Latvia - VirsligaData current as of 06 September 2026

Riga vs FS Jelgava: match statistics

Riga crest
Riga
2 : 2half-time 0:2
FS Jelgava crest
FS Jelgava

Riga vs FS Jelgava: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Riga played FS Jelgava in Virsliga (Latvia). The match was played on 16 May 2026. Final score: 2:2.

Current form

Riga: 4-1-0, 2.60 points/match. FS Jelgava: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match.

Goal statistics

Riga scores 3.33 and concedes 1.17 goals per match. FS Jelgava scores 0.67 and concedes 1.83. League average: 3.06 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Riga 67%, FS Jelgava 33%. Over 2.5: Riga 92%, FS Jelgava 33%. League level: BTTS 60%, Over 2.5 53%.

xG, shots and style

Riga has higher xG: 2.02 vs 1.25. Riga: 16.5 shots per match, FS Jelgava: 9.7.

Match halves

Riga: half-time lead 67%, second-half goals 1.75. FS Jelgava: half-time lead 25%, second-half goals 0.25.

Goals by minute

Riga: 76-90+ (10 goals). FS Jelgava: 0-15 (2 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Virsliga: 3.06 goals per match, BTTS 60%, Over 2.5 53%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 5 previous H2H matches were available: 4-1-0. Average goals 4.00, BTTS 40%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

I predict a home win (1). Riga has a significant offensive advantage at home — averaging 3.2 goals per match, xG 2.23, 6.4 shots on target per game and 17% conversion with 64% possession. In the last 5 matches Riga scored 15 goals and averaged 2.6 points per game, while FS Jelgava scored 4 goals and has 1.4 points per game in the same period. Defensively the hosts also perform better: opponents generate on average 0.76 xG against Riga at their ground, whereas Jelgava concede 1.61 xG on the road and lose on average 1.33 goals per game. Additionally Riga have not had a goalless home match (0% matches without a goal) and have an 80% win rate at home, while Jelgava win only 17% of away games and fail to score in 50% of away matches; therefore I assess probabilities at 75% for the hosts, 15% for a draw and 10% for the visitors.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

I back BTTS - Yes and estimate its probability at 63%, because league-wide BTTS occurs in 57% of matches and Riga have had BTTS in 60% of their last 5 games. Although both teams’ season-long BTTS rates are low (33% each), the hosts’ recent form and weak defense favor both teams scoring. Riga concede on average 2.33 goals per home match this season (xG against 1.52), while in their last 5 matches they’ve averaged 3.0 goals scored per game (15 goals, xG 1.93), indicating high attacking volume and goal-scoring dynamics from the hosts. FS Jelgava have a season scoring average of 0.5 goals (0.8 in the last 5), but their away xG is 1.31 and despite a low shot conversion of 5% they create chances, so against Riga’s vulnerable defense the visitors have a realistic chance to score. Combined: league BTTS 57%, Riga conceding 2.33 at home and hosts’ 60% BTTS in the last 5 matches lead me to pick Yes (63%) over No (37%).

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Riga has averaged 3.0 goals (15 goals) in their last 5 matches with xG 1.93, while FS Jelgava have 0.8 goals in their last 5 (4 goals) and xG 1.23. The hosts average 3.0 shots on target with a 9% conversion rate, the visitors 2.67 shots on target with a 5% conversion rate, indicating superior attacking efficiency for Riga. Defensively Riga conceded 0.86 xG in the last 5, and Jelgava conceded 1.36; combining these values yields expected goals of 1.80 for the home side and 0.95 for the visitors, a total of 2.75. The league averages 3.0 goals per game, and Riga had 80% of their last 5 matches over 2.5 goals, which further supports a higher-scoring match scenario. A Poisson model with a total expected goals of 2.75 gives approximately a 76% probability for Over 1.5, 52% for Over 2.5 and 31% for Over 3.5, therefore I recommend the Over at line 1.5 as the strongest signal.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The most likely scenario is 1/1 (40%), because Riga led at the break in 3 of their last 5 matches (60%) and in those games averaged 1.2 goals by half-time versus 0.4 for FS Jelgava. Although season-long the hosts led at the break in only 17% of matches, the last 5 show a clear improvement and Riga won 80% of those five fixtures. The hosts also have a higher shot conversion rate (9% vs 5%) and similar xG (1.19 for Riga vs 1.31 for Jelgava), which combined with better conversion and form favors scoring and maintaining a lead. Over the season Riga concedes an average of 2.33 goals per game, but in the last 5 matches they concede 1.0 per game on average, reducing the risk of a turnaround by the visitors after half-time; therefore 1/X received a lower but meaningful weight (20%), and the remaining outcomes were allocated as less likely.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

