China - Chinese Super LeagueData current as of 18 October 2026

Qingdao Youth Island vs Chongqing Tongliang Long: match statistics

Qingdao Youth Island vs Chongqing Tongliang Long: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Qingdao Youth Island played Chongqing Tongliang Long in Chinese Super League (China). The match was played on 14 August 2026. Final score: 0:0.

Current form

Qingdao Youth Island: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match. Chongqing Tongliang Long: 0-2-3, 0.40 points/match.

Goal statistics

Qingdao Youth Island scores 1.18 and concedes 1.32 goals per match. Chongqing Tongliang Long scores 1.14 and concedes 1.23. League average: 3.05 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Qingdao Youth Island 64%, Chongqing Tongliang Long 55%. Over 2.5: Qingdao Youth Island 36%, Chongqing Tongliang Long 36%. League level: BTTS 63%, Over 2.5 58%.

xG, shots and style

Qingdao Youth Island has higher xG: 1.21 vs 1.02. Qingdao Youth Island: 10.5 shots per match, Chongqing Tongliang Long: 8.9.

Match halves

Qingdao Youth Island: half-time lead 27%, second-half goals 0.68. Chongqing Tongliang Long: half-time lead 18%, second-half goals 0.68.

Goals by minute

Qingdao Youth Island: 61-75 (6 goals). Chongqing Tongliang Long: 46-60 (6 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Chinese Super League: 3.05 goals per match, BTTS 63%, Over 2.5 58%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-1-0. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 100%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Qingdao Youth Island remain unbeaten at home, winning 36% of their matches and drawing as many as 64%, while Chongqing Tongliang Long have lost 45% of their away fixtures. The hosts average 1.36 goals scored and just 0.82 conceded at home, whereas the visitors manage only 0.82 goals away from home and concede 1.27. Qingdao’s advantage is also evident in the quality of chances created: their average xG stands at 1.26 compared with Chongqing’s 0.82, while Chongqing allow opponents an xG of 1.60. Current form also favours the hosts, who have collected 8 points from their last five matches, compared with just 4 for the visitors, who have suffered three defeats. A draw remains a realistic scenario given Qingdao’s high draw rate, but their stronger defence and Chongqing’s significantly weaker away attacking efficiency point to a home win.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The stronger signal points to BTTS - No, primarily due to Chongqing Tongliang Long’s limited attacking efficiency: the visitors average only 0.82 goals per game this season and failed to score in 36% of their matches. Qingdao Youth Island kept a clean sheet in 36% of their games and conceded just 0.6 goals per match across their last five fixtures, making it significantly harder for the visitors to find the net. The hosts’ recent scoring form also reduces the potential for goals from both sides, as they scored only 4 goals in their last five matches, with BTTS occurring in just 20% of those games. The hosts should have a greater chance of scoring against a visiting defence allowing an average xG of 1.60, but a scenario in which only one team scores is more likely than goals at both ends.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The profile of both teams points to a tight match with limited chances: the hosts average 10.82 shots, while the visitors manage just 7.09, including only 2.82 shots on target for Chongqing per game. In their last five matches, Qingdao scored 4 and conceded 3 goals, while Chongqing scored 5, confirming a moderate scoring pace. Neither team has gone Over 2.5 goals in more than 36% of their matches this season, and this line was not covered in any of the hosts’ last five games. The visitors have an average attacking xG of just 0.82, while the hosts keep a clean sheet in 36% of their matches, limiting the prospect of a high-scoring game. The projected total of 2.18 goals gives a clear betting edge to Under 3.5 goals.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The strongest scenario is a draw at half-time followed by a Qingdao Youth Island victory in the match, as the hosts have been level at the break in 64% of their games, compared with 45% for Chongqing. Both teams average just 0.45 goals before half-time, while the hosts have conceded only 0.2 goals per match in this period over their last five games. After the break, Qingdao average 1.00 goal, whereas Chongqing score just 0.36 and concede as many as 0.91 goals. The hosts’ advantage is also evident across the season: they create an average of 1.21 xG compared with their opponents’ 0.82, while Chongqing’s defence allows 1.60 xG. Current form further supports Qingdao, who have taken 1.6 points per match over their last five games, compared with Chongqing’s 0.8, with the visitors losing 60% of those fixtures.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

