Queens Park Rangers vs Swansea City: match statistics
Full analysis and pick in the app
Check the betting analysis, pick, value bet and full reasoning for this match.
Queens Park Rangers vs Swansea City: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Queens Park Rangers play Swansea City in Championship (England). The match date is 24 October 2026. Venue: MATRADE Loftus Road.
Current form
Queens Park Rangers: 1-3-1, 1.20 points/match. Swansea City: 4-0-1, 2.40 points/match.
Goal statistics
Queens Park Rangers scores 1.36 and concedes 1.09 goals per match. Swansea City scores 1.45 and concedes 0.73. League average: 2.88 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Queens Park Rangers 64%, Swansea City 45%. Over 2.5: Queens Park Rangers 55%, Swansea City 55%. League level: BTTS 64%, Over 2.5 61%.
xG, shots and style
Queens Park Rangers has higher xG: 1.66 vs 1.39. Queens Park Rangers: 15.1 shots per match, Swansea City: 12.1.
Match halves
Queens Park Rangers: half-time lead 36%, second-half goals 0.55. Swansea City: half-time lead 27%, second-half goals 0.82.
Goals by minute
Queens Park Rangers: 31-45+ (6 goals). Swansea City: 46-60 (5 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Championship: 2.88 goals per match, BTTS 64%, Over 2.5 61%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 2 previous H2H matches were available: 1-0-1. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 50%.
Before the match
1X2 odds
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Queens Park Rangers | Swansea City | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 34% | 37% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.26 | 0.33 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Swansea City is 100% better for: last-5 form.
1.2 pts / match - Queens Park Rangers · 2.4 pts / match - Swansea City
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Swansea City is 7% better for: goals scored per match.
1.36 goals / match - Queens Park Rangers · 1.45 goals / match - Swansea City
Swansea City is 49% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.09 goals / match - Queens Park Rangers · 0.73 goals / match - Swansea City
Queens Park Rangers scores in 64% of matches (7 of 11 matches), while Swansea City keeps a clean sheet in 45% (5 of 11 matches).
Swansea City scores in 73% of matches (8 of 11 matches), while Queens Park Rangers keeps a clean sheet in 18% (2 of 11 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Queens Park Rangers
Over / Under - Swansea City
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Queens Park Rangers is 23% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.45 pts / match - Queens Park Rangers · 1.18 pts / match - Swansea City
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Queens Park Rangers - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 36% of matches and wins 36%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Swansea City - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 27% of matches and wins 64%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.40 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.0 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.8 | 0.8 |
| Average goals in match | 1.8 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 40% |
| No goal | 40% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +1 | -1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.80 | 2.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 1.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 0.2 |
| Average goals in match | 1.0 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 80% |
| No goal | 80% | 20% |
| Goal difference | -1 | +5 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (6 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (5 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Queens Park Rangers
Swansea City
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Championship).
Teams vs league
| Queens Park Rangers | Liga | Swansea City | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 2.45 | 2.88 | ▼ 2.18 |
| Both teams scored | • 64% | 64% | ▼ 45% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 55% | 61% | ▼ 55% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 18% | 21% | ▲ 45% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 73% | 77% | ▼ 73% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 55% | 79% | ▼ 64% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (2): Queens Park Rangers 1 - 0 - 1 Swansea City. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 50% matches.
FAQ
When do Queens Park Rangers and Swansea City play?
Queens Park Rangers face Swansea City on 24 October 2026 in Championship at MATRADE Loftus Road. The exact kick-off time in your timezone is shown at the top of the match page.
What is the head-to-head record between Queens Park Rangers and Swansea City?
In the last 2 head-to-head matches Queens Park Rangers won 1, Swansea City won 1 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 2.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Queens Park Rangers vs Swansea City?
Queens Park Rangers score 1.36 goals per game on average and Swansea City 1.45. The Championship average is 2.88 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 61% of games. Both teams score in 64% of Queens Park Rangers's matches and 45% of Swansea City's.
What form are Queens Park Rangers and Swansea City in?
Over the last 5 games Queens Park Rangers have a 1-3-1 record (1.20 points per game) and Swansea City 4-0-1 (2.40 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Queens Park Rangers vs Swansea City?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.