Sarasota Paradise vs Chattanooga Red Wolves: match statistics
Sarasota Paradise vs Chattanooga Red Wolves: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Sarasota Paradise played Chattanooga Red Wolves in USL League One (United States). The match was played on 19 August 2026. Final score: 3:2.
Current form
Sarasota Paradise: 0-2-3, 0.40 points/match. Chattanooga Red Wolves: 3-0-2, 1.80 points/match.
Goal statistics
Sarasota Paradise scores 0.95 and concedes 1.65 goals per match. Chattanooga Red Wolves scores 1.83 and concedes 1.44. League average: 2.90 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Sarasota Paradise 55%, Chattanooga Red Wolves 61%. Over 2.5: Sarasota Paradise 55%, Chattanooga Red Wolves 67%. League level: BTTS 57%, Over 2.5 60%.
xG, shots and style
Sarasota Paradise has higher xG: 1.48 vs 1.39. Sarasota Paradise: 12.8 shots per match, Chattanooga Red Wolves: 11.4.
Match halves
Sarasota Paradise: half-time lead 10%, second-half goals 0.70. Chattanooga Red Wolves: half-time lead 28%, second-half goals 1.06.
Goals by minute
Sarasota Paradise: 46-60 (5 goals). Chattanooga Red Wolves: 46-60 (9 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
USL League One: 2.90 goals per match, BTTS 57%, Over 2.5 60%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-0-1. Average goals 5.00, BTTS 100%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Chattanooga Red Wolves sit 8th, while Sarasota Paradise are only 15th, and the gap is also reflected in their current form: the visitors have won 3 of their last 5 matches, whereas the hosts have failed to win any and have scored just 2 goals. Red Wolves have scored 31 goals this season compared with Sarasota’s 18, and away from home they average 1.75 goals per match with a 14% conversion rate, higher than the hosts’ 10% at home. Sarasota do have a positive goal difference at home and an average xG of 1.57, but they have conceded as many as 11 goals in their last five matches, significantly reducing their chances. Chattanooga’s away defence is also vulnerable to errors, conceding an average of 2.13 goals and keeping no clean sheets, so the hosts should create chances; however, the visitors’ superior form and greater attacking potential make them the more convincing side.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Sarasota Paradise have a low seasonal BTTS rate of just 33% and have kept a clean sheet in 56% of their matches, which significantly increases the risk of Chattanooga failing to score. The hosts are currently struggling in attack, scoring only 2 goals in their last five matches—an average of 0.4 per game—despite an xG of 1.46. Chattanooga score more consistently, averaging 1.75 goals per game across the season and 1.8 in their last five outings, but their defence concedes an average of 2.13 goals per match. The visitors’ high 88% BTTS rate supports a Goal/Goal outcome, but this is offset by Sarasota’s very strong seasonal defence and their clear decline in attacking efficiency during the latest run of fixtures. BTTS - No is therefore the most likely outcome, primarily because there is a realistic chance that the hosts will fail to score again.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Chattanooga play very open games: Over 1.5 goals has landed in 100% of their matches, while Over 2.5 goals has landed in 88%. The visitors score an average of 1.75 goals per match, while Sarasota have conceded as many as 2.2 goals per game across their last five appearances. Although Sarasota have kept a clean sheet in 56% of matches in the season data, their current defensive form is clearly weaker, and opponents from Chattanooga average 4.88 shots on target per match. The hosts should also contribute, as their season average of 1.89 goals is backed by 1.34 xG, while Chattanooga have failed to keep a clean sheet even once. The Over 1.5 goals line has the strongest support both from the combined projection of 3.10 goals and the exceptionally high frequency of at least two goals in the visitors’ matches.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
The strongest scenario is for Chattanooga Red Wolves to lead at the break and maintain their winning position, as Sarasota have failed to win any of their last five matches, averaging just 0.4 goals scored and conceding 2.2 per game. During this period, the hosts have failed to score before half-time and were losing at the break in 50% of their matches, while Chattanooga averaged 0.75 goals in the first half. The visitors are clearly superior in terms of current form, with a 60% win rate in their last five matches compared with Sarasota’s 0%, and they average 1.25 goals after the break against just 0.25 for the hosts. In addition, Chattanooga average 4.88 shots on target per match compared with their opponents’ 3.67, while Sarasota have failed to score in 75% of their recent second halves, further strengthening the 2/2 HT/FT option.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Sarasota Paradise | Chattanooga Red Wolves | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 33% | 36% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.23 | 0.45 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Chattanooga Red Wolves is 350% better for: last-5 form.
0.4 pts / match - Sarasota Paradise · 1.8 pts / match - Chattanooga Red Wolves
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Chattanooga Red Wolves is 93% better for: goals scored per match.
0.95 goals / match - Sarasota Paradise · 1.83 goals / match - Chattanooga Red Wolves
Chattanooga Red Wolves is 15% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.65 goals / match - Sarasota Paradise · 1.44 goals / match - Chattanooga Red Wolves
Sarasota Paradise scores in 70% of matches (14 of 20 matches), while Chattanooga Red Wolves keeps a clean sheet in 28% (5 of 18 matches).
Chattanooga Red Wolves scores in 89% of matches (16 of 18 matches), while Sarasota Paradise keeps a clean sheet in 25% (5 of 20 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Sarasota Paradise
Over / Under - Chattanooga Red Wolves
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Chattanooga Red Wolves is 36% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
0.9 pts / match - Sarasota Paradise · 1.22 pts / match - Chattanooga Red Wolves
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Sarasota Paradise - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 10% of matches and wins 25%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Chattanooga Red Wolves - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 28% of matches and wins 56%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.60 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.0 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.0 | 0.8 |
| Average goals in match | 1.0 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 60% |
| No goal | 100% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -5 | -1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.20 | 1.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 1.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.2 | 1.0 |
| Average goals in match | 1.6 | 2.6 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 40% |
| No goal | 80% | 20% |
| Goal difference | -4 | +3 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (5 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (9 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Sarasota Paradise
Chattanooga Red Wolves
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (USL League One).
Teams vs league
| Sarasota Paradise | Liga | Chattanooga Red Wolves | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 2.60 | 2.90 | ▲ 3.28 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 55% | 57% | ▲ 61% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 55% | 60% | ▲ 67% |
| Clean sheets | • 25% | 25% | ▲ 28% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 45% | 70% | ▲ 78% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 85% | 79% | ▲ 89% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: Sarasota Paradise 0 - 0 - 1 Chattanooga Red Wolves. Average goals 5.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Sarasota Paradise vs Chattanooga Red Wolves?
The USL League One match finished Sarasota Paradise 3:2 Chattanooga Red Wolves. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Sarasota Paradise vs Chattanooga Red Wolves?
Sarasota Paradise score 0.95 goals per game on average and Chattanooga Red Wolves 1.83. The USL League One average is 2.90 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 60% of games. Both teams score in 55% of Sarasota Paradise's matches and 61% of Chattanooga Red Wolves's.
What form are Sarasota Paradise and Chattanooga Red Wolves in?
Over the last 5 games Sarasota Paradise have a 0-2-3 record (0.40 points per game) and Chattanooga Red Wolves 3-0-2 (1.80 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Sarasota Paradise vs Chattanooga Red Wolves?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Sarasota Paradise vs Chattanooga Red Wolves: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.