56Possession (%)44
Qingdao Youth IslandChongqing Tongliang Long
17Shots12
Qingdao Youth IslandChongqing Tongliang Long
3Shots on target3
Qingdao Youth IslandChongqing Tongliang Long
1.61xG1.2
Qingdao Youth IslandChongqing Tongliang Long
3Corners4
Qingdao Youth IslandChongqing Tongliang Long
44Dangerous attacks32
Qingdao Youth IslandChongqing Tongliang Long
10Fouls17
Qingdao Youth IslandChongqing Tongliang Long
0Cards1
Qingdao Youth IslandChongqing Tongliang Long

Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Qingdao Youth IslandChongqing Tongliang Long
1.18Goals scored / match1.14
Qingdao Youth IslandChongqing Tongliang Long
1.32Goals conceded / match1.23
Qingdao Youth IslandChongqing Tongliang Long
Qingdao Youth IslandChongqing Tongliang Long
44%Average possession49%
Qingdao Youth IslandChongqing Tongliang Long
3.5Shots on target / match3.23
Qingdao Youth IslandChongqing Tongliang Long
Qingdao Youth IslandChongqing Tongliang Long
Qingdao Youth IslandChongqing Tongliang Long

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

10.5Shots per match8.95
Qingdao Youth IslandChongqing Tongliang Long
3.5Shots on target3.23
Qingdao Youth IslandChongqing Tongliang Long
11.3%Shot conversion12.7%
Qingdao Youth IslandChongqing Tongliang Long
44%Possession49%
Qingdao Youth IslandChongqing Tongliang Long
1.21xG for1.02
Qingdao Youth IslandChongqing Tongliang Long
1.49xG against1.29
Qingdao Youth IslandChongqing Tongliang Long

Shooting quality

Qingdao Youth Island: BalancedChongqing Tongliang Long: Balanced
Qingdao Youth IslandChongqing Tongliang Long
Accuracy (shots on target)33%36%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.340.35

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Qingdao Youth Island is 300% better for: last-5 form.

1.6 pts / match - Qingdao Youth Island · 0.4 pts / match - Chongqing Tongliang Long

Qingdao Youth Island
LDWWD
Season result split
32% W50% D18% L
Season (W-D-L)
7-11-4
1.45 pts / match · goal difference -3
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-2-1
1.60 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
4-7-0
Last 5 at home
3-2-0
DWWDW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 1.14Opponent xG: 1.33BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 20%
Chongqing Tongliang Long
DDLLL
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
32% W36% D32% L
Season (W-D-L)
7-8-7
1.32 pts / match · goal difference -2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-2-3
0.40 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
3-3-5
Last 5 away
1-1-3
WLDLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 1.26Opponent xG: 1.21BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 20%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Chongqing Tongliang Long is 7% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.32 goals / match - Qingdao Youth Island · 1.23 goals / match - Chongqing Tongliang Long

Qingdao Youth Island scoring profile: very strong

Qingdao Youth Island scores in 77% of matches (17 of 22 matches), while Chongqing Tongliang Long keeps a clean sheet in 32% (7 of 22 matches).

Chongqing Tongliang Long scoring profile: very strong

Chongqing Tongliang Long scores in 77% of matches (17 of 22 matches), while Qingdao Youth Island keeps a clean sheet in 27% (6 of 22 matches).

26Goals scored (season)25
Qingdao Youth IslandChongqing Tongliang Long
29Goals conceded (season)27
Qingdao Youth IslandChongqing Tongliang Long
2.5Average goals in match2.36
Qingdao Youth IslandChongqing Tongliang Long
4Goals scored (last 5)4
Qingdao Youth IslandChongqing Tongliang Long
4Goals conceded (last 5)8
Qingdao Youth IslandChongqing Tongliang Long

How often they score at least...

