SC Villa vs URA: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

SC Villa played URA in Uganda Premier League (Uganda). The match was played on 11 December 2025. Final score: 3:0.

Current form

SC Villa: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match. URA: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match.

Goal statistics

SC Villa scores 1.33 and concedes 0.78 goals per match. URA scores 1.44 and concedes 1.11. League average: 2.42 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: SC Villa 56%, URA 56%. Over 2.5: SC Villa 44%, URA 33%. League level: BTTS 50%, Over 2.5 43%.

xG, shots and style

URA has higher xG: 1.71 vs 1.29. SC Villa: 7.0 shots per match, URA: 11.3.

Match halves

SC Villa: half-time lead 11%, second-half goals 1.00. URA: half-time lead 33%, second-half goals 0.78.

Goals by minute

SC Villa: 61-75 (5 goals). URA: 31-45+ (4 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Uganda Premier League: 2.42 goals per match, BTTS 50%, Over 2.5 43%.

Head-to-head

No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.

Half-by-half

1 : 0
1st half
2 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

42Possession (%)58
SC VillaURA
8Shots9
SC VillaURA
6Shots on target4
SC VillaURA
1.35xG1.48
SC VillaURA
0Corners11
SC VillaURA
59Dangerous attacks88
SC VillaURA
20Fouls12
SC VillaURA
0Cards0
SC VillaURA

Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.33Goals scored / match1.44
SC VillaURA
0.78Goals conceded / match1.11
SC VillaURA
46%Average possession51%
SC VillaURA
3Shots on target / match5.33
SC VillaURA

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

7Shots per match11.33
SC VillaURA
3Shots on target5.33
SC VillaURA
19%Shot conversion12.7%
SC VillaURA
46%Possession51%
SC VillaURA
1.29xG for1.71
SC VillaURA
1.24xG against1.57
SC VillaURA

Shooting quality

SC Villa: Counter-attackingURA: Balanced
SC VillaURA
Accuracy (shots on target)43%47%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.180.15
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.440.27

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

SC Villa is 43% better for: last-5 form.

2 pts / match - SC Villa · 1.4 pts / match - URA

SC Villa
WWWDL
Season result split
56% W22% D22% L
Season (W-D-L)
5-2-2
1.89 pts / match · goal difference +5
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-1-1
2.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
3-1-0
Last 5 at home
3-1-0
DWWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 0.6xG: 1.17Opponent xG: 1.26BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 20%
URA
WDLWL
Season result split
22% W56% D22% L
Season (W-D-L)
2-5-2
1.22 pts / match · goal difference +3
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
0-3-1
Last 5 away
0-3-1
DDDL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.2Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 1.76Opponent xG: 1.46BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

URA is 8% better for: goals scored per match.

1.33 goals / match - SC Villa · 1.44 goals / match - URA

SC Villa is 42% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.78 goals / match - SC Villa · 1.11 goals / match - URA

SC Villa scoring profile: very strong

SC Villa scores in 89% of matches (8 of 9 matches), while URA keeps a clean sheet in 33% (3 of 9 matches).

URA scoring profile: mixed

URA scores in 56% of matches (5 of 9 matches), while SC Villa keeps a clean sheet in 33% (3 of 9 matches).

12Goals scored (season)13
SC VillaURA
7Goals conceded (season)10
SC VillaURA
2.11Average goals in match2.56
SC VillaURA
5Goals scored (last 5)11
SC VillaURA
3Goals conceded (last 5)8
SC VillaURA

How often they score at least...

89%1 goal56%
SC VillaURA
33%2 goals22%
SC VillaURA
11%3 goals22%
SC VillaURA
0%4 goals11%
SC VillaURA

How often they concede at least...

67%1 goal67%
SC VillaURA
11%2 goals33%
SC VillaURA
0%3 goals11%
SC VillaURA
0%4 goals0%
SC VillaURA

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

0%BTTS at half-time11%
SC VillaURA
0%BTTS in both halves11%
SC VillaURA
11%Scored in both halves22%
SC VillaURA

BTTS and goal count

33%Min. 3 goals and BTTS33%
SC VillaURA
11%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
SC VillaURA
40%BTTS - last 560%
SC VillaURA

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

44%Min. 1 goal before half-time67%
SC VillaURA
11%Min. 2 goals before half-time33%
SC VillaURA
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time22%
SC VillaURA

