Latvia - 1. LigaData current as of 17 October 2026

Riga FC II vs Rēzekne / BJSS: match statistics

Riga FC II crest
Riga FC II
5 : 0half-time 0:0
Rēzekne / BJSS crest
Rēzekne / BJSS

Riga FC II vs Rēzekne / BJSS: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Riga FC II played Rēzekne / BJSS in 1. Liga (Latvia). The match was played on 11 October 2026. Final score: 5:0.

Current form

Riga FC II: 1-3-1, 1.20 points/match. Rēzekne / BJSS: 0-1-4, 0.20 points/match.

Goal statistics

Riga FC II scores 1.38 and concedes 1.76 goals per match. Rēzekne / BJSS scores 0.81 and concedes 3.05. League average: 3.71 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Riga FC II 62%, Rēzekne / BJSS 62%. Over 2.5: Riga FC II 62%, Rēzekne / BJSS 76%. League level: BTTS 63%, Over 2.5 70%.

xG, shots and style

Riga FC II has higher xG: 1.30 vs 0.76. Riga FC II: 8.1 shots per match, Rēzekne / BJSS: 2.2.

Match halves

Riga FC II: half-time lead 29%, second-half goals 0.67. Rēzekne / BJSS: half-time lead 5%, second-half goals 0.43.

Goals by minute

Riga FC II: 76-90+ (7 goals). Rēzekne / BJSS: 0-15 (4 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

1. Liga: 3.71 goals per match, BTTS 63%, Over 2.5 70%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 3 previous H2H matches were available: 0-0-3. Average goals 4.33, BTTS 100%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Riga FC II have won 55% of their home matches, while Rēzekne / BJSS have lost every away game, clearly tipping the balance in the hosts’ favour. Over the last five rounds, the hosts have scored 6 goals and conceded 7, whereas the visitors have managed just 4 goals and conceded as many as 18. Their attacking advantage is also reflected in their home and away averages: Riga score 1.82 goals per match, while Rēzekne manage only 0.4 away from home and fail to score in 60% of those matches. The hosts also create more chances, with a home xG of 1.42 compared with the visitors’ away xG of 0.69, while Rēzekne’s defence allows chances worth an average of 2.66 xG per match. Although Riga concede an average of 1.73 goals at home, Rēzekne’s away average of 3.2 goals conceded makes a home win by far the most likely outcome.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Riga FC II have seen BTTS - Yes in 82% of their matches and have not kept a clean sheet, which points towards the visitors scoring. However, Rēzekne / BJSS average just 0.40 goals per match and fail to score in 60% of their games, making their contribution to this scenario uncertain. The visitors average 1.88 shots on target, and their xG stands at 0.69 compared with the hosts’ 0.88, further indicating limited attacking potential. Riga FC II, meanwhile, average 1.18 goals, while the visitors concede 3.20, so a goal from the hosts is more likely. Although the hosts concede an average of 2.91 goals, the visitors’ high rate of matches without scoring gives a slight edge to BTTS - No: at least one team is expected not to score.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The strongest pick is Over 1.5 goals: this line has landed in 100% of Riga FC II’s home matches and 80% of Rēzekne / BJSS’s away games. The visitors concede an average of 3.2 goals, rising to 3.6 over their last five matches, giving the hosts a chance to score at least twice despite averaging 1.18 goals at home. Riga FC II also concede heavily, at an average of 2.91 goals, but the visitors score just 0.4 goals away from home and have failed to score in 60% of their matches. Over 2.5 goals is supported by both teams’ results, having landed in 73% and 80% of their matches, respectively; however, the visitors’ poor scoring record makes it a less reliable option than Over 1.5 goals.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The most likely scenario is that Riga FC II leads at the break and holds on to its advantage until the final whistle. Rēzekne / BJSS were trailing at half-time in 9 of their 10 matches, conceding an average of 1.4 goals before the break and scoring just 0.1. The hosts themselves led at half-time in only 11% of their matches, so a half-time draw followed by a home win remains a notable alternative. Riga’s recent record across their last five matches supports a full-time win: they scored an average of 1.2 goals and conceded 1.4, while the visitors scored 0.8 and conceded 3.6. The advantage could also be maintained after the break, as the visitors have recently conceded an average of 2.5 goals per match in the second half, compared with just 0.2 for the hosts.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
5 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

65Possession (%)35
Riga FC IIRēzekne / BJSS
17Shots4
Riga FC IIRēzekne / BJSS
7Shots on target0
Riga FC IIRēzekne / BJSS
1.96xG0.4
Riga FC IIRēzekne / BJSS
10Corners3
Riga FC IIRēzekne / BJSS
56Dangerous attacks19
Riga FC IIRēzekne / BJSS
14Fouls6
Riga FC IIRēzekne / BJSS
0Cards0
Riga FC IIRēzekne / BJSS

Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Riga FC IIRēzekne / BJSS
1.38Goals scored / match0.81
Riga FC IIRēzekne / BJSS
1.76Goals conceded / match3.05
Riga FC IIRēzekne / BJSS
47%Average possession23%
Riga FC IIRēzekne / BJSS
4.19Shots on target / match0.95
Riga FC IIRēzekne / BJSS

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

8.14Shots per match2.19
Riga FC IIRēzekne / BJSS
4.19Shots on target0.95
Riga FC IIRēzekne / BJSS
17%Shot conversion37%
Riga FC IIRēzekne / BJSS
47%Possession23%
Riga FC IIRēzekne / BJSS
1.3xG for0.76
Riga FC IIRēzekne / BJSS
1.6xG against2.36
Riga FC IIRēzekne / BJSS

Shooting quality

Riga FC II: Counter-attackingRēzekne / BJSS: Counter-attacking
Riga FC IIRēzekne / BJSS
Accuracy (shots on target)51%43%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.160.35
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.330.85

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Riga FC II is 500% better for: last-5 form.

1.2 pts / match - Riga FC II · 0.2 pts / match - Rēzekne / BJSS

Riga FC II
LDWDD
Season result split
33% W24% D43% L
Season (W-D-L)
7-5-9
1.24 pts / match · goal difference -8
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-3-1
1.20 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
6-2-3
Last 5 at home
2-2-1
WDLWD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.30Opponent xG: 1.37BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 40%
Rēzekne / BJSS
LLLDL
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
5% W14% D81% L
Season (W-D-L)
1-3-17
0.29 pts / match · goal difference -47
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-1-4
0.20 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
0-0-10
Last 5 away
0-0-5
LLLLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 3.6xG: 0.56Opponent xG: 2.44BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 80%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Riga FC II is 70% better for: goals scored per match.

1.38 goals / match - Riga FC II · 0.81 goals / match - Rēzekne / BJSS

Riga FC II is 73% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.76 goals / match - Riga FC II · 3.05 goals / match - Rēzekne / BJSS

Riga FC II scoring profile: very strong

Riga FC II scores in 71% of matches (15 of 21 matches), while Rēzekne / BJSS keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 21 matches).

Rēzekne / BJSS scoring profile: very strong

Rēzekne / BJSS scores in 62% of matches (13 of 21 matches), while Riga FC II keeps a clean sheet in 14% (3 of 21 matches).

29Goals scored (season)17
Riga FC IIRēzekne / BJSS
37Goals conceded (season)64
Riga FC IIRēzekne / BJSS
3.14Average goals in match3.86
Riga FC IIRēzekne / BJSS
6Goals scored (last 5)4
Riga FC IIRēzekne / BJSS
7Goals conceded (last 5)18
Riga FC IIRēzekne / BJSS

How often they score at least...

71%1 goal62%
Riga FC IIRēzekne / BJSS
48%2 goals19%
Riga FC IIRēzekne / BJSS
14%3 goals0%
Riga FC IIRēzekne / BJSS
5%4 goals0%
Riga FC IIRēzekne / BJSS

How often they concede at least...

86%1 goal100%
Riga FC IIRēzekne / BJSS
62%2 goals81%
Riga FC IIRēzekne / BJSS
24%3 goals52%
Riga FC IIRēzekne / BJSS
5%4 goals38%
Riga FC IIRēzekne / BJSS

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

63%
League average

Goal patterns

33%BTTS at half-time19%
Riga FC IIRēzekne / BJSS
5%BTTS in both halves5%
Riga FC IIRēzekne / BJSS
33%Scored in both halves10%
Riga FC IIRēzekne / BJSS

BTTS and goal count

52%Min. 3 goals and BTTS57%
Riga FC IIRēzekne / BJSS
10%Min. 3 goals without BTTS19%
Riga FC IIRēzekne / BJSS
80%BTTS - last 560%
Riga FC IIRēzekne / BJSS

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

81%Min. 1 goal before half-time71%
Riga FC IIRēzekne / BJSS
43%Min. 2 goals before half-time33%
Riga FC IIRēzekne / BJSS
24%Min. 3 goals before half-time14%
Riga FC IIRēzekne / BJSS

2nd half

81%Min. 1 goal after half-time81%
Riga FC IIRēzekne / BJSS
52%Min. 2 goals after half-time76%
Riga FC IIRēzekne / BJSS
24%Min. 3 goals after half-time43%
Riga FC IIRēzekne / BJSS

Match halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Riga FC II is 138% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.24 pts / match - Riga FC II · 0.52 pts / match - Rēzekne / BJSS

Riga FC II - half-time state
29% leading38% draw33% trailing
Rēzekne / BJSS - half-time state
5% leading38% draw57% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.24Points per match (1st half)0.52
Riga FC IIRēzekne / BJSS
0.71Goals scored (1st half)0.24
Riga FC IIRēzekne / BJSS
0.76Goals conceded (1st half)0.95
Riga FC IIRēzekne / BJSS
1.48Average goals (1st half)1.19
Riga FC IIRēzekne / BJSS
38%Clean sheet before half-time33%
Riga FC IIRēzekne / BJSS
48%No goal before half-time76%
Riga FC IIRēzekne / BJSS