77%1 goal77%
Qingdao Youth IslandChongqing Tongliang Long
27%2 goals32%
Qingdao Youth IslandChongqing Tongliang Long
14%3 goals5%
Qingdao Youth IslandChongqing Tongliang Long
0%4 goals0%
Qingdao Youth IslandChongqing Tongliang Long

How often they concede at least...

73%1 goal68%
Qingdao Youth IslandChongqing Tongliang Long
32%2 goals32%
Qingdao Youth IslandChongqing Tongliang Long
14%3 goals23%
Qingdao Youth IslandChongqing Tongliang Long
9%4 goals0%
Qingdao Youth IslandChongqing Tongliang Long

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

64%
Qingdao Youth Island - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.14 of 22 matches
55%
Chongqing Tongliang Long - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.12 of 22 matches
63%
League average

Goal patterns

23%BTTS at half-time9%
Qingdao Youth IslandChongqing Tongliang Long
9%BTTS in both halves0%
Qingdao Youth IslandChongqing Tongliang Long
23%Scored in both halves0%
Qingdao Youth IslandChongqing Tongliang Long

BTTS and goal count

32%Min. 3 goals and BTTS36%
Qingdao Youth IslandChongqing Tongliang Long
5%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
Qingdao Youth IslandChongqing Tongliang Long
20%BTTS - last 560%
Qingdao Youth IslandChongqing Tongliang Long

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

Full match - team comparison (Over)

Qingdao Youth IslandChongqing Tongliang Long
Qingdao Youth IslandChongqing Tongliang Long
Qingdao Youth IslandChongqing Tongliang Long
Qingdao Youth IslandChongqing Tongliang Long
Qingdao Youth IslandChongqing Tongliang Long

1st half

64%Min. 1 goal before half-time55%
Qingdao Youth IslandChongqing Tongliang Long
36%Min. 2 goals before half-time32%
Qingdao Youth IslandChongqing Tongliang Long
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time5%
Qingdao Youth IslandChongqing Tongliang Long

2nd half

73%Min. 1 goal after half-time82%
Qingdao Youth IslandChongqing Tongliang Long
36%Min. 2 goals after half-time36%
Qingdao Youth IslandChongqing Tongliang Long
23%Min. 3 goals after half-time14%
Qingdao Youth IslandChongqing Tongliang Long

Match halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Qingdao Youth Island is 29% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.41 pts / match - Qingdao Youth Island · 1.09 pts / match - Chongqing Tongliang Long

Qingdao Youth Island - half-time state
27% leading59% draw14% trailing
Chongqing Tongliang Long - half-time state
18% leading55% draw27% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.41Points per match (1st half)1.09
Qingdao Youth IslandChongqing Tongliang Long
0.5Goals scored (1st half)0.45
Qingdao Youth IslandChongqing Tongliang Long
0.5Goals conceded (1st half)0.5
Qingdao Youth IslandChongqing Tongliang Long
1Average goals (1st half)0.95
Qingdao Youth IslandChongqing Tongliang Long
64%Clean sheet before half-time64%
Qingdao Youth IslandChongqing Tongliang Long
50%No goal before half-time73%
Qingdao Youth IslandChongqing Tongliang Long

After half-time (2nd half)

1.23Points per match (2nd half)1.41
Qingdao Youth IslandChongqing Tongliang Long
0.68Goals scored (2nd half)0.68
Qingdao Youth IslandChongqing Tongliang Long
0.82Goals conceded (2nd half)0.73
Qingdao Youth IslandChongqing Tongliang Long
1.5Average goals (2nd half)1.41
Qingdao Youth IslandChongqing Tongliang Long
45%Clean sheet after half-time50%
Qingdao Youth IslandChongqing Tongliang Long
50%No goal after half-time50%
Qingdao Youth IslandChongqing Tongliang Long

