Latvia - 1. LigaSporta komplekss ĶeizarmežsData current as of 07 September 2026

Riga FC II vs Skanste: match statistics

Reasoning:

Full analysis and pick in the app

Check the betting analysis, pick, value bet and full reasoning for this match.

Check analysis and pick

Riga FC II vs Skanste: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Riga FC II play Skanste in 1. Liga (Latvia). The match date is 7 September 2026. Venue: Sporta komplekss Ķeizarmežs.

Current form

Riga FC II: 0-2-3, 0.40 points/match. Skanste: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

Riga FC II scores 1.39 and concedes 1.89 goals per match. Skanste scores 2.06 and concedes 1.94. League average: 3.67 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Riga FC II 61%, Skanste 61%. Over 2.5: Riga FC II 67%, Skanste 72%. League level: BTTS 64%, Over 2.5 70%.

xG, shots and style

Skanste has higher xG: 1.57 vs 1.29. Riga FC II: 8.1 shots per match, Skanste: 10.7.

Match halves

Riga FC II: half-time lead 33%, second-half goals 0.61. Skanste: half-time lead 22%, second-half goals 1.00.

Goals by minute

Riga FC II: 16-30 (5 goals). Skanste: 46-60 (12 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

1. Liga: 3.67 goals per match, BTTS 64%, Over 2.5 70%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 3 previous H2H matches were available: 0-0-3. Average goals 1.33, BTTS 0%.

Before the match

1X2 odds

(-)
(-)
(-)

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.39Goals scored / match2.06
Riga FC IISkanste
1.89Goals conceded / match1.94
Riga FC IISkanste
47%Average possession41%
Riga FC IISkanste
4.17Shots on target / match4.83
Riga FC IISkanste

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

8.11Shots per match10.67
Riga FC IISkanste
4.17Shots on target4.83
Riga FC IISkanste
17.1%Shot conversion19.3%
Riga FC IISkanste
47%Possession41%
Riga FC IISkanste
1.29xG for1.57
Riga FC IISkanste
1.72xG against1.76
Riga FC IISkanste

Shooting quality

Riga FC II: Counter-attackingSkanste: Counter-attacking
Riga FC IISkanste
Accuracy (shots on target)51%45%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.160.15
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.330.43

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Skanste is 400% better for: last-5 form.

0.4 pts / match - Riga FC II · 2 pts / match - Skanste

Riga FC II
LDLLD
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
33% W17% R50% P
Season (W-D-L)
6-3-9
1.17 pts / match · goal difference -9
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-2-3
0.40 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
5-1-3
Last 5 at home
3-1-1
WWWDL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 2.2xG: 1.17Opponent xG: 1.80BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%
Skanste
LWWDW
Season result split
39% W11% R50% P
Season (W-D-L)
7-2-9
1.28 pts / match · goal difference +2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-1-1
2.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
2-1-5
Last 5 away
1-1-3
LWLLD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 3.4Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 1.96Opponent xG: 1.85BTTS: 100%Over 2.5: 80%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Skanste is 48% better for: goals scored per match.

1.39 goals / match - Riga FC II · 2.06 goals / match - Skanste

Riga FC II scoring profile: very strong

Riga FC II scores in 72% of matches (13 of 18 matches), while Skanste keeps a clean sheet in 11% (2 of 18 matches).

Skanste scoring profile: very strong

Skanste scores in 72% of matches (13 of 18 matches), while Riga FC II keeps a clean sheet in 11% (2 of 18 matches).

25Goals scored (season)37
Riga FC IISkanste
34Goals conceded (season)35
Riga FC IISkanste
3.28Average goals in match4
Riga FC IISkanste
4Goals scored (last 5)17
Riga FC IISkanste
11Goals conceded (last 5)8
Riga FC IISkanste

How often they score at least...

72%1 goal72%
Riga FC IISkanste
50%2 goals39%
Riga FC IISkanste
11%3 goals33%
Riga FC IISkanste
6%4 goals33%
Riga FC IISkanste

How often they concede at least...

89%1 goal89%
Riga FC IISkanste
67%2 goals67%
Riga FC IISkanste
28%3 goals28%
Riga FC IISkanste
6%4 goals11%
Riga FC IISkanste

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

64%
League average

Goal patterns

33%BTTS at half-time33%
Riga FC IISkanste
0%BTTS in both halves6%
Riga FC IISkanste
33%Scored in both halves22%
Riga FC IISkanste

BTTS and goal count

56%Min. 3 goals and BTTS50%
Riga FC IISkanste
11%Min. 3 goals without BTTS22%
Riga FC IISkanste
60%BTTS - last 5100%
Riga FC IISkanste

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

83%Min. 1 goal before half-time83%
Riga FC IISkanste
44%Min. 2 goals before half-time50%
Riga FC IISkanste
28%Min. 3 goals before half-time22%
Riga FC IISkanste

