Qingdao Youth Island vs Chongqing Tongliang Long: match statistics
Qingdao Youth Island vs Chongqing Tongliang Long: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Qingdao Youth Island played Chongqing Tongliang Long in Chinese Super League (China). The match was played on 14 August 2026. Final score: 0:0.
Current form
Qingdao Youth Island: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match. Chongqing Tongliang Long: 0-2-3, 0.40 points/match.
Goal statistics
Qingdao Youth Island scores 1.18 and concedes 1.32 goals per match. Chongqing Tongliang Long scores 1.14 and concedes 1.23. League average: 3.05 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Qingdao Youth Island 64%, Chongqing Tongliang Long 55%. Over 2.5: Qingdao Youth Island 36%, Chongqing Tongliang Long 36%. League level: BTTS 63%, Over 2.5 58%.
xG, shots and style
Qingdao Youth Island has higher xG: 1.21 vs 1.02. Qingdao Youth Island: 10.5 shots per match, Chongqing Tongliang Long: 8.9.
Match halves
Qingdao Youth Island: half-time lead 27%, second-half goals 0.68. Chongqing Tongliang Long: half-time lead 18%, second-half goals 0.68.
Goals by minute
Qingdao Youth Island: 61-75 (6 goals). Chongqing Tongliang Long: 46-60 (6 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Chinese Super League: 3.05 goals per match, BTTS 63%, Over 2.5 58%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-1-0. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 100%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Qingdao Youth Island remain unbeaten at home, winning 36% of their matches and drawing as many as 64%, while Chongqing Tongliang Long have lost 45% of their away fixtures. The hosts average 1.36 goals scored and just 0.82 conceded at home, whereas the visitors manage only 0.82 goals away from home and concede 1.27. Qingdao’s advantage is also evident in the quality of chances created: their average xG stands at 1.26 compared with Chongqing’s 0.82, while Chongqing allow opponents an xG of 1.60. Current form also favours the hosts, who have collected 8 points from their last five matches, compared with just 4 for the visitors, who have suffered three defeats. A draw remains a realistic scenario given Qingdao’s high draw rate, but their stronger defence and Chongqing’s significantly weaker away attacking efficiency point to a home win.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
The stronger signal points to BTTS - No, primarily due to Chongqing Tongliang Long’s limited attacking efficiency: the visitors average only 0.82 goals per game this season and failed to score in 36% of their matches. Qingdao Youth Island kept a clean sheet in 36% of their games and conceded just 0.6 goals per match across their last five fixtures, making it significantly harder for the visitors to find the net. The hosts’ recent scoring form also reduces the potential for goals from both sides, as they scored only 4 goals in their last five matches, with BTTS occurring in just 20% of those games. The hosts should have a greater chance of scoring against a visiting defence allowing an average xG of 1.60, but a scenario in which only one team scores is more likely than goals at both ends.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
The profile of both teams points to a tight match with limited chances: the hosts average 10.82 shots, while the visitors manage just 7.09, including only 2.82 shots on target for Chongqing per game. In their last five matches, Qingdao scored 4 and conceded 3 goals, while Chongqing scored 5, confirming a moderate scoring pace. Neither team has gone Over 2.5 goals in more than 36% of their matches this season, and this line was not covered in any of the hosts’ last five games. The visitors have an average attacking xG of just 0.82, while the hosts keep a clean sheet in 36% of their matches, limiting the prospect of a high-scoring game. The projected total of 2.18 goals gives a clear betting edge to Under 3.5 goals.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
The strongest scenario is a draw at half-time followed by a Qingdao Youth Island victory in the match, as the hosts have been level at the break in 64% of their games, compared with 45% for Chongqing. Both teams average just 0.45 goals before half-time, while the hosts have conceded only 0.2 goals per match in this period over their last five games. After the break, Qingdao average 1.00 goal, whereas Chongqing score just 0.36 and concede as many as 0.91 goals. The hosts’ advantage is also evident across the season: they create an average of 1.21 xG compared with their opponents’ 0.82, while Chongqing’s defence allows 1.60 xG. Current form further supports Qingdao, who have taken 1.6 points per match over their last five games, compared with Chongqing’s 0.8, with the visitors losing 60% of those fixtures.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Qingdao Youth Island | Chongqing Tongliang Long | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 33% | 36% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.34 | 0.35 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Qingdao Youth Island is 300% better for: last-5 form.
1.6 pts / match - Qingdao Youth Island · 0.4 pts / match - Chongqing Tongliang Long
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Chongqing Tongliang Long is 7% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.32 goals / match - Qingdao Youth Island · 1.23 goals / match - Chongqing Tongliang Long
Qingdao Youth Island scores in 77% of matches (17 of 22 matches), while Chongqing Tongliang Long keeps a clean sheet in 32% (7 of 22 matches).
Chongqing Tongliang Long scores in 77% of matches (17 of 22 matches), while Qingdao Youth Island keeps a clean sheet in 27% (6 of 22 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Qingdao Youth Island
Over / Under - Chongqing Tongliang Long
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Qingdao Youth Island is 29% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.41 pts / match - Qingdao Youth Island · 1.09 pts / match - Chongqing Tongliang Long
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Qingdao Youth Island - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 27% of matches and wins 32%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Chongqing Tongliang Long - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 18% of matches and wins 32%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.60 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 0.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 0.8 | 0.8 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 0% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 60% |
| No goal | 60% | 60% |
| Goal difference | 0 | 0 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.40 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 0.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.0 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 1.4 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 60% |
| No goal | 80% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -3 | -1 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (6 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): -5 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (6 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Qingdao Youth Island
Chongqing Tongliang Long
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Chinese Super League).
Teams vs league
| Qingdao Youth Island | Liga | Chongqing Tongliang Long | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 2.50 | 3.05 | ▼ 2.36 |
| Both teams scored | • 64% | 63% | ▼ 55% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 36% | 58% | ▼ 36% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 27% | 20% | ▲ 32% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 64% | 70% | ▼ 55% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 73% | 87% | ▼ 82% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: Qingdao Youth Island 0 - 1 - 0 Chongqing Tongliang Long. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Qingdao Youth Island vs Chongqing Tongliang Long?
The Chinese Super League match finished Qingdao Youth Island 0:0 Chongqing Tongliang Long. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Qingdao Youth Island vs Chongqing Tongliang Long?
Qingdao Youth Island score 1.18 goals per game on average and Chongqing Tongliang Long 1.14. The Chinese Super League average is 3.05 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 58% of games. Both teams score in 64% of Qingdao Youth Island's matches and 55% of Chongqing Tongliang Long's.
What form are Qingdao Youth Island and Chongqing Tongliang Long in?
Over the last 5 games Qingdao Youth Island have a 2-2-1 record (1.60 points per game) and Chongqing Tongliang Long 0-2-3 (0.40 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Qingdao Youth Island vs Chongqing Tongliang Long?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.


