Azerbaijan - Premyer LiqasıData current as of 12 September 2026

Sabah vs Zira: match statistics

Sabah crest
Sabah
2 : 2half-time 1:2
Zira crest
Zira

Sabah vs Zira: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Sabah played Zira in Premyer Liqası (Azerbaijan). The match was played on 11 April 2026. Final score: 2:2.

Current form

Sabah: 4-1-0, 2.60 points/match. Zira: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match.

Goal statistics

Sabah scores 2.46 and concedes 0.73 goals per match. Zira scores 1.31 and concedes 1.08. League average: 2.59 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Sabah 54%, Zira 54%. Over 2.5: Sabah 62%, Zira 42%. League level: BTTS 45%, Over 2.5 47%.

xG, shots and style

Sabah has higher xG: 1.84 vs 1.37. Sabah: 13.6 shots per match, Zira: 10.6.

Match halves

Sabah: half-time lead 54%, second-half goals 1.27. Zira: half-time lead 38%, second-half goals 0.69.

Goals by minute

Sabah: 46-60 (14 goals). Zira: 76-90+ (11 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Premyer Liqası: 2.59 goals per match, BTTS 45%, Over 2.5 47%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 2 previous H2H matches were available: 2-0-0. Average goals 3.50, BTTS 50%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Sabah is the clear favorite: at home they average 2.31 goals per match with xG 2.06, while Zira score 1.25 goals away with xG 1.29. Sabah’s attack confirms current form — 21 goals in the last 5 matches (4 wins, 1 draw) versus Zira’s 7 goals (2 wins, 2 draws, 1 loss); PPG over the last 5 is 2.6 for Sabah vs 1.6 for Zira. Defensively the hosts are stronger: Sabah concedes 0.54 goals per home match and has 46% clean sheets, while Zira concede 1.17 goals away and have 33% clean sheets. Sabah also creates more chances (15.23 shots and 5.77 on target with 59% possession) versus Zira (10.08 shots, 3.75 on target, 55% possession), and a conversion rate of 15% vs 12% further increases the hosts’ edge. Considering the standings advantage (Sabah 1st, Zira 4th), 20 wins for Sabah versus 11 for Zira, and the home goal difference +23 compared to Zira’s +1 on the road, I forecast a home win.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Seasonal and last-5 metrics strongly support BTTS: seasonal BTTS percentages are 57% for Sabah and 50% for Zira, while in the last 5 matches they are 80% and 60% respectively (average 70%), indicating an increased likelihood of Goal/Goal. Sabah has 64 goals this season, averaging 1.36 goals per match season-to-date, with the last 5 matches averaging 4.2 goals (21 goals in 5), whereas Zira has 34 goals this season and averages 1.25 goals (1.4 in the last 5), so both teams can score. xG confirms the offensive potential: total xG is about 2.74 (1.45 xG for Sabah vs 1.29 xG for Zira), and xG against are 1.03 and 1.12, so both sides create scoring opportunities. Defensively both sides concede regularly (Sabah 1.2 goals on average in the last 5 and 1.0 seasonally; Zira 1.2 in the last 5 and 1.17 seasonally), therefore I forecast BTTS - Yes with a probability around 72% versus 28% for BTTS - No.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Both teams exceed 1.5 goals frequently this season: Sabah 64% and Zira 75%, average 69.5%, therefore I rate Over 1.5 at 72%. Expected xG indicate a moderate total — xG Sabah 1.45 vs xG against Zira 1.12 (expected Sabah ≈1.29), and xG Zira 1.29 vs xG against Sabah 1.03 (expected Zira ≈1.16), total ≈2.45. Sabah is in clearly better form: in the last 5 matches they scored 21 goals (4.2 per game) and have last5 xG 1.86, while Zira scored 7 goals (1.4 per game) and last5 xG 1.10, which increases the likelihood of goals. The 2.5 line is more balanced — season Over2.5: Sabah 43% and Zira 42% (≈42.5%) — I give it a moderate 55% for over, whereas Over 1.5 remains the strongest and safest signal from the data.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Sabah holds a clear advantage at the break: they led at the break in 6 matches (43% of the season) and in 3 of the last 5 fixtures (60%), with an average first-half goals of 2.2 in those five games versus 0.2 for Zira. This is supported by xG values — home xG is 1.45 versus 1.29 for the visitors, and first-half goals average 0.71 (Sabah) vs 0.50 (Zira), suggesting better chances and finishing by Sabah in the first half. For the Full-Time outcome, form points to Sabah: they have an 80% win rate in the last 5 matches and average 2.6 points per game versus 40% and 1.6 ppg for Zira; seasonally Sabah scores 1.36 and concedes 1.00, Zira 1.25 and concedes 1.17. Zira are, however, dangerous after the break (0.75 second-half goals on average vs 0.64 for Sabah and 42% second-half wins), so a turnaround is possible; nevertheless the strongest signal is Sabah leading at Half-Time and winning the match, therefore I select 1/1 as the most probable scenario.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

