Egypt - Egyptian Premier LeagueData current as of 24 July 2026

Pyramids FC vs Ceramica Cleopatra: match statistics

155%(1.94)
X25%(2.81)
220%(4.30)

Pyramids FC displays impressive home form with a 75% win rate at home and only 13% losses, confirming their dominance at their own stadium. The hosts have an advantage in the average goals scored in home matches (1.75) and maintain a solid defense, conceding an average of just 0.5 goals per match. Ceramica Cleopatra, despite being the league leaders, shows weaker away form with a 50% win rate and 25% losses, and their last five overall matches have yielded only an average of 1.8 points per game. xG statistics indicate Pyramids' superiority (1.86 xG For vs the visitors' 1.08 xG For in away matches), suggesting a higher quality of chances created. Considering the hosts' excellent recent run (4 wins in the last 5 matches) and their ball possession dominance (68%), Pyramids FC has a real chance of victory, although Ceramica Cleopatra's quality does not rule out a draw.

Pyramids FC vs Ceramica Cleopatra: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Pyramids FC play Ceramica Cleopatra in Egyptian Premier League (Egypt). The match date is 20 February 2026 at 20:30. Final score: 1:0.

Current form

Pyramids FC: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match. Ceramica Cleopatra: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

Pyramids FC scores 1.65 and concedes 0.81 goals per match. Ceramica Cleopatra scores 1.31 and concedes 0.81. League average: 2.02 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Pyramids FC 54%, Ceramica Cleopatra 42%. Over 2.5: Pyramids FC 50%, Ceramica Cleopatra 23%. League level: BTTS 47%, Over 2.5 34%.

xG, shots and style

Pyramids FC has higher xG: 1.64 vs 1.19. Pyramids FC: 14.8 shots per match, Ceramica Cleopatra: 9.8.

Match halves

Pyramids FC: half-time lead 38%, second-half goals 0.92. Ceramica Cleopatra: half-time lead 35%, second-half goals 0.77.

Goals by minute

Pyramids FC: 61-75 (11 goals). Ceramica Cleopatra: 76-90+ (9 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Egyptian Premier League: 2.02 goals per match, BTTS 47%, Over 2.5 34%.

Head-to-head

1 H2H matches: 0-1-0. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 100%.

Match description

Pyramids FC displays impressive home form with a 75% win rate at home and only 13% losses, confirming their dominance at their own stadium. The hosts have an advantage in the average goals scored in home matches (1.75) and maintain a solid defense, conceding an average of just 0.5 goals per match. Ceramica Cleopatra, despite being the league leaders, shows weaker away form with a 50% win rate and 25% losses, and their last five overall matches have yielded only an average of 1.8 points per game. xG statistics indicate Pyramids' superiority (1.86 xG For vs the visitors' 1.08 xG For in away matches), suggesting a higher quality of chances created. Considering the hosts' excellent recent run (4 wins in the last 5 matches) and their ball possession dominance (68%), Pyramids FC has a real chance of victory, although Ceramica Cleopatra's quality does not rule out a draw.

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
1 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

60Possession (%)40
Pyramids FCCeramica Cleopatra
23Shots4
Pyramids FCCeramica Cleopatra
11Shots on target0
Pyramids FCCeramica Cleopatra
0xG0
Pyramids FCCeramica Cleopatra
9Corners2
Pyramids FCCeramica Cleopatra
0Dangerous attacks0
Pyramids FCCeramica Cleopatra
13Fouls7
Pyramids FCCeramica Cleopatra
2Cards2
Pyramids FCCeramica Cleopatra

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Pyramids FCCeramica Cleopatra
1.65Goals scored / match1.31
Pyramids FCCeramica Cleopatra
0.81Goals conceded / match0.81
Pyramids FCCeramica Cleopatra
59%Average possession57%
Pyramids FCCeramica Cleopatra
5.27Shots on target / match3.81
Pyramids FCCeramica Cleopatra

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

14.85Shots per match9.81
Pyramids FCCeramica Cleopatra
5.27Shots on target3.81
Pyramids FCCeramica Cleopatra
11.1%Shot conversion13.3%
Pyramids FCCeramica Cleopatra
59%Possession57%
Pyramids FCCeramica Cleopatra
1.64xG for1.19
Pyramids FCCeramica Cleopatra
0.83xG against1.24
Pyramids FCCeramica Cleopatra

Shooting quality

Pyramids FC: DominantCeramica Cleopatra: Efficient finishing
Pyramids FCCeramica Cleopatra
Accuracy (shots on target)35%39%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.310.34

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Pyramids FC is 100% better for: last-5 form.

