Azerbaijan - Premyer LiqasıData current as of 12 September 2026

Qabala vs Araz: match statistics

Qabala crest
Qabala
1 : 1half-time 0:0
Araz crest
Araz

Qabala vs Araz: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Qabala played Araz in Premyer Liqası (Azerbaijan). The match was played on 25 April 2026. Final score: 1:1.

Current form

Qabala: 1-0-4, 0.60 points/match. Araz: 2-0-3, 1.20 points/match.

Goal statistics

Qabala scores 0.89 and concedes 1.57 goals per match. Araz scores 1.36 and concedes 1.82. League average: 2.55 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Qabala 39%, Araz 57%. Over 2.5: Qabala 43%, Araz 61%. League level: BTTS 44%, Over 2.5 46%.

xG, shots and style

Qabala has higher xG: 1.23 vs 1.19. Qabala: 10.4 shots per match, Araz: 9.2.

Match halves

Qabala: half-time lead 14%, second-half goals 0.46. Araz: half-time lead 32%, second-half goals 0.79.

Goals by minute

Qabala: 76-90+ (6 goals). Araz: 31-45+ (11 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Premyer Liqası: 2.55 goals per match, BTTS 44%, Over 2.5 46%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 2 previous H2H matches were available: 1-0-1. Average goals 3.00, BTTS 100%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Araz appears to be the favorite: they have 12 wins this season versus Qabala's 5 and sit 6th compared to the hosts' 11th. The visitors score an average of 1.43 goals away, while the hosts manage only 0.92 at home; additionally Qabala failed to score in 46% of home matches, whereas Araz were goalless on the road in only 7% of games. Although Qabala generate slightly higher home xG (1.24 vs 1.04) and register more shots (10.92 vs 7.79), Araz compensate with efficiency — a conversion rate of 18% versus Qabala's 8% — which translates into an advantage in actual goals. In terms of form over the last 5 matches Araz average 1.2 points per game, Qabala 0.6; Qabala conceded 8 goals in their last five, Araz 10, indicating both defenses are vulnerable, but the visitors make better use of their chances. On that basis I predict an Araz win.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

I back BTTS - Yes. Araz has BTTS in 71% of matches this season (60% in the last 5), Qabala 43% (40% in the last 5), and the league average is 44%, which favors a both-teams-to-score scenario. Both sides are prone to conceding — Qabala concedes 1.64 goals per match on average (1.6 in the last 5), Araz 2.00 goals (2.0 in the last 5), so the risk of both teams conceding is high. Offensively both teams create chances: average goals 1.29 (Qabala) and 1.43 (Araz), xG 1.34 and 1.04 (sum 2.38) and 3.36 and 3.29 shots on target per match, with Araz having a higher conversion 18% versus Qabala 12%. Therefore I assess BTTS probability at 67% Yes and 33% No, which is the strongest signal from the available data.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

I estimate xG at 1.49 for Qabala ((1.34+1.64)/2=1.49) and 1.29 for Araz ((1.04+1.54)/2=1.29), yielding a combined 2.78 expected goals. Historical indicators strongly support Over 1.5: Qabala have 86% of matches over 1.5, Araz 93%, and both teams have 100% of matches with at least one goal. Additionally, Araz concedes an average of 2.00 goals per game and have 71% BTTS matches, while Qabala concede 1.64 and have 43% BTTS, which increases the likelihood of goals from both sides. In the last 5 matches Qabala averaged 1.0 scored and 1.6 conceded, Araz averaged 1.2 scored and 2.0 conceded, and Araz have 80% Over 2.5 in their last 5, so the probability of exceeding 2.5 is moderate. Taking into account the 2.78 expected goals, the league average of 2.56 and the high 86%/93% for Over 1.5, I recommend Over 1.5 as the strongest signal (I estimate the chances at around 90%).

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

I rate 1/1 as the most likely scenario, because Qabala led at the break in 6 of 14 home matches (43%), while Araz led at the break in only 3 of 14 (21%). The hosts have superior first-half metrics: they average 0.71 goals by half-time and concede 0.57, keep a half-time clean sheet in 64% of games, and post higher xG (1.34 vs 1.04) and more shots (10.57 vs 7.79), which supports them maintaining a lead. However, Araz is stronger after the break: the visitors average 1.00 second-half goals versus the hosts’ 0.57 and win 43% of second halves compared to Qabala’s 28%, so there is a real risk of an equalizer or a turnaround. Consequently, I also assign significant chances to 1/X (13%) and X/2 (13%), while scenarios that start with the visitors leading are less likely (2/2 9%, 2/X 6%).

