South Korea - K League 2Mokdong StadiumData current as of 01 September 2026

Seoul E-Land vs Paju Citizen: match statistics

Seoul E-Land crest
Seoul E-Land
1 : 1half-time 0:0
Paju Citizen crest
Paju Citizen

Seoul E-Land vs Paju Citizen: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Seoul E-Land played Paju Citizen in K League 2 (South Korea). The match was played on 23 August 2026. Venue: Mokdong Stadium. Final score: 1:1.

Current form

Seoul E-Land: 3-2-0, 2.20 points/match. Paju Citizen: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match.

Goal statistics

Seoul E-Land scores 1.86 and concedes 1.24 goals per match. Paju Citizen scores 1.00 and concedes 1.24. League average: 2.74 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Seoul E-Land 67%, Paju Citizen 48%. Over 2.5: Seoul E-Land 76%, Paju Citizen 48%. League level: BTTS 62%, Over 2.5 54%.

xG, shots and style

Seoul E-Land has higher xG: 1.62 vs 1.29. Seoul E-Land: 13.4 shots per match, Paju Citizen: 10.3.

Match halves

Seoul E-Land: half-time lead 29%, second-half goals 1.24. Paju Citizen: half-time lead 24%, second-half goals 0.52.

Goals by minute

Seoul E-Land: 76-90+ (11 goals). Paju Citizen: 76-90+ (5 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

K League 2: 2.74 goals per match, BTTS 62%, Over 2.5 54%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 1-0-0. Average goals 4.00, BTTS 100%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Seoul E-Land sit 2nd, while Paju Citizen are only 10th, and the hosts’ overall season record stands at 12 wins in 21 matches compared with the visitors’ 7 victories. The hosts are unbeaten in their last five games, scoring 11 goals and averaging 2.2 points per match, whereas Paju have scored just 4 goals over the same period and suffered 3 defeats. At home, Seoul E-Land average 2.2 goals with an xG of 1.66, while Paju score an average of 1.1 goals away from home and fail to find the net in 30% of such matches. The hosts’ advantage is also evident in chance creation: they register 13.4 shots and 5.8 shots on target per match, compared with 10.6 and 3.7 for the visitors. Although Paju keep a clean sheet in 30% of their away matches, they allow opponents an xG of 1.81, which, combined with Seoul E-Land’s potent attack, strongly points to a home win.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The case for both teams to score is strengthened by Seoul E-Land’s current form: in their last 5 matches, BTTS landed in 80% of games, with the team scoring 11 goals and conceding 7. Paju Citizen averaged only 0.8 goals per match during this period, but the hosts conceded an average of 1.4 goals, while their xG against was a high 1.67. The visitors create an average of 1.39 xG this season and register 3.7 shots on target per match, giving them a realistic chance of exploiting their opponent’s defensive problems. Seoul E-Land also have clear attacking potential, as Paju concede an average of 1.30 goals this season and 1.4 in their last 5 matches. However, the BTTS pick is only moderately strong, as the hosts failed to score in 55% of their league matches, while their full-season BTTS rate is just 36%.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The strongest signal is Under 3.5 goals, as this outcome occurred in 73% of Seoul E-Land matches and 80% of Paju Citizen fixtures. Both teams very rarely score three goals: the hosts did so in 9% of their matches, while the visitors have not done so at all, which limits the risk of a high-scoring game. Seoul average 1.20 xG, but Paju allow 1.81 xG, so the hosts are projected to score 1.35 goals. The visitors create an average of 1.39 xG compared with Seoul’s 1.26 xG conceded, supporting approximately 1.18 goals for Paju; however, the combined projection of 2.53 still sits clearly below the 3.5 line. The hosts’ last five matches were more open, averaging 2.2 goals scored with 80% of games finishing Over 2.5, but the season-long profiles of both teams more clearly point against at least four goals.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

A draw at half-time is the most likely match scenario, as Seoul E-Land were level at the break in 64% of their matches and Paju Citizen in 60%, while both teams recorded this outcome in 80% of their last five games. The first halves should be cautious: the hosts average 0.45 goals scored and 0.27 conceded during this period, whereas the visitors score 0.50 and concede 0.50 goals. After the break, the advantage shifts towards Seoul E-Land, who averaged 1.8 goals in second halves across their last five matches, while Paju Citizen conceded 1.2 goals during the same period. The hosts are also clearly in better recent form, earning 2.2 points per game in their last five appearances compared with their opponents’ 1.2, with a 60% win rate and no defeats. Although Seoul E-Land’s full-season results are weaker, Paju Citizen’s defence allows an average xG of 1.81, supporting the scenario of a half-time draw followed by a home win at the final whistle.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
1 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

64Possession (%)36
Seoul E-LandPaju Citizen
22Shots5
Seoul E-LandPaju Citizen
9Shots on target3
Seoul E-LandPaju Citizen
2.48xG0.83
Seoul E-LandPaju Citizen
12Corners4
Seoul E-LandPaju Citizen
66Dangerous attacks41
Seoul E-LandPaju Citizen
11Fouls10
Seoul E-LandPaju Citizen
5Cards2
Seoul E-LandPaju Citizen

