Belgium - First Division BData current as of 06 September 2026

RWDM vs Patro Eisden: match statistics

RWDM crest
RWDM
2 : 4half-time 1:2
Patro Eisden crest
Patro Eisden
130%(3.00)
X25%(3.15)
245%(2.18)

Patro Eisden displays decidedly better form and defensive efficiency in away matches. The visitors have a positive goal difference on the road (+2) and concede an average of only 0.89 goals per match, while RWDM concedes an average of 1.9 goals in home games and holds a negative balance (-2). RWDM wins just 20% of matches at home and loses as many as 50%, pointing to serious problems in the host role. Patro Eisden has better form in the last 5 matches (1.6 points per match vs 1.0) and a significantly higher expected goals ratio in away matches (xG 1.76 vs xGA 1.03). Given RWDM's weakness at home and the visitors' defensive and offensive solidity, Patro Eisden has real chances of securing three points in this meeting.

RWDM vs Patro Eisden: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

RWDM played Patro Eisden in First Division B (Belgium). The match was played on 24 January 2026. Final score: 2:4.

Current form

RWDM: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match. Patro Eisden: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match.

Goal statistics

RWDM scores 1.63 and concedes 1.79 goals per match. Patro Eisden scores 1.16 and concedes 0.89. League average: 2.76 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: RWDM 58%, Patro Eisden 42%. Over 2.5: RWDM 63%, Patro Eisden 37%. League level: BTTS 54%, Over 2.5 52%.

xG, shots and style

Patro Eisden has higher xG: 1.73 vs 1.44. RWDM: 12.6 shots per match, Patro Eisden: 16.3.

Match halves

RWDM: half-time lead 37%, second-half goals 0.84. Patro Eisden: half-time lead 26%, second-half goals 0.68.

Goals by minute

RWDM: 0-15 (6 goals). Patro Eisden: 76-90+ (8 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

First Division B: 2.76 goals per match, BTTS 54%, Over 2.5 52%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-0-1. Average goals 1.00, BTTS 0%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Patro Eisden displays decidedly better form and defensive efficiency in away matches. The visitors have a positive goal difference on the road (+2) and concede an average of only 0.89 goals per match, while RWDM concedes an average of 1.9 goals in home games and holds a negative balance (-2). RWDM wins just 20% of matches at home and loses as many as 50%, pointing to serious problems in the host role. Patro Eisden has better form in the last 5 matches (1.6 points per match vs 1.0) and a significantly higher expected goals ratio in away matches (xG 1.76 vs xGA 1.03). Given RWDM's weakness at home and the visitors' defensive and offensive solidity, Patro Eisden has real chances of securing three points in this meeting.

View the statistical overview

Half-by-half

1 : 2
1st half
1 : 2
2nd half

Match statistics

61Possession (%)39
RWDMPatro Eisden
10Shots18
RWDMPatro Eisden
4Shots on target11
RWDMPatro Eisden
1.08xG2.34
RWDMPatro Eisden
4Corners2
RWDMPatro Eisden
22Dangerous attacks61
RWDMPatro Eisden
15Fouls16
RWDMPatro Eisden
1Cards0
RWDMPatro Eisden

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.63Goals scored / match1.16
RWDMPatro Eisden
1.79Goals conceded / match0.89
RWDMPatro Eisden
52%Average possession36%
RWDMPatro Eisden
4.47Shots on target / match5.21
RWDMPatro Eisden

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

12.58Shots per match16.26
RWDMPatro Eisden
4.47Shots on target5.21
RWDMPatro Eisden
13%Shot conversion7.1%
RWDMPatro Eisden
52%Possession36%
RWDMPatro Eisden
1.44xG for1.73
RWDMPatro Eisden
1.49xG against1.04
RWDMPatro Eisden

Shooting quality

RWDM: Efficient finishingPatro Eisden: Attacking
RWDMPatro Eisden
Accuracy (shots on target)36%32%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.360.22

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Patro Eisden is 60% better for: last-5 form.

