RAAL La Louvière vs Zulte-Waregem: match statistics
RAAL La Louvière vs Zulte-Waregem: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
RAAL La Louvière played Zulte-Waregem in Pro League (Belgium). The match was played on 19 April 2026. Final score: 0:2.
Current form
RAAL La Louvière: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match. Zulte-Waregem: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match.
Goal statistics
RAAL La Louvière scores 0.94 and concedes 1.28 goals per match. Zulte-Waregem scores 1.31 and concedes 1.56. League average: 2.62 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: RAAL La Louvière 50%, Zulte-Waregem 63%. Over 2.5: RAAL La Louvière 44%, Zulte-Waregem 50%. League level: BTTS 55%, Over 2.5 48%.
xG, shots and style
Zulte-Waregem has higher xG: 1.44 vs 1.22. RAAL La Louvière: 10.6 shots per match, Zulte-Waregem: 12.6.
Match halves
RAAL La Louvière: half-time lead 16%, second-half goals 0.53. Zulte-Waregem: half-time lead 22%, second-half goals 0.72.
Goals by minute
RAAL La Louvière: 76-90+ (10 goals). Zulte-Waregem: 76-90+ (12 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Pro League: 2.62 goals per match, BTTS 55%, Over 2.5 48%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 2 previous H2H matches were available: 0-2-0. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 50%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
I predict a draw. The home side have as many as 44% draws at home and only 19% wins on their own pitch, indicating a strong propensity to share points. Zulte-Waregem are more efficient in attack — averaging 1.31 goals away, conversion rate around 11% and only 25% of matches without a goal — while RAAL at home score 0.75 goals with a 6% conversion and fail to score in 56% of matches. Defensively the hosts perform better at home (1.06 goals conceded per game and 44% clean sheets) than the visitors away (1.81 goals conceded and 13% clean sheets), and xG shows a balanced picture (1.41 xG for hosts vs 1.35 xG for visitors). In the last 5 matches RAAL average 1.0 point per game (8 scored and 10 conceded), and Zulte 1.4 points (5 scored and 6 conceded), therefore a draw appears the most likely outcome, although an away win is realistic.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Seasonal metrics indicate RAAL has BTTS in 50% of matches, Zulte-Waregem as high as 75%, and the league average is 54%, providing a strong seasonal signal for both teams to score. xG data support this tactically: the home side have xG_for 1.54 versus xG_against_away 1.60, while the visitors have xG_for 1.35 versus xG_against_home 1.40 — both sides generate above 1.3 xG per game. Over the last 5 fixtures the BTTS rate drops to 40% for both teams; in that period the home team averaged 1.6 goals scored and conceded 2.0 (8-10), and the visitors scored 1.0 and conceded 1.2 (5-6), indicating regular goals conceded. Additionally the hosts record 4.5 SOT and 13.81 shots overall, the visitors 3.81 SOT and 11.44 shots, and season goal tallies are 30-41 (home) and 42-50 (away), which confirms both teams’ tendency to concede. On this basis I favor the "BTTS - Yes" scenario with a 65% probability versus 35% for "No", because the high seasonal BTTS rate of the visitors, positive xG for both sides and consistent goals conceded (1.31 and 1.81 seasonally) form the strongest signal for both teams to score.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
I expect 1.57 xG for RAAL La Louvière and 1.38 xG for Zulte‑Waregem, totaling approximately 2.95 expected goals. Season-to-date the percentage of matches over 1.5 goals is 69% for the home side and 88% for the away side (average ≈79%), while both teams have BTTS rates of 50% and 75% respectively — a strong signal for Over 1.5. For the 2.5 line, seasonal values are 38% (home) and 63% (away), and the combined xG of 2.95 supports a moderate lean toward Over 2.5 (hence a forecast of ~62%). The 3.5 line has weaker backing: seasonally 31%/38% and expected ~2.95 goals yield only about 32% for Over 3.5, so Under 3.5 is more likely. The best play is Over 1.5 as the strongest and most reliable signal (80%), with Over 2.5 as a secondary, moderate option (62%).