2 pts / match - Pyramids FC · 1 pts / match - Ceramica Cleopatra

Pyramids FC
LWWDW
Season result split
62% W23% R15% P
Season (W-D-L)
16-6-4
2.08 pts / match · goal difference +22
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-1-1
2.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
10-2-2
Last 5 at home
3-1-1
LDWWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.8Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.35Opponent xG: 0.95BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%
Ceramica Cleopatra
DWLDL
Season result split
46% W31% R23% P
Season (W-D-L)
12-8-6
1.69 pts / match · goal difference +13
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
5-4-4
Last 5 away
1-2-2
LDDWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 1.06Opponent xG: 1.18BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 0%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Pyramids FC is 26% better for: goals scored per match.

1.65 goals / match - Pyramids FC · 1.31 goals / match - Ceramica Cleopatra

Pyramids FC scoring profile: very strong

Pyramids FC scores in 88% of matches (23 of 26 matches), while Ceramica Cleopatra keeps a clean sheet in 38% (10 of 26 matches).

Ceramica Cleopatra scoring profile: strong

Ceramica Cleopatra scores in 77% of matches (20 of 26 matches), while Pyramids FC keeps a clean sheet in 38% (10 of 26 matches).

43Goals scored (season)34
Pyramids FCCeramica Cleopatra
21Goals conceded (season)21
Pyramids FCCeramica Cleopatra
2.46Average goals in match2.12
Pyramids FCCeramica Cleopatra
9Goals scored (last 5)4
Pyramids FCCeramica Cleopatra
5Goals conceded (last 5)4
Pyramids FCCeramica Cleopatra

How often they score at least...

88%1 goal77%
Pyramids FCCeramica Cleopatra
54%2 goals42%
Pyramids FCCeramica Cleopatra
19%3 goals12%
Pyramids FCCeramica Cleopatra
4%4 goals0%
Pyramids FCCeramica Cleopatra

How often they concede at least...

62%1 goal62%
Pyramids FCCeramica Cleopatra
19%2 goals15%
Pyramids FCCeramica Cleopatra
0%3 goals4%
Pyramids FCCeramica Cleopatra
0%4 goals0%
Pyramids FCCeramica Cleopatra

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

42%
Ceramica Cleopatra - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.11 of 26 matches
47%
League average

Goal patterns

27%BTTS at half-time15%
Pyramids FCCeramica Cleopatra
4%BTTS in both halves8%
Pyramids FCCeramica Cleopatra
42%Scored in both halves23%
Pyramids FCCeramica Cleopatra

BTTS and goal count

42%Min. 3 goals and BTTS19%
Pyramids FCCeramica Cleopatra
8%Min. 3 goals without BTTS4%
Pyramids FCCeramica Cleopatra
60%BTTS - last 540%
Pyramids FCCeramica Cleopatra

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

62%Min. 1 goal before half-time58%
Pyramids FCCeramica Cleopatra
31%Min. 2 goals before half-time19%
Pyramids FCCeramica Cleopatra
8%Min. 3 goals before half-time12%
Pyramids FCCeramica Cleopatra

2nd half

85%Min. 1 goal after half-time81%
Pyramids FCCeramica Cleopatra
38%Min. 2 goals after half-time38%
Pyramids FCCeramica Cleopatra
15%Min. 3 goals after half-time4%
Pyramids FCCeramica Cleopatra

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Pyramids FC is 15% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.73 pts / match - Pyramids FC · 1.5 pts / match - Ceramica Cleopatra

Pyramids FC - half-time state
38% leading58% draw4% trailing
Ceramica Cleopatra - half-time state
35% leading46% draw19% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.73Points per match (1st half)1.5
Pyramids FCCeramica Cleopatra
0.73Goals scored (1st half)0.54
Pyramids FCCeramica Cleopatra
0.35Goals conceded (1st half)0.35
Pyramids FCCeramica Cleopatra
1.08Average goals (1st half)0.88
Pyramids FCCeramica Cleopatra
69%Clean sheet before half-time69%
Pyramids FCCeramica Cleopatra
42%No goal before half-time58%
Pyramids FCCeramica Cleopatra

