China - Chinese Super LeagueShanghai StadiumData current as of 05 September 2026

Shanghai SIPG vs Qingdao Jonoon: match statistics

Shanghai SIPG crest
Shanghai SIPG
2 : 1half-time 1:1
Qingdao Jonoon crest
Qingdao Jonoon

Shanghai SIPG vs Qingdao Jonoon: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Shanghai SIPG played Qingdao Jonoon in Chinese Super League (China). The match was played on 23 August 2026. Venue: Shanghai Stadium. Final score: 2:1.

Current form

Shanghai SIPG: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match. Qingdao Jonoon: 0-0-5, 0.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

Shanghai SIPG scores 1.61 and concedes 1.39 goals per match. Qingdao Jonoon scores 1.35 and concedes 1.91. League average: 3.12 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Shanghai SIPG 74%, Qingdao Jonoon 65%. Over 2.5: Shanghai SIPG 61%, Qingdao Jonoon 57%. League level: BTTS 64%, Over 2.5 58%.

xG, shots and style

Shanghai SIPG has higher xG: 1.42 vs 1.38. Shanghai SIPG: 11.6 shots per match, Qingdao Jonoon: 12.8.

Match halves

Shanghai SIPG: half-time lead 26%, second-half goals 1.00. Qingdao Jonoon: half-time lead 26%, second-half goals 0.83.

Goals by minute

Shanghai SIPG: 46-60 (11 goals). Qingdao Jonoon: 76-90+ (8 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Chinese Super League: 3.12 goals per match, BTTS 64%, Over 2.5 58%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 3 previous H2H matches were available: 2-0-1. Average goals 5.00, BTTS 100%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Shanghai SIPG come into this match with 3 wins, 1 draw and 1 defeat in their last 5 games, while Qingdao Jonoon have lost all 5 of their previous matches, scoring just 2 goals in the process. At home, the hosts average 1.8 goals per game with an xG of 1.74, while the visitors concede as many as 2.5 goals per away match and have kept no clean sheets. The difference in quality is also clearly reflected in the possession figures: Shanghai SIPG control the ball for an average of 63% of the time, compared with just 47% for Qingdao Jonoon. The hosts’ defence allows an average xG of 1.15, whereas the visitors’ attack generates an xG of 1.37 away from home and fails to score in 25% of such matches. With Qingdao Jonoon losing 83% of their away fixtures and Shanghai SIPG winning 40% of their home games, a home victory is the most likely outcome.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The strongest argument in favor of BTTS - No is Qingdao Jonoon’s current attacking form: they have scored just 2 goals in their last five matches, averaging 0.4 per game, and have lost all 5 fixtures. Shanghai SIPG concede an average of 1.27 goals per season but have kept a clean sheet in 18% of matches, so their opponents’ poor run realistically increases the chance that the visitors will fail to score again. The hosts should score, however, as they average 1.55 goals per season and 1.8 across their last five appearances, while Qingdao concede as many as 2.5 goals per match and have not kept a single clean sheet. Seasonal BTTS figures stand at 55% for Shanghai and 75% for Qingdao, but the visitors’ current 40% rate and poor finishing, despite an xG of 1.63 in their last five matches, slightly favor a scenario in which only one side scores.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Shanghai SIPG score an average of 1.55 goals per match, while Qingdao Jonoon concede as many as 2.50, with the visitors yet to keep a single clean sheet this season. The hosts are also in good attacking form: they have scored 9 goals in their last five matches, averaging 1.8 per game, with an average xG of 1.62. The 1.5-goal line has been surpassed in 64% of Shanghai’s matches and in as many as 92% of Qingdao’s fixtures, which is a clearly stronger signal than for higher lines. Qingdao have scored just 0.4 goals per match recently, but they have created chances worth 1.63 xG, while Shanghai concede an average of 1.27 goals, so the visitors’ contribution to the total remains realistic. The safest option is Over 1.5 goals, as the combination of the visitors’ weak defence and the hosts’ attacking potential strongly supports at least two goals.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Shanghai SIPG have a clear first-half advantage: they have led at the break in 45% of their matches, scoring an average of 0.91 goals before half-time and conceding just 0.27. Qingdao Jonoon score only 0.17 goals before the break, concede 1.17, and have gone into half-time trailing in as many as 67% of their matches. The difference is reinforced by their current form: the hosts have won 3 of their last 5 matches, scoring an average of 1.8 goals, while the visitors have lost all 5, scoring just 0.4 goals per game. Across the season, Qingdao have lost 83% of their matches and concede an average of 2.5 goals, making the Shanghai SIPG lead at half-time and victory at full-time the strongest scenario. The possibility of a post-half-time change in the result is slightly increased by the fact that the hosts concede an average of 1.27 goals per match, but the visitors' poor attacking efficiency limits the likelihood of a full turnaround.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

