Sacramento Republic vs Phoenix Rising: match statistics
Sacramento Republic vs Phoenix Rising: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Sacramento Republic played Phoenix Rising in USL Championship (United States). The match was played on 23 August 2026. Final score: 2:2.
Current form
Sacramento Republic: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match. Phoenix Rising: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match.
Goal statistics
Sacramento Republic scores 1.14 and concedes 1.00 goals per match. Phoenix Rising scores 1.44 and concedes 1.50. League average: 2.79 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Sacramento Republic 57%, Phoenix Rising 56%. Over 2.5: Sacramento Republic 29%, Phoenix Rising 50%. League level: BTTS 58%, Over 2.5 52%.
xG, shots and style
Phoenix Rising has higher xG: 1.49 vs 1.36. Sacramento Republic: 10.7 shots per match, Phoenix Rising: 12.4.
Match halves
Sacramento Republic: half-time lead 14%, second-half goals 0.79. Phoenix Rising: half-time lead 25%, second-half goals 1.00.
Goals by minute
Sacramento Republic: 76-90+ (5 goals). Phoenix Rising: 76-90+ (8 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
USL Championship: 2.79 goals per match, BTTS 58%, Over 2.5 52%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 6 previous H2H matches were available: 2-3-1. Average goals 2.67, BTTS 50%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Sacramento Republic are showing clearly better form: they have won 3 of their last 5 matches, scoring 9 goals and conceding just 2, while Phoenix Rising have managed only 1 win and scored 5 goals. At home, the hosts win 67% of their matches, averaging 1.89 goals scored and just 0.78 conceded, whereas the visitors lose 50% of their away fixtures and average 0.90 goals scored. Sacramento’s advantage is also evident in chance creation: their average xG stands at 1.60 compared with Phoenix’s 1.08, while they register 4.67 shots on target per match versus 2.30 for their opponents. Phoenix fail to score in 30% of their away appearances, while Sacramento keep a clean sheet in 44% of home matches, further strengthening the case for a home win. The visitors can still rely on a draw, having drawn 30% of their away games, but the difference in attacking efficiency, defensive solidity and current form clearly favors Sacramento.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Sacramento Republic are in a very solid defensive phase: they have conceded just 2 goals in their last 5 matches, averaging 0.4 per game, while their xG against is only 0.77. Phoenix Rising score just 0.9 goals per game this season and average 2.3 shots on target, which limits the visitors’ chances of breaking through this defense. The hosts do have strong attacking potential, with an average xG of 1.93 and 1.67 goals scored per game, while Phoenix concede an average of 1.4 goals. However, the key point is that BTTS - Yes landed in only 20% of Sacramento’s last five matches, while the hosts kept a clean sheet in 33% of their league games this season. The most likely scenario is therefore Sacramento scoring while Phoenix fail to reply, supporting the BTTS - No pick.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Sacramento creates an average of 1.93 xG per match, while Phoenix allows opponents 1.42 xG, clearly supporting a scenario of around 1–2 home goals. The visitors score just 0.90 goals per game this season, whereas Sacramento conceded only 0.40 goals per match over their last 5 games and allowed just 0.77 xG. The 3.5-goal line was exceeded in 33% of Sacramento’s matches and in just 10% of Phoenix’s, while 67% and 90% of their respective games ended below this line. Even with Sacramento’s strong recent output of 1.8 goals scored per match over five rounds, Phoenix’s limited attacking potential reduces the likelihood of four goals. The strongest pick is Under 3.5, as the data from both teams points to a controlled game with the home side in charge, but without the need for a high-scoring result.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
The strongest scenario is a draw at half-time followed by a Sacramento Republic win, as both teams were level after 45 minutes in 80% of their last five matches. Across the season, Phoenix were level at half-time in 60% of their games and scored just 0.30 goals per match before the break, while Sacramento conceded only 0.44 goals during that phase. After the break, the home side have greater attacking potential: they average 1.11 goals, compared with just 0.60 for the visitors, while Sacramento won the second half in 44% of matches, compared with 20% for Phoenix. The hosts’ advantage is also evident in the quality of chances created, with their average xG standing at 1.93 versus 1.08 for their opponents, while shots on target average 6.78 compared with 2.30. In addition, Sacramento are in better form, winning 3 of their last 5 matches and conceding an average of 0.4 goals in those games, whereas Phoenix have recorded only 1 victory.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Sacramento Republic | Phoenix Rising | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 32% | 38% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.13 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.33 | 0.30 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Sacramento Republic is 75% better for: last-5 form.
1.4 pts / match - Sacramento Republic · 0.8 pts / match - Phoenix Rising
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Phoenix Rising is 26% better for: goals scored per match.
1.14 goals / match - Sacramento Republic · 1.44 goals / match - Phoenix Rising
Sacramento Republic is 50% better for: goals conceded per match.
1 goals / match - Sacramento Republic · 1.5 goals / match - Phoenix Rising
Sacramento Republic scores in 79% of matches (11 of 14 matches), while Phoenix Rising keeps a clean sheet in 25% (4 of 16 matches).
Phoenix Rising scores in 81% of matches (13 of 16 matches), while Sacramento Republic keeps a clean sheet in 29% (4 of 14 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Sacramento Republic
Over / Under - Phoenix Rising
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Phoenix Rising is 28% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
0.93 pts / match - Sacramento Republic · 1.19 pts / match - Phoenix Rising
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Sacramento Republic - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 14% of matches and wins 36%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Phoenix Rising - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 25% of matches and wins 31%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.20 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 0.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 1.0 | 0.8 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 60% |
| No goal | 80% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -1 | 0 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.00 | 0.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 1.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 2.0 |
| Average goals in match | 0.8 | 3.2 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 100% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 0% |
| No goal | 60% | 40% |
| Goal difference | 0 | -4 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (5 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (8 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): +5 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Sacramento Republic
Phoenix Rising
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (USL Championship).
Teams vs league
| Sacramento Republic | Liga | Phoenix Rising | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 2.14 | 2.79 | ▲ 2.94 |
| Both teams scored | • 57% | 58% | ▼ 56% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 29% | 52% | ▼ 50% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 29% | 26% | • 25% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 57% | 67% | ▲ 69% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 64% | 80% | • 81% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (6): Sacramento Republic 2 - 3 - 1 Phoenix Rising. Average goals 2.67, both teams scored in 50% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Sacramento Republic vs Phoenix Rising?
The USL Championship match finished Sacramento Republic 2:2 Phoenix Rising. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Sacramento Republic and Phoenix Rising?
In the last 6 head-to-head matches Sacramento Republic won 2, Phoenix Rising won 1 and 3 ended level. These games averaged 2.67 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Sacramento Republic vs Phoenix Rising?
Sacramento Republic score 1.14 goals per game on average and Phoenix Rising 1.44. The USL Championship average is 2.79 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 52% of games. Both teams score in 57% of Sacramento Republic's matches and 56% of Phoenix Rising's.
What form are Sacramento Republic and Phoenix Rising in?
Over the last 5 games Sacramento Republic have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and Phoenix Rising 1-1-3 (0.80 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Sacramento Republic vs Phoenix Rising?
The statistical background for Sacramento Republic vs Phoenix Rising — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.


