Slovenia - 2. SNLŠtadion Ob JezeruData current as of 19 September 2026

Rudar vs Triglav: match statistics

Rudar crest
Rudar
2 : 0half-time 0:0
Triglav crest
Triglav

Rudar vs Triglav: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Rudar played Triglav in 2. SNL (Slovenia). The match was played on 13 September 2026. Venue: Štadion Ob Jezeru. Final score: 2:0.

Current form

Rudar: 2-0-3, 1.20 points/match. Triglav: 3-0-1, 2.25 points/match.

Goal statistics

Rudar scores 1.80 and concedes 1.80 goals per match. Triglav scores 1.50 and concedes 0.50. League average: 2.89 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Rudar 40%, Triglav 25%. Over 2.5: Rudar 60%, Triglav 25%. League level: BTTS 44%, Over 2.5 56%.

xG, shots and style

Triglav has higher xG: 1.77 vs 1.64. Rudar: 13.0 shots per match, Triglav: 14.3.

Match halves

Rudar: half-time lead 0%, second-half goals 1.40. Triglav: half-time lead 0%, second-half goals 1.25.

Goals by minute

Rudar: 76-90+ (4 goals). Triglav: 61-75 (3 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

2. SNL: 2.89 goals per match, BTTS 44%, Over 2.5 56%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 2 previous H2H matches were available: 0-0-2. Average goals 2.50, BTTS 0%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Rudar have a perfect home record, averaging 3.5 goals scored and just 0.5 conceded per match, for a +6 goal difference. The hosts also create more chances: their average xG stands at 1.91, while opponents allow an average xG of 1.04; Rudar take 16 shots per game, including 5.5 on target. Triglav sit higher in the table and have won 4 of their last 5 matches, conceding just 2 goals during that period, which significantly boosts their chances. However, away from home, the visitors score only 1.67 goals per match, failed to score in 33% of such fixtures and lost 1 of 3 games. Rudar’s highly effective home performances, supported by 58% average possession and a 22% shot-conversion rate, give the hosts a slight edge despite Triglav’s strong form.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The BTTS pick is not a slight favorite, primarily due to Triglav’s highly solid defense, having conceded just 0.4 goals per game in their last 5 matches and keeping 3 clean sheets in 33% of their appearances to date. Rudar have recently scored as many as 3.6 goals per match, but their seasonal home scoring average is only 1.0, while Triglav allow opponents an xG of 1.38. The visitors have clear attacking credentials, averaging 1.67 goals, 1.88 xG and 4.67 shots on target, making a Triglav goal likely. At the same time, BTTS has occurred in just 0% of Rudar’s matches and 33% of Triglav’s fixtures this season, compared with the league average of 41%. The most realistic scenario is therefore a win for one side without conceding, particularly if Triglav restrict the hosts as effectively as they have in recent weeks.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The latest form of both teams clearly points toward goals: Rudar averaged 3.6 goals scored over their last 5 matches, while Triglav averaged 3.2. The hosts also conceded 1.6 goals per game, whereas Triglav allowed opponents just 0.4 goals, which limits the case for a very high line but does not undermine the chances of at least two goals. The chance-quality metrics are also strong, with Rudar averaging 1.73 xG and Triglav 1.48 xG, while the hosts allowed 2.24 xG. At least 3 goals were scored in 80% of Rudar’s last five matches and in 40% of Triglav’s games, compared with the league average of 2.85 goals. The strongest selection is Over 1.5 goals, as even after accounting for the visitors’ solid defence, both attacks and the pace shown in recent form clearly favour at least two goals.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The strongest signal points to a draw at half-time and a Triglav victory at full-time: in the current data, both teams were level at the break in all of their matches, while the visitors were not trailing at half-time in any of them. Triglav possess the clearer attacking potential, averaging 1.88 xG compared with Rudar’s 1.43 and registering 15.33 shots per match against the hosts’ 11.0. In their last five matches, the visitors won 80% of their games and averaged 2.2 goals after the break, while Rudar conceded an average of 0.8 goals in second halves. Triglav’s advantage should be particularly evident between the 61st and 75th minutes, when they scored 3 goals, while Rudar have yet to concede after the break in the very small sample from the current season. The hosts remain dangerous, having averaged 3.6 goals scored in their last five matches, but their weaker defensive record of 1.6 goals conceded on average suggests that, after an evenly balanced first half, the visitors will turn the game in their favour. HT/FT: X/2.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
2 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