1 : 1
1st half
1 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

59Possession (%)41
Shanghai SIPGQingdao Jonoon
11Shots10
Shanghai SIPGQingdao Jonoon
4Shots on target2
Shanghai SIPGQingdao Jonoon
1.36xG1.01
Shanghai SIPGQingdao Jonoon
5Corners2
Shanghai SIPGQingdao Jonoon
52Dangerous attacks32
Shanghai SIPGQingdao Jonoon
11Fouls18
Shanghai SIPGQingdao Jonoon
1Cards3
Shanghai SIPGQingdao Jonoon

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Shanghai SIPGQingdao Jonoon
1.61Goals scored / match1.35
Shanghai SIPGQingdao Jonoon
1.39Goals conceded / match1.91
Shanghai SIPGQingdao Jonoon
58%Average possession45%
Shanghai SIPGQingdao Jonoon
4Shots on target / match3.91
Shanghai SIPGQingdao Jonoon

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

11.61Shots per match12.83
Shanghai SIPGQingdao Jonoon
4Shots on target3.91
Shanghai SIPGQingdao Jonoon
13.9%Shot conversion10.5%
Shanghai SIPGQingdao Jonoon
58%Possession45%
Shanghai SIPGQingdao Jonoon
1.42xG for1.38
Shanghai SIPGQingdao Jonoon
1.29xG against1.65
Shanghai SIPGQingdao Jonoon

Shooting quality

Shanghai SIPG: Efficient finishingQingdao Jonoon: Balanced
Shanghai SIPGQingdao Jonoon
Accuracy (shots on target)34%30%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.400.35

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Shanghai SIPG
WLWWD
Season result split
35% W30% R35% P
Season (W-D-L)
8-7-8
1.35 pts / match · goal difference +5
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-1-1
2.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
4-4-3
Last 5 at home
1-3-1
DDWLD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.8Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.76Opponent xG: 1.30BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 40%
Qingdao Jonoon
LLLLL
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
26% W13% R61% P
Season (W-D-L)
6-3-14
0.91 pts / match · goal difference -13
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-0-5
0.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
1-1-10
Last 5 away
0-0-5
LLLLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.4Goals conceded: 2.6xG: 1.53Opponent xG: 1.68BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Shanghai SIPG is 19% better for: goals scored per match.

1.61 goals / match - Shanghai SIPG · 1.35 goals / match - Qingdao Jonoon

Shanghai SIPG is 37% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.39 goals / match - Shanghai SIPG · 1.91 goals / match - Qingdao Jonoon

Shanghai SIPG scoring profile: very strong

Shanghai SIPG scores in 87% of matches (20 of 23 matches), while Qingdao Jonoon keeps a clean sheet in 9% (2 of 23 matches).

Qingdao Jonoon scoring profile: very strong

Qingdao Jonoon scores in 70% of matches (16 of 23 matches), while Shanghai SIPG keeps a clean sheet in 13% (3 of 23 matches).

37Goals scored (season)31
Shanghai SIPGQingdao Jonoon
32Goals conceded (season)44
Shanghai SIPGQingdao Jonoon
3Average goals in match3.26
Shanghai SIPGQingdao Jonoon
9Goals scored (last 5)2
Shanghai SIPGQingdao Jonoon
6Goals conceded (last 5)13
Shanghai SIPGQingdao Jonoon

How often they score at least...

