Qarabağ vs Karvan FK: match statistics
Qarabağ vs Karvan FK: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Qarabağ played Karvan FK in Premyer Liqası (Azerbaijan). The match was played on 6 April 2026. Final score: 8:0.
Current form
Qarabağ: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match. Karvan FK: 0-2-3, 0.40 points/match.
Goal statistics
Qarabağ scores 2.00 and concedes 0.75 goals per match. Karvan FK scores 0.64 and concedes 1.96. League average: 2.55 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Qarabağ 42%, Karvan FK 52%. Over 2.5: Qarabağ 42%, Karvan FK 48%. League level: BTTS 44%, Over 2.5 47%.
xG, shots and style
Qarabağ has higher xG: 2.03 vs 0.87. Qarabağ: 16.0 shots per match, Karvan FK: 6.5.
Match halves
Qarabağ: half-time lead 42%, second-half goals 1.25. Karvan FK: half-time lead 16%, second-half goals 0.32.
Goals by minute
Qarabağ: 76-90+ (16 goals). Karvan FK: 31-45+ (5 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Premyer Liqası: 2.55 goals per match, BTTS 44%, Over 2.5 47%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 2 previous H2H matches were available: 2-0-0. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 0%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Qarabağ is the clear favorite: they sit 2nd in the table, win 62% of home matches and score on average 1.92 goals per game (average xG 2.10) with 16.46 shots and 6 on target. In the last 5 matches the hosts have scored 14 goals (2.8 per game) and have a record of 3 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss, averaging 2 points per game. Karvan are 12th, have only 1 away win (8% away wins), score 0.75 goals away on average (xG 0.82) and register 5.5 shots with 1.67 on target, and in the last 5 matches have scored 3 goals and have 0 wins. The defensive gap is clear: Qarabağ concede 0.62 goals at home (xG against 0.79) and keep 62% clean sheets, while Karvan concede 1.92 goals away and have only 8% clean sheets. Considering the xG advantage (2.10 vs 0.82), the difference in recent form (14 vs 3 goals in the last 5) and possession (66% vs 39%), I back the home win.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
BTTS statistics favor the "Yes" option: Qarabağ has BTTS in 46% of matches this season, Karvan in 58%, while the league average is 44%. In the last 5 meetings both teams recorded BTTS in 60% of games, which is a strong short-term signal. Qarabağ scored 14 goals in the last 5 matches (2.8 per game) and conceded 5 (1.0), while Karvan scored 3 (0.6) and conceded 7 (1.4), so the home side creates many chances and the visitors show defensive vulnerabilities. Additionally, recent xG shows a home advantage (2.37 vs 1.00 for Karvan), and seasonally Karvan conceded 49 goals versus 18 conceded by Qarabağ, increasing the probability of both teams scoring; based on this I recommend BTTS = "Yes" (65%).
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Based on xG: Qarabağ has xG_for_avg 0.91 and Karvan xG_against_avg 1.76, yielding an estimated ≈1.34 expected goals for the home side; conversely Karvan xG_for_avg 0.82 vs Qarabağ xG_against_avg 1.49 gives ≈1.16 for the away side, total ≈2.50. Seasonal metrics confirm a high goal potential — home team has 100% of matches with over 0.5 goals and 92% with over 1.5, away team 92% and 75% respectively, which strongly supports Over 1.5. Additionally, in the last 5 matches Qarabağ scored 14 goals (2.8 avg) and had 80% of games with over 2.5 goals, while Karvan has 3 goals in the last 5 (0.6 avg), creating an asymmetry but maintaining a high probability of at least 2 goals in the match. At the 2.5 line seasonal values are similar — 46% Over for the home side and 50% for the away — so I estimate a moderate probability of Over 2.5 at about 55%. Over 3.5 looks unlikely (8% seasonally for the home side and 25% for the away), therefore I recommend playing Over 1.5 as the strongest and most data-driven signal.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
I favor the 1/1 scenario as the strongest signal because in the last five matches Qarabağ averaged 1.2 goals by half-time and held a lead at the break in 40% of those games, whereas Karvan FK averaged only 0.2 goals by half-time and did not lead at the break in any (0%). Over the full matches in the last five fixtures the home side averaged 2.8 goals and won 60% of games, while the visitors averaged 0.6 goals and recorded 0% wins, which increases the likelihood that Qarabağ will maintain a lead. Additionally, the home team generates more shots (7.46 vs 5.5), has a higher xG (0.91 vs 0.82) and a higher average half-time result over the last five matches (1.6 points vs 0.6 for the opponents), indicating controlled dominance from the first half. Although on a seasonal basis the home side have a lower shot conversion rate (7% vs the visitors’ 14%), their current form (2.8 goals in five matches) compensates for this weakness, so scenarios with the home leading at half-time and winning (1/1) or drawing at half-time then winning (X/1) receive the highest probability. A visitor lead at half-time appears unlikely (last five: 0% leads), therefore variants starting with ‘2’ carry low probability.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Qarabağ | Karvan FK | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 37% | 28% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.13 | 0.13 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.34 | 0.35 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Qarabağ is 400% better for: last-5 form.
2 pts / match - Qarabağ · 0.4 pts / match - Karvan FK
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Qarabağ is 213% better for: goals scored per match.
2 goals / match - Qarabağ · 0.64 goals / match - Karvan FK
Qarabağ is 161% better for: goals conceded per match.
0.75 goals / match - Qarabağ · 1.96 goals / match - Karvan FK
Qarabağ scores in 83% of matches (20 of 24 matches), while Karvan FK keeps a clean sheet in 4% (1 of 25 matches).
Karvan FK scores in 52% of matches (13 of 25 matches), while Qarabağ keeps a clean sheet in 46% (11 of 24 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Qarabağ
Over / Under - Karvan FK
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Qarabağ is 77% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.63 pts / match - Qarabağ · 0.92 pts / match - Karvan FK
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Qarabağ - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 42% of matches and wins 67%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Karvan FK - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 16% of matches and wins 4%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.
Concedes 0.4 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.40 | 2.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.8 | 1.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 1.2 | 2.4 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 60% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 60% |
| No goal | 60% | 20% |
| Goal difference | +2 | +6 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.60 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.2 | 0.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.8 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 40% |
| No goal | 80% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -3 | -1 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (16 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +13 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (5 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (13). Late-goal balance (76-90): -9 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Qarabağ
Karvan FK
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Premyer Liqası).
Teams vs league
| Qarabağ | Liga | Karvan FK | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 2.75 | 2.55 | • 2.60 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 42% | 44% | ▲ 52% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 42% | 47% | • 48% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 46% | 33% | ▼ 4% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 75% | 65% | ▲ 72% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 79% | 73% | • 72% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (2): Qarabağ 2 - 0 - 0 Karvan FK. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Qarabağ vs Karvan FK?
The Premyer Liqası match finished Qarabağ 8:0 Karvan FK. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Qarabağ and Karvan FK?
In the last 2 head-to-head matches Qarabağ won 2, Karvan FK won 0 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 2.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Qarabağ vs Karvan FK?
Qarabağ score 2.00 goals per game on average and Karvan FK 0.64. The Premyer Liqası average is 2.55 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 47% of games. Both teams score in 42% of Qarabağ's matches and 52% of Karvan FK's.
What form are Qarabağ and Karvan FK in?
Over the last 5 games Qarabağ have a 3-1-1 record (2.00 points per game) and Karvan FK 0-2-3 (0.40 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Qarabağ vs Karvan FK?
The statistical background for Qarabağ vs Karvan FK — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.