1 pts / match - RWDM · 1.6 pts / match - Patro Eisden

RWDM
DDWLL
Season result split
26% W26% R47% P
Season (W-D-L)
5-5-9
1.05 pts / match · goal difference -3
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
2-3-5
Last 5 at home
0-2-3
DLLDL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 2.2xG: 1.31Opponent xG: 1.40BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 80%
Patro Eisden
DWLDW
Season result split
47% W26% R26% P
Season (W-D-L)
9-5-5
1.68 pts / match · goal difference +5
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-2-1
1.60 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
3-3-3
Last 5 away
1-2-2
LLDWD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 0.4xG: 1.81Opponent xG: 1.12BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 0%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

RWDM is 41% better for: goals scored per match.

1.63 goals / match - RWDM · 1.16 goals / match - Patro Eisden

Patro Eisden is 101% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.79 goals / match - RWDM · 0.89 goals / match - Patro Eisden

RWDM scoring profile: strong

RWDM scores in 74% of matches (14 of 19 matches), while Patro Eisden keeps a clean sheet in 37% (7 of 19 matches).

Patro Eisden scoring profile: very strong

Patro Eisden scores in 63% of matches (12 of 19 matches), while RWDM keeps a clean sheet in 16% (3 of 19 matches).

31Goals scored (season)22
RWDMPatro Eisden
34Goals conceded (season)17
RWDMPatro Eisden
3.42Average goals in match2.05
RWDMPatro Eisden
7Goals scored (last 5)4
RWDMPatro Eisden
11Goals conceded (last 5)2
RWDMPatro Eisden

How often they score at least...

74%1 goal63%
RWDMPatro Eisden
47%2 goals42%
RWDMPatro Eisden
32%3 goals5%
RWDMPatro Eisden
5%4 goals5%
RWDMPatro Eisden

How often they concede at least...

84%1 goal63%
RWDMPatro Eisden
58%2 goals26%
RWDMPatro Eisden
32%3 goals0%
RWDMPatro Eisden
5%4 goals0%
RWDMPatro Eisden

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

54%
League average

Goal patterns

21%BTTS at half-time11%
RWDMPatro Eisden
16%BTTS in both halves0%
RWDMPatro Eisden
37%Scored in both halves16%
RWDMPatro Eisden

BTTS and goal count

53%Min. 3 goals and BTTS37%
RWDMPatro Eisden
11%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
RWDMPatro Eisden
60%BTTS - last 520%
RWDMPatro Eisden

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

74%Min. 1 goal before half-time53%
RWDMPatro Eisden
47%Min. 2 goals before half-time11%
RWDMPatro Eisden
5%Min. 3 goals before half-time5%
RWDMPatro Eisden

2nd half

95%Min. 1 goal after half-time79%
RWDMPatro Eisden
68%Min. 2 goals after half-time32%
RWDMPatro Eisden
26%Min. 3 goals after half-time11%
RWDMPatro Eisden

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

RWDM is 16% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.53 pts / match - RWDM · 1.32 pts / match - Patro Eisden

RWDM - half-time state
37% leading42% draw21% trailing
Patro Eisden - half-time state
26% leading53% draw21% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.53Points per match (1st half)1.32
RWDMPatro Eisden
0.79Goals scored (1st half)0.47
RWDMPatro Eisden
0.58Goals conceded (1st half)0.32
RWDMPatro Eisden
1.37Average goals (1st half)0.79
RWDMPatro Eisden
63%Clean sheet before half-time68%
RWDMPatro Eisden
42%No goal before half-time68%
RWDMPatro Eisden

After half-time (2nd half)

1.05Points per match (2nd half)1.32
RWDMPatro Eisden
0.84Goals scored (2nd half)0.68
RWDMPatro Eisden
1.21Goals conceded (2nd half)0.58
RWDMPatro Eisden
2.05Average goals (2nd half)1.26
RWDMPatro Eisden
26%Clean sheet after half-time47%
RWDMPatro Eisden
47%No goal after half-time53%
RWDMPatro Eisden