2nd half

83%Min. 1 goal after half-time78%
Riga FC IISkanste
56%Min. 2 goals after half-time50%
Riga FC IISkanste
22%Min. 3 goals after half-time39%
Riga FC IISkanste

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Riga FC II is 33% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.33 pts / match - Riga FC II · 1 pts / match - Skanste

Riga FC II - half-time state
33% leading33% draw33% trailing
Skanste - half-time state
22% leading33% draw44% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.33Points per match (1st half)1
Riga FC IISkanste
0.78Goals scored (1st half)0.72
Riga FC IISkanste
0.78Goals conceded (1st half)1.06
Riga FC IISkanste
1.56Average goals (1st half)1.78
Riga FC IISkanste
39%Clean sheet before half-time22%
Riga FC IISkanste
44%No goal before half-time61%
Riga FC IISkanste

After half-time (2nd half)

1.06Points per match (2nd half)1.39
Riga FC IISkanste
0.61Goals scored (2nd half)1
Riga FC IISkanste
1.11Goals conceded (2nd half)0.83
Riga FC IISkanste
1.72Average goals (2nd half)1.83
Riga FC IISkanste
44%Clean sheet after half-time50%
Riga FC IISkanste
50%No goal after half-time50%
Riga FC IISkanste

Riga FC II - second-half results

28% W22% R50% P
24
Half-time points
14
Half-time goals
0
Goal difference (1st half)
19
Second-half points
-9
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.33
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 33% of matches and wins 33%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.3

Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Skanste - second-half results

39% W22% R39% P
18
Half-time points
13
Half-time goals
-6
Goal difference (1st half)
25
Second-half points
+3
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding177%

Leads at half-time in 22% of matches and wins 39%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.2

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Riga FC II - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.800.80
Goals scored / match0.40.4
Goals conceded / match1.21.0
Average goals in match1.61.4
1 goal100%80%
2 goals40%40%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet20%40%
No goal60%60%
Goal difference-4-3
Half-time: 20% leading - 20% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 20% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2
Skanste - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.202.00
Goals scored / match2.21.2
Goals conceded / match1.20.4
Average goals in match3.41.6
1 goal100%80%
2 goals100%40%
3 goals60%40%
Clean sheet0%60%
No goal0%40%
Goal difference+5+4
Half-time: 60% leading - 40% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 20% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 100% - Half-time goals total: 11

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Riga FC II
ScoredConceded
4
2
0-15
5
7
16-30
5
5
31-45
3
8
46-60
3
1
61-75
5
11
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (5 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): -6 - late phases are a weakness.

Skanste
ScoredConceded
10
3
0-15
3
8
16-30
6
9
31-45
12
6
46-60
4
3
61-75
2
6
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (12 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.64
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.7 : 2.0
Estimated goal split
home : away
99%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
61%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-63%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
52%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
8%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 13 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Riga FC II

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.43
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.07
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+2.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.10
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.17
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
70%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
113%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.77
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.2
Late goals
20% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 16% come in the first quarter-hour.
20%

Skanste

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.19
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.31
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-5.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.49
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.18
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
123%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
97%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.72
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
5% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 27% come in the first quarter-hour.
5%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (1. Liga).

Teams vs league

Riga FC IILigaSkanste
Average goals in match 3.283.67 4.00
Both teams scored 61%64% 61%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 67%70% 72%
Clean sheets 11%20% 11%
Goal before half-time 83%77% 83%
Goal after half-time 83%85% 78%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.67
Average goals per match
64%
Both teams scored
70%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
20%
Clean sheets
2.00
Home goals / match
1.67
Away goals / match
+20%
Home attack advantage
+17%
Home defence advantage
+8%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
77%
1 goal
44%
2 goals
21%
3 goals
6%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
85%
1 goal
61%
2 goals
35%
3 goals
12%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (3): Riga FC II 0 - 0 - 3 Skanste. Average goals 1.33, both teams scored in 0% matches.

Skanste
2 : 0
Riga FC II
Skanstes SK
1 : 0
Riga FC II
Riga FC II
0 : 1
Skanstes SK

FAQ

When do Riga FC II and Skanste play?

Riga FC II face Skanste on 7 September 2026 in 1. Liga at Sporta komplekss Ķeizarmežs. The exact kick-off time in your timezone is shown at the top of the match page.

What is the head-to-head record between Riga FC II and Skanste?

In the last 3 head-to-head matches Riga FC II won 0, Skanste won 3 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 1.33 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Riga FC II vs Skanste?

Riga FC II score 1.39 goals per game on average and Skanste 2.06. The 1. Liga average is 3.67 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 70% of games. Both teams score in 61% of Riga FC II's matches and 61% of Skanste's.

What form are Riga FC II and Skanste in?

Over the last 5 games Riga FC II have a 0-2-3 record (0.40 points per game) and Skanste 3-1-1 (2.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Riga FC II vs Skanste?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.