Scotland - ChampionshipData current as of 06 September 2026

Ross County vs Queen's Park: match statistics

Ross County crest
Ross County
0 : 1half-time 0:1
Queen's Park crest
Queen's Park
145%(1.73)
X30%(3.75)
225%(4.10)

Ross County are showing better form in their last five matches with a record of two wins and 1.2 points per game, while Queen's Park are averaging just 0.8 points per match. The hosts have an advantage in shooting efficiency at home with a conversion rate of 9% and an average of 1.17 goals per game, which exceeds the visitors' away xG (0.93). Queen's Park have a poor defensive record in away matches, conceding an average of 2.09 goals per game and keeping only 18% clean sheets. Despite Ross County losing 58% of their home matches, their higher possession (46% vs 43%) and better form point to the hosts' advantage. Considering all statistics, I expect a close match with a slight edge for Ross County, although a draw is also a realistic scenario due to Queen's Park's high tendency to draw away (36%).

Ross County vs Queen's Park: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Ross County played Queen's Park in Championship (Scotland). The match was played on 14 February 2026. Final score: 0:1.

Current form

Ross County: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match. Queen's Park: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match.

Goal statistics

Ross County scores 0.96 and concedes 1.65 goals per match. Queen's Park scores 1.05 and concedes 1.59. League average: 2.48 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Ross County 43%, Queen's Park 64%. Over 2.5: Ross County 48%, Queen's Park 55%. League level: BTTS 50%, Over 2.5 45%.

xG, shots and style

Ross County has higher xG: 1.35 vs 0.98. Ross County: 11.7 shots per match, Queen's Park: 7.6.

Match halves

Ross County: half-time lead 22%, second-half goals 0.52. Queen's Park: half-time lead 23%, second-half goals 0.55.

Goals by minute

Ross County: 76-90+ (5 goals). Queen's Park: 76-90+ (8 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Championship: 2.48 goals per match, BTTS 50%, Over 2.5 45%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 2 previous H2H matches were available: 1-0-1. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 50%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Ross County are showing better form in their last five matches with a record of two wins and 1.2 points per game, while Queen's Park are averaging just 0.8 points per match. The hosts have an advantage in shooting efficiency at home with a conversion rate of 9% and an average of 1.17 goals per game, which exceeds the visitors' away xG (0.93). Queen's Park have a poor defensive record in away matches, conceding an average of 2.09 goals per game and keeping only 18% clean sheets. Despite Ross County losing 58% of their home matches, their higher possession (46% vs 43%) and better form point to the hosts' advantage. Considering all statistics, I expect a close match with a slight edge for Ross County, although a draw is also a realistic scenario due to Queen's Park's high tendency to draw away (36%).

View the statistical overview

Half-by-half

0 : 1
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

55Possession (%)45
Ross CountyQueen's Park
8Shots11
Ross CountyQueen's Park
1Shots on target3
Ross CountyQueen's Park
1.02xG1.24
Ross CountyQueen's Park
4Corners2
Ross CountyQueen's Park
61Dangerous attacks46
Ross CountyQueen's Park
11Fouls11
Ross CountyQueen's Park
2Cards2
Ross CountyQueen's Park

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Ross CountyQueen's Park
0.96Goals scored / match1.05
Ross CountyQueen's Park
1.65Goals conceded / match1.59
Ross CountyQueen's Park
47%Average possession44%
Ross CountyQueen's Park
3.83Shots on target / match2.95
Ross CountyQueen's Park

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

11.7Shots per match7.64
Ross CountyQueen's Park
3.83Shots on target2.95
Ross CountyQueen's Park
8.2%Shot conversion13.7%
Ross CountyQueen's Park
47%Possession44%
Ross CountyQueen's Park
1.35xG for0.98
Ross CountyQueen's Park
1.55xG against1.66
Ross CountyQueen's Park

Shooting quality

Ross County: BalancedQueen's Park: Counter-attacking
Ross CountyQueen's Park
Accuracy (shots on target)33%39%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.13
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.250.36

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Ross County is 43% better for: last-5 form.