RWDM - second-half results

26% W26% R47% P
29
Half-time points
15
Half-time goals
+4
Goal difference (1st half)
20
Second-half points
-7
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.53
PPG before half-time
Lead holding70%

Leads at half-time in 37% of matches and wins 26%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time+0.6

Concedes 0.6 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Patro Eisden - second-half results

32% W37% R32% P
25
Half-time points
9
Half-time goals
+3
Goal difference (1st half)
25
Second-half points
+2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.32
PPG before half-time
Lead holding181%

Leads at half-time in 26% of matches and wins 47%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.3

Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

RWDM - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.801.00
Goals scored / match0.60.8
Goals conceded / match0.81.4
Average goals in match1.42.2
1 goal80%100%
2 goals60%80%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet20%20%
No goal40%40%
Goal difference-1-3
Half-time: 0% leading - 80% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 60% - Half-time goals total: 3
Patro Eisden - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.401.40
Goals scored / match0.20.6
Goals conceded / match0.00.4
Average goals in match0.21.0
1 goal20%80%
2 goals0%20%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet100%60%
No goal80%60%
Goal difference+1+1
Half-time: 20% leading - 80% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

RWDM
ScoredConceded
6
1
0-15
4
5
16-30
5
5
31-45
5
8
46-60
5
4
61-75
6
11
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (6 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): -5 - late phases are a weakness.

Patro Eisden
ScoredConceded
3
2
0-15
3
3
16-30
3
1
31-45
2
6
46-60
3
2
61-75
8
3
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (8 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +5 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.74
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.3 : 1.5
Estimated goal split
home : away
99%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
50%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-63%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
47%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
10%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 10 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

RWDM

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.05
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.11
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-5.9 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.19
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.30
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
117%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
131%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.05
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.0
Late goals
19% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 19% come in the first quarter-hour.
19%

Patro Eisden

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.69
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.42
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-3.7 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.57
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.15
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
85%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
64%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.08
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
36% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 14% come in the first quarter-hour.
36%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (First Division B).

Teams vs league

RWDMLigaPatro Eisden
Average goals in match 3.422.76 2.05
Both teams scored 58%54% 42%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 63%52% 37%
Clean sheets 16%26% 37%
Goal before half-time 74%73% 53%
Goal after half-time 95%79% 79%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.76
Average goals per match
54%
Both teams scored
52%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
26%
Clean sheets
1.39
Home goals / match
1.37
Away goals / match
+1%
Home attack advantage
+1%
Home defence advantage
+1%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
73%
1 goal
33%
2 goals
12%
3 goals
5%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
79%
1 goal
47%
2 goals
20%
3 goals
6%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Patro EisdenGoalRadja NainggolanAssist: Stef Peeters
  2. Patro EisdenGoalLéandro RousseauAssist: Milan Robberechts
  3. RWDMYellow cardAli Loune
  4. RWDMSubstitutionOn: Oskar SzulcOff: Jacob Montes
  5. Patro EisdenSubstitutionOn: Ridwane M'BarkiOff: Denys Prychynenko
  6. Patro EisdenGoalKjetil BorryAssist: Japhet Emmanuel Muanza
  7. Patro EisdenSubstitutionOn: Nicolas OryeOff: Amir Rais

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Referee context

See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.

Anthony LetellierMatches officiated: 19
3.58Cards per match
0Penalties per match
1 / X / 247%Home wins26%Draws26%Away wins

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: RWDM 0 - 0 - 1 Patro Eisden. Average goals 1.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.

FAQ

What was the result of RWDM vs Patro Eisden?

The First Division B match finished RWDM 2:4 Patro Eisden. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before RWDM vs Patro Eisden?

RWDM score 1.63 goals per game on average and Patro Eisden 1.16. The First Division B average is 2.76 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 52% of games. Both teams score in 58% of RWDM's matches and 42% of Patro Eisden's.

What form are RWDM and Patro Eisden in?

Over the last 5 games RWDM have a 1-2-2 record (1.00 points per game) and Patro Eisden 2-2-1 (1.60 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for RWDM vs Patro Eisden?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for RWDM vs Patro Eisden: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.