China - Chinese Super LeagueData current as of 23 July 2026

Shanghai SIPG vs Wuhan Three Towns: match statistics

Shanghai SIPG vs Wuhan Three Towns: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Shanghai SIPG play Wuhan Three Towns in Chinese Super League (China). The match date is 25 April 2026 at 14:00. Final score: 4:0.

Current form

Shanghai SIPG: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match. Wuhan Three Towns: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

Shanghai SIPG scores 1.56 and concedes 1.44 goals per match. Wuhan Three Towns scores 1.44 and concedes 1.89. League average: 3.09 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Shanghai SIPG 78%, Wuhan Three Towns 67%. Over 2.5: Shanghai SIPG 67%, Wuhan Three Towns 56%. League level: BTTS 65%, Over 2.5 59%.

xG, shots and style

Wuhan Three Towns has higher xG: 1.35 vs 1.33. Shanghai SIPG: 10.9 shots per match, Wuhan Three Towns: 12.1.

Match halves

Shanghai SIPG: half-time lead 28%, second-half goals 1.00. Wuhan Three Towns: half-time lead 28%, second-half goals 0.78.

Goals by minute

Shanghai SIPG: 46-60 (7 goals). Wuhan Three Towns: 31-45+ (7 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Chinese Super League: 3.09 goals per match, BTTS 65%, Over 2.5 59%.

Head-to-head

2 H2H matches: 2-0-0. Average goals 3.50, BTTS 50%.

Match description

Shanghai SIPG holds a clear advantage in key home metrics: they average 2.00 goals scored at home and concede 1.50, while Wuhan Three Towns average 1.33 goals scored away and concede 2.67. The hosts create significantly more chances — 16.5 average shots and 5.25 on target per home match versus the visitors' 8.67 shots and 2.33 on target — and average xG is 1.96 for Shanghai versus 1.04 for Wuhan, indicating higher quality opportunities for the home side. A possession gap of 65% to 46% and Wuhan’s 0% away wins with 67% away losses further favor the hosts despite the visitors’ higher conversion rate (15% vs 12%). Over the last 5 matches both teams average a similar 0.8 points per game, but Shanghai’s home record of +2 versus Wuhan’s -4 on the road suggests the hosts will control the match and have a greater probability of winning.

Half-by-half

1 : 0
1st half
3 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

60Possession (%)40
Shanghai SIPGWuhan Three Towns
14Shots6
Shanghai SIPGWuhan Three Towns
6Shots on target3
Shanghai SIPGWuhan Three Towns
1.57xG0.84
Shanghai SIPGWuhan Three Towns
3Corners3
Shanghai SIPGWuhan Three Towns
36Dangerous attacks33
Shanghai SIPGWuhan Three Towns
14Fouls22
Shanghai SIPGWuhan Three Towns
0Cards1
Shanghai SIPGWuhan Three Towns

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Shanghai SIPGWuhan Three Towns
1.56Goals scored / match1.44
Shanghai SIPGWuhan Three Towns
1.44Goals conceded / match1.89
Shanghai SIPGWuhan Three Towns
58%Average possession46%
Shanghai SIPGWuhan Three Towns
3.61Shots on target / match4.22
Shanghai SIPGWuhan Three Towns

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

10.89Shots per match12.06
Shanghai SIPGWuhan Three Towns
3.61Shots on target4.22
Shanghai SIPGWuhan Three Towns
14.3%Shot conversion12%
Shanghai SIPGWuhan Three Towns
58%Possession46%
Shanghai SIPGWuhan Three Towns
1.33xG for1.35
Shanghai SIPGWuhan Three Towns
1.29xG against1.54
Shanghai SIPGWuhan Three Towns

Shooting quality

Shanghai SIPG: Efficient finishingWuhan Three Towns: Counter-attacking
Shanghai SIPGWuhan Three Towns
Accuracy (shots on target)33%35%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.430.34

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Shanghai SIPG
DLWLD
Season result split
28% W33% R39% P
Season (W-D-L)
5-6-7
1.17 pts / match · goal difference +2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
3-3-2
Last 5 at home
1-3-1
LWDDD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 1.8xG: 1.32Opponent xG: 1.17BTTS: 100%Over 2.5: 80%
Wuhan Three Towns
DDLLW
Season result split
17% W39% R44% P
Season (W-D-L)
3-7-8
0.89 pts / match · goal difference -8
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
0-5-5
Last 5 away
0-3-2
DDDLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 1.69Opponent xG: 1.67BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Shanghai SIPG is 8% better for: goals scored per match.

