Latvia - VirsligaSporta komplekss ĶeizarmežsData current as of 05 August 2026

Riga vs Grobiņa: match statistics

Riga crest
Riga
4 : 0half-time 0:0
Grobiņa crest
Grobiņa

Riga vs Grobiņa: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Riga played Grobiņa in Virsliga (Latvia). The match was played on 2 August 2026. Venue: Sporta komplekss Ķeizarmežs. Final score: 4:0.

Current form

Riga: 4-1-0, 2.60 points/match. Grobiņa: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

Riga scores 2.96 and concedes 0.87 goals per match. Grobiņa scores 0.71 and concedes 1.54. League average: 2.95 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Riga 57%, Grobiņa 38%. Over 2.5: Riga 83%, Grobiņa 25%. League level: BTTS 56%, Over 2.5 55%.

xG, shots and style

Riga has higher xG: 2.05 vs 1.22. Riga: 17.3 shots per match, Grobiņa: 9.8.

Match halves

Riga: half-time lead 70%, second-half goals 1.43. Grobiņa: half-time lead 17%, second-half goals 0.33.

Goals by minute

Riga: 31-45+ (16 goals). Grobiņa: 0-15 (4 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Virsliga: 2.95 goals per match, BTTS 56%, Over 2.5 55%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 6 previous H2H matches were available: 5-1-0. Average goals 2.33, BTTS 17%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Riga is the clear favorite: they sit 2nd, have won all of their last 5 matches and scored 17 goals in those five (avg. 3.4 per game), while Grobiņa has 2 wins and 6 goals in the same period. At home Riga averages 2.92 goals, records 6.17 on-target shots from 18.75 attempts and has a home xG of 2.15, whereas Grobiņa on the road scores 0.55 goals, has 3.36 on-target shots and an xG of 1.28. Defensively the hosts concede only 0.83 goals per home match and keep clean sheets in 50% of games, while Grobiņa concedes 1.64 goals away and has 18% clean sheets; xG against is 0.83 versus 1.4 for Grobiņa. Riga have an 83% home win rate and a +25 goal difference at their stadium, whereas Grobiņa have an 18% away win rate, a -12 goal difference and fail to score in 45% of away trips. Considering the superiority in chance volume (18.75 vs 10.55), finishing output (2.92 vs 0.55) and form (avg. 3 points per game in last 5 vs 1.4), I predict a home win.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

I assess BTTS probability at 60% (Yes) vs 40% (No) and select 'Yes' as the most likely outcome. Season-long BTTS rates are low: Riga 38% and Grobiņa 36%, but Riga’s last 5 matches show 100% BTTS and an average of 3.4 goals per game (17 goals), while Grobiņa’s last 5 feature 40% BTTS and an average of 1.2 goals. Both teams generate similar season xG (Riga 1.17 vs Grobiņa 1.28) and comparable shots on target (3.31 vs 3.36), indicating balanced chance-creation potential. Defenses are vulnerable: Grobiņa concedes 1.64 goals per game, Riga 1.46, and clean sheets occur in only 23% and 18% of matches respectively, which increases the likelihood of Goal/Goal. Additionally, Riga have scored 68 goals this season while Grobiņa have conceded 37, so considering the strong form of the home side and the fragile away defense, the 'Yes' scenario is better justified.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Form and xG analysis indicates a goals advantage: in the last 5 matches Riga scored on average 3.4 goals (17 goals), with average xG of 2.98, while Grobiņa's defense conceded xG 1.36 — averaging these values yields about 2.17 expected goals for the home side. For the visitors the last 5 matches show xG_for 1.88, and Riga's defense has xG_against 1.23, which together forecast about 1.56 goals for Grobiņa. Total expected goals sum to 3.73 (2.17 + 1.56), which is clearly above the league average of 2.95 and well above the 2.5 threshold. Additionally, Riga had 100% of matches over 2.5 in the last 5 fixtures, while Grobiņa had 40% in that period; season-long over 2.5 rates are 38% for the home team and 9% for the away team, indicating that the home side’s recent form outweighs the visitors’ seasonal trends. Therefore the best line to play is Over 2.5 (back the “Over”) — the expected outcome ~3.73 goals gives a strong signal for Over 2.5, while Over 1.5 is almost certain and Over 3.5 remains more risky.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Based on recent form, Riga have won 5 of their last 5 matches (100% wins), while Grobiņa have 2 wins in their last 5 (40%), and the hosts led at the break in 3 of those 5 matches (60%) versus 1 of 5 (20%) for the visitors. In the last 5 matches Riga averaged 3.4 goals per game and 1.2 goals by half-time, while Grobiņa averaged 1.2 goals per game and 0.4 by half-time, which clearly favors the hosts (3.4 vs 1.2; 1.2 vs 0.4). Seasonally, however, Riga led at the break in only 15% of matches and had a half-time draw in 54% of games, so a draw at Half-Time in traditional statistics cannot be ruled out. Although seasonal xG shows 1.17 for Riga versus 1.28 for Grobiņa, Riga have better shot efficiency (conversion 9% vs 5%) and, given current form, I assign the highest probability to the scenario of a lead at the break and a Full-Time win for the hosts (1/1) – 35%. I nonetheless retain significant probabilities for a Half-Time draw with a later home turnaround to win (X/1 16%) and a Half-Time/Full-Time draw-draw (X/X 12%) due to the seasonal tendency toward half-time draws.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
4 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

