Rīgas FS vs Ogre United: match statistics
Rīgas FS vs Ogre United: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Rīgas FS played Ogre United in Virsliga (Latvia). The match was played on 22 June 2026. Venue: RTU stadions. Final score: 6:0.
Current form
Rīgas FS: 4-0-1, 2.40 points/match. Ogre United: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match.
Goal statistics
Rīgas FS scores 2.33 and concedes 0.78 goals per match. Ogre United scores 0.89 and concedes 2.33. League average: 2.97 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Rīgas FS 44%, Ogre United 67%. Over 2.5: Rīgas FS 61%, Ogre United 50%. League level: BTTS 59%, Over 2.5 54%.
xG, shots and style
Rīgas FS has higher xG: 1.99 vs 1.03. Rīgas FS: 16.4 shots per match, Ogre United: 8.9.
Match halves
Rīgas FS: half-time lead 56%, second-half goals 1.22. Ogre United: half-time lead 11%, second-half goals 0.56.
Goals by minute
Rīgas FS: 16-30 (9 goals). Ogre United: 46-60 (5 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Virsliga: 2.97 goals per match, BTTS 59%, Over 2.5 54%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 2 previous H2H matches were available: 2-0-0. Average goals 4.50, BTTS 50%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Rīgas FS holds a clear statistical advantage: as league leaders at home they have won 75% of matches, average 2.88 goals scored and concede only 0.75, while Ogre United sit 10th and on the road score 0.78 and concede 2.89. The home side generate 1.94 xG at home with 0.87 xG against, whereas the visitors have 1.1 xG away and 2.01 xG against, indicating higher quality of chance creation by Rīgas FS and greater defensive vulnerability from Ogre. Rīgas FS attempts 16.63 shots per match with 6 on target and 17% conversion on average possession of 62%, while Ogre average 9.11 shots with 3.11 on target and 9% conversion and 40% possession, so the hosts should dominate in chance creation. In the last 5 matches Rīgas FS have won 4, scored 13 goals and average 2.4 points per game in that period, whereas Ogre have 1 win, 5 goals scored, 0.8 points per game and have conceded 10 goals, confirming the visitors’ poorer form. Considering the edge in conversion (17% vs 9%), number of shots on target and clean sheets (50% for hosts vs 11% for visitors) and the goal difference (+17 for hosts vs -19 for visitors), I assess the probabilities as: home 78%, draw 12%, away 10%.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
I recommend BTTS - Yes. Rīgas FS posts a seasonal BTTS rate of 78% and 80% in the last 5 matches, while Ogre is at 56% seasonally and 60% in the last 5, giving a combined BTTS signal well above the league baseline of 59%. This season Rīgas FS scored 42 goals while Ogre conceded 42; simultaneously Ogre have only 16 goals scored and Rīgas FS have conceded 14, indicating the home side will attack against a very vulnerable defence. In the last 5 matches Rīgas have 13 goals (2.6 avg) and xG 1.88, and Ogre 5 goals (1.0 avg) and xG 1.1; defences are also leaking — Rīgas concede 1.0 avg in L5 and Ogre 2.0. Clean sheets are rare (Rīgas 0% seasonal clean sheets, Ogre 11% vs league average 43%), and on-target shots per match are 1.89 (Rīgas) vs 3.11 (Ogre), which further reduces the chance of a no-goal outcome for one side; therefore I assess BTTS probability at 72% vs 28% and recommend “Yes.”
