Egypt - Egyptian Premier League30 June Air Defence StadiumData current as of 17 October 2026

Pyramids FC vs Ceramica Cleopatra: match statistics

Pyramids FC vs Ceramica Cleopatra: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Pyramids FC played Ceramica Cleopatra in Egyptian Premier League (Egypt). The match was played on 12 October 2026. Venue: 30 June Air Defence Stadium. Final score: 4:1.

Current form

Pyramids FC: 5-0-0, 3.00 points/match. Ceramica Cleopatra: 4-0-1, 2.40 points/match.

Goal statistics

Pyramids FC scores 1.80 and concedes 0.20 goals per match. Ceramica Cleopatra scores 2.00 and concedes 0.60. League average: 2.11 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Pyramids FC 20%, Ceramica Cleopatra 40%. Over 2.5: Pyramids FC 40%, Ceramica Cleopatra 40%. League level: BTTS 41%, Over 2.5 31%.

xG, shots and style

Pyramids FC has higher xG: 1.52 vs 1.38. Pyramids FC: 13.4 shots per match, Ceramica Cleopatra: 11.0.

Match halves

Pyramids FC: half-time lead 60%, second-half goals 1.20. Ceramica Cleopatra: half-time lead 60%, second-half goals 1.40.

Goals by minute

Pyramids FC: 61-75 (3 goals). Ceramica Cleopatra: 46-60 (3 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Egyptian Premier League: 2.11 goals per match, BTTS 41%, Over 2.5 31%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 2 previous H2H matches were available: 1-1-0. Average goals 1.50, BTTS 50%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Pyramids FC have won all of their last 5 matches, while Ceramica Cleopatra have won 4 of their last 5, giving the hosts a slightly stronger run of form heading into this fixture. At home, Pyramids average 15.5 shots per match, compared with 9.5 for Ceramica away, and also lead in chance quality, with 1.79 to 1.31 xG. The hosts’ defence looks stronger as well: they have yet to concede a goal at home, while Ceramica concede an average of 0.5 goals on the road. However, the visitors remain dangerous, averaging 2.5 goals away from home with a 26% shot-conversion rate, compared with Pyramids’ 1.5 goals and 10% at home. Pyramids’ advantage in chance creation and defensive solidity makes them favourites, although Ceramica’s finishing limits confidence in this prediction.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Both teams score regularly: the hosts average 1.67 goals in home matches, while the visitors average 2.5 away, so a goal at both ends cannot be ruled out. However, the stronger signal comes from the defenses: Pyramids FC keep a clean sheet in 67% of their home matches and concede an average of 0.67 goals, while Ceramica Cleopatra record clean sheets in 50% of their away matches and concede an average of 0.5 goals. This translates into a relatively low BTTS rate—33% and 50%, respectively, compared with the league average of 38%. In the visitors’ last five matches, BTTS - Yes landed in just 20% of cases, further tilting the forecast toward BTTS - No: at least one team is expected not to score.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The strongest signal is Over 1.5 goals: both teams have gone over this line in 100% of their matches so far, and neither has ended a game without scoring. Pyramids average 1.67 goals, while Ceramica average 2.5, although their average xG figures are lower, at 1.44 and 1.31 respectively, so I take a more cautious view and project 2.5 goals in total. Both defences are solid — the hosts concede an average of 0.67 goals and the visitors 0.5 — limiting the case for higher goal lines. Over 2.5 goals has landed in 33% of Pyramids’ matches and 50% of Ceramica’s, compared with 32% across the league as a whole. Therefore, Over 1.5 goals is the better pick than risking a game with three or more goals.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Pyramids FC have won their last five matches, scoring an average of 2.6 goals, while Ceramica Cleopatra have won four of their last five and averaged 1.8 goals. The home side had a lead at the break in 60% of these matches, compared with 40% for the visitors; they scored an average of 1.4 and 0.4 goals before half-time, respectively. This points to Pyramids FC leading at the break, and their greater attacking efficiency in recent matches increases the likelihood of them holding on to their advantage until the final whistle. However, the risk of a turnaround is significant, as Ceramica Cleopatra average 2.0 goals after half-time away from home, compared with the home side’s 1.0 goal in their home matches.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

3 : 1
1st half
1 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

38Possession (%)62
Pyramids FCCeramica Cleopatra
18Shots10
Pyramids FCCeramica Cleopatra
6Shots on target5
Pyramids FCCeramica Cleopatra
1.7xG1.22
Pyramids FCCeramica Cleopatra
4Corners2
Pyramids FCCeramica Cleopatra
21Dangerous attacks31
Pyramids FCCeramica Cleopatra
13Fouls7
Pyramids FCCeramica Cleopatra
2Cards4
Pyramids FCCeramica Cleopatra

Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Pyramids FCCeramica Cleopatra
1.8Goals scored / match2
Pyramids FCCeramica Cleopatra
0.2Goals conceded / match0.6
Pyramids FCCeramica Cleopatra
61%Average possession59%
Pyramids FCCeramica Cleopatra
4.6Shots on target / match5.2
Pyramids FCCeramica Cleopatra

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

13.4Shots per match11
Pyramids FCCeramica Cleopatra
4.6Shots on target5.2
Pyramids FCCeramica Cleopatra
13.4%Shot conversion18.2%
Pyramids FCCeramica Cleopatra
61%Possession59%
Pyramids FCCeramica Cleopatra
1.52xG for1.38
Pyramids FCCeramica Cleopatra
0.82xG against1.19
Pyramids FCCeramica Cleopatra

Shooting quality

Pyramids FC: Efficient finishingCeramica Cleopatra: Efficient finishing
Pyramids FCCeramica Cleopatra
Accuracy (shots on target)34%47%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.13
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.390.38

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Pyramids FC is 25% better for: last-5 form.