1 : 2
1st half
1 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

66Possession (%)34
SabahZira
18Shots4
SabahZira
8Shots on target3
SabahZira
2.47xG0.83
SabahZira
9Corners1
SabahZira
107Dangerous attacks50
SabahZira
9Fouls13
SabahZira
1Cards3
SabahZira

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

2.46Goals scored / match1.31
SabahZira
0.73Goals conceded / match1.08
SabahZira
57%Average possession57%
SabahZira
5.69Shots on target / match3.88
SabahZira

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

13.62Shots per match10.58
SabahZira
5.69Shots on target3.88
SabahZira
18.1%Shot conversion12.4%
SabahZira
57%Possession57%
SabahZira
1.84xG for1.37
SabahZira
1.08xG against1.07
SabahZira

Shooting quality

Sabah: Efficient finishingZira: Balanced
SabahZira
Accuracy (shots on target)42%37%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.140.13
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.430.34

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Sabah is 63% better for: last-5 form.

2.6 pts / match - Sabah · 1.6 pts / match - Zira

Sabah
DWWWW
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
77% W19% D4% L
Season (W-D-L)
20-5-1
2.50 pts / match · goal difference +45
Last 5 (W-D-L)
4-1-0
2.60 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
10-2-1
Last 5 at home
5-0-0
WWWWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 4.4Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.79Opponent xG: 1.02BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 100%
Zira
WDLWD
Season result split
42% W38% D19% L
Season (W-D-L)
11-10-5
1.65 pts / match · goal difference +6
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-2-1
1.60 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
6-3-3
Last 5 away
3-1-1
DWLWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.19Opponent xG: 1.13BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Sabah is 88% better for: goals scored per match.

2.46 goals / match - Sabah · 1.31 goals / match - Zira

Sabah is 48% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.73 goals / match - Sabah · 1.08 goals / match - Zira

Sabah scoring profile: very strong

Sabah scores in 88% of matches (23 of 26 matches), while Zira keeps a clean sheet in 38% (10 of 26 matches).

Zira scoring profile: strong

Zira scores in 81% of matches (21 of 26 matches), while Sabah keeps a clean sheet in 42% (11 of 26 matches).

64Goals scored (season)34
SabahZira
19Goals conceded (season)28
SabahZira
3.19Average goals in match2.38
SabahZira
22Goals scored (last 5)6
SabahZira
7Goals conceded (last 5)6
SabahZira

How often they score at least...

88%1 goal81%
SabahZira
73%2 goals31%
SabahZira
50%3 goals12%
SabahZira
19%4 goals4%
SabahZira

How often they concede at least...

58%1 goal62%
SabahZira
12%2 goals35%
SabahZira
4%3 goals12%
SabahZira
0%4 goals0%
SabahZira

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

12%BTTS at half-time15%
SabahZira
0%BTTS in both halves8%
SabahZira
46%Scored in both halves15%
SabahZira

BTTS and goal count

50%Min. 3 goals and BTTS35%
SabahZira
12%Min. 3 goals without BTTS8%
SabahZira
80%BTTS - last 560%
SabahZira

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

65%Min. 1 goal before half-time73%
SabahZira
38%Min. 2 goals before half-time31%
SabahZira
27%Min. 3 goals before half-time15%
SabahZira

2nd half

81%Min. 1 goal after half-time65%
SabahZira
58%Min. 2 goals after half-time38%
SabahZira
27%Min. 3 goals after half-time12%
SabahZira

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Sabah is 36% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

2.04 pts / match - Sabah · 1.5 pts / match - Zira

Sabah - half-time state
54% leading42% draw4% trailing
Zira - half-time state
38% leading35% draw27% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