1.56 goals / match - Shanghai SIPG · 1.44 goals / match - Wuhan Three Towns

Shanghai SIPG is 31% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.44 goals / match - Shanghai SIPG · 1.89 goals / match - Wuhan Three Towns

Shanghai SIPG scoring profile: very strong

Shanghai SIPG scores in 89% of matches (16 of 18 matches), while Wuhan Three Towns keeps a clean sheet in 11% (2 of 18 matches).

Wuhan Three Towns scoring profile: very strong

Wuhan Three Towns scores in 78% of matches (14 of 18 matches), while Shanghai SIPG keeps a clean sheet in 11% (2 of 18 matches).

28Goals scored (season)26
Shanghai SIPGWuhan Three Towns
26Goals conceded (season)34
Shanghai SIPGWuhan Three Towns
3Average goals in match3.33
Shanghai SIPGWuhan Three Towns
8Goals scored (last 5)8
Shanghai SIPGWuhan Three Towns
9Goals conceded (last 5)8
Shanghai SIPGWuhan Three Towns

How often they score at least...

89%1 goal78%
Shanghai SIPGWuhan Three Towns
44%2 goals50%
Shanghai SIPGWuhan Three Towns
11%3 goals11%
Shanghai SIPGWuhan Three Towns
11%4 goals6%
Shanghai SIPGWuhan Three Towns

How often they concede at least...

89%1 goal89%
Shanghai SIPGWuhan Three Towns
44%2 goals56%
Shanghai SIPGWuhan Three Towns
11%3 goals28%
Shanghai SIPGWuhan Three Towns
0%4 goals11%
Shanghai SIPGWuhan Three Towns

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

67%
Wuhan Three Towns - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.12 of 18 matches
65%
League average

Goal patterns

22%BTTS at half-time28%
Shanghai SIPGWuhan Three Towns
11%BTTS in both halves6%
Shanghai SIPGWuhan Three Towns
33%Scored in both halves22%
Shanghai SIPGWuhan Three Towns

BTTS and goal count

61%Min. 3 goals and BTTS50%
Shanghai SIPGWuhan Three Towns
6%Min. 3 goals without BTTS6%
Shanghai SIPGWuhan Three Towns
100%BTTS - last 560%
Shanghai SIPGWuhan Three Towns

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

61%Min. 1 goal before half-time72%
Shanghai SIPGWuhan Three Towns
33%Min. 2 goals before half-time44%
Shanghai SIPGWuhan Three Towns
6%Min. 3 goals before half-time33%
Shanghai SIPGWuhan Three Towns

2nd half

94%Min. 1 goal after half-time94%
Shanghai SIPGWuhan Three Towns
61%Min. 2 goals after half-time50%
Shanghai SIPGWuhan Three Towns
33%Min. 3 goals after half-time22%
Shanghai SIPGWuhan Three Towns

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Shanghai SIPG is 19% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.39 pts / match - Shanghai SIPG · 1.17 pts / match - Wuhan Three Towns

Shanghai SIPG - half-time state
28% leading56% draw17% trailing
Wuhan Three Towns - half-time state
28% leading33% draw39% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.39Points per match (1st half)1.17
Shanghai SIPGWuhan Three Towns
0.56Goals scored (1st half)0.67
Shanghai SIPGWuhan Three Towns
0.44Goals conceded (1st half)0.89
Shanghai SIPGWuhan Three Towns
1Average goals (1st half)1.56
Shanghai SIPGWuhan Three Towns
67%Clean sheet before half-time39%
Shanghai SIPGWuhan Three Towns
50%No goal before half-time61%
Shanghai SIPGWuhan Three Towns

After half-time (2nd half)