3 pts / match - Pyramids FC · 2.4 pts / match - Ceramica Cleopatra

Pyramids FC
WWWWW
5 wins in a row
Season result split
100% W0% D0% L
Season (W-D-L)
5-0-0
3.00 pts / match · goal difference +8
Last 5 (W-D-L)
5-0-0
3.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
2-0-0
Last 5 at home
2-0-0
WW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.8Goals conceded: 0.2xG: 1.52Opponent xG: 0.82BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 40%
Ceramica Cleopatra
LWWWW
Season result split
80% W0% D20% L
Season (W-D-L)
4-0-1
2.40 pts / match · goal difference +7
Last 5 (W-D-L)
4-0-1
2.40 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
2-0-0
Last 5 away
2-0-0
WW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.0Goals conceded: 0.6xG: 1.38Opponent xG: 1.19BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Ceramica Cleopatra is 11% better for: goals scored per match.

1.8 goals / match - Pyramids FC · 2 goals / match - Ceramica Cleopatra

Pyramids FC is 200% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.2 goals / match - Pyramids FC · 0.6 goals / match - Ceramica Cleopatra

Pyramids FC scoring profile: strong

Pyramids FC scores in 100% of matches (5 of 5 matches), while Ceramica Cleopatra keeps a clean sheet in 60% (3 of 5 matches).

Ceramica Cleopatra scoring profile: mixed

Ceramica Cleopatra scores in 100% of matches (5 of 5 matches), while Pyramids FC keeps a clean sheet in 80% (4 of 5 matches).

9Goals scored (season)10
Pyramids FCCeramica Cleopatra
1Goals conceded (season)3
Pyramids FCCeramica Cleopatra
2Average goals in match2.6
Pyramids FCCeramica Cleopatra
9Goals scored (last 5)10
Pyramids FCCeramica Cleopatra
1Goals conceded (last 5)3
Pyramids FCCeramica Cleopatra

How often they score at least...

100%1 goal100%
Pyramids FCCeramica Cleopatra
60%2 goals80%
Pyramids FCCeramica Cleopatra
20%3 goals20%
Pyramids FCCeramica Cleopatra
0%4 goals0%
Pyramids FCCeramica Cleopatra

How often they concede at least...

20%1 goal40%
Pyramids FCCeramica Cleopatra
0%2 goals20%
Pyramids FCCeramica Cleopatra
0%3 goals0%
Pyramids FCCeramica Cleopatra
0%4 goals0%
Pyramids FCCeramica Cleopatra

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

40%
Ceramica Cleopatra - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.2 of 5 matches
41%
League average

Goal patterns

0%BTTS at half-time0%
Pyramids FCCeramica Cleopatra
0%BTTS in both halves0%
Pyramids FCCeramica Cleopatra
40%Scored in both halves40%
Pyramids FCCeramica Cleopatra

BTTS and goal count

20%Min. 3 goals and BTTS40%
Pyramids FCCeramica Cleopatra
20%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
Pyramids FCCeramica Cleopatra
20%BTTS - last 540%
Pyramids FCCeramica Cleopatra

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

60%Min. 1 goal before half-time60%
Pyramids FCCeramica Cleopatra
0%Min. 2 goals before half-time0%
Pyramids FCCeramica Cleopatra
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
Pyramids FCCeramica Cleopatra

2nd half

80%Min. 1 goal after half-time100%
Pyramids FCCeramica Cleopatra
40%Min. 2 goals after half-time80%
Pyramids FCCeramica Cleopatra
20%Min. 3 goals after half-time20%
Pyramids FCCeramica Cleopatra

Match halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Pyramids FC - half-time state
60% leading40% draw0% trailing
Ceramica Cleopatra - half-time state
60% leading40% draw0% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

2.2Points per match (1st half)2.2
Pyramids FCCeramica Cleopatra
0.6Goals scored (1st half)0.6
Pyramids FCCeramica Cleopatra
0Goals conceded (1st half)0
Pyramids FCCeramica Cleopatra
0.6Average goals (1st half)0.6
Pyramids FCCeramica Cleopatra
100%Clean sheet before half-time100%
Pyramids FCCeramica Cleopatra
40%No goal before half-time40%
Pyramids FCCeramica Cleopatra

After half-time (2nd half)