2 pts / match - Ross County · 1.4 pts / match - Queen's Park

Ross County
DWWLW
Season result split
22% W30% R48% P
Season (W-D-L)
5-7-11
0.96 pts / match · goal difference -16
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-1-1
2.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
3-2-7
Last 5 at home
1-1-3
LLLDW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 0.4xG: 1.20Opponent xG: 1.47BTTS: 0%Over 2.5: 0%
Queen's Park
WDLWL
Season result split
18% W41% R41% P
Season (W-D-L)
4-9-9
0.95 pts / match · goal difference -12
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
2-4-5
Last 5 away
1-0-4
LLLWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 1.10Opponent xG: 1.47BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 80%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Queen's Park is 9% better for: goals scored per match.

0.96 goals / match - Ross County · 1.05 goals / match - Queen's Park

Ross County scoring profile: strong

Ross County scores in 61% of matches (14 of 23 matches), while Queen's Park keeps a clean sheet in 23% (5 of 22 matches).

Queen's Park scoring profile: strong

Queen's Park scores in 68% of matches (15 of 22 matches), while Ross County keeps a clean sheet in 26% (6 of 23 matches).

22Goals scored (season)23
Ross CountyQueen's Park
38Goals conceded (season)35
Ross CountyQueen's Park
2.61Average goals in match2.64
Ross CountyQueen's Park
4Goals scored (last 5)8
Ross CountyQueen's Park
2Goals conceded (last 5)8
Ross CountyQueen's Park

How often they score at least...

61%1 goal68%
Ross CountyQueen's Park
26%2 goals27%
Ross CountyQueen's Park
9%3 goals9%
Ross CountyQueen's Park
0%4 goals0%
Ross CountyQueen's Park

How often they concede at least...

74%1 goal77%
Ross CountyQueen's Park
57%2 goals36%
Ross CountyQueen's Park
22%3 goals23%
Ross CountyQueen's Park
4%4 goals18%
Ross CountyQueen's Park

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

50%
League average

Goal patterns

17%BTTS at half-time27%
Ross CountyQueen's Park
13%BTTS in both halves0%
Ross CountyQueen's Park
17%Scored in both halves18%
Ross CountyQueen's Park

BTTS and goal count

35%Min. 3 goals and BTTS45%
Ross CountyQueen's Park
13%Min. 3 goals without BTTS9%
Ross CountyQueen's Park
0%BTTS - last 560%
Ross CountyQueen's Park

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

65%Min. 1 goal before half-time68%
Ross CountyQueen's Park
26%Min. 2 goals before half-time45%
Ross CountyQueen's Park
13%Min. 3 goals before half-time18%
Ross CountyQueen's Park

2nd half

87%Min. 1 goal after half-time73%
Ross CountyQueen's Park
48%Min. 2 goals after half-time32%
Ross CountyQueen's Park
22%Min. 3 goals after half-time18%
Ross CountyQueen's Park

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Queen's Park is 8% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.09 pts / match - Ross County · 1.18 pts / match - Queen's Park

Ross County - half-time state
22% leading43% draw35% trailing
Queen's Park - half-time state
23% leading50% draw27% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.09Points per match (1st half)1.18
Ross CountyQueen's Park
0.43Goals scored (1st half)0.5
Ross CountyQueen's Park
0.61Goals conceded (1st half)0.82
Ross CountyQueen's Park
1.04Average goals (1st half)1.32
Ross CountyQueen's Park
48%Clean sheet before half-time50%
Ross CountyQueen's Park
70%No goal before half-time55%
Ross CountyQueen's Park

After half-time (2nd half)

0.78Points per match (2nd half)1.05
Ross CountyQueen's Park
0.52Goals scored (2nd half)0.55
Ross CountyQueen's Park
1.04Goals conceded (2nd half)0.77
Ross CountyQueen's Park
1.57Average goals (2nd half)1.32
Ross CountyQueen's Park
30%Clean sheet after half-time45%
Ross CountyQueen's Park
52%No goal after half-time59%
Ross CountyQueen's Park