87%1 goal70%
Shanghai SIPGQingdao Jonoon
48%2 goals35%
Shanghai SIPGQingdao Jonoon
17%3 goals22%
Shanghai SIPGQingdao Jonoon
9%4 goals9%
Shanghai SIPGQingdao Jonoon

How often they concede at least...

87%1 goal91%
Shanghai SIPGQingdao Jonoon
43%2 goals52%
Shanghai SIPGQingdao Jonoon
9%3 goals30%
Shanghai SIPGQingdao Jonoon
0%4 goals13%
Shanghai SIPGQingdao Jonoon

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

64%
League average

Goal patterns

22%BTTS at half-time9%
Shanghai SIPGQingdao Jonoon
9%BTTS in both halves0%
Shanghai SIPGQingdao Jonoon
30%Scored in both halves17%
Shanghai SIPGQingdao Jonoon

BTTS and goal count

57%Min. 3 goals and BTTS57%
Shanghai SIPGQingdao Jonoon
4%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
Shanghai SIPGQingdao Jonoon
60%BTTS - last 540%
Shanghai SIPGQingdao Jonoon

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

70%Min. 1 goal before half-time65%
Shanghai SIPGQingdao Jonoon
35%Min. 2 goals before half-time30%
Shanghai SIPGQingdao Jonoon
9%Min. 3 goals before half-time17%
Shanghai SIPGQingdao Jonoon

2nd half

87%Min. 1 goal after half-time91%
Shanghai SIPGQingdao Jonoon
52%Min. 2 goals after half-time57%
Shanghai SIPGQingdao Jonoon
30%Min. 3 goals after half-time35%
Shanghai SIPGQingdao Jonoon

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Shanghai SIPG is 12% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.26 pts / match - Shanghai SIPG · 1.13 pts / match - Qingdao Jonoon

Shanghai SIPG - half-time state
26% leading48% draw26% trailing
Qingdao Jonoon - half-time state
26% leading35% draw39% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.26Points per match (1st half)1.13
Shanghai SIPGQingdao Jonoon
0.61Goals scored (1st half)0.52
Shanghai SIPGQingdao Jonoon
0.57Goals conceded (1st half)0.74
Shanghai SIPGQingdao Jonoon
1.17Average goals (1st half)1.26
Shanghai SIPGQingdao Jonoon
57%Clean sheet before half-time57%
Shanghai SIPGQingdao Jonoon
52%No goal before half-time70%
Shanghai SIPGQingdao Jonoon

After half-time (2nd half)

1.35Points per match (2nd half)1.13
Shanghai SIPGQingdao Jonoon
1Goals scored (2nd half)0.83
Shanghai SIPGQingdao Jonoon
0.83Goals conceded (2nd half)1.17
Shanghai SIPGQingdao Jonoon
1.83Average goals (2nd half)2
Shanghai SIPGQingdao Jonoon
39%Clean sheet after half-time17%
Shanghai SIPGQingdao Jonoon
30%No goal after half-time43%
Shanghai SIPGQingdao Jonoon

Shanghai SIPG - second-half results

35% W30% R35% P
29
Half-time points
14
Half-time goals
+1
Goal difference (1st half)
31
Second-half points
+4
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.26
PPG before half-time
Lead holding135%

Leads at half-time in 26% of matches and wins 35%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.3

Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Qingdao Jonoon - second-half results

26% W35% R39% P
26
Half-time points
12
Half-time goals
-5
Goal difference (1st half)
26
Second-half points
-8
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.13
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 26% of matches and wins 26%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.4

Concedes 0.4 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Shanghai SIPG - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.802.20
Goals scored / match0.81.0
Goals conceded / match1.00.2
Average goals in match1.81.2
1 goal100%60%
2 goals40%20%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet20%80%
No goal60%40%
Goal difference-1+4
Half-time: 20% leading - 20% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 40% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 4
Qingdao Jonoon - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.200.00
Goals scored / match0.20.2
Goals conceded / match1.21.4
Average goals in match1.41.6
1 goal80%100%
2 goals40%20%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet20%0%
No goal80%80%
Goal difference-5-6
Half-time: 0% leading - 20% draw - 80% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 0% draw - 100% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 1

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Shanghai SIPG
ScoredConceded
1
7
0-15
5
4
16-30
8
2
31-45
11
6
46-60
4
7
61-75
8
6
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (11 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.