0 : 2
1st half
2 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

73Possession (%)27
RigaFS Jelgava
25Shots7
RigaFS Jelgava
6Shots on target1
RigaFS Jelgava
2.71xG0.69
RigaFS Jelgava
4Corners2
RigaFS Jelgava
99Dangerous attacks24
RigaFS Jelgava
13Fouls11
RigaFS Jelgava
4Cards2
RigaFS Jelgava

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

3.33Goals scored / match0.67
RigaFS Jelgava
1.17Goals conceded / match1.83
RigaFS Jelgava
64%Average possession46%
RigaFS Jelgava
6.58Shots on target / match2.83
RigaFS Jelgava

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

16.5Shots per match9.67
RigaFS Jelgava
6.58Shots on target2.83
RigaFS Jelgava
20.2%Shot conversion6.9%
RigaFS Jelgava
64%Possession46%
RigaFS Jelgava
2.02xG for1.25
RigaFS Jelgava
0.94xG against1.57
RigaFS Jelgava

Shooting quality

Riga: DominantFS Jelgava: Balanced
RigaFS Jelgava
Accuracy (shots on target)40%29%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.13
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.510.24

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Riga is 86% better for: last-5 form.

2.6 pts / match - Riga · 1.4 pts / match - FS Jelgava

Riga
WDWWW
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
75% W17% R8% P
Season (W-D-L)
9-2-1
2.42 pts / match · goal difference +26
Last 5 (W-D-L)
4-1-0
2.60 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
4-1-0
Last 5 at home
4-1-0
WDWWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 3.0Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.89Opponent xG: 0.85BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 80%
FS Jelgava
LWLWD
Season result split
25% W25% R50% P
Season (W-D-L)
3-3-6
1.00 pts / match · goal difference -14
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
1-3-2
Last 5 away
1-2-2
DLWLD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 1.26Opponent xG: 1.38BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Riga is 397% better for: goals scored per match.

3.33 goals / match - Riga · 0.67 goals / match - FS Jelgava

Riga is 56% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.17 goals / match - Riga · 1.83 goals / match - FS Jelgava

Riga scoring profile: very strong

Riga scores in 100% of matches (12 of 12 matches), while FS Jelgava keeps a clean sheet in 25% (3 of 12 matches).

FS Jelgava scoring profile: mixed

FS Jelgava scores in 50% of matches (6 of 12 matches), while Riga keeps a clean sheet in 33% (4 of 12 matches).

40Goals scored (season)8
RigaFS Jelgava
14Goals conceded (season)22
RigaFS Jelgava
4.5Average goals in match2.5
RigaFS Jelgava
15Goals scored (last 5)4
RigaFS Jelgava
5Goals conceded (last 5)8
RigaFS Jelgava

How often they score at least...

100%1 goal50%
RigaFS Jelgava
83%2 goals17%
RigaFS Jelgava
75%3 goals0%
RigaFS Jelgava
42%4 goals0%
RigaFS Jelgava

How often they concede at least...

67%1 goal75%
RigaFS Jelgava
33%2 goals25%
RigaFS Jelgava
17%3 goals25%
RigaFS Jelgava
0%4 goals17%
RigaFS Jelgava

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

42%BTTS at half-time17%
RigaFS Jelgava
17%BTTS in both halves0%
RigaFS Jelgava
75%Scored in both halves8%
RigaFS Jelgava

BTTS and goal count

67%Min. 3 goals and BTTS17%
RigaFS Jelgava
25%Min. 3 goals without BTTS17%
RigaFS Jelgava
60%BTTS - last 520%
RigaFS Jelgava

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

92%Min. 1 goal before half-time67%
RigaFS Jelgava
75%Min. 2 goals before half-time33%
RigaFS Jelgava
42%Min. 3 goals before half-time17%
RigaFS Jelgava

2nd half

92%Min. 1 goal after half-time75%
RigaFS Jelgava
67%Min. 2 goals after half-time25%
RigaFS Jelgava
42%Min. 3 goals after half-time8%
RigaFS Jelgava

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Riga is 85% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

2.17 pts / match - Riga · 1.17 pts / match - FS Jelgava

Riga - half-time state
67% leading17% draw17% trailing
FS Jelgava - half-time state
25% leading42% draw33% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

2.17Points per match (1st half)1.17
RigaFS Jelgava
1.58Goals scored (1st half)0.42
RigaFS Jelgava
0.58Goals conceded (1st half)0.75
RigaFS Jelgava
2.17Average goals (1st half)1.17
RigaFS Jelgava
50%Clean sheet before half-time50%
RigaFS Jelgava
17%No goal before half-time67%
RigaFS Jelgava

After half-time (2nd half)

