Salford City vs Grimsby Town: match statistics
Salford City vs Grimsby Town: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Salford City played Grimsby Town in EFL League Two (England). The match was played on 15 May 2026. Final score: 2:2.
Current form
Salford City: 3-2-0, 2.20 points/match. Grimsby Town: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match.
Goal statistics
Salford City scores 1.34 and concedes 1.11 goals per match. Grimsby Town scores 1.60 and concedes 1.11. League average: 2.58 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Salford City 49%, Grimsby Town 51%. Over 2.5: Salford City 45%, Grimsby Town 49%. League level: BTTS 53%, Over 2.5 48%.
xG, shots and style
Grimsby Town has higher xG: 1.59 vs 1.58. Salford City: 13.6 shots per match, Grimsby Town: 13.8.
Match halves
Salford City: half-time lead 34%, second-half goals 0.72. Grimsby Town: half-time lead 34%, second-half goals 0.74.
Goals by minute
Salford City: 76-90+ (18 goals). Grimsby Town: 31-45+ (19 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
League Two: 2.58 goals per match, BTTS 53%, Over 2.5 48%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 3 previous H2H matches were available: 1-0-2. Average goals 3.00, BTTS 67%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
I back the home win: Salford win 61% of matches at home, average 1.48 goals per game and xG 1.75, while Grimsby average 1.43 goals away and xG 1.37. Defensively the hosts are superior — Salford concede 1.04 goals at home and keep 43% clean sheets, whereas Grimsby concede 1.22 away and have 35% clean sheets; in the last 5 matches Salford have conceded only 2 goals vs Grimsby’s 5. The visitors’ attack can still be dangerous: Grimsby have scored 75 goals this season compared to Salford’s 63 and in the last 5 matches they scored 12 goals (2.4 per game) vs the hosts’ 6 (1.2). Salford create more high-quality chances — on average 15 shots and 5.09 on target per home game versus 11.83 and 3.87 for Grimsby away, which together with the higher xG (1.75 vs 1.37) gives them an edge in chance creation. Considering a higher xG by 0.38, a greater volume of shots and better defense over the last five matches (PPG 2.2 vs 2.0), I assess the probabilities as: Salford win 48%, draw 26%, Grimsby win 26%.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
A strong signal for BTTS - Yes is Grimsby's form: in the last 5 matches they have BTTS at 80% and scored an average of 2.4 goals (12 goals in last 5), demonstrating offensive effectiveness. Seasonal data for both teams also supports both teams scoring: Salford has season BTTS 50% and Grimsby 52%, with the league average 53%, so these fixtures often end Goal/Goal. Counterargument is Salford's solid defense in the last 5 matches — Salford conceded only 0.4 goals on average (2 conceded in last 5) and concedes 1.0 goals per game on the season, with 38% clean sheets expected, which reduces opponent scoring probability. Looking at xG and chances, Salford has xG 1.81 vs 1.37 for Grimsby and registers 5.58 shots on target vs 3.87 for Grimsby, but Grimsby has higher season shot conversion (12% vs 11%), so they can convert chances. Overall, Grimsby's 80% BTTS in form and season 50–52% for both teams favor the 'yes' scenario, therefore I assess BTTS at 62% vs 38% and pick 'yes'.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Considering the home xG 1.81 and xG against Grimsby 1.38, and seasonal goals averages 1.75 (Salford) and 1.43 (Grimsby), I estimate about 1.60 goals for Salford and about 1.20 for Grimsby (total ~2.80). The combined expected goals 2.80 is above the league average 2.58, which increases the probability of Over 1.5 goals and provides moderate support for the 2.5 line. Seasonally Over 1.5 occurred in 67% of Salford’s matches and 74% of Grimsby’s matches, and in the last 5 games Grimsby scored 12 goals (2.4 per game) and had 80% of matches Over 2.5, further boosting the chance of more goals. Both teams have goal-to-both-scores percentages of 50% (Salford) and 52% (Grimsby), and Salford averages 5.58 shots on target versus Grimsby’s 3.87, suggesting offensive activity on both sides. Therefore the most reliable signal is Over 1.5 (I rate ~85%), with Over 2.5 making sense at ~60%, and Over 3.5 I rate at about 31%.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Grimsby leads at the break in 39% of their away matches, while Salford lead HT in only 29% of their home games, and a half-time draw occurs around 42–43% (Salford 42%, Grimsby 43%), so the visitors are more likely to be in the lead at the break. After the break, however, Salford dominate: they average 1.00 goals in the second half and concede 0.46, win 50% of second halves and average 1.79 points per match in second halves, whereas Grimsby score 0.48 goals after the break and win only 26% of second halves. Additionally, Salford have higher xG (1.81 vs 1.37) and more shots and shots on target (15.71 and 5.58 vs 11.83 and 3.87), which increases their chances of mounting a turnaround. Considering that in the last five matches Grimsby scored 10 first-half goals versus Salford’s 5, the most likely and strongest signal is the 2/1 scenario (away leading HT, home winning Full-Time), with reasonable alternatives being X/1 and X/X.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Salford City | Grimsby Town | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 33% | 34% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.30 | 0.34 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Salford City is 10% better for: last-5 form.
2.2 pts / match - Salford City · 2 pts / match - Grimsby Town
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Grimsby Town is 19% better for: goals scored per match.
1.34 goals / match - Salford City · 1.6 goals / match - Grimsby Town
Salford City scores in 72% of matches (34 of 47 matches), while Grimsby Town keeps a clean sheet in 36% (17 of 47 matches).
Grimsby Town scores in 83% of matches (39 of 47 matches), while Salford City keeps a clean sheet in 32% (15 of 47 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Salford City
Over / Under - Grimsby Town
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Salford City - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 34% of matches and wins 55%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Grimsby Town - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 34% of matches and wins 47%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.80 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.8 | 0.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 0.2 |
| Average goals in match | 1.0 | 0.6 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 40% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 80% |
| No goal | 60% | 80% |
| Goal difference | +3 | +1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 2.00 | 2.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.4 | 1.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 2.0 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 60% |
| No goal | 0% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +4 | +3 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (18 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (13). Late-goal balance (76-90): +5 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (19 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): +6 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Salford City
Grimsby Town
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (League Two).
Teams vs league
| Salford City | Liga | Grimsby Town | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 2.45 | 2.58 | ▲ 2.70 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 49% | 53% | ▼ 51% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 45% | 48% | • 49% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 32% | 27% | ▲ 36% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 62% | 67% | ▲ 70% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 68% | 78% | • 77% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (3): Salford City 1 - 0 - 2 Grimsby Town. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 67% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Salford City vs Grimsby Town?
The EFL League Two match finished Salford City 2:2 Grimsby Town. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Salford City and Grimsby Town?
In the last 3 head-to-head matches Salford City won 1, Grimsby Town won 2 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 67% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Salford City vs Grimsby Town?
Salford City score 1.34 goals per game on average and Grimsby Town 1.60. The EFL League Two average is 2.58 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 48% of games. Both teams score in 49% of Salford City's matches and 51% of Grimsby Town's.
What form are Salford City and Grimsby Town in?
Over the last 5 games Salford City have a 3-2-0 record (2.20 points per game) and Grimsby Town 3-1-1 (2.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Salford City vs Grimsby Town?
The statistical background for Salford City vs Grimsby Town — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.