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
1 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

33Possession (%)67
QabalaAraz
8Shots7
QabalaAraz
2Shots on target2
QabalaAraz
0.81xG0.84
QabalaAraz
1Corners5
QabalaAraz
23Dangerous attacks35
QabalaAraz
15Fouls14
QabalaAraz
2Cards1
QabalaAraz

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

0.89Goals scored / match1.36
QabalaAraz
1.57Goals conceded / match1.82
QabalaAraz
47%Average possession53%
QabalaAraz
3.39Shots on target / match3.32
QabalaAraz

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

10.36Shots per match9.18
QabalaAraz
3.39Shots on target3.32
QabalaAraz
8.6%Shot conversion14.8%
QabalaAraz
47%Possession53%
QabalaAraz
1.23xG for1.19
QabalaAraz
1.47xG against1.59
QabalaAraz

Shooting quality

Qabala: BalancedAraz: Efficient finishing
QabalaAraz
Accuracy (shots on target)33%36%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.13
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.260.41

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Araz is 100% better for: last-5 form.

0.6 pts / match - Qabala · 1.2 pts / match - Araz

Qabala
LLWLL
Season result split
18% W14% D68% L
Season (W-D-L)
5-4-19
0.68 pts / match · goal difference -19
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-0-4
0.60 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
3-1-9
Last 5 at home
0-1-4
LLDLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 1.33Opponent xG: 1.28BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%
Araz
WWLLL
Season result split
43% W18% D39% L
Season (W-D-L)
12-5-11
1.46 pts / match · goal difference -13
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-0-3
1.20 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
5-3-6
Last 5 away
2-0-3
LWLWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 2.0xG: 1.11Opponent xG: 1.57BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 80%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Araz is 53% better for: goals scored per match.

0.89 goals / match - Qabala · 1.36 goals / match - Araz

Qabala is 16% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.57 goals / match - Qabala · 1.82 goals / match - Araz

Qabala scoring profile: strong

Qabala scores in 50% of matches (14 of 28 matches), while Araz keeps a clean sheet in 25% (7 of 28 matches).

Araz scoring profile: very strong

Araz scores in 82% of matches (23 of 28 matches), while Qabala keeps a clean sheet in 14% (4 of 28 matches).

25Goals scored (season)38
QabalaAraz
44Goals conceded (season)51
QabalaAraz
2.46Average goals in match3.18
QabalaAraz
5Goals scored (last 5)6
QabalaAraz
8Goals conceded (last 5)10
QabalaAraz

How often they score at least...

50%1 goal82%
QabalaAraz
25%2 goals50%
QabalaAraz
11%3 goals4%
QabalaAraz
4%4 goals0%
QabalaAraz

How often they concede at least...

86%1 goal75%
QabalaAraz
43%2 goals43%
QabalaAraz
14%3 goals29%
QabalaAraz
4%4 goals21%
QabalaAraz

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

29%BTTS at half-time18%
QabalaAraz
7%BTTS in both halves7%
QabalaAraz
21%Scored in both halves25%
QabalaAraz

BTTS and goal count

32%Min. 3 goals and BTTS46%
QabalaAraz
11%Min. 3 goals without BTTS14%
QabalaAraz
40%BTTS - last 560%
QabalaAraz

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

71%Min. 1 goal before half-time79%
QabalaAraz
36%Min. 2 goals before half-time39%
QabalaAraz
14%Min. 3 goals before half-time14%
QabalaAraz

2nd half

64%Min. 1 goal after half-time93%
QabalaAraz
39%Min. 2 goals after half-time57%
QabalaAraz
14%Min. 3 goals after half-time25%
QabalaAraz

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Araz is 48% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