2.25Points per match (2nd half)1
RigaFS Jelgava
1.75Goals scored (2nd half)0.25
RigaFS Jelgava
0.58Goals conceded (2nd half)1.08
RigaFS Jelgava
2.33Average goals (2nd half)1.33
RigaFS Jelgava
58%Clean sheet after half-time50%
RigaFS Jelgava
8%No goal after half-time75%
RigaFS Jelgava

Riga - second-half results

67% W25% R8% P
26
Half-time points
19
Half-time goals
+12
Goal difference (1st half)
27
Second-half points
+14
Goal difference (2nd half)
2.17
PPG before half-time
Lead holding112%

Leads at half-time in 67% of matches and wins 75%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

FS Jelgava - second-half results

25% W25% R50% P
14
Half-time points
5
Half-time goals
-4
Goal difference (1st half)
12
Second-half points
-10
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.17
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 25% of matches and wins 25%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.3

Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Riga - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.003.00
Goals scored / match1.21.8
Goals conceded / match0.60.4
Average goals in match1.82.2
1 goal80%100%
2 goals60%80%
3 goals40%40%
Clean sheet60%60%
No goal20%0%
Goal difference+3+7
Half-time: 60% leading - 20% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 100% won - 0% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 6
FS Jelgava - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.201.40
Goals scored / match0.40.4
Goals conceded / match0.80.8
Average goals in match1.21.2
1 goal40%80%
2 goals40%40%
3 goals40%0%
Clean sheet60%60%
No goal80%60%
Goal difference-2-2
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Riga
ScoredConceded
4
2
0-15
6
3
16-30
9
2
31-45
6
3
46-60
5
2
61-75
10
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (10 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): +8 - wins late phases.

FS Jelgava
ScoredConceded
2
4
0-15
2
4
16-30
1
1
31-45
0
2
46-60
1
2
61-75
2
9
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (2 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): -7 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.50
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
2.6 : 0.9
Estimated goal split
home : away
114%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
50%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+14%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
50%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
0%
0:0 risk
practically zero
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Riga

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+1.08
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+1.08
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-3.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+1.31
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.23
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
202%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
82%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.18
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
25% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 10% come in the first quarter-hour.
25%

FS Jelgava

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.32
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.84
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+7.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.58
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.26
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
47%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
111%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.40
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.2
Late goals
25% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 25% come in the first quarter-hour.
25%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Virsliga).

Teams vs league

RigaLigaFS Jelgava
Average goals in match 4.503.06 2.50
Both teams scored 67%60% 33%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 92%53% 33%
Clean sheets 33%21% 25%
Goal before half-time 92%76% 67%
Goal after half-time 92%85% 75%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.06
Average goals per match
60%
Both teams scored
53%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
21%
Clean sheets
1.65
Home goals / match
1.42
Away goals / match
+16%
Home attack advantage
+14%
Home defence advantage
+-8%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
76%
1 goal
42%
2 goals
21%
3 goals
5%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
85%
1 goal
44%
2 goals
18%
3 goals
10%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. FS JelgavaGoalTomas RatajAssist: Glebs Žaleiko
  2. FS JelgavaGoalLeo's Prior
  3. RigaYellow cardAntonijs Černomordijs
  4. RigaYellow cardMaksims Toņiševs
  5. FS JelgavaYellow cardGlebs Žaleiko
  6. FS JelgavaYellow cardAleksandrs Butovskis
  7. FS JelgavaSubstitutionOn: Martin HašekOff: David Holoubek
  8. RigaSubstitutionOn: Brian Peña Perez-VicoOff: Ahmed Ankrah
  9. FS JelgavaSubstitutionOn: Armands PētersonsOff: Aleksandrs Butovskis
  10. RigaYellow cardSalah Oulad M'Hand
  11. RigaYellow cardMuhammed Badamosi

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (5): Riga 4 - 1 - 0 FS Jelgava. Average goals 4.00, both teams scored in 40% matches.

FS Jelgava
0 : 8
Riga
FS Jelgava
2 : 3
Riga FC
Riga FC
3 : 0
FS Jelgava
Riga FC
2 : 0
FS Jelgava
FS Jelgava
1 : 1
Riga FC

FAQ

What was the result of Riga vs FS Jelgava?

The Virsliga match finished Riga 2:2 FS Jelgava. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Riga and FS Jelgava?

In the last 5 head-to-head matches Riga won 4, FS Jelgava won 0 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 4.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 40% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Riga vs FS Jelgava?

Riga score 3.33 goals per game on average and FS Jelgava 0.67. The Virsliga average is 3.06 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 53% of games. Both teams score in 67% of Riga's matches and 33% of FS Jelgava's.

What form are Riga and FS Jelgava in?

Over the last 5 games Riga have a 4-1-0 record (2.60 points per game) and FS Jelgava 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Riga vs FS Jelgava?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.