Qingdao Youth Island vs Chongqing Tongliang Long: match statistics
Full analysis and pick in the app
Check the betting analysis, pick, value bet and full reasoning for this match.
Qingdao Youth Island vs Chongqing Tongliang Long: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Qingdao Youth Island play Chongqing Tongliang Long in Chinese Super League (China). The match date is 14 August 2026.
Current form
Qingdao Youth Island: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match. Chongqing Tongliang Long: 0-2-3, 0.40 points/match.
Goal statistics
Qingdao Youth Island scores 1.18 and concedes 1.32 goals per match. Chongqing Tongliang Long scores 1.14 and concedes 1.23. League average: 3.04 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Qingdao Youth Island 64%, Chongqing Tongliang Long 55%. Over 2.5: Qingdao Youth Island 36%, Chongqing Tongliang Long 36%. League level: BTTS 63%, Over 2.5 57%.
xG, shots and style
Qingdao Youth Island has higher xG: 1.21 vs 1.02. Qingdao Youth Island: 10.5 shots per match, Chongqing Tongliang Long: 8.9.
Match halves
Qingdao Youth Island: half-time lead 27%, second-half goals 0.68. Chongqing Tongliang Long: half-time lead 18%, second-half goals 0.68.
Goals by minute
Qingdao Youth Island: 61-75 (6 goals). Chongqing Tongliang Long: 46-60 (6 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Chinese Super League: 3.04 goals per match, BTTS 63%, Over 2.5 57%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-1-0. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 100%.
Before the match
1X2 odds
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Qingdao Youth Island | Chongqing Tongliang Long | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 33% | 36% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.34 | 0.35 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Qingdao Youth Island is 300% better for: last-5 form.
1.6 pts / match - Qingdao Youth Island · 0.4 pts / match - Chongqing Tongliang Long
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Chongqing Tongliang Long is 7% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.32 goals / match - Qingdao Youth Island · 1.23 goals / match - Chongqing Tongliang Long
Qingdao Youth Island scores in 77% of matches (17 of 22 matches), while Chongqing Tongliang Long keeps a clean sheet in 32% (7 of 22 matches).
Chongqing Tongliang Long scores in 77% of matches (17 of 22 matches), while Qingdao Youth Island keeps a clean sheet in 27% (6 of 22 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Qingdao Youth Island
Over / Under - Chongqing Tongliang Long
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Qingdao Youth Island is 29% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.41 pts / match - Qingdao Youth Island · 1.09 pts / match - Chongqing Tongliang Long
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Qingdao Youth Island - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 27% of matches and wins 32%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Chongqing Tongliang Long - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 18% of matches and wins 32%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.60 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 0.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 0.8 | 0.8 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 0% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 60% |
| No goal | 60% | 60% |
| Goal difference | 0 | 0 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.40 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 0.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.0 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 1.4 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 60% |
| No goal | 80% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -3 | -1 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (6 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): -5 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (6 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Qingdao Youth Island
Chongqing Tongliang Long
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Chinese Super League).
Teams vs league
| Qingdao Youth Island | Liga | Chongqing Tongliang Long | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 2.50 | 3.04 | ▼ 2.36 |
| Both teams scored | • 64% | 63% | ▼ 55% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 36% | 57% | ▼ 36% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 27% | 20% | ▲ 32% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 64% | 70% | ▼ 55% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 73% | 87% | ▼ 82% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: Qingdao Youth Island 0 - 1 - 0 Chongqing Tongliang Long. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.
FAQ
When do Qingdao Youth Island and Chongqing Tongliang Long play?
Qingdao Youth Island face Chongqing Tongliang Long on 14 August 2026 in Chinese Super League. The exact kick-off time in your timezone is shown at the top of the match page.
What do the goal statistics show before Qingdao Youth Island vs Chongqing Tongliang Long?
Qingdao Youth Island score 1.18 goals per game on average and Chongqing Tongliang Long 1.14. The Chinese Super League average is 3.04 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 57% of games. Both teams score in 64% of Qingdao Youth Island's matches and 55% of Chongqing Tongliang Long's.
What form are Qingdao Youth Island and Chongqing Tongliang Long in?
Over the last 5 games Qingdao Youth Island have a 2-2-1 record (1.60 points per game) and Chongqing Tongliang Long 0-2-3 (0.40 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Qingdao Youth Island vs Chongqing Tongliang Long?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.