%
PSBS Biak NumforPSIM Yogyakarta
9%3 goals14%
PSBS Biak NumforPSIM Yogyakarta
5%4 goals0%
PSBS Biak NumforPSIM Yogyakarta

How often they concede at least...

86%1 goal64%
PSBS Biak NumforPSIM Yogyakarta
59%2 goals41%
PSBS Biak NumforPSIM Yogyakarta
32%3 goals18%
PSBS Biak NumforPSIM Yogyakarta
14%4 goals5%
PSBS Biak NumforPSIM Yogyakarta

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

64%
PSBS Biak Numfor - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.14 of 22 matches
53%
League average

Goal patterns

18%BTTS at half-time14%
PSBS Biak NumforPSIM Yogyakarta
9%BTTS in both halves5%
PSBS Biak NumforPSIM Yogyakarta
9%Scored in both halves18%
PSBS Biak NumforPSIM Yogyakarta

BTTS and goal count

59%Min. 3 goals and BTTS36%
PSBS Biak NumforPSIM Yogyakarta
14%Min. 3 goals without BTTS14%
PSBS Biak NumforPSIM Yogyakarta
60%BTTS - last 560%
PSBS Biak NumforPSIM Yogyakarta

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

68%Min. 1 goal before half-time55%
PSBS Biak NumforPSIM Yogyakarta
36%Min. 2 goals before half-time23%
PSBS Biak NumforPSIM Yogyakarta
14%Min. 3 goals before half-time9%
PSBS Biak NumforPSIM Yogyakarta

2nd half

82%Min. 1 goal after half-time86%
PSBS Biak NumforPSIM Yogyakarta
59%Min. 2 goals after half-time59%
PSBS Biak NumforPSIM Yogyakarta
32%Min. 3 goals after half-time23%
PSBS Biak NumforPSIM Yogyakarta

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

PSIM Yogyakarta is 22% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

0.86 pts / match - PSBS Biak Numfor · 1.05 pts / match - PSIM Yogyakarta

PSBS Biak Numfor - half-time state
14% leading45% draw41% trailing
PSIM Yogyakarta - half-time state
18% leading50% draw32% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.86Points per match (1st half)1.05
PSBS Biak NumforPSIM Yogyakarta
0.45Goals scored (1st half)0.36
PSBS Biak NumforPSIM Yogyakarta
0.77Goals conceded (1st half)0.5
PSBS Biak NumforPSIM Yogyakarta
1.23Average goals (1st half)0.86
PSBS Biak NumforPSIM Yogyakarta
41%Clean sheet before half-time59%
PSBS Biak NumforPSIM Yogyakarta
73%No goal before half-time73%
PSBS Biak NumforPSIM Yogyakarta

After half-time (2nd half)

0.95Points per match (2nd half)1.68
PSBS Biak NumforPSIM Yogyakarta
0.64Goals scored (2nd half)0.95
PSBS Biak NumforPSIM Yogyakarta
1.27Goals conceded (2nd half)0.77
PSBS Biak NumforPSIM Yogyakarta
1.91Average goals (2nd half)1.73
PSBS Biak NumforPSIM Yogyakarta
32%Clean sheet after half-time50%
PSBS Biak NumforPSIM Yogyakarta
55%No goal after half-time32%
PSBS Biak NumforPSIM Yogyakarta

PSBS Biak Numfor - second-half results

23% W27% R50% P
19
Half-time points
10
Half-time goals
-7
Goal difference (1st half)
21
Second-half points
-14
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.86
PPG before half-time
Lead holding129%

Leads at half-time in 14% of matches and wins 18%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.5

Concedes 0.5 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

PSIM Yogyakarta - second-half results

45% W32% R23% P
23
Half-time points
8
Half-time goals
-3
Goal difference (1st half)
37
Second-half points
+4
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.05
PPG before half-time
Lead holding200%

Leads at half-time in 18% of matches and wins 36%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.3

Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

PSBS Biak Numfor - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.001.00
Goals scored / match0.20.4
Goals conceded / match0.40.8
Average goals in match0.61.2
1 goal60%80%
2 goals0%40%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal80%60%
Goal difference-1-2
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1
PSIM Yogyakarta - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.401.20
Goals scored / match0.21.0
Goals conceded / match1.01.0
Average goals in match1.22.0
1 goal80%80%
2 goals40%80%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet20%20%
No goal80%40%
Goal difference-40
Half-time: 0% leading - 40% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 60% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 1

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

PSBS Biak Numfor
ScoredConceded
2
3
0-15
1
7
16-30
7
7
31-45
2
6
46-60
5
8
61-75
7
14
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (7 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (14). Late-goal balance (76-90): -7 - late phases are a weakness.

PSIM Yogyakarta
ScoredConceded
1
1
0-15
1
4
16-30
6
6
31-45
4
5
46-60
9
3
61-75
8
9
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (9 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.87
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.2 : 1.7
Estimated goal split
home : away
109%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
57%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+40%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
49%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
8%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 13 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

PSBS Biak Numfor

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.44
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.52
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+3.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.21
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.31
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
72%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
181%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.42
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
29% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 8% come in the first quarter-hour.
29%

PSIM Yogyakarta

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.17
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.12
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.27
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.15
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
117%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
84%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.90
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.6
Late goals
28% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 3% come in the first quarter-hour.
28%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Liga 1).

Teams vs league

PSBS Biak NumforLigaPSIM Yogyakarta
Average goals in match 3.142.64 2.59
Both teams scored 64%53% 50%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 73%51% 50%
Clean sheets 14%26% 36%
Goal before half-time 68%70% 55%
Goal after half-time 82%82% 86%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.64
Average goals per match
53%
Both teams scored
51%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
26%
Clean sheets
1.51
Home goals / match
1.13
Away goals / match
+34%
Home attack advantage
+25%
Home defence advantage
+14%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
70%
1 goal
28%
2 goals
7%
3 goals
1%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
82%
1 goal
50%
2 goals
20%
3 goals
4%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. PSIM YogyakartaYellow cardJosé Pedro Magalhães Valente
  2. PSBS Biak NumforSubstitutionOn: Ilham Udin ArmaiynOff: Damianus Adiman Putra
  3. PSBS Biak NumforYellow cardNurhidayat Haji Haris
  4. PSBS Biak NumforSubstitutionOn: Heri SusantoOff: Arif Budiyono
  5. PSIM YogyakartaYellow cardNolberto Ezequiel Vidal
  6. PSBS Biak NumforSubstitutionOn: Iqbal Hadi PerdanaOff: Nelson Alom
  7. PSBS Biak NumforYellow cardIlham Udin Armaiyn
  8. PSIM YogyakartaYellow cardAndi Irfan

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: PSBS Biak Numfor 0 - 1 - 0 PSIM Yogyakarta. Average goals 4.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.

FAQ

What was the result of PSBS Biak Numfor vs PSIM Yogyakarta?

The Liga 1 match finished PSBS Biak Numfor 2:4 PSIM Yogyakarta. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before PSBS Biak Numfor vs PSIM Yogyakarta?

PSBS Biak Numfor score 1.09 goals per game on average and PSIM Yogyakarta 1.32. The Liga 1 average is 2.64 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 51% of games. Both teams score in 64% of PSBS Biak Numfor's matches and 50% of PSIM Yogyakarta's.

What form are PSBS Biak Numfor and PSIM Yogyakarta in?

Over the last 5 games PSBS Biak Numfor have a 0-2-3 record (0.40 points per game) and PSIM Yogyakarta 0-3-2 (0.60 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for PSBS Biak Numfor vs PSIM Yogyakarta?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.