After half-time (2nd half)

1.24Points per match (2nd half)0.62
Riga FC IIRēzekne / BJSS
0.67Goals scored (2nd half)0.43
Riga FC IIRēzekne / BJSS
1Goals conceded (2nd half)1.71
Riga FC IIRēzekne / BJSS
1.67Average goals (2nd half)2.14
Riga FC IIRēzekne / BJSS
48%Clean sheet after half-time24%
Riga FC IIRēzekne / BJSS
48%No goal after half-time62%
Riga FC IIRēzekne / BJSS

Riga FC II - second-half results

33% W24% D43% L
26
Half-time points
15
Half-time goals
-1
Goal difference (1st half)
26
Second-half points
-7
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.24
PPG before half-time
Lead holding114%

Leads at half-time in 29% of matches and wins 33%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Rēzekne / BJSS - second-half results

10% W33% D57% L
11
Half-time points
5
Half-time goals
-15
Goal difference (1st half)
13
Second-half points
-27
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.52
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 5% of matches and wins 5%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.8

Concedes 0.8 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Riga FC II - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.602.20
Goals scored / match0.40.8
Goals conceded / match1.20.2
Average goals in match1.61.0
1 goal80%60%
2 goals60%20%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet20%80%
No goal60%40%
Goal difference-4+3
Half-time: 0% leading - 60% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 40% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 2
Rēzekne / BJSS - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.600.40
Goals scored / match0.20.2
Goals conceded / match1.22.0
Average goals in match1.42.2
1 goal60%80%
2 goals60%80%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet40%20%
No goal80%80%
Goal difference-5-9
Half-time: 0% leading - 60% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 40% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 1

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Riga FC II
ScoredConceded
4
3
0-15
5
7
16-30
6
6
31-45
3
8
46-60
4
1
61-75
7
12
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (7 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): -5 - late phases are a weakness.

Rēzekne / BJSS
ScoredConceded
4
16
0-15
1
7
16-30
3
5
31-45
4
6
46-60
2
17
61-75
3
13
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (4 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (17). Late-goal balance (76-90): -10 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.50
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
2.2 : 1.3
Estimated goal split
home : away
94%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
62%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+24%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
44%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
11%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 9 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Riga FC II

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.30
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.08
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+2.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.08
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.16
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
68%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
105%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.04
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.0
Late goals
24% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 14% come in the first quarter-hour.
24%

Rēzekne / BJSS

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-1.60
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.64
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+1.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.05
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.69
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
49%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
150%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.09
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
18% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 24% come in the first quarter-hour.
18%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (1. Liga).

Teams vs league

Riga FC IILigaRēzekne / BJSS
Average goals in match▼ 3.143.71▲ 3.86
Both teams scored• 62%63%• 62%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▼ 62%70%▲ 76%
Clean sheets▼ 14%20%▼ 0%
Goal before half-time▲ 81%76%▼ 71%
Goal after half-time▼ 81%83%▼ 81%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.71
Average goals per match
63%
Both teams scored
70%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
20%
Clean sheets
2.04
Home goals / match
1.67
Away goals / match
+22%
Home attack advantage
+18%
Home defence advantage
+8%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
76%
1 goal
46%
2 goals
25%
3 goals
7%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
83%
1 goal
60%
2 goals
34%
3 goals
12%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Home team

Other recorded players

—Nazar Prudchenko⚽ 2
—Nils Voitiskis⚽ 2

Away team

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Riga FC IIGoalNils Voitiskis
  2. Riga FC IIGoalNazar Prudchenko
  3. Riga FC IIGoalNazar Prudchenko
  4. Riga FC IIGoalNils Voitiskis

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (3): Riga FC II 0 - 0 - 3 Rēzekne / BJSS. Average goals 4.33, both teams scored in 100% matches.

Rēzekne / BJSS
2 : 1
Riga FC II
FK Rēzekne FA / BJSS
3 : 2
Riga FC II
Riga FC II
2 : 3
FK Rēzekne FA / BJSS

FAQ

What was the result of Riga FC II vs Rēzekne / BJSS?

The 1. Liga match finished Riga FC II 5:0 Rēzekne / BJSS. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Riga FC II and Rēzekne / BJSS?

In the last 3 head-to-head matches Riga FC II won 0, Rēzekne / BJSS won 3 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 4.33 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Riga FC II vs Rēzekne / BJSS?

Riga FC II score 1.38 goals per game on average and Rēzekne / BJSS 0.81. The 1. Liga average is 3.71 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 70% of games. Both teams score in 62% of Riga FC II's matches and 62% of Rēzekne / BJSS's.

What form are Riga FC II and Rēzekne / BJSS in?

Over the last 5 games Riga FC II have a 1-3-1 record (1.20 points per game) and Rēzekne / BJSS 0-1-4 (0.20 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Riga FC II vs Rēzekne / BJSS?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Riga FC II vs Rēzekne / BJSS: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.