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
A half-time draw appears most likely — the home team had a draw at the break in 7 matches (44%), and the visitors also in 7 matches (44%), while the home side led at the break in only 4 games (25%) and the visitors in 3 (19%). After the restart the advantage lies with the home team: their average xG is 1.54 versus 1.35 for the visitors, and in second halves they score on average 0.81 goals compared to 0.63 for their opponents. Additionally, the home team attempts more shots (13.81 vs 11.44) and more shots on target (4.5 vs 3.81), and their average points earned in second halves is 1.44 versus 0.88 for the visitors, which favors a turnaround from a half-time draw to a full-time win. Based on these figures and the overall win ratio of 38% for the home side versus 19% for the visitors, the Half-Time/Full-Time scenario draw at the break and home win (X/1) is the strongest signal. Therefore I assigned X/1 a 26% probability, with alternatives being 1/1 (16%) and X/X (10%) and 2/2 (13%) as the main secondary scenarios.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| RAAL La Louvière | Zulte-Waregem | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 30% | 33% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.30 | 0.31 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Zulte-Waregem is 40% better for: last-5 form.
1 pts / match - RAAL La Louvière · 1.4 pts / match - Zulte-Waregem
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Zulte-Waregem is 39% better for: goals scored per match.
0.94 goals / match - RAAL La Louvière · 1.31 goals / match - Zulte-Waregem
RAAL La Louvière is 22% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.28 goals / match - RAAL La Louvière · 1.56 goals / match - Zulte-Waregem
RAAL La Louvière scores in 56% of matches (18 of 32 matches), while Zulte-Waregem keeps a clean sheet in 19% (6 of 32 matches).
Zulte-Waregem scores in 75% of matches (24 of 32 matches), while RAAL La Louvière keeps a clean sheet in 31% (10 of 32 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - RAAL La Louvière
Over / Under - Zulte-Waregem
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
RAAL La Louvière - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 16% of matches and wins 19%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Zulte-Waregem - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 22% of matches and wins 28%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.00 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 1.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| Average goals in match | 1.6 | 2.0 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 20% |
| No goal | 60% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -2 | 0 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.00 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.2 | 0.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 0.8 |
| Average goals in match | 0.6 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 20% |
| No goal | 80% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -1 | 0 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (10 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (13). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (12 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
RAAL La Louvière
Zulte-Waregem
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Pro League).
Teams vs league
| RAAL La Louvière | Liga | Zulte-Waregem | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 2.22 | 2.62 | ▲ 2.88 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 50% | 55% | ▲ 63% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 44% | 48% | ▲ 50% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 31% | 26% | ▼ 19% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 56% | 71% | • 72% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 56% | 75% | ▲ 81% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (2): RAAL La Louvière 0 - 2 - 0 Zulte-Waregem. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 50% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of RAAL La Louvière vs Zulte-Waregem?
The Pro League match finished RAAL La Louvière 0:2 Zulte-Waregem. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between RAAL La Louvière and Zulte-Waregem?
In the last 2 head-to-head matches RAAL La Louvière won 0, Zulte-Waregem won 0 and 2 ended level. These games averaged 2.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before RAAL La Louvière vs Zulte-Waregem?
RAAL La Louvière score 0.94 goals per game on average and Zulte-Waregem 1.31. The Pro League average is 2.62 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 48% of games. Both teams score in 50% of RAAL La Louvière's matches and 63% of Zulte-Waregem's.
What form are RAAL La Louvière and Zulte-Waregem in?
Over the last 5 games RAAL La Louvière have a 1-2-2 record (1.00 points per game) and Zulte-Waregem 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for RAAL La Louvière vs Zulte-Waregem?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for RAAL La Louvière vs Zulte-Waregem: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.


