Iran - Persian Gulf Pro LeagueData current as of 22 October 2026

Shams Azar Qazvin vs Tractor Sazi: match statistics

Shams Azar Qazvin vs Tractor Sazi: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Shams Azar Qazvin played Tractor Sazi in Persian Gulf Pro League (Iran). The match was played on 1 September 2026. Final score: 0:0.

Current form

Shams Azar Qazvin: 1-1-2, 1.00 points/match. Tractor Sazi: 4-0-0, 3.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

Shams Azar Qazvin scores 1.00 and concedes 1.25 goals per match. Tractor Sazi scores 1.75 and concedes 0.00. League average: 1.87 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Shams Azar Qazvin 50%, Tractor Sazi 0%. Over 2.5: Shams Azar Qazvin 25%, Tractor Sazi 0%. League level: BTTS 32%, Over 2.5 24%.

xG, shots and style

xG is very similar for both teams. Shams Azar Qazvin: -1.0 shots per match, Tractor Sazi: -1.0.

Match halves

Shams Azar Qazvin: half-time lead 25%, second-half goals 0.50. Tractor Sazi: half-time lead 25%, second-half goals 1.25.

Goals by minute

Shams Azar Qazvin: 16-30 (1 goals). Tractor Sazi: 76-90+ (4 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Persian Gulf Pro League: 1.87 goals per match, BTTS 32%, Over 2.5 24%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-1-0. Average goals 0.00, BTTS 0%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Tractor Sazi have made a perfect start to the season: they have won all 3 matches, scored 5 goals and conceded none, which puts them 2nd in the table. Shams Azar Qazvin remain winless after 3 rounds, with 2 goals scored and 5 conceded, and have lost 3 of their last five matches. At home, the hosts have lost both of their matches so far, averaging just 0.5 goals scored and 2 conceded per game. The visitors have won their only away match to date, scoring 2 goals and keeping a clean sheet, and they have scored in every match this season. The contrast between Tractor Sazi’s defence, which has yet to concede a goal, and Shams Azar’s poor attacking efficiency strongly favours an away win.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The strongest signal points to BTTS - No: both teams have recorded 100% of their current league matches without conceding, while the percentage of matches in which both sides scored stands at 0% for each team. Tractor Sazi have scored 5 goals and conceded none, whereas Shams Azar Qazvin have scored only 2 goals but allowed opponents to score 5. In their last five matches, the hosts averaged just 0.6 goals per game, with a very low xG of 0.33, clearly reducing their chances of breaching the visitors’ defence. Tractor conceded an average of 0.6 goals per match during this period and kept 3 clean sheets in the season data, so a result with at least one team failing to score is more likely than a goal exchange. Additionally, the league has a low BTTS rate of 37%, with an average of 2.0 goals per match, supporting a cautious scenario.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The league profile clearly favors low-scoring outcomes: the average is just 2.00 goals, while Over 2.5 goals has landed in only 26% of matches. All previous matches involving both teams finished with Under 2.5 and Under 3.5 goals, while 100% of those games featured at least one goal. In their last five appearances, Shams Azar averaged 0.6 goals scored, whereas Tractor conceded only 0.6, limiting the hosts’ projection to approximately 0.65 goals. Tractor are in better form, averaging 1.2 goals scored across their last five matches, but the total projection of 1.85 goals leaves a very substantial margin for Under 3.5.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Tractor Sazi have shown significantly better form in their last five matches, winning 80% of them and averaging 2.4 points, while Shams Azar have not won any and averaged just 0.4 points per match. During this period, the hosts scored only 0.6 goals per game and conceded 1.6, whereas Tractor scored 1.2 and allowed opponents just 0.6. The visitors’ superiority is already evident before half-time: they averaged 0.6 goals scored and none conceded, while Shams Azar scored 0.2 and conceded 0.8 goals in the first halves. Tractor held a lead at the break in 40% of their last matches, compared with 0% for the hosts, reinforcing the scenario of an away lead being maintained until full-time. The visitors are also more consistent in the second halves, winning 40% of these periods compared with 0% for Shams Azar. Therefore, the most likely HT/FT outcome is 2/2.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

-1Possession (%)-1
Shams Azar QazvinTractor Sazi
-1Shots-1
Shams Azar QazvinTractor Sazi
-1Shots on target-1
Shams Azar QazvinTractor Sazi
0xG0
Shams Azar QazvinTractor Sazi
-1Corners-1
Shams Azar QazvinTractor Sazi
0Dangerous attacks0
Shams Azar QazvinTractor Sazi
-1Fouls-1
Shams Azar QazvinTractor Sazi
0Cards2
Shams Azar QazvinTractor Sazi

Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Shams Azar QazvinTractor Sazi
1Goals scored / match1.75
Shams Azar QazvinTractor Sazi
1.25Goals conceded / match0
Shams Azar QazvinTractor Sazi
-1%Average possession-1%
Shams Azar QazvinTractor Sazi
-1Shots on target / match-1
Shams Azar QazvinTractor Sazi

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

-1Shots per match-1
Shams Azar QazvinTractor Sazi
-1Shots on target-1
Shams Azar QazvinTractor Sazi
-100%Shot conversion-175%
Shams Azar QazvinTractor Sazi
-1%Possession-1%
Shams Azar QazvinTractor Sazi
0xG for0
Shams Azar QazvinTractor Sazi
0xG against0
Shams Azar QazvinTractor Sazi

Shooting quality

Shams Azar Qazvin: BalancedTractor Sazi: Balanced
Shams Azar QazvinTractor Sazi
Accuracy (shots on target)0%0%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.000.00
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.000.00

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Tractor Sazi is 200% better for: last-5 form.

1 pts / match - Shams Azar Qazvin · 3 pts / match - Tractor Sazi

Shams Azar Qazvin
LDLW
Season result split
25% W25% D50% L
Season (W-D-L)
1-1-2
1.00 pts / match · goal difference -1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-2
1.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
0-0-2
Last 5 at home
0-0-2
LL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 1.3xG: 0.00Opponent xG: 0.00BTTS: 50%Over 2.5: 25%
Tractor Sazi
WWWW
5 wins in a row
Season result split
100% W0% D0% L
Season (W-D-L)
4-0-0
3.00 pts / match · goal difference +7
Last 5 (W-D-L)
4-0-0
3.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
2-0-0
Last 5 away
2-0-0
WW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.8Goals conceded: 0.0xG: 0.00Opponent xG: 0.00BTTS: 0%Over 2.5: 0%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Tractor Sazi is 75% better for: goals scored per match.

1 goals / match - Shams Azar Qazvin · 1.75 goals / match - Tractor Sazi

Shams Azar Qazvin scoring profile: more difficult

Shams Azar Qazvin scores in 75% of matches (3 of 4 matches), while Tractor Sazi keeps a clean sheet in 100% (4 of 4 matches).

Tractor Sazi scoring profile: very strong

Tractor Sazi scores in 100% of matches (4 of 4 matches), while Shams Azar Qazvin keeps a clean sheet in 25% (1 of 4 matches).

4Goals scored (season)7
Shams Azar QazvinTractor Sazi
5Goals conceded (season)0
Shams Azar QazvinTractor Sazi
2.25Average goals in match1.75
Shams Azar QazvinTractor Sazi
4Goals scored (last 5)7
Shams Azar QazvinTractor Sazi
5Goals conceded (last 5)0
Shams Azar QazvinTractor Sazi

How often they score at least...

75%1 goal100%
Shams Azar QazvinTractor Sazi
25%2 goals75%
Shams Azar QazvinTractor Sazi
0%3 goals0%
Shams Azar QazvinTractor Sazi
0%4 goals0%
Shams Azar QazvinTractor Sazi

How often they concede at least...

75%1 goal0%
Shams Azar QazvinTractor Sazi
50%2 goals0%
Shams Azar QazvinTractor Sazi
0%3 goals0%
Shams Azar QazvinTractor Sazi
0%4 goals0%
Shams Azar QazvinTractor Sazi

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

32%
League average

Goal patterns

25%BTTS at half-time0%
Shams Azar QazvinTractor Sazi
0%BTTS in both halves0%
Shams Azar QazvinTractor Sazi
25%Scored in both halves0%
Shams Azar QazvinTractor Sazi

BTTS and goal count

25%Min. 3 goals and BTTS0%
Shams Azar QazvinTractor Sazi
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
Shams Azar QazvinTractor Sazi
50%BTTS - last 50%
Shams Azar QazvinTractor Sazi

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

75%Min. 1 goal before half-time25%
Shams Azar QazvinTractor Sazi
50%Min. 2 goals before half-time25%
Shams Azar QazvinTractor Sazi
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
Shams Azar QazvinTractor Sazi

2nd half

75%Min. 1 goal after half-time75%
Shams Azar QazvinTractor Sazi
25%Min. 2 goals after half-time50%
Shams Azar QazvinTractor Sazi
0%Min. 3 goals after half-time0%
Shams Azar QazvinTractor Sazi

Match halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Tractor Sazi is 20% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.25 pts / match - Shams Azar Qazvin · 1.5 pts / match - Tractor Sazi