Ross County - second-half results

17% W26% R57% P
25
Half-time points
10
Half-time goals
-4
Goal difference (1st half)
18
Second-half points
-12
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.09
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 22% of matches and wins 22%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.4

Concedes 0.4 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Queen's Park - second-half results

23% W36% R41% P
26
Half-time points
11
Half-time goals
-7
Goal difference (1st half)
23
Second-half points
-5
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.18
PPG before half-time
Lead holding78%

Leads at half-time in 23% of matches and wins 18%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time-0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Ross County - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.201.60
Goals scored / match0.40.4
Goals conceded / match0.20.2
Average goals in match0.60.6
1 goal40%60%
2 goals20%0%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet80%80%
No goal80%60%
Goal difference+1+1
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 2
Queen's Park - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.401.40
Goals scored / match0.80.8
Goals conceded / match1.00.6
Average goals in match1.81.4
1 goal80%80%
2 goals60%40%
3 goals40%20%
Clean sheet40%60%
No goal40%40%
Goal difference-1+1
Half-time: 40% leading - 20% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 4

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Ross County
ScoredConceded
4
4
0-15
3
5
16-30
3
5
31-45
4
8
46-60
3
7
61-75
5
9
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (5 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.

Queen's Park
ScoredConceded
2
4
0-15
2
7
16-30
7
7
31-45
1
3
46-60
3
4
61-75
8
10
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (8 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.63
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.3 : 1.4
Estimated goal split
home : away
106%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
54%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-24%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
41%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
12%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 8 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Ross County

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.20
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.49
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+4.7 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.39
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.10
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
73%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
142%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+1.04
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
23% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 18% come in the first quarter-hour.
23%

Queen's Park

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.68
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.14
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+1.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.07
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.07
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
91%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
120%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.45
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
35% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 9% come in the first quarter-hour.
35%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Championship).

Teams vs league

Ross CountyLigaQueen's Park
Average goals in match 2.612.48 2.64
Both teams scored 43%50% 64%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 48%45% 55%
Clean sheets 26%31% 23%
Goal before half-time 65%70% 68%
Goal after half-time 87%73% 73%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.48
Average goals per match
50%
Both teams scored
45%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
31%
Clean sheets
1.32
Home goals / match
1.16
Away goals / match
+14%
Home attack advantage
+12%
Home defence advantage
+4%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
70%
1 goal
30%
2 goals
11%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
73%
1 goal
40%
2 goals
17%
3 goals
3%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Queen's ParkYellow cardLouis Longridge
  2. Ross CountyYellow cardDylan Smith
  3. Queen's ParkGoalMatthew ShielsAssist: Aidan Connolly
  4. Ross CountyYellow cardConnor Steven Randall
  5. Queen's ParkSubstitutionOn: Grant SavouryOff: Callum Smith
  6. Ross CountySubstitutionOn: James ScottOff: Jamie Lindsay
  7. Queen's ParkSubstitutionOn: Michael RuthOff: Sebastian Drozd
  8. Queen's ParkYellow cardRoddy MacGregor
  9. Queen's ParkSubstitutionOn: Liam McLeishOff: Aidan Connolly

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Referee context

See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.

Sean MurdochMatches officiated: 8
7.5Cards per match
0Penalties per match
1 / X / 213%Home wins38%Draws50%Away wins

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (2): Ross County 1 - 0 - 1 Queen's Park. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 50% matches.

Queen's Park FC
0 : 1
Ross County FC
Ross County FC
1 : 2
Queen's Park FC

FAQ

What was the result of Ross County vs Queen's Park?

The Championship match finished Ross County 0:1 Queen's Park. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Ross County and Queen's Park?

In the last 2 head-to-head matches Ross County won 1, Queen's Park won 1 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 2.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Ross County vs Queen's Park?

Ross County score 0.96 goals per game on average and Queen's Park 1.05. The Championship average is 2.48 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 45% of games. Both teams score in 43% of Ross County's matches and 64% of Queen's Park's.

What form are Ross County and Queen's Park in?

Over the last 5 games Ross County have a 3-1-1 record (2.00 points per game) and Queen's Park 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Ross County vs Queen's Park?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Ross County vs Queen's Park: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.