Latvia - 1. LigaOC Rēzekne Mākslīgais LaukumsData current as of 31 August 2026

Rēzekne / BJSS vs Metta - LU: match statistics

Rēzekne / BJSS crest
Rēzekne / BJSS
0 : 2half-time 0:0
Metta - LU crest
Metta - LU

Rēzekne / BJSS vs Metta - LU: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Rēzekne / BJSS played Metta - LU in 1. Liga (Latvia). The match was played on 23 August 2026. Venue: OC Rēzekne Mākslīgais Laukums. Final score: 0:2.

Current form

Rēzekne / BJSS: 0-1-4, 0.20 points/match. Metta - LU: 4-1-0, 2.60 points/match.

Goal statistics

Rēzekne / BJSS scores 0.81 and concedes 2.88 goals per match. Metta - LU scores 4.31 and concedes 0.88. League average: 3.60 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Rēzekne / BJSS 63%, Metta - LU 56%. Over 2.5: Rēzekne / BJSS 75%, Metta - LU 88%. League level: BTTS 64%, Over 2.5 69%.

xG, shots and style

Metta - LU has higher xG: 3.01 vs 0.77. Rēzekne / BJSS: 2.9 shots per match, Metta - LU: 22.0.

Match halves

Rēzekne / BJSS: half-time lead 6%, second-half goals 0.50. Metta - LU: half-time lead 81%, second-half goals 1.75.

Goals by minute

Rēzekne / BJSS: 46-60 (3 goals). Metta - LU: 31-45+ (18 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

1. Liga: 3.60 goals per match, BTTS 64%, Over 2.5 69%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-0-1. Average goals 5.00, BTTS 0%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Metta - LU are top of the table with a record of 13 wins, 2 draws and just 1 defeat, while Rēzekne / BJSS sit 14th and have won only 1 of 16 matches. The visitors have scored 69 goals this season, including 28 in their last five games, whereas the hosts have managed just 4 goals over the same period and have failed to win any of those matches. Away from home, Metta - LU create significantly more chances, averaging 19.33 shots and an xG of 2.46, compared with 4.75 shots and an xG of 0.88 for Rēzekne / BJSS at home. The hosts concede an average of 2.75 goals per home match and have kept no clean sheets, while the visitors allow opponents just 0.86 goals and 0.89 xG away from home. The clear advantage in attacking quality, possession (61% to 44%) and defensive solidity strongly supports a convincing Metta - LU victory.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Both teams regularly feature in matches with goals at both ends: this scenario occurred in 56% of Rēzekne / BJSS matches and 57% of Metta - LU games, compared with the league average of 63%. The hosts have not recorded a single goalless match this season and average as many as 5.67 goals at home, which is a strong argument against the visitors keeping a clean sheet. Metta - LU score an average of 2.57 goals away from home and as many as 5.6 across their last five matches, while Rēzekne / BJSS conceded 2.2 goals per game during this period. The hosts’ recent form has been weaker offensively, as they scored just 0.8 goals from an xG of 0.97, but their opponents concede an average of 1.4 goals and record 0.96 xG against. The combination of Metta’s very strong attack and Rēzekne’s high home scoring efficiency makes it more likely that both teams will score, supporting the BTTS - Yes / Goal-Goal selection rather than BTTS - No.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Metta - LU are in very strong offensive form, averaging 5.6 goals scored over their last 5 matches, with an average xG of 2.92. During this period, Rēzekne / BJSS conceded 2.2 goals per match and allowed opponents an average of 1.76 xG, clearly favoring high attacking output from the visitors. The 1.5 line was surpassed in 100% of the hosts’ matches and 86% of Metta’s fixtures, while over 2.5 goals landed in 89% and 86% of their respective league matches. The hosts scored only 4 goals in their last 5 appearances, but Metta conceded an average of 1.4 goals, meaning Rēzekne could also contribute to the total. The strongest signal is Over 1.5 goals, as the visitors’ offensive advantage alone gives a high probability of at least two goals.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The strongest signal comes from current form: Rēzekne have failed to win any of their last five matches, scoring just 0.8 goals per game and conceding 2.2, while Metta - LU have averaged 5.6 goals and won 60% of those fixtures. At half-time, the hosts failed to score in any of these matches and were trailing in 75% of them, whereas the visitors held a lead at the break in 60% of their games, scoring an average of 3.2 goals. Metta - LU have also maintained their advantage after the interval, averaging 2.4 goals in the second half and winning it in 80% of their recent appearances, compared with just 0.75 goals for Rēzekne. Full-season data were more favourable to the hosts, but their recent decline from 5.67 to 0.8 goals per game is too pronounced. Therefore, the most likely scenario is the visitors leading at half-time and winning the match, namely 2/2.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
0 : 2
2nd half