Qingdao Youth Island - second-half results

27% W41% D32% L
31
Half-time points
11
Half-time goals
0
Goal difference (1st half)
27
Second-half points
-3
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.41
PPG before half-time
Lead holding119%

Leads at half-time in 27% of matches and wins 32%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.3

Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Chongqing Tongliang Long - second-half results

36% W32% D32% L
24
Half-time points
10
Half-time goals
-1
Goal difference (1st half)
31
Second-half points
-1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.09
PPG before half-time
Lead holding178%

Leads at half-time in 18% of matches and wins 32%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Qingdao Youth Island - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.601.40
Goals scored / match0.40.4
Goals conceded / match0.40.4
Average goals in match0.80.8
1 goal60%80%
2 goals20%0%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet80%60%
No goal60%60%
Goal difference00
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 2
Chongqing Tongliang Long - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.401.40
Goals scored / match0.40.4
Goals conceded / match1.00.6
Average goals in match1.41.0
1 goal80%80%
2 goals20%20%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet20%60%
No goal80%60%
Goal difference-3-1
Half-time: 0% leading - 40% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Qingdao Youth Island
ScoredConceded
1
4
0-15
5
2
16-30
5
5
31-45
3
3
46-60
6
4
61-75
6
11
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (6 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): -5 - late phases are a weakness.

Chongqing Tongliang Long
ScoredConceded
3
0
0-15
4
4
16-30
3
7
31-45
6
5
46-60
5
5
61-75
4
6
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (6 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.44
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.2 : 1.2
Estimated goal split
home : away
80%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
60%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-18%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
59%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
5%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 20 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Qingdao Youth Island

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.28
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.14
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+2.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.03
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.17
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
66%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
104%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.15
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
23% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 4% come in the first quarter-hour.
23%

Chongqing Tongliang Long

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.27
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.18
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.12
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.06
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
90%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
69%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.92
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
16% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 12% come in the first quarter-hour.
16%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Chinese Super League).

Teams vs league

Qingdao Youth IslandLigaChongqing Tongliang Long
Average goals in match▼ 2.503.05▼ 2.36
Both teams scored• 64%63%▼ 55%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▼ 36%58%▼ 36%
Clean sheets▲ 27%20%▲ 32%
Goal before half-time▼ 64%70%▼ 55%
Goal after half-time▼ 73%87%▼ 82%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.05
Average goals per match
63%
Both teams scored
58%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
20%
Clean sheets
1.78
Home goals / match
1.27
Away goals / match
+40%
Home attack advantage
+29%
Home defence advantage
+22%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
70%
1 goal
36%
2 goals
14%
3 goals
4%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
87%
1 goal
54%
2 goals
24%
3 goals
13%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Qingdao Youth IslandSubstitutionOn: Xinli PengOff: Zhanpeng Yang
  2. Chongqing Tongliang LongYellow cardMichael Ngadeu-Ngadjui
  3. Qingdao Youth IslandSubstitutionOn: Elnizar LohmanOff: Yu Dong

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Qingdao Youth Island 0 - 1 - 0 Chongqing Tongliang Long. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.

FAQ

What was the result of Qingdao Youth Island vs Chongqing Tongliang Long?

The Chinese Super League match finished Qingdao Youth Island 0:0 Chongqing Tongliang Long. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Qingdao Youth Island vs Chongqing Tongliang Long?

Qingdao Youth Island score 1.18 goals per game on average and Chongqing Tongliang Long 1.14. The Chinese Super League average is 3.05 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 58% of games. Both teams score in 64% of Qingdao Youth Island's matches and 55% of Chongqing Tongliang Long's.

What form are Qingdao Youth Island and Chongqing Tongliang Long in?

Over the last 5 games Qingdao Youth Island have a 2-2-1 record (1.60 points per game) and Chongqing Tongliang Long 0-2-3 (0.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Qingdao Youth Island vs Chongqing Tongliang Long?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.