Ranheim vs Sandnes Ulf: match statistics
Ranheim vs Sandnes Ulf: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Ranheim played Sandnes Ulf in First Division (Norway). The match was played on 31 May 2026. Venue: EXTRA Arena. Final score: 5:1.
Current form
Ranheim: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match. Sandnes Ulf: 2-0-3, 1.20 points/match.
Goal statistics
Ranheim scores 2.63 and concedes 2.13 goals per match. Sandnes Ulf scores 1.22 and concedes 1.44. League average: 3.45 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Ranheim 75%, Sandnes Ulf 44%. Over 2.5: Ranheim 88%, Sandnes Ulf 33%. League level: BTTS 55%, Over 2.5 70%.
xG, shots and style
Ranheim has higher xG: 1.69 vs 1.42. Ranheim: 14.3 shots per match, Sandnes Ulf: 12.1.
Match halves
Ranheim: half-time lead 50%, second-half goals 1.50. Sandnes Ulf: half-time lead 22%, second-half goals 0.78.
Goals by minute
Ranheim: 46-60 (7 goals). Sandnes Ulf: 76-90+ (3 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
First Division: 3.45 goals per match, BTTS 55%, Over 2.5 70%.
Head-to-head
No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Ranheim has a clear advantage in home metrics: 75% home win rate, an average of 3.25 goals scored per match and xG 2.02, while Sandnes Ulf averages only 0.75 goals away and xG 1.30. The hosts average 17.75 shots and 8 on target per home match versus the visitors’ 10 shots and 3 on target away, with a conversion rate of 18% versus 8%, giving Ranheim a significant edge in chance quality and efficiency. Sandnes Ulf fail to score in 50% of away matches and concede on average 1.5 goals away, whereas Ranheim concede 1.0 at home, although the hosts have let in 11 goals in the last 5 matches, indicating some defensive issues. Considering Ranheim’s 13 goals in the last 5 matches versus Sandnes’ 6 goals, alongside superior xG figures and more shots on target, I forecast a home win.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
I forecast BTTS - Yes with a 65% probability vs 35% for No, as Ranheim's offensive signals and Sandnes' recent attacking improvement strongly favor Goal/Goal. Ranheim records 60% BTTS on the season and 80% BTTS in the last 5 matches, scoring an average 2.6 goals (13 in 5) and conceding 2.2 (11), indicating high-shot-volume games. Sandnes Ulf has only 25% BTTS for the season and averages 0.75 goals per match with 50% of matches goalless, but in the last 5 matches they averaged 1.2 goals (6 goals) with an average xG of 1.55, i.e. creating more chances than the seasonal 0.75 suggests. Additionally, season xG is 1.52 for Ranheim vs 1.30 for Sandnes, and shots on target 5.0 vs 3.0 confirm the home team's offensive edge, while recent average xG against Ranheim of 1.8 and seasonal conceded average 1.4 indicate vulnerability to conceding. Considering a league BTTS of 55% and the combined recent averages of 2.6 vs 1.2 goals per match, the both teams to score scenario looks stronger, hence the pick: Yes.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
I estimate total expected xG around 2.84: Ranheim xG_for 1.52 and opponent xG_against 1.43 yield ~1.48, while Sandnes Ulf xG_for 1.30 and opponent xG_against 1.41 yield ~1.36. Ranheim averages 1.6 goals per game, 13.8 shots with 5.0 on target and a 12% conversion, whereas Sandnes averages 0.75 goals, 10.0 shots and 3.0 on target with an 8% conversion — the home side’s offensive edge increases the likelihood of more goals. In the last 5 matches Ranheim scored 13 (2.6 per match) and conceded 11 (2.2), with 80% of their last 5 games exceeding 2.5 goals; Sandnes scored 6 and conceded 7 in their last 5 (1.2 and 1.4), showing a form asymmetry. Seasonal Over 1.5 rates are 80% for Ranheim and 100% for Sandnes, and the league average is 3.45 goals per game; therefore I consider Over 1.5 the strongest signal (90%). I price Over 2.5 at 66% based on total xG 2.84 and a league Over 2.5 rate of 69%. Over 3.5 is less likely (38%) because although Ranheim have 40% of matches season-to-date with >3.5 goals, Sandnes have 0%, which limits the chance of a very high-scoring game.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Ranheim holds a clear advantage in first-half metrics: they led at the break in 40% of home matches, while Sandnes Ulf have not led at the break in any away game, and the average first-half goals are 0.8 for Ranheim versus 0.0 for the visitors. Ranheim creates more high-quality chances — xG 1.52 compared to 1.30 for Sandnes, 5.0 shots on target vs 3.0 and a higher conversion rate 12% vs 8% — which increases the hosts’ probability of scoring first. Over the full match the hosts average 1.6 goals per game vs 0.75 for the opponents, and the visitors concede on average 1.5 goals, so a first-half lead for the hosts often translates into a victory. Additionally, 80% of Ranheim’s halves feature at least one goal, making a 0-0 half unlikely; Sandnes also have poor away form (25% wins, 75% losses). Taking this into account I assess the 1/1 scenario (home team leading at half-time and winning outright) as the strongest signal with an estimated probability of approximately 35%.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Ranheim | Sandnes Ulf | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 47% | 34% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.40 | 0.30 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Ranheim is 17% better for: last-5 form.
1.4 pts / match - Ranheim · 1.2 pts / match - Sandnes Ulf
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Ranheim is 116% better for: goals scored per match.
2.63 goals / match - Ranheim · 1.22 goals / match - Sandnes Ulf
Sandnes Ulf is 48% better for: goals conceded per match.
2.13 goals / match - Ranheim · 1.44 goals / match - Sandnes Ulf
Ranheim scores in 88% of matches (7 of 8 matches), while Sandnes Ulf keeps a clean sheet in 22% (2 of 9 matches).
Sandnes Ulf scores in 67% of matches (6 of 9 matches), while Ranheim keeps a clean sheet in 13% (1 of 8 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Ranheim
Over / Under - Sandnes Ulf
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Ranheim is 63% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.63 pts / match - Ranheim · 1 pts / match - Sandnes Ulf
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Ranheim - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 50% of matches and wins 50%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.6 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Sandnes Ulf - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 22% of matches and wins 33%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.40 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.0 | 1.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.8 | 1.4 |
| Average goals in match | 1.8 | 3.0 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 40% |
| No goal | 20% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +1 | +1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.20 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 0.8 |
| Average goals in match | 1.2 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 40% |
| No goal | 60% | 60% |
| Goal difference | 0 | -1 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (7 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (3 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Ranheim
Sandnes Ulf
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (First Division).
Teams vs league
| Ranheim | Liga | Sandnes Ulf | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 4.75 | 3.45 | ▼ 2.67 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 75% | 55% | ▼ 44% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 88% | 70% | ▼ 33% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 13% | 23% | • 22% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 100% | 78% | • 78% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 88% | 86% | ▲ 89% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
FAQ
What was the result of Ranheim vs Sandnes Ulf?
The First Division match finished Ranheim 5:1 Sandnes Ulf. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Ranheim vs Sandnes Ulf?
Ranheim score 2.63 goals per game on average and Sandnes Ulf 1.22. The First Division average is 3.45 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 70% of games. Both teams score in 75% of Ranheim's matches and 44% of Sandnes Ulf's.
What form are Ranheim and Sandnes Ulf in?
Over the last 5 games Ranheim have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and Sandnes Ulf 2-0-3 (1.20 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Ranheim vs Sandnes Ulf?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Ranheim vs Sandnes Ulf: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.