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Seoul E-LandPaju Citizen
1.86Goals scored / match1
Seoul E-LandPaju Citizen
1.24Goals conceded / match1.24
Seoul E-LandPaju Citizen
51%Average possession44%
Seoul E-LandPaju Citizen
5.38Shots on target / match3.67
Seoul E-LandPaju Citizen

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

13.38Shots per match10.33
Seoul E-LandPaju Citizen
5.38Shots on target3.67
Seoul E-LandPaju Citizen
13.9%Shot conversion9.7%
Seoul E-LandPaju Citizen
51%Possession44%
Seoul E-LandPaju Citizen
1.62xG for1.29
Seoul E-LandPaju Citizen
1.28xG against1.52
Seoul E-LandPaju Citizen

Shooting quality

Seoul E-Land: Efficient finishingPaju Citizen: Balanced
Seoul E-LandPaju Citizen
Accuracy (shots on target)40%36%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.350.27

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Seoul E-Land is 57% better for: last-5 form.

2.2 pts / match - Seoul E-Land · 1.4 pts / match - Paju Citizen

Seoul E-Land
DWWDW
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
57% W19% R24% P
Season (W-D-L)
12-4-5
1.90 pts / match · goal difference +13
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-2-0
2.20 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
6-1-3
Last 5 at home
3-1-1
DWLWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.2Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.61Opponent xG: 1.49BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 80%
Paju Citizen
DLWLW
Season result split
33% W14% R52% P
Season (W-D-L)
7-3-11
1.14 pts / match · goal difference -5
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
4-2-4
Last 5 away
2-1-2
LLWDW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 1.35Opponent xG: 1.44BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Seoul E-Land is 86% better for: goals scored per match.

1.86 goals / match - Seoul E-Land · 1 goals / match - Paju Citizen

Seoul E-Land scoring profile: very strong

Seoul E-Land scores in 86% of matches (18 of 21 matches), while Paju Citizen keeps a clean sheet in 24% (5 of 21 matches).

Paju Citizen scoring profile: strong

Paju Citizen scores in 57% of matches (12 of 21 matches), while Seoul E-Land keeps a clean sheet in 29% (6 of 21 matches).

39Goals scored (season)21
Seoul E-LandPaju Citizen
26Goals conceded (season)26
Seoul E-LandPaju Citizen
3.1Average goals in match2.24
Seoul E-LandPaju Citizen
11Goals scored (last 5)4
Seoul E-LandPaju Citizen
7Goals conceded (last 5)4
Seoul E-LandPaju Citizen

How often they score at least...

86%1 goal57%
Seoul E-LandPaju Citizen
62%2 goals38%
Seoul E-LandPaju Citizen
33%3 goals5%
Seoul E-LandPaju Citizen
5%4 goals0%
Seoul E-LandPaju Citizen

How often they concede at least...

71%1 goal76%
Seoul E-LandPaju Citizen
38%2 goals24%
Seoul E-LandPaju Citizen
14%3 goals19%
Seoul E-LandPaju Citizen
0%4 goals5%
Seoul E-LandPaju Citizen

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

62%
League average

Goal patterns

29%BTTS at half-time24%
Seoul E-LandPaju Citizen
5%BTTS in both halves5%
Seoul E-LandPaju Citizen
38%Scored in both halves19%
Seoul E-LandPaju Citizen

BTTS and goal count

67%Min. 3 goals and BTTS48%
Seoul E-LandPaju Citizen
10%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
Seoul E-LandPaju Citizen
80%BTTS - last 540%
Seoul E-LandPaju Citizen

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

71%Min. 1 goal before half-time48%
Seoul E-LandPaju Citizen
33%Min. 2 goals before half-time24%
Seoul E-LandPaju Citizen
5%Min. 3 goals before half-time14%
Seoul E-LandPaju Citizen

2nd half

86%Min. 1 goal after half-time76%
Seoul E-LandPaju Citizen
67%Min. 2 goals after half-time38%
Seoul E-LandPaju Citizen
29%Min. 3 goals after half-time19%
Seoul E-LandPaju Citizen

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Seoul E-Land - half-time state
29% leading52% draw19% trailing
Paju Citizen - half-time state
24% leading62% draw14% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.38Points per match (1st half)1.33
Seoul E-LandPaju Citizen
0.62Goals scored (1st half)0.48
Seoul E-LandPaju Citizen
0.48Goals conceded (1st half)0.38
Seoul E-LandPaju Citizen
1.1Average goals (1st half)0.86
Seoul E-LandPaju Citizen
52%Clean sheet before half-time67%
Seoul E-LandPaju Citizen
48%No goal before half-time62%
Seoul E-LandPaju Citizen

After half-time (2nd half)