1.11Points per match (2nd half)1.17
Shanghai SIPGWuhan Three Towns
1Goals scored (2nd half)0.78
Shanghai SIPGWuhan Three Towns
1Goals conceded (2nd half)1
Shanghai SIPGWuhan Three Towns
2Average goals (2nd half)1.78
Shanghai SIPGWuhan Three Towns
28%Clean sheet after half-time33%
Shanghai SIPGWuhan Three Towns
28%No goal after half-time39%
Shanghai SIPGWuhan Three Towns

Shanghai SIPG - second-half results

28% W28% R44% P
25
Half-time points
10
Half-time goals
+2
Goal difference (1st half)
20
Second-half points
0
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.39
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 28% of matches and wins 28%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.6

Concedes 0.6 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Wuhan Three Towns - second-half results

28% W33% R39% P
21
Half-time points
12
Half-time goals
-4
Goal difference (1st half)
21
Second-half points
-4
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.17
PPG before half-time
Lead holding61%

Leads at half-time in 28% of matches and wins 17%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Shanghai SIPG - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.400.80
Goals scored / match0.80.8
Goals conceded / match0.41.4
Average goals in match1.22.2
1 goal60%100%
2 goals60%80%
3 goals0%40%
Clean sheet60%20%
No goal40%20%
Goal difference+2-3
Half-time: 20% leading - 80% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 20% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 4
Wuhan Three Towns - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.800.60
Goals scored / match1.20.4
Goals conceded / match0.61.0
Average goals in match1.81.4
1 goal60%80%
2 goals60%60%
3 goals40%0%
Clean sheet60%20%
No goal40%60%
Goal difference+3-3
Half-time: 40% leading - 60% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 60% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 6

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Shanghai SIPG
ScoredConceded
1
5
0-15
3
2
16-30
6
1
31-45
7
6
46-60
4
6
61-75
7
6
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (7 goli). Concedes most in 46-60 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

Wuhan Three Towns
ScoredConceded
3
5
0-15
2
3
16-30
7
8
31-45
4
5
46-60
6
7
61-75
4
6
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (7 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.17
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.7 : 1.4
Estimated goal split
home : away
102%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
73%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+11%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
69%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
2%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 50 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Shanghai SIPG

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.04
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.08
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-8.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.23
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.15
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
87%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
111%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.17
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.4
Late goals
25% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 4% come in the first quarter-hour.
25%

Wuhan Three Towns

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.19
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.26
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-3.9 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.09
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.35
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
111%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
105%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.11
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
15% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 12% come in the first quarter-hour.
15%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Chinese Super League).

Teams vs league

Shanghai SIPGLigaWuhan Three Towns
Average goals in match 3.003.09 3.33
Both teams scored 78%65% 67%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 67%59% 56%
Clean sheets 11%19% 11%
Goal before half-time 61%70% 72%
Goal after half-time 94%89% 94%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.09
Average goals per match
65%
Both teams scored
59%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
19%
Clean sheets
1.80
Home goals / match
1.30
Away goals / match
+38%
Home attack advantage
+28%
Home defence advantage
+20%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
70%
1 goal
37%
2 goals
15%
3 goals
4%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
89%
1 goal
56%
2 goals
24%
3 goals
12%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (2): Shanghai SIPG 2 - 0 - 0 Wuhan Three Towns. Average goals 3.50, both teams scored in 50% matches.

Shanghai SIPG FC
3 : 2
Wuhan Three Towns FC
Wuhan Three Towns FC
0 : 2
Shanghai SIPG FC

FAQ

What was the result of Shanghai SIPG vs Wuhan Three Towns?

The Chinese Super League match finished Shanghai SIPG 4:0 Wuhan Three Towns. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Shanghai SIPG and Wuhan Three Towns?

In the last 2 head-to-head matches Shanghai SIPG won 2, Wuhan Three Towns won 0 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 3.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Shanghai SIPG vs Wuhan Three Towns?

Shanghai SIPG score 1.56 goals per game on average and Wuhan Three Towns 1.44. The Chinese Super League average is 3.09 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 59% of games. Both teams score in 78% of Shanghai SIPG's matches and 67% of Wuhan Three Towns's.

What form are Shanghai SIPG and Wuhan Three Towns in?

Over the last 5 games Shanghai SIPG have a 1-2-2 record (1.00 points per game) and Wuhan Three Towns 1-2-2 (1.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Shanghai SIPG vs Wuhan Three Towns?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.