Qingdao Jonoon
ScoredConceded
6
5
0-15
2
7
16-30
4
5
31-45
4
12
46-60
7
7
61-75
8
8
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (8 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.13
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.8 : 1.4
Estimated goal split
home : away
100%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
70%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+60%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
61%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
4%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 25 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Shanghai SIPG

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.13
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.09
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-8.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.19
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.10
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
90%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
105%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.65
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.4
Late goals
22% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 3% come in the first quarter-hour.
22%

Qingdao Jonoon

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.27
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.29
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.9 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.03
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.26
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
102%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
107%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.91
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
26% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 19% come in the first quarter-hour.
26%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Chinese Super League).

Teams vs league

Shanghai SIPGLigaQingdao Jonoon
Average goals in match 3.003.12 3.26
Both teams scored 74%64% 65%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 61%58% 57%
Clean sheets 13%20% 9%
Goal before half-time 70%71% 65%
Goal after half-time 87%87% 91%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.12
Average goals per match
64%
Both teams scored
58%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
20%
Clean sheets
1.79
Home goals / match
1.33
Away goals / match
+35%
Home attack advantage
+26%
Home defence advantage
+19%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
71%
1 goal
37%
2 goals
14%
3 goals
4%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
87%
1 goal
55%
2 goals
25%
3 goals
14%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Qingdao JonoonGoalCarlos Strandberg
  2. Shanghai SIPGGoalLei WuAssist: Xi Yang
  3. Qingdao JonoonSubstitutionOn: Yangyang JinOff: Nemanja Anđelković
  4. Shanghai SIPGSubstitutionOn: Jiwen KuaiOff: Kodjo Jean Claude Aziangbe
  5. Qingdao JonoonYellow cardYaw Yeboah
  6. Shanghai SIPGSubstitutionOn: Shuai LiOff: Xin Yue
  7. Shanghai SIPGYellow cardÓscar Melendo Jiménez
  8. Qingdao JonoonSubstitutionOn: Guobao LiuOff: Xinyu Liu
  9. Qingdao JonoonYellow cardJunshuai Liu
  10. Shanghai SIPGGoalLei Wu
  11. Qingdao JonoonSubstitutionOn: Qiao WangOff: Hailong Li
  12. Shanghai SIPGSubstitutionOn: Shenchao WangOff: Linpeng Zhang
  13. Qingdao JonoonYellow cardGuobao Liu

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (3): Shanghai SIPG 2 - 0 - 1 Qingdao Jonoon. Average goals 5.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.

Qingdao Jonoon
3 : 1
Shanghai SIPG
Qingdao Jonoon FC
3 : 4
Shanghai SIPG FC
Shanghai SIPG FC
3 : 1
Qingdao Jonoon FC

FAQ

What was the result of Shanghai SIPG vs Qingdao Jonoon?

The Chinese Super League match finished Shanghai SIPG 2:1 Qingdao Jonoon. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Shanghai SIPG and Qingdao Jonoon?

In the last 3 head-to-head matches Shanghai SIPG won 2, Qingdao Jonoon won 1 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 5.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Shanghai SIPG vs Qingdao Jonoon?

Shanghai SIPG score 1.61 goals per game on average and Qingdao Jonoon 1.35. The Chinese Super League average is 3.12 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 58% of games. Both teams score in 74% of Shanghai SIPG's matches and 65% of Qingdao Jonoon's.

What form are Shanghai SIPG and Qingdao Jonoon in?

Over the last 5 games Shanghai SIPG have a 3-1-1 record (2.00 points per game) and Qingdao Jonoon 0-0-5 (0.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Shanghai SIPG vs Qingdao Jonoon?

The statistical background for Shanghai SIPG vs Qingdao Jonoon — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.