1.95Points per match (2nd half)1
Seoul E-LandPaju Citizen
1.24Goals scored (2nd half)0.52
Seoul E-LandPaju Citizen
0.76Goals conceded (2nd half)0.86
Seoul E-LandPaju Citizen
2Average goals (2nd half)1.38
Seoul E-LandPaju Citizen
48%Clean sheet after half-time38%
Seoul E-LandPaju Citizen
29%No goal after half-time62%
Seoul E-LandPaju Citizen

Seoul E-Land - second-half results

57% W24% R19% P
29
Half-time points
13
Half-time goals
+3
Goal difference (1st half)
41
Second-half points
+10
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.38
PPG before half-time
Lead holding197%

Leads at half-time in 29% of matches and wins 57%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.3

Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Paju Citizen - second-half results

24% W29% R48% P
28
Half-time points
10
Half-time goals
+2
Goal difference (1st half)
21
Second-half points
-7
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.33
PPG before half-time
Lead holding138%

Leads at half-time in 24% of matches and wins 33%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.5

Concedes 0.5 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Seoul E-Land - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.802.60
Goals scored / match0.41.8
Goals conceded / match0.60.8
Average goals in match1.02.6
1 goal60%80%
2 goals40%80%
3 goals0%60%
Clean sheet40%40%
No goal60%20%
Goal difference-1+5
Half-time: 0% leading - 80% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 80% won - 20% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 2
Paju Citizen - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.801.40
Goals scored / match0.00.8
Goals conceded / match0.20.6
Average goals in match0.21.4
1 goal20%80%
2 goals0%40%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet80%40%
No goal100%60%
Goal difference-1+1
Half-time: 0% leading - 80% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 0

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Seoul E-Land
ScoredConceded
3
3
0-15
5
4
16-30
5
3
31-45
6
2
46-60
9
4
61-75
11
10
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (11 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

Paju Citizen
ScoredConceded
3
3
0-15
4
1
16-30
3
4
31-45
3
2
46-60
3
5
61-75
5
11
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (5 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): -6 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.67
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.6 : 1.1
Estimated goal split
home : away
97%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
58%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+50%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
49%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
6%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 17 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Seoul E-Land

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.34
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.28
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-3.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.24
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.04
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
131%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
94%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.30
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.6
Late goals
28% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 8% come in the first quarter-hour.
28%

Paju Citizen

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.23
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.01
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.9 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.29
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.28
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
76%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
87%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.26
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.0
Late goals
24% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 14% come in the first quarter-hour.
24%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (K League 2).

Teams vs league

Seoul E-LandLigaPaju Citizen
Average goals in match 3.102.74 2.24
Both teams scored 67%62% 48%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 76%54% 48%
Clean sheets 29%23% 24%
Goal before half-time 71%69% 48%
Goal after half-time 86%78% 76%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.74
Average goals per match
62%
Both teams scored
54%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
23%
Clean sheets
1.42
Home goals / match
1.32
Away goals / match
+8%
Home attack advantage
+7%
Home defence advantage
+3%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
69%
1 goal
31%
2 goals
11%
3 goals
2%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
78%
1 goal
52%
2 goals
25%
3 goals
7%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Seoul E-LandYellow cardSeo-Joon Bae
  2. Seoul E-LandSubstitutionOn: Hyeok-Chan SonOff: Seo-Joon Bae
  3. Paju CitizenGoalJea-Ho LeeAssist: Borja González Tomás
  4. Seoul E-LandSubstitutionOn: Hyun KimOff: Joo-wan An
  5. Seoul E-LandGoalJae-Yong Park
  6. Paju CitizenSubstitutionOn: Taek-Geun LeeOff: Min-ki Lee
  7. Seoul E-LandSubstitutionOn: Joo-Hyuk LeeOff: Alan Lima Cariús
  8. Paju CitizenSubstitutionOn: Hyun-Tae KimOff: Borja González Tomás
  9. Paju CitizenSubstitutionOn: June-Hyuk AhnOff: Jae-jun You
  10. Seoul E-LandYellow cardHyun Kim
  11. Paju CitizenYellow cardJune-Hyuk Ahn
  12. Paju CitizenSubstitutionOn: Hyeon-Byung JeonOff: Min-Ho Kim
  13. Seoul E-LandYellow cardJi-Ung Baek
  14. Seoul E-LandYellow cardGabriel dos Santos Francisco
  15. Paju CitizenYellow cardWon-Woo Ryu

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Seoul E-Land 1 - 0 - 0 Paju Citizen. Average goals 4.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.

FAQ

What was the result of Seoul E-Land vs Paju Citizen?

The K League 2 match finished Seoul E-Land 1:1 Paju Citizen. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Seoul E-Land vs Paju Citizen?

Seoul E-Land score 1.86 goals per game on average and Paju Citizen 1.00. The K League 2 average is 2.74 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 54% of games. Both teams score in 67% of Seoul E-Land's matches and 48% of Paju Citizen's.

What form are Seoul E-Land and Paju Citizen in?

Over the last 5 games Seoul E-Land have a 3-2-0 record (2.20 points per game) and Paju Citizen 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Seoul E-Land vs Paju Citizen?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Seoul E-Land vs Paju Citizen: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.