49Possession (%)51
RudarTriglav
17Shots9
RudarTriglav
5Shots on target4
RudarTriglav
1.93xG1.28
RudarTriglav
8Corners5
RudarTriglav
71Dangerous attacks58
RudarTriglav
14Fouls11
RudarTriglav
0Cards0
RudarTriglav

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.8Goals scored / match1.5
RudarTriglav
1.8Goals conceded / match0.5
RudarTriglav
53%Average possession51%
RudarTriglav
4.6Shots on target / match4.5
RudarTriglav

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

13Shots per match14.25
RudarTriglav
4.6Shots on target4.5
RudarTriglav
13.8%Shot conversion10.5%
RudarTriglav
53%Possession51%
RudarTriglav
1.64xG for1.77
RudarTriglav
1.85xG against1.45
RudarTriglav

Shooting quality

Rudar: Efficient finishingTriglav: Attacking
RudarTriglav
Accuracy (shots on target)35%32%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.130.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.390.33

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Triglav is 88% better for: last-5 form.

1.2 pts / match - Rudar · 2.25 pts / match - Triglav

Rudar
LWLWL
Season result split
40% W0% D60% L
Season (W-D-L)
2-0-3
1.20 pts / match · goal difference 0
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-0-3
1.20 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
2-0-0
Last 5 at home
2-0-0
WW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.8Goals conceded: 1.8xG: 1.64Opponent xG: 1.85BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 60%
Triglav
WLWW
Season result split
75% W0% D25% L
Season (W-D-L)
3-0-1
2.25 pts / match · goal difference +4
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-0-1
2.25 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
2-0-1
Last 5 away
2-0-1
WLW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.5Goals conceded: 0.5xG: 1.77Opponent xG: 1.45BTTS: 25%Over 2.5: 25%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Rudar is 20% better for: goals scored per match.

1.8 goals / match - Rudar · 1.5 goals / match - Triglav

Triglav is 260% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.8 goals / match - Rudar · 0.5 goals / match - Triglav

Rudar scoring profile: mixed

Rudar scores in 60% of matches (3 of 5 matches), while Triglav keeps a clean sheet in 50% (2 of 4 matches).

Triglav scoring profile: very strong

Triglav scores in 75% of matches (3 of 4 matches), while Rudar keeps a clean sheet in 20% (1 of 5 matches).

9Goals scored (season)6
RudarTriglav
9Goals conceded (season)2
RudarTriglav
3.6Average goals in match2
RudarTriglav
9Goals scored (last 5)6
RudarTriglav
9Goals conceded (last 5)2
RudarTriglav

How often they score at least...

60%1 goal75%
RudarTriglav
60%2 goals25%
RudarTriglav
40%3 goals25%
RudarTriglav
20%4 goals25%
RudarTriglav

How often they concede at least...

80%1 goal50%
RudarTriglav
60%2 goals0%
RudarTriglav
20%3 goals0%
RudarTriglav
20%4 goals0%
RudarTriglav

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

40%BTTS at half-time25%
RudarTriglav
20%BTTS in both halves0%
RudarTriglav
40%Scored in both halves25%
RudarTriglav

BTTS and goal count

40%Min. 3 goals and BTTS25%
RudarTriglav
20%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
RudarTriglav
40%BTTS - last 525%
RudarTriglav

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

80%Min. 1 goal before half-time25%
RudarTriglav
40%Min. 2 goals before half-time25%
RudarTriglav
20%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
RudarTriglav

2nd half

100%Min. 1 goal after half-time100%
RudarTriglav
60%Min. 2 goals after half-time25%
RudarTriglav
60%Min. 3 goals after half-time25%
RudarTriglav

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Triglav is 150% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