Shams Azar Qazvin - half-time state
25% leading50% draw25% trailing
Tractor Sazi - half-time state
25% leading75% draw0% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.25Points per match (1st half)1.5
Shams Azar QazvinTractor Sazi
0.5Goals scored (1st half)0.5
Shams Azar QazvinTractor Sazi
0.75Goals conceded (1st half)0
Shams Azar QazvinTractor Sazi
1.25Average goals (1st half)0.5
Shams Azar QazvinTractor Sazi
50%Clean sheet before half-time100%
Shams Azar QazvinTractor Sazi
50%No goal before half-time75%
Shams Azar QazvinTractor Sazi

After half-time (2nd half)

1.25Points per match (2nd half)2.5
Shams Azar QazvinTractor Sazi
0.5Goals scored (2nd half)1.25
Shams Azar QazvinTractor Sazi
0.5Goals conceded (2nd half)0
Shams Azar QazvinTractor Sazi
1Average goals (2nd half)1.25
Shams Azar QazvinTractor Sazi
50%Clean sheet after half-time100%
Shams Azar QazvinTractor Sazi
50%No goal after half-time25%
Shams Azar QazvinTractor Sazi

Shams Azar Qazvin - second-half results

25% W50% D25% L
5
Half-time points
2
Half-time goals
-1
Goal difference (1st half)
5
Second-half points
0
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.25
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 25% of matches and wins 25%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.3

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Tractor Sazi - second-half results

75% W25% D0% L
6
Half-time points
2
Half-time goals
+2
Goal difference (1st half)
10
Second-half points
+5
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.50
PPG before half-time
Lead holding400%

Leads at half-time in 25% of matches and wins 100%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Shams Azar Qazvin - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.251.25
Goals scored / match0.50.5
Goals conceded / match0.80.5
Average goals in match1.31.0
1 goal75%75%
2 goals50%25%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet50%50%
No goal50%50%
Goal difference-10
Half-time: 25% leading - 50% draw - 25% trailing
2nd half: 25% won - 50% draw - 25% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 25% - Half-time goals total: 2
Tractor Sazi - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.502.50
Goals scored / match0.51.3
Goals conceded / match0.00.0
Average goals in match0.51.3
1 goal25%75%
2 goals25%50%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet100%100%
No goal75%25%
Goal difference+2+5
Half-time: 25% leading - 75% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 75% won - 25% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Shams Azar Qazvin
ScoredConceded
0
2
0-15
1
0
16-30
1
1
31-45
1
1
46-60
0
0
61-75
1
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (1 goal). Concedes most in 0-15 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

Tractor Sazi
ScoredConceded
0
0
0-15
0
0
16-30
2
0
31-45
1
0
46-60
0
0
61-75
4
0
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (4 goals). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.00
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
0.5 : 1.5
Estimated goal split
home : away
107%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
25%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
75%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
0%
0:0 risk
practically zero
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Shams Azar Qazvin

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
0.00
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.25
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.7 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+1.00
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-1.25
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
105%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
136%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
25% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
25%

Tractor Sazi

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
0.00
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+1.75
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
0.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+1.75
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
0.00
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
190%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
0%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.8
Late goals
57% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
57%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Persian Gulf Pro League).

Teams vs league

Shams Azar QazvinLigaTractor Sazi
Average goals in match▲ 2.251.87▼ 1.75
Both teams scored▲ 50%32%▼ 0%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)• 25%24%▼ 0%
Clean sheets▼ 25%45%▲ 100%
Goal before half-time▲ 75%55%▼ 25%
Goal after half-time▲ 75%61%▲ 75%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

1.87
Average goals per match
32%
Both teams scored
24%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
45%
Clean sheets
0.95
Home goals / match
0.92
Away goals / match
+3%
Home attack advantage
+3%
Home defence advantage
+-6%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
55%
1 goal
32%
2 goals
3%
3 goals
0%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
61%
1 goal
29%
2 goals
8%
3 goals
0%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Tractor SaziYellow cardMohammad Daneshgar

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Shams Azar Qazvin 0 - 1 - 0 Tractor Sazi. Average goals 0.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.

FAQ

What was the result of Shams Azar Qazvin vs Tractor Sazi?

The Persian Gulf Pro League match finished Shams Azar Qazvin 0:0 Tractor Sazi. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Shams Azar Qazvin vs Tractor Sazi?

Shams Azar Qazvin score 1.00 goals per game on average and Tractor Sazi 1.75. The Persian Gulf Pro League average is 1.87 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 24% of games. Both teams score in 50% of Shams Azar Qazvin's matches and 0% of Tractor Sazi's.

What form are Shams Azar Qazvin and Tractor Sazi in?

Over the last 5 games Shams Azar Qazvin have a 1-1-2 record (1.00 points per game) and Tractor Sazi 4-0-0 (3.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Shams Azar Qazvin vs Tractor Sazi?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.