0.89 pts / match - Qabala · 1.32 pts / match - Araz

Qabala - half-time state
14% leading46% draw39% trailing
Araz - half-time state
32% leading36% draw32% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.89Points per match (1st half)1.32
QabalaAraz
0.43Goals scored (1st half)0.57
QabalaAraz
0.82Goals conceded (1st half)0.79
QabalaAraz
1.25Average goals (1st half)1.36
QabalaAraz
39%Clean sheet before half-time50%
QabalaAraz
61%No goal before half-time54%
QabalaAraz

After half-time (2nd half)

0.86Points per match (2nd half)1.32
QabalaAraz
0.46Goals scored (2nd half)0.79
QabalaAraz
0.75Goals conceded (2nd half)1.04
QabalaAraz
1.21Average goals (2nd half)1.82
QabalaAraz
50%Clean sheet after half-time39%
QabalaAraz
68%No goal after half-time39%
QabalaAraz

Qabala - second-half results

14% W43% D43% L
25
Half-time points
12
Half-time goals
-11
Goal difference (1st half)
24
Second-half points
-8
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.89
PPG before half-time
Lead holding129%

Leads at half-time in 14% of matches and wins 18%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Araz - second-half results

36% W25% D39% L
37
Half-time points
16
Half-time goals
-6
Goal difference (1st half)
37
Second-half points
-7
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.32
PPG before half-time
Lead holding134%

Leads at half-time in 32% of matches and wins 43%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.3

Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Qabala - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.601.00
Goals scored / match0.40.6
Goals conceded / match0.80.8
Average goals in match1.21.4
1 goal80%60%
2 goals40%60%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet20%60%
No goal60%60%
Goal difference-2-1
Half-time: 0% leading - 60% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 2
Araz - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.200.80
Goals scored / match0.80.4
Goals conceded / match0.61.4
Average goals in match1.41.8
1 goal60%100%
2 goals40%60%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet60%20%
No goal60%60%
Goal difference+1-5
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 20% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 4

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Qabala
ScoredConceded
3
6
0-15
4
9
16-30
5
8
31-45
5
9
46-60
2
4
61-75
6
8
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (6 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.

Araz
ScoredConceded
2
8
0-15
3
6
16-30
11
8
31-45
7
7
46-60
6
9
61-75
9
13
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (11 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (13). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.82
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.4 : 1.5
Estimated goal split
home : away
111%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
48%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+6%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
41%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
9%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 11 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Qabala

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.24
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.44
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.34
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.10
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
70%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
124%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.08
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.0
Late goals
24% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 12% come in the first quarter-hour.
24%

Araz

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.40
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.06
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+11.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.17
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.23
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
107%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
142%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.26
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
24% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 5% come in the first quarter-hour.
24%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Premyer Liqası).

Teams vs league

QabalaLigaAraz
Average goals in match 2.462.55 3.18
Both teams scored 39%44% 57%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 43%46% 61%
Clean sheets 14%33% 25%
Goal before half-time 71%66% 79%
Goal after half-time 64%72% 93%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.55
Average goals per match
44%
Both teams scored
46%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
33%
Clean sheets
1.28
Home goals / match
1.27
Away goals / match
+1%
Home attack advantage
+1%
Home defence advantage
+-3%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
66%
1 goal
31%
2 goals
13%
3 goals
2%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
72%
1 goal
46%
2 goals
19%
3 goals
5%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. QabalaYellow cardJaime Sierra Mateos
  2. ArazYellow cardCristian Avram
  3. ArazGoalIssouf Paro

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (2): Qabala 1 - 0 - 1 Araz. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.

FK Qabala
2 : 1
Araz FK
Araz FK
2 : 1
FK Qabala

FAQ

What was the result of Qabala vs Araz?

The Premyer Liqası match finished Qabala 1:1 Araz. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Qabala and Araz?

In the last 2 head-to-head matches Qabala won 1, Araz won 1 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Qabala vs Araz?

Qabala score 0.89 goals per game on average and Araz 1.36. The Premyer Liqası average is 2.55 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 46% of games. Both teams score in 39% of Qabala's matches and 57% of Araz's.

What form are Qabala and Araz in?

Over the last 5 games Qabala have a 1-0-4 record (0.60 points per game) and Araz 2-0-3 (1.20 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Qabala vs Araz?

The statistical background for Qabala vs Araz — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.