After half-time (2nd half)

1.85Points per match (2nd half)1.62
Pyramids FCCeramica Cleopatra
0.92Goals scored (2nd half)0.77
Pyramids FCCeramica Cleopatra
0.46Goals conceded (2nd half)0.46
Pyramids FCCeramica Cleopatra
1.38Average goals (2nd half)1.23
Pyramids FCCeramica Cleopatra
58%Clean sheet after half-time58%
Pyramids FCCeramica Cleopatra
27%No goal after half-time42%
Pyramids FCCeramica Cleopatra

Pyramids FC - second-half results

50% W35% R15% P
45
Half-time points
19
Half-time goals
+10
Goal difference (1st half)
48
Second-half points
+12
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.73
PPG before half-time
Lead holding163%

Leads at half-time in 38% of matches and wins 62%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Ceramica Cleopatra - second-half results

42% W35% R23% P
39
Half-time points
14
Half-time goals
+5
Goal difference (1st half)
42
Second-half points
+8
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.50
PPG before half-time
Lead holding131%

Leads at half-time in 35% of matches and wins 46%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Pyramids FC - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.401.60
Goals scored / match1.00.8
Goals conceded / match0.80.2
Average goals in match1.81.0
1 goal60%60%
2 goals60%20%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet40%80%
No goal40%60%
Goal difference+1+3
Half-time: 20% leading - 80% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 60% - Half-time goals total: 5
Ceramica Cleopatra - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.601.00
Goals scored / match0.60.2
Goals conceded / match0.40.4
Average goals in match1.00.6
1 goal80%60%
2 goals20%0%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet60%60%
No goal40%80%
Goal difference+1-1
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Pyramids FC
ScoredConceded
3
3
0-15
7
2
16-30
9
4
31-45
3
5
46-60
11
2
61-75
10
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (11 goli). Concedes most in 46-60 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +5 - wins late phases.

Ceramica Cleopatra
ScoredConceded
3
2
0-15
5
3
16-30
6
4
31-45
6
3
46-60
5
2
61-75
9
7
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (9 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.29
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.2 : 1.1
Estimated goal split
home : away
113%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
48%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-13%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
68%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
3%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 33 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Pyramids FC

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.81
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.03
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-9.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.01
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.02
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
159%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
83%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.08
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
23% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 7% come in the first quarter-hour.
23%

Ceramica Cleopatra

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.05
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.55
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-12.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.12
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.43
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
134%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
78%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.69
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
26% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 9% come in the first quarter-hour.
26%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Egyptian Premier League).

Teams vs league

Pyramids FCLigaCeramica Cleopatra
Average goals in match 2.462.02 2.12
Both teams scored 54%47% 42%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 50%34% 23%
Clean sheets 38%35% 38%
Goal before half-time 62%58% 58%
Goal after half-time 85%70% 81%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.02
Average goals per match
47%
Both teams scored
34%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
35%
Clean sheets
1.04
Home goals / match
0.98
Away goals / match
+6%
Home attack advantage
+6%
Home defence advantage
+6%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
58%
1 goal
21%
2 goals
7%
3 goals
1%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
70%
1 goal
34%
2 goals
9%
3 goals
3%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Pyramids FC 0 - 1 - 0 Ceramica Cleopatra. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.

FAQ

What was the result of Pyramids FC vs Ceramica Cleopatra?

The Egyptian Premier League match finished Pyramids FC 1:0 Ceramica Cleopatra. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Pyramids FC vs Ceramica Cleopatra?

Pyramids FC score 1.65 goals per game on average and Ceramica Cleopatra 1.31. The Egyptian Premier League average is 2.02 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 34% of games. Both teams score in 54% of Pyramids FC's matches and 42% of Ceramica Cleopatra's.

What form are Pyramids FC and Ceramica Cleopatra in?

Over the last 5 games Pyramids FC have a 3-1-1 record (2.00 points per game) and Ceramica Cleopatra 1-2-2 (1.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Pyramids FC vs Ceramica Cleopatra?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Pyramids FC vs Ceramica Cleopatra: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.