Match statistics

-1Possession (%)-1
Rēzekne / BJSSMetta - LU
-1Shots-1
Rēzekne / BJSSMetta - LU
-1Shots on target-1
Rēzekne / BJSSMetta - LU
0xG0
Rēzekne / BJSSMetta - LU
-1Corners-1
Rēzekne / BJSSMetta - LU
0Dangerous attacks0
Rēzekne / BJSSMetta - LU
-1Fouls-1
Rēzekne / BJSSMetta - LU
-1Cards-1
Rēzekne / BJSSMetta - LU

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Rēzekne / BJSSMetta - LU
0.81Goals scored / match4.31
Rēzekne / BJSSMetta - LU
2.88Goals conceded / match0.88
Rēzekne / BJSSMetta - LU
28%Average possession56%
Rēzekne / BJSSMetta - LU
1.44Shots on target / match11.63
Rēzekne / BJSSMetta - LU

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

2.94Shots per match22
Rēzekne / BJSSMetta - LU
1.44Shots on target11.63
Rēzekne / BJSSMetta - LU
27.7%Shot conversion19.6%
Rēzekne / BJSSMetta - LU
28%Possession56%
Rēzekne / BJSSMetta - LU
0.77xG for3.01
Rēzekne / BJSSMetta - LU
2.35xG against0.71
Rēzekne / BJSSMetta - LU

Shooting quality

Rēzekne / BJSS: Counter-attackingMetta - LU: Dominant
Rēzekne / BJSSMetta - LU
Accuracy (shots on target)49%53%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.260.14
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.560.37

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Metta - LU is 1200% better for: last-5 form.

0.2 pts / match - Rēzekne / BJSS · 2.6 pts / match - Metta - LU

Rēzekne / BJSS
DLLLL
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
6% W13% R81% P
Season (W-D-L)
1-2-13
0.31 pts / match · goal difference -33
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-1-4
0.20 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
1-2-5
Last 5 at home
1-1-3
LWLDL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 2.2xG: 0.97Opponent xG: 1.76BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 60%
Metta - LU
WWWDW
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
81% W13% R6% P
Season (W-D-L)
13-2-1
2.56 pts / match · goal difference +55
Last 5 (W-D-L)
4-1-0
2.60 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
5-2-0
Last 5 away
3-2-0
WDWWD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 6.0Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 2.97Opponent xG: 0.59BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 100%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Metta - LU is 432% better for: goals scored per match.

0.81 goals / match - Rēzekne / BJSS · 4.31 goals / match - Metta - LU

Metta - LU is 227% better for: goals conceded per match.

2.88 goals / match - Rēzekne / BJSS · 0.88 goals / match - Metta - LU

Rēzekne / BJSS scoring profile: mixed

Rēzekne / BJSS scores in 63% of matches (10 of 16 matches), while Metta - LU keeps a clean sheet in 44% (7 of 16 matches).

Metta - LU scoring profile: very strong

Metta - LU scores in 100% of matches (16 of 16 matches), while Rēzekne / BJSS keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 16 matches).

13Goals scored (season)69
Rēzekne / BJSSMetta - LU
46Goals conceded (season)14
Rēzekne / BJSSMetta - LU
3.69Average goals in match5.19
Rēzekne / BJSSMetta - LU
4Goals scored (last 5)30
Rēzekne / BJSSMetta - LU
11Goals conceded (last 5)4
Rēzekne / BJSSMetta - LU

How often they score at least...

63%1 goal100%
Rēzekne / BJSSMetta - LU
19%2 goals88%
Rēzekne / BJSSMetta - LU
0%3 goals69%
Rēzekne / BJSSMetta - LU
0%4 goals44%
Rēzekne / BJSSMetta - LU

How often they concede at least...

100%1 goal56%
Rēzekne / BJSSMetta - LU
75%2 goals25%
Rēzekne / BJSSMetta - LU
50%3 goals6%
Rēzekne / BJSSMetta - LU
38%4 goals0%
Rēzekne / BJSSMetta - LU

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

64%
League average

Goal patterns

19%BTTS at half-time13%
Rēzekne / BJSSMetta - LU
6%BTTS in both halves0%
Rēzekne / BJSSMetta - LU
13%Scored in both halves75%
Rēzekne / BJSSMetta - LU

BTTS and goal count

56%Min. 3 goals and BTTS56%
Rēzekne / BJSSMetta - LU
19%Min. 3 goals without BTTS31%
Rēzekne / BJSSMetta - LU
80%BTTS - last 560%
Rēzekne / BJSSMetta - LU

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

75%Min. 1 goal before half-time88%
Rēzekne / BJSSMetta - LU
25%Min. 2 goals before half-time50%
Rēzekne / BJSSMetta - LU
13%Min. 3 goals before half-time38%
Rēzekne / BJSSMetta - LU

2nd half

81%Min. 1 goal after half-time88%
Rēzekne / BJSSMetta - LU
75%Min. 2 goals after half-time75%
Rēzekne / BJSSMetta - LU
50%Min. 3 goals after half-time56%
Rēzekne / BJSSMetta - LU

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Metta - LU is 412% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

