Pyramids FC vs Ceramica Cleopatra: match statistics
Pyramids FC displays impressive home form with a 75% win rate at home and only 13% losses, confirming their dominance at their own stadium. The hosts have an advantage in the average goals scored in home matches (1.75) and maintain a solid defense, conceding an average of just 0.5 goals per match. Ceramica Cleopatra, despite being the league leaders, shows weaker away form with a 50% win rate and 25% losses, and their last five overall matches have yielded only an average of 1.8 points per game. xG statistics indicate Pyramids' superiority (1.86 xG For vs the visitors' 1.08 xG For in away matches), suggesting a higher quality of chances created. Considering the hosts' excellent recent run (4 wins in the last 5 matches) and their ball possession dominance (68%), Pyramids FC has a real chance of victory, although Ceramica Cleopatra's quality does not rule out a draw.
Pyramids FC vs Ceramica Cleopatra: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Pyramids FC played Ceramica Cleopatra in Egyptian Premier League (Egypt). The match was played on 20 February 2026. Final score: 1:0.
Current form
Pyramids FC: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match. Ceramica Cleopatra: 4-0-1, 2.40 points/match.
Goal statistics
Pyramids FC scores 1.67 and concedes 0.80 goals per match. Ceramica Cleopatra scores 1.56 and concedes 0.69. League average: 2.00 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Pyramids FC 53%, Ceramica Cleopatra 31%. Over 2.5: Pyramids FC 53%, Ceramica Cleopatra 31%. League level: BTTS 46%, Over 2.5 33%.
xG, shots and style
Pyramids FC has higher xG: 1.71 vs 1.24. Pyramids FC: 15.1 shots per match, Ceramica Cleopatra: 10.8.
Match halves
Pyramids FC: half-time lead 47%, second-half goals 0.93. Ceramica Cleopatra: half-time lead 31%, second-half goals 1.00.
Goals by minute
Pyramids FC: 61-75 (7 goals). Ceramica Cleopatra: 76-90+ (7 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Egyptian Premier League: 2.00 goals per match, BTTS 46%, Over 2.5 33%.
Head-to-head
No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Pyramids FC displays impressive home form with a 75% win rate at home and only 13% losses, confirming their dominance at their own stadium. The hosts have an advantage in the average goals scored in home matches (1.75) and maintain a solid defense, conceding an average of just 0.5 goals per match. Ceramica Cleopatra, despite being the league leaders, shows weaker away form with a 50% win rate and 25% losses, and their last five overall matches have yielded only an average of 1.8 points per game. xG statistics indicate Pyramids' superiority (1.86 xG For vs the visitors' 1.08 xG For in away matches), suggesting a higher quality of chances created. Considering the hosts' excellent recent run (4 wins in the last 5 matches) and their ball possession dominance (68%), Pyramids FC has a real chance of victory, although Ceramica Cleopatra's quality does not rule out a draw.
View the statistical overviewHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Pyramids FC | Ceramica Cleopatra | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 36% | 39% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.31 | 0.37 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Ceramica Cleopatra is 50% better for: last-5 form.
1.6 pts / match - Pyramids FC · 2.4 pts / match - Ceramica Cleopatra
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Pyramids FC is 7% better for: goals scored per match.
1.67 goals / match - Pyramids FC · 1.56 goals / match - Ceramica Cleopatra
Ceramica Cleopatra is 16% better for: goals conceded per match.
0.8 goals / match - Pyramids FC · 0.69 goals / match - Ceramica Cleopatra
Pyramids FC scores in 93% of matches (14 of 15 matches), while Ceramica Cleopatra keeps a clean sheet in 56% (9 of 16 matches).
Ceramica Cleopatra scores in 81% of matches (13 of 16 matches), while Pyramids FC keeps a clean sheet in 47% (7 of 15 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Pyramids FC
Over / Under - Ceramica Cleopatra
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Pyramids FC is 30% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.87 pts / match - Pyramids FC · 1.44 pts / match - Ceramica Cleopatra
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Pyramids FC - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 47% of matches and wins 60%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Ceramica Cleopatra - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 31% of matches and wins 69%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.40 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.8 | 0.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 0.8 |
| Average goals in match | 1.4 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 20% |
| No goal | 20% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +1 | 0 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.40 | 2.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.0 | 1.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.0 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 2.0 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 60% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 60% |
| No goal | 40% | 0% |
| Goal difference | 0 | +5 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (7 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (7 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Pyramids FC
Ceramica Cleopatra
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Egyptian Premier League).
Teams vs league
| Pyramids FC | Liga | Ceramica Cleopatra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 2.47 | 2.00 | ▲ 2.25 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 53% | 46% | ▼ 31% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 53% | 33% | ▼ 31% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 47% | 35% | ▲ 56% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 73% | 57% | ▼ 50% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 87% | 68% | ▲ 81% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
FAQ
What was the result of Pyramids FC vs Ceramica Cleopatra?
The Egyptian Premier League match finished Pyramids FC 1:0 Ceramica Cleopatra. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Pyramids FC vs Ceramica Cleopatra?
Pyramids FC score 1.67 goals per game on average and Ceramica Cleopatra 1.56. The Egyptian Premier League average is 2.00 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 33% of games. Both teams score in 53% of Pyramids FC's matches and 31% of Ceramica Cleopatra's.
What form are Pyramids FC and Ceramica Cleopatra in?
Over the last 5 games Pyramids FC have a 2-2-1 record (1.60 points per game) and Ceramica Cleopatra 4-0-1 (2.40 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Pyramids FC vs Ceramica Cleopatra?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Pyramids FC vs Ceramica Cleopatra: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.