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
I project approximately 2.99 total goals in the match: Rīgas FS 1.79 and Ogre United 1.20. This is based on a weighted xG calculation — the hosts’ last 5 matches show attack xG 1.88 and opponent defensive xG conceded 2.12 (average 2.00), while season figures are 0.95 and 2.01 (average 1.48); consolidated yields 1.79 for Rīgas FS, with Ogre similarly around 1.20. Rīgas FS have averaged 2.6 goals scored in their last 5 games, and Ogre United concede on average 2.12 xG and 2.89 goals per game over the season, which increases the likelihood of a higher-scoring match. Additionally, matches over 1.5 goals account for 78% for the hosts and 100% for the visitors, and BTTS rates are 78% and 56%, so the strongest signal from the data is Over 1.5.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Rīgas FS holds a clear form advantage: in their last 5 matches the hosts won 4 of 5 (80%) and led at the break in 3 of 5 (60%), scoring on average 1.2 goals in the first half versus 0.4 for Ogre United. Seasonal and recent first-half metrics confirm this: seasonally Rīgas score 0.44 goals by half-time vs 0.22 for Ogre, and in the last 5 matches the HT goals average is 1.2 vs 0.4. Over the full match the hosts have averaged 2.6 goals in the last 5 fixtures compared with 1.0 for the visitors, and the hosts’ shot conversion rate is 11% versus 9% for Ogre, which increases the chance of maintaining a lead. Although season xG is 0.95 for Rīgas and 1.10 for Ogre (the visitors have slightly higher xG), the low percentage of matches in which both teams scored by half-time for the hosts (22%), combined with a high percentage of matches where both teams scored by full-time (78%), suggests the hosts will have the lead at the break and an open second half. Therefore the strongest signal from the data is 1/1 (home leading at half-time and winning Full-Time), which carries the highest probability.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Rīgas FS | Ogre United | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 38% | 28% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.37 | 0.36 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Rīgas FS is 200% better for: last-5 form.
2.4 pts / match - Rīgas FS · 0.8 pts / match - Ogre United
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Rīgas FS is 162% better for: goals scored per match.
2.33 goals / match - Rīgas FS · 0.89 goals / match - Ogre United
Rīgas FS is 199% better for: goals conceded per match.
0.78 goals / match - Rīgas FS · 2.33 goals / match - Ogre United
Rīgas FS scores in 94% of matches (17 of 18 matches), while Ogre United keeps a clean sheet in 6% (1 of 18 matches).
Ogre United scores in 72% of matches (13 of 18 matches), while Rīgas FS keeps a clean sheet in 50% (9 of 18 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Rīgas FS
Over / Under - Ogre United
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Rīgas FS is 218% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.94 pts / match - Rīgas FS · 0.61 pts / match - Ogre United
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Rīgas FS - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 56% of matches and wins 83%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Ogre United - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 11% of matches and wins 6%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 2.00 | 2.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.2 | 1.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 1.8 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 80% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 60% |
| No goal | 20% | 0% |
| Goal difference | +3 | +5 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.80 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.2 | 0.8 |
| Average goals in match | 1.6 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 40% |
| No goal | 60% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -4 | -1 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (9 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +5 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (5 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): -7 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Rīgas FS
Ogre United
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Virsliga).
Teams vs league
| Rīgas FS | Liga | Ogre United | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 3.11 | 2.97 | ▲ 3.22 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 44% | 59% | ▲ 67% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 61% | 54% | ▼ 50% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 50% | 22% | ▼ 6% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 83% | 77% | • 78% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 78% | 85% | ▲ 94% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (2): Rīgas FS 2 - 0 - 0 Ogre United. Average goals 4.50, both teams scored in 50% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Rīgas FS vs Ogre United?
The Virsliga match finished Rīgas FS 6:0 Ogre United. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Rīgas FS and Ogre United?
In the last 2 head-to-head matches Rīgas FS won 2, Ogre United won 0 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 4.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Rīgas FS vs Ogre United?
Rīgas FS score 2.33 goals per game on average and Ogre United 0.89. The Virsliga average is 2.97 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 54% of games. Both teams score in 44% of Rīgas FS's matches and 67% of Ogre United's.
What form are Rīgas FS and Ogre United in?
Over the last 5 games Rīgas FS have a 4-0-1 record (2.40 points per game) and Ogre United 1-1-3 (0.80 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Rīgas FS vs Ogre United?
The statistical background for Rīgas FS vs Ogre United — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.