0.5 pts / match - Rēzekne / BJSS · 2.56 pts / match - Metta - LU

Rēzekne / BJSS - half-time state
6% leading31% draw63% trailing
Metta - LU - half-time state
81% leading13% draw6% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.5Points per match (1st half)2.56
Rēzekne / BJSSMetta - LU
0.25Goals scored (1st half)2.44
Rēzekne / BJSSMetta - LU
0.88Goals conceded (1st half)0.19
Rēzekne / BJSSMetta - LU
1.13Average goals (1st half)2.63
Rēzekne / BJSSMetta - LU
31%Clean sheet before half-time81%
Rēzekne / BJSSMetta - LU
75%No goal before half-time19%
Rēzekne / BJSSMetta - LU

After half-time (2nd half)

0.69Points per match (2nd half)2.13
Rēzekne / BJSSMetta - LU
0.5Goals scored (2nd half)1.75
Rēzekne / BJSSMetta - LU
1.63Goals conceded (2nd half)0.56
Rēzekne / BJSSMetta - LU
2.13Average goals (2nd half)2.31
Rēzekne / BJSSMetta - LU
25%Clean sheet after half-time63%
Rēzekne / BJSSMetta - LU
56%No goal after half-time13%
Rēzekne / BJSSMetta - LU

Rēzekne / BJSS - second-half results

13% W31% R56% P
8
Half-time points
4
Half-time goals
-10
Goal difference (1st half)
11
Second-half points
-18
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.50
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 6% of matches and wins 6%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.7

Concedes 0.7 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Metta - LU - second-half results

63% W25% R13% P
41
Half-time points
39
Half-time goals
+36
Goal difference (1st half)
34
Second-half points
+19
Goal difference (2nd half)
2.56
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 81% of matches and wins 81%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.4

Concedes 0.4 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Rēzekne / BJSS - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.201.00
Goals scored / match0.20.6
Goals conceded / match1.01.2
Average goals in match1.21.8
1 goal80%80%
2 goals20%60%
3 goals20%40%
Clean sheet20%40%
No goal80%40%
Goal difference-4-3
Half-time: 0% leading - 20% draw - 80% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 1
Metta - LU - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.403.00
Goals scored / match3.42.6
Goals conceded / match0.40.4
Average goals in match3.83.0
1 goal100%100%
2 goals40%100%
3 goals40%100%
Clean sheet60%60%
No goal20%0%
Goal difference+15+11
Half-time: 80% leading - 0% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 100% won - 0% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 17

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Rēzekne / BJSS
ScoredConceded
2
13
0-15
1
5
16-30
2
2
31-45
3
5
46-60
2
12
61-75
3
9
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (3 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (13). Late-goal balance (76-90): -6 - late phases are a weakness.

Metta - LU
ScoredConceded
11
2
0-15
12
1
16-30
18
2
31-45
9
5
46-60
8
1
61-75
11
3
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (18 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +8 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

4.44
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
0.8 : 3.6
Estimated goal split
home : away
123%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
60%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+13%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
63%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
0%
0:0 risk
practically zero
4+
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Rēzekne / BJSS

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-1.58
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.49
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+1.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.04
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.53
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
41%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
180%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.11
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
23% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 15% come in the first quarter-hour.
23%

Metta - LU

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+2.30
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+1.13
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-5.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+1.30
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.17
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
269%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
44%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.04
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.7
Late goals
16% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 16% come in the first quarter-hour.
16%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (1. Liga).

Teams vs league

Rēzekne / BJSSLigaMetta - LU
Average goals in match 3.693.60 5.19
Both teams scored 63%64% 56%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 75%69% 88%
Clean sheets 0%20% 44%
Goal before half-time 75%76% 88%
Goal after half-time 81%85% 88%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.60
Average goals per match
64%
Both teams scored
69%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
20%
Clean sheets
2.00
Home goals / match
1.60
Away goals / match
+25%
Home attack advantage
+20%
Home defence advantage
+9%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
76%
1 goal
39%
2 goals
20%
3 goals
6%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
85%
1 goal
62%
2 goals
35%
3 goals
12%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Home team

Away team

Other recorded players

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Metta - LUGoalSadiq Saleh
  2. Metta - LUGoalSadiq Saleh

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Rēzekne / BJSS 0 - 0 - 1 Metta - LU. Average goals 5.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.

FAQ

What was the result of Rēzekne / BJSS vs Metta - LU?

The 1. Liga match finished Rēzekne / BJSS 0:2 Metta - LU. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Rēzekne / BJSS vs Metta - LU?

Rēzekne / BJSS score 0.81 goals per game on average and Metta - LU 4.31. The 1. Liga average is 3.60 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 69% of games. Both teams score in 63% of Rēzekne / BJSS's matches and 56% of Metta - LU's.

What form are Rēzekne / BJSS and Metta - LU in?

Over the last 5 games Rēzekne / BJSS have a 0-1-4 record (0.20 points per game) and Metta - LU 4-1-0 (2.60 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Rēzekne / BJSS vs Metta - LU?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Rēzekne / BJSS vs Metta - LU: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.