75Possession (%)25
RigaGrobiņa
21Shots6
RigaGrobiņa
6Shots on target2
RigaGrobiņa
2.24xG0.71
RigaGrobiņa
7Corners3
RigaGrobiņa
70Dangerous attacks26
RigaGrobiņa
12Fouls13
RigaGrobiņa
0Cards1
RigaGrobiņa

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

2.96Goals scored / match0.71
RigaGrobiņa
0.87Goals conceded / match1.54
RigaGrobiņa
63%Average possession43%
RigaGrobiņa
6.43Shots on target / match3.33
RigaGrobiņa

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

17.3Shots per match9.79
RigaGrobiņa
6.43Shots on target3.33
RigaGrobiņa
17.1%Shot conversion7.2%
RigaGrobiņa
63%Possession43%
RigaGrobiņa
2.05xG for1.22
RigaGrobiņa
0.94xG against1.61
RigaGrobiņa

Shooting quality

Riga: DominantGrobiņa: Balanced
RigaGrobiņa
Accuracy (shots on target)37%34%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.460.21

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Riga is 160% better for: last-5 form.

2.6 pts / match - Riga · 1 pts / match - Grobiņa

Riga
WDWWW
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
78% W17% R4% P
Season (W-D-L)
18-4-1
2.52 pts / match · goal difference +48
Last 5 (W-D-L)
4-1-0
2.60 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
10-2-0
Last 5 at home
5-0-0
WWWWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.4Goals conceded: 0.2xG: 2.12Opponent xG: 1.01BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 60%
Grobiņa
DLWLD
Season result split
17% W38% R46% P
Season (W-D-L)
4-9-11
0.88 pts / match · goal difference -20
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
2-4-5
Last 5 away
0-1-4
DLLLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.54Opponent xG: 1.84BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Riga is 317% better for: goals scored per match.

2.96 goals / match - Riga · 0.71 goals / match - Grobiņa

Riga is 77% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.87 goals / match - Riga · 1.54 goals / match - Grobiņa

Riga scoring profile: very strong

Riga scores in 96% of matches (22 of 23 matches), while Grobiņa keeps a clean sheet in 21% (5 of 24 matches).

Grobiņa scoring profile: mixed

Grobiņa scores in 50% of matches (12 of 24 matches), while Riga keeps a clean sheet in 43% (10 of 23 matches).

68Goals scored (season)17
RigaGrobiņa
20Goals conceded (season)37
RigaGrobiņa
3.83Average goals in match2.25
RigaGrobiņa
12Goals scored (last 5)5
RigaGrobiņa
1Goals conceded (last 5)7
RigaGrobiņa

How often they score at least...

96%1 goal50%
RigaGrobiņa
87%2 goals13%
RigaGrobiņa
65%3 goals8%
RigaGrobiņa
30%4 goals0%
RigaGrobiņa

How often they concede at least...

57%1 goal79%
RigaGrobiņa
22%2 goals42%
RigaGrobiņa
9%3 goals17%
RigaGrobiņa
0%4 goals4%
RigaGrobiņa

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

26%BTTS at half-time13%
RigaGrobiņa
9%BTTS in both halves4%
RigaGrobiņa
61%Scored in both halves8%
RigaGrobiņa

BTTS and goal count

57%Min. 3 goals and BTTS17%
RigaGrobiņa
26%Min. 3 goals without BTTS8%
RigaGrobiņa
20%BTTS - last 540%
RigaGrobiņa

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

91%Min. 1 goal before half-time63%
RigaGrobiņa
70%Min. 2 goals before half-time33%
RigaGrobiņa
35%Min. 3 goals before half-time13%
RigaGrobiņa

2nd half

83%Min. 1 goal after half-time71%
RigaGrobiņa
52%Min. 2 goals after half-time33%
RigaGrobiņa
30%Min. 3 goals after half-time4%
RigaGrobiņa