0.4 pts / match - Rudar · 1 pts / match - Triglav

Rudar - half-time state
0% leading40% draw60% trailing
Triglav - half-time state
0% leading100% draw0% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.4Points per match (1st half)1
RudarTriglav
0.4Goals scored (1st half)0.25
RudarTriglav
1Goals conceded (1st half)0.25
RudarTriglav
1.4Average goals (1st half)0.5
RudarTriglav
20%Clean sheet before half-time75%
RudarTriglav
60%No goal before half-time75%
RudarTriglav

After half-time (2nd half)

1.2Points per match (2nd half)2.25
RudarTriglav
1.4Goals scored (2nd half)1.25
RudarTriglav
0.8Goals conceded (2nd half)0.25
RudarTriglav
2.2Average goals (2nd half)1.5
RudarTriglav
40%Clean sheet after half-time75%
RudarTriglav
40%No goal after half-time25%
RudarTriglav

Rudar - second-half results

40% W0% D60% L
2
Half-time points
2
Half-time goals
-3
Goal difference (1st half)
6
Second-half points
+3
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.40
PPG before half-time
Defence after half-time-0.2

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Triglav - second-half results

75% W0% D25% L
4
Half-time points
1
Half-time goals
0
Goal difference (1st half)
9
Second-half points
+4
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.00
PPG before half-time
Defence after half-time0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Rudar - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.401.20
Goals scored / match0.41.4
Goals conceded / match1.00.8
Average goals in match1.42.2
1 goal80%100%
2 goals40%60%
3 goals20%60%
Clean sheet20%40%
No goal60%40%
Goal difference-3+3
Half-time: 0% leading - 40% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 0% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 2
Triglav - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.002.25
Goals scored / match0.31.3
Goals conceded / match0.30.3
Average goals in match0.51.5
1 goal25%100%
2 goals25%25%
3 goals0%25%
Clean sheet75%75%
No goal75%25%
Goal difference0+4
Half-time: 0% leading - 100% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 75% won - 0% draw - 25% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 25% - Half-time goals total: 1

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Rudar
ScoredConceded
2
1
0-15
0
1
16-30
0
3
31-45
1
1
46-60
2
2
61-75
4
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (4 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.

Triglav
ScoredConceded
0
1
0-15
1
0
16-30
0
0
31-45
2
0
46-60
3
1
61-75
0
0
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (3 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.80
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.1 : 1.6
Estimated goal split
home : away
97%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
33%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-11%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
45%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
10%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 10 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Rudar

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.21
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.21
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.16
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.05
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
108%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
148%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+1.0
Late goals
44% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 22% come in the first quarter-hour.
44%

Triglav

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.32
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.68
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.27
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.95
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
123%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
30%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+1.0
Late goals
0% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
0%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (2. SNL).

Teams vs league

RudarLigaTriglav
Average goals in match 3.602.89 2.00
Both teams scored 40%44% 25%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 60%56% 25%
Clean sheets 20%33% 50%
Goal before half-time 80%69% 25%
Goal after half-time 100%80% 100%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.89
Average goals per match
44%
Both teams scored
56%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
33%
Clean sheets
1.67
Home goals / match
1.22
Away goals / match
+37%
Home attack advantage
+27%
Home defence advantage
+31%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
69%
1 goal
44%
2 goals
20%
3 goals
4%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
80%
1 goal
38%
2 goals
22%
3 goals
7%
4 goals

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (2): Rudar 0 - 0 - 2 Triglav. Average goals 2.50, both teams scored in 0% matches.

NK Triglav Kranj
2 : 0
NK Rudar Velenje
NK Rudar Velenje
0 : 3
NK Triglav Kranj

FAQ

What was the result of Rudar vs Triglav?

The 2. SNL match finished Rudar 2:0 Triglav. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Rudar and Triglav?

In the last 2 head-to-head matches Rudar won 0, Triglav won 2 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 2.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Rudar vs Triglav?

Rudar score 1.80 goals per game on average and Triglav 1.50. The 2. SNL average is 2.89 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 56% of games. Both teams score in 40% of Rudar's matches and 25% of Triglav's.

What form are Rudar and Triglav in?

Over the last 5 games Rudar have a 2-0-3 record (1.20 points per game) and Triglav 3-0-1 (2.25 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Rudar vs Triglav?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.