2nd half

78%Min. 1 goal after half-time56%
SC VillaURA
44%Min. 2 goals after half-time22%
SC VillaURA
11%Min. 3 goals after half-time11%
SC VillaURA

Match halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

URA is 49% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

0.89 pts / match - SC Villa · 1.33 pts / match - URA

SC Villa - half-time state
11% leading56% draw33% trailing
URA - half-time state
33% leading33% draw33% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.89Points per match (1st half)1.33
SC VillaURA
0.22Goals scored (1st half)0.67
SC VillaURA
0.33Goals conceded (1st half)0.56
SC VillaURA
0.56Average goals (1st half)1.22
SC VillaURA
67%Clean sheet before half-time56%
SC VillaURA
89%No goal before half-time67%
SC VillaURA

After half-time (2nd half)

2.11Points per match (2nd half)1.56
SC VillaURA
1Goals scored (2nd half)0.78
SC VillaURA
0.33Goals conceded (2nd half)0.56
SC VillaURA
1.33Average goals (2nd half)1.33
SC VillaURA
67%Clean sheet after half-time67%
SC VillaURA
22%No goal after half-time56%
SC VillaURA

SC Villa - second-half results

56% W44% D0% L
8
Half-time points
2
Half-time goals
-1
Goal difference (1st half)
19
Second-half points
+6
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.89
PPG before half-time
Lead holding509%

Leads at half-time in 11% of matches and wins 56%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

URA - second-half results

33% W56% D11% L
12
Half-time points
6
Half-time goals
+1
Goal difference (1st half)
14
Second-half points
+2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.33
PPG before half-time
Lead holding67%

Leads at half-time in 33% of matches and wins 22%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

SC Villa - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.802.20
Goals scored / match0.01.0
Goals conceded / match0.20.4
Average goals in match0.21.4
1 goal20%80%
2 goals0%40%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet80%60%
No goal100%20%
Goal difference-1+3
Half-time: 0% leading - 80% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 40% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 0
URA - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.401.80
Goals scored / match1.01.2
Goals conceded / match0.80.8
Average goals in match1.82.0
1 goal80%60%
2 goals60%40%
3 goals40%20%
Clean sheet40%60%
No goal60%40%
Goal difference+1+2
Half-time: 40% leading - 20% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 60% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 5

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

SC Villa
ScoredConceded
3
2
0-15
0
1
16-30
0
1
31-45
2
0
46-60
5
1
61-75
2
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (5 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

URA
ScoredConceded
0
2
0-15
2
2
16-30
4
1
31-45
1
3
46-60
3
1
61-75
3
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (4 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.33
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.2 : 1.1
Estimated goal split
home : away
96%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
56%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
50%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
5%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 20 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

SC Villa

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.05
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.50
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-3.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.04
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.46
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
92%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
80%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.11
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.8
Late goals
17% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 25% come in the first quarter-hour.
17%

URA

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.14
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.19
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-6.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.27
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.46
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
148%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
77%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.18
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
23% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
23%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Uganda Premier League).

Teams vs league

SC VillaLigaURA
Average goals in match▼ 2.112.42▲ 2.56
Both teams scored▲ 56%50%▲ 56%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)• 44%43%▼ 33%
Clean sheets▲ 33%30%▲ 33%
Goal before half-time▼ 44%61%▲ 67%
Goal after half-time▲ 78%61%▼ 56%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.42
Average goals per match
50%
Both teams scored
43%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
30%
Clean sheets
1.45
Home goals / match
0.97
Away goals / match
+49%
Home attack advantage
+33%
Home defence advantage
+19%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
61%
1 goal
32%
2 goals
11%
3 goals
1%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
61%
1 goal
30%
2 goals
11%
3 goals
3%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Home team

Other recorded players

—Frank Ssebuufu⚽ 1
—Najib Yiga⚽ 1

Away team

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. SC VillaGoalNajib Yiga
  2. SC VillaGoalFrank Ssebuufu

FAQ

What was the result of SC Villa vs URA?

The Uganda Premier League match finished SC Villa 3:0 URA. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before SC Villa vs URA?

SC Villa score 1.33 goals per game on average and URA 1.44. The Uganda Premier League average is 2.42 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 43% of games. Both teams score in 56% of SC Villa's matches and 56% of URA's.

What form are SC Villa and URA in?

Over the last 5 games SC Villa have a 3-1-1 record (2.00 points per game) and URA 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for SC Villa vs URA?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for SC Villa vs URA: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.