2.04Points per match (1st half)1.5
SabahZira
1.19Goals scored (1st half)0.62
SabahZira
0.19Goals conceded (1st half)0.58
SabahZira
1.38Average goals (1st half)1.19
SabahZira
85%Clean sheet before half-time58%
SabahZira
38%No goal before half-time54%
SabahZira

After half-time (2nd half)

1.96Points per match (2nd half)1.38
SabahZira
1.27Goals scored (2nd half)0.69
SabahZira
0.54Goals conceded (2nd half)0.5
SabahZira
1.81Average goals (2nd half)1.19
SabahZira
58%Clean sheet after half-time62%
SabahZira
27%No goal after half-time50%
SabahZira

Sabah - second-half results

54% W35% D12% L
53
Half-time points
31
Half-time goals
+26
Goal difference (1st half)
51
Second-half points
+19
Goal difference (2nd half)
2.04
PPG before half-time
Lead holding143%

Leads at half-time in 54% of matches and wins 77%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.4

Concedes 0.4 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Zira - second-half results

31% W46% D23% L
39
Half-time points
16
Half-time goals
+1
Goal difference (1st half)
36
Second-half points
+5
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.50
PPG before half-time
Lead holding111%

Leads at half-time in 38% of matches and wins 42%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Sabah - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.602.40
Goals scored / match2.22.2
Goals conceded / match0.41.0
Average goals in match2.63.2
1 goal100%100%
2 goals60%100%
3 goals60%60%
Clean sheet80%40%
No goal0%0%
Goal difference+9+6
Half-time: 80% leading - 20% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 80% won - 0% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 11
Zira - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.801.60
Goals scored / match0.21.0
Goals conceded / match0.40.8
Average goals in match0.61.8
1 goal40%100%
2 goals20%60%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal80%0%
Goal difference-1+1
Half-time: 0% leading - 80% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 1

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Sabah
ScoredConceded
9
2
0-15
12
1
16-30
10
2
31-45
14
2
46-60
9
3
61-75
10
9
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (14 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

Zira
ScoredConceded
3
2
0-15
3
9
16-30
10
4
31-45
1
4
46-60
6
6
61-75
11
3
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (11 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): +8 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.79
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.8 : 1.0
Estimated goal split
home : away
108%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
54%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+26%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
71%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
2%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 50 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Sabah

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.76
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.97
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-6.7 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.62
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.35
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
188%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
57%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.10
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
16% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 14% come in the first quarter-hour.
16%

Zira

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.30
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.07
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-3.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.06
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.01
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
102%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
82%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.05
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
32% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 9% come in the first quarter-hour.
32%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Premyer Liqası).

Teams vs league

SabahLigaZira
Average goals in match 3.192.59 2.38
Both teams scored 54%45% 54%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 62%47% 42%
Clean sheets 42%33% 38%
Goal before half-time 65%65% 73%
Goal after half-time 81%73% 65%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.59
Average goals per match
45%
Both teams scored
47%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
33%
Clean sheets
1.31
Home goals / match
1.28
Away goals / match
+2%
Home attack advantage
+2%
Home defence advantage
+-3%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
65%
1 goal
32%
2 goals
13%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
73%
1 goal
47%
2 goals
20%
3 goals
5%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. ZiraGoalEren Aydın
  2. ZiraYellow cardIron Gomis
  3. ZiraYellow cardIssa Djibrilla
  4. SabahYellow cardUmarali Rahmonaliyev

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Referee context

See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.

Tural QurbanovMatches officiated: 9
3.44Cards per match
0Penalties per match
1 / X / 233%Home wins44%Draws22%Away wins

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (2): Sabah 2 - 0 - 0 Zira. Average goals 3.50, both teams scored in 50% matches.

Zira IK
1 : 3
Sabah FK
Sabah FK
3 : 0
Zira IK

FAQ

What was the result of Sabah vs Zira?

The Premyer Liqası match finished Sabah 2:2 Zira. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Sabah and Zira?

In the last 2 head-to-head matches Sabah won 2, Zira won 0 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 3.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Sabah vs Zira?

Sabah score 2.46 goals per game on average and Zira 1.31. The Premyer Liqası average is 2.59 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 47% of games. Both teams score in 54% of Sabah's matches and 54% of Zira's.

What form are Sabah and Zira in?

Over the last 5 games Sabah have a 4-1-0 record (2.60 points per game) and Zira 2-2-1 (1.60 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Sabah vs Zira?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.