2.6Points per match (2nd half)2.4
Pyramids FCCeramica Cleopatra
1.2Goals scored (2nd half)1.4
Pyramids FCCeramica Cleopatra
0.2Goals conceded (2nd half)0.6
Pyramids FCCeramica Cleopatra
1.4Average goals (2nd half)2
Pyramids FCCeramica Cleopatra
80%Clean sheet after half-time60%
Pyramids FCCeramica Cleopatra
20%No goal after half-time20%
Pyramids FCCeramica Cleopatra

Pyramids FC - second-half results

80% W20% D0% L
11
Half-time points
3
Half-time goals
+3
Goal difference (1st half)
13
Second-half points
+5
Goal difference (2nd half)
2.20
PPG before half-time
Lead holding167%

Leads at half-time in 60% of matches and wins 100%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Ceramica Cleopatra - second-half results

80% W0% D20% L
11
Half-time points
3
Half-time goals
+3
Goal difference (1st half)
12
Second-half points
+4
Goal difference (2nd half)
2.20
PPG before half-time
Lead holding133%

Leads at half-time in 60% of matches and wins 80%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.6

Concedes 0.6 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Pyramids FC - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.202.60
Goals scored / match0.61.2
Goals conceded / match0.00.2
Average goals in match0.61.4
1 goal60%80%
2 goals0%40%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet100%80%
No goal40%20%
Goal difference+3+5
Half-time: 60% leading - 40% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 80% won - 20% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 3
Ceramica Cleopatra - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.202.40
Goals scored / match0.61.4
Goals conceded / match0.00.6
Average goals in match0.62.0
1 goal60%100%
2 goals0%80%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet100%60%
No goal40%20%
Goal difference+3+4
Half-time: 60% leading - 40% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 80% won - 0% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Pyramids FC
ScoredConceded
1
0
0-15
0
0
16-30
2
0
31-45
2
1
46-60
3
0
61-75
1
0
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (3 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

Ceramica Cleopatra
ScoredConceded
2
0
0-15
0
0
16-30
1
0
31-45
3
1
46-60
3
0
61-75
1
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (3 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.30
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.2 : 1.1
Estimated goal split
home : away
109%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
30%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-35%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
100%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
0%
0:0 risk
practically zero
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Pyramids FC

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.70
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.90
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+0.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.28
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.62
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
184%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
18%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.6
Late goals
11% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 11% come in the first quarter-hour.
11%

Ceramica Cleopatra

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.19
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+1.21
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.62
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.59
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
177%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
61%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.8
Late goals
10% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 20% come in the first quarter-hour.
10%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Egyptian Premier League).

Teams vs league

Pyramids FCLigaCeramica Cleopatra
Average goals in match▼ 2.002.11▲ 2.60
Both teams scored▼ 20%41%• 40%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▲ 40%31%▲ 40%
Clean sheets▲ 80%34%▲ 60%
Goal before half-time▲ 60%48%▲ 60%
Goal after half-time▼ 80%83%▲ 100%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.11
Average goals per match
41%
Both teams scored
31%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
34%
Clean sheets
0.98
Home goals / match
1.13
Away goals / match
+-13%
Home attack advantage
+-15%
Home defence advantage
+-4%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
48%
1 goal
17%
2 goals
6%
3 goals
2%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
83%
1 goal
41%
2 goals
13%
3 goals
0%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Ceramica CleopatraGoalAbdallah MagdyAssist: Amr Mahmoud Kalawa
  2. Pyramids FCGoalAhmed Nadir Benbouali
  3. Pyramids FCGoalMohanad Mostafa LasheenAssist: Ahmed Samy
  4. Pyramids FCYellow cardWalid El Karti
  5. Ceramica CleopatraSubstitutionOn: Ahmed Ramadan MohamedOff: Abdallah Magdy
  6. Pyramids FCYellow cardNasser Maher
  7. Ceramica CleopatraYellow cardHussein Al Sayed
  8. Ceramica CleopatraYellow cardAhmed Ramadan Mohamed
  9. Pyramids FCSubstitutionOn: Eiad El AskalnyOff: Karim Hafez Ramadan
  10. Ceramica CleopatraRed cardJustice Arthur

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (2): Pyramids FC 1 - 1 - 0 Ceramica Cleopatra. Average goals 1.50, both teams scored in 50% matches.

FAQ

What was the result of Pyramids FC vs Ceramica Cleopatra?

The Egyptian Premier League match finished Pyramids FC 4:1 Ceramica Cleopatra. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Pyramids FC and Ceramica Cleopatra?

In the last 2 head-to-head matches Pyramids FC won 1, Ceramica Cleopatra won 0 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 1.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Pyramids FC vs Ceramica Cleopatra?

Pyramids FC score 1.80 goals per game on average and Ceramica Cleopatra 2.00. The Egyptian Premier League average is 2.11 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 31% of games. Both teams score in 20% of Pyramids FC's matches and 40% of Ceramica Cleopatra's.

What form are Pyramids FC and Ceramica Cleopatra in?

Over the last 5 games Pyramids FC have a 5-0-0 record (3.00 points per game) and Ceramica Cleopatra 4-0-1 (2.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Pyramids FC vs Ceramica Cleopatra?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Pyramids FC vs Ceramica Cleopatra: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.