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Riga is 122% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

2.22 pts / match - Riga · 1 pts / match - Grobiņa

Riga - half-time state
70% leading13% draw17% trailing
Grobiņa - half-time state
17% leading50% draw33% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

2.22Points per match (1st half)1
RigaGrobiņa
1.52Goals scored (1st half)0.38
RigaGrobiņa
0.48Goals conceded (1st half)0.75
RigaGrobiņa
2Average goals (1st half)1.13
RigaGrobiņa
61%Clean sheet before half-time54%
RigaGrobiņa
22%No goal before half-time71%
RigaGrobiņa

After half-time (2nd half)

2.22Points per match (2nd half)0.83
RigaGrobiņa
1.43Goals scored (2nd half)0.33
RigaGrobiņa
0.39Goals conceded (2nd half)0.79
RigaGrobiņa
1.83Average goals (2nd half)1.13
RigaGrobiņa
70%Clean sheet after half-time42%
RigaGrobiņa
22%No goal after half-time71%
RigaGrobiņa

Riga - second-half results

65% W26% R9% P
51
Half-time points
35
Half-time goals
+24
Goal difference (1st half)
51
Second-half points
+24
Goal difference (2nd half)
2.22
PPG before half-time
Lead holding111%

Leads at half-time in 70% of matches and wins 78%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Grobiņa - second-half results

13% W46% R42% P
24
Half-time points
9
Half-time goals
-9
Goal difference (1st half)
20
Second-half points
-11
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 17% of matches and wins 17%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Riga - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.002.20
Goals scored / match1.21.2
Goals conceded / match0.20.0
Average goals in match1.41.2
1 goal80%60%
2 goals40%40%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet80%100%
No goal40%40%
Goal difference+5+6
Half-time: 60% leading - 20% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 40% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 6
Grobiņa - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.001.00
Goals scored / match0.40.6
Goals conceded / match0.60.8
Average goals in match1.01.4
1 goal60%80%
2 goals40%60%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal80%60%
Goal difference-1-1
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Riga
ScoredConceded
7
4
0-15
12
3
16-30
16
4
31-45
9
4
46-60
8
3
61-75
16
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (16 goli). Concedes most in 0-15 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): +14 - wins late phases.

Grobiņa
ScoredConceded
4
3
0-15
2
3
16-30
3
12
31-45
2
9
46-60
2
1
61-75
4
9
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (4 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): -5 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.04
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
2.3 : 0.8
Estimated goal split
home : away
103%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
48%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-23%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
48%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
2%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 50 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Riga

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+1.11
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.98
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-5.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.91
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.07
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
180%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
66%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.08
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.1
Late goals
24% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 10% come in the first quarter-hour.
24%

Grobiņa

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.39
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.44
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+8.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.51
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.07
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
54%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
94%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.12
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.0
Late goals
24% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 24% come in the first quarter-hour.
24%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Virsliga).

Teams vs league

RigaLigaGrobiņa
Average goals in match 3.832.95 2.25
Both teams scored 57%56% 38%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 83%55% 25%
Clean sheets 43%24% 21%
Goal before half-time 91%77% 63%
Goal after half-time 83%83% 71%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.95
Average goals per match
56%
Both teams scored
55%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
24%
Clean sheets
1.64
Home goals / match
1.31
Away goals / match
+25%
Home attack advantage
+20%
Home defence advantage
+5%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
77%
1 goal
43%
2 goals
18%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
83%
1 goal
46%
2 goals
17%
3 goals
6%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (6): Riga 5 - 1 - 0 Grobiņa. Average goals 2.33, both teams scored in 17% matches.

Riga
2 : 0
Grobiņa
Grobiņa
0 : 3
Riga
Grobinas Sporta Centrs
1 : 1
Riga FC
Riga FC
2 : 0
Grobinas Sporta Centrs
Grobinas Sporta Centrs
0 : 2
Riga FC
Riga FC
3 : 0
Grobinas Sporta Centrs

FAQ

What was the result of Riga vs Grobiņa?

The Virsliga match finished Riga 4:0 Grobiņa. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Riga and Grobiņa?

In the last 6 head-to-head matches Riga won 5, Grobiņa won 0 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 2.33 goals, with both teams scoring in 17% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Riga vs Grobiņa?

Riga score 2.96 goals per game on average and Grobiņa 0.71. The Virsliga average is 2.95 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 55% of games. Both teams score in 57% of Riga's matches and 38% of Grobiņa's.

What form are Riga and Grobiņa in?

Over the last 5 games Riga have a 4-1-0 record (2.60 points per game) and Grobiņa 1-2-2 (1.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Riga vs Grobiņa?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.