Armenia - Armenian Premier LeagueData current as of 07 September 2026

Shirak vs BKMA: match statistics

Shirak crest
Shirak
1 : 1half-time 1:1
BKMA crest
BKMA

Shirak vs BKMA: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Shirak played BKMA in Armenian Premier League (Armenia). The match was played on 16 April 2026. Final score: 1:1.

Current form

Shirak: 0-1-4, 0.20 points/match. BKMA: 0-1-4, 0.20 points/match.

Goal statistics

Shirak scores 0.68 and concedes 1.79 goals per match. BKMA scores 1.05 and concedes 1.55. League average: 2.53 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Shirak 37%, BKMA 55%. Over 2.5: Shirak 47%, BKMA 55%. League level: BTTS 45%, Over 2.5 48%.

xG, shots and style

BKMA has higher xG: 1.28 vs 0.96. Shirak: 8.0 shots per match, BKMA: 11.4.

Match halves

Shirak: half-time lead 16%, second-half goals 0.37. BKMA: half-time lead 25%, second-half goals 0.60.

Goals by minute

Shirak: 61-75 (4 goals). BKMA: 61-75 (6 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Armenian Premier League: 2.53 goals per match, BTTS 45%, Over 2.5 48%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 2 previous H2H matches were available: 0-1-1. Average goals 1.50, BTTS 50%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Both teams are clearly in crisis: in the last 5 matches each averaged only 0.2 points and both conceded 9 goals; Shirak failed to score in those five matches (0 goals), while BKMA scored only 1. BKMA has an advantage in chance creation — on average 10.56 shots and 4.33 on target per away game versus Shirak’s 8 shots and 3.22 on target at home, and a higher xG of 1.18 versus 0.98. This season BKMA have scored 21 goals compared to Shirak’s 13, confirming better offensive efficiency from the visitors despite poor form. However, Shirak defends better at home — conceding 1.33 goals per game and keeping 22% clean sheets, while BKMA concede 2.11 goals away and have 11% clean sheets; at the same time Shirak failed to score in 56% of home matches, and BKMA were goalless in 33% of away games. Considering the greater number of chances, higher xG (1.18 vs 0.98) and lower share of goalless matches for BKMA, I predict a narrow victory for the visitors.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Seasonal signals are mixed: BKMA has 67% of matches with both teams scoring vs Shirak's 45%, which seasonally favors BTTS on BKMA's side. However, in the last 5 matches Shirak hasn't scored a single goal (0.0) and has 0% BTTS in their last five, while BKMA averages 1.0 goals in the last 5 and 20% BTTS, which weakens the both-teams-to-score outlook now. Looking at xG and defense, Shirak has a season xG of 1.27 with xG against 1.48, but in the last 5 their xG for dropped to 0.81 with xG against 2.03, and BKMA seasonally has xG 1.18 and concedes 2.11 goals per match on average — so BKMA is likely to score while Shirak struggles to create. Considering Shirak's zero goals in their last 5, the lower recent xG of 0.81 and the seasonal BTTS disparity of 67%/45%, I assign a higher probability to “No” – 70% versus 30% “Yes.”

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

I estimate expected goals at 1.53 for Shirak and 1.33 for BKMA (total 2.86), based on seasonal attacking xG 1.27 (Shirak) and 1.18 (BKMA) and xG conceded 1.48 (Shirak) and 1.78 (BKMA). Over 1.5 is the strongest signal: Shirak scored over 1.5 goals in 64% of matches this season, BKMA in 89%, so I assess the chance of Over 1.5 at 80%. Over 2.5 has moderate support — seasonally Shirak 45% and BKMA 67% — and the projected 2.86 goals translates to roughly a 62% probability for Over 2.5. Over 3.5 is much less likely (seasonally 27% and 44% and expected 2.86 < 3.5), hence only ~30% chance for Over 3.5. Additionally, in the last 5 matches Shirak scored 0 goals and BKMA 1 goal, while both teams conceded 9 goals in those 5 games, which sustains an edge for overs on the lower lines despite poor attacking form.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Half-time statistics clearly favor the visitors: Shirak led at the break in 18% of matches, the score was level at half-time in 36%, and the home side trailed at the break in 45%, with half-time goals averaging 0.18 for Shirak versus 0.78 for BKMA. In the second half Shirak more often stages a turnaround — the home team collected 15 points in second halves compared to 4 points for the visitors, and second-half wins are 27% for Shirak versus 11% for BKMA. BKMA defends poorly away (conceding 2.11 goals on average away with xG against 1.78) and concedes many goals after the break (6 goals in minutes 46–60), while Shirak scored 4 goals in 61–75 and 3 goals in 76–90, which favors an equalizer. Combining these facts (Shirak trailing at the break in a high 45% of matches, but with strong ability to score and earn points after half-time, and BKMA’s high tendency to concede) the most consistent scenario is visitors leading at half-time and a draw at full-time; therefore I recommend HT/FT 2/X (probability 21%).

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

1 : 1
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

38Possession (%)62
ShirakBKMA
12Shots22
ShirakBKMA
3Shots on target8
ShirakBKMA
1.24xG2.27
ShirakBKMA
4Corners4
ShirakBKMA
38Dangerous attacks46
ShirakBKMA
20Fouls15
ShirakBKMA
2Cards1
ShirakBKMA

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

0.68Goals scored / match1.05
ShirakBKMA
1.79Goals conceded / match1.55
ShirakBKMA
39%Average possession51%
ShirakBKMA
2.95Shots on target / match3.95
ShirakBKMA

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

7.95Shots per match11.4
ShirakBKMA
2.95Shots on target3.95
ShirakBKMA
8.6%Shot conversion9.2%
ShirakBKMA
39%Possession51%
ShirakBKMA
0.96xG for1.28
ShirakBKMA
1.96xG against1.63
ShirakBKMA

Shooting quality

Shirak: BalancedBKMA: Balanced
ShirakBKMA
Accuracy (shots on target)37%35%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.230.27

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Shirak
LLLLD
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
11% W26% R63% P
Season (W-D-L)
2-5-12
0.58 pts / match · goal difference -21
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-1-4
0.20 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
2-1-6
Last 5 at home
1-0-4
LLWLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.0Goals conceded: 1.8xG: 0.92Opponent xG: 2.21BTTS: 0%Over 2.5: 40%
BKMA
LLLLD
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
15% W35% R50% P
Season (W-D-L)
3-7-10
0.80 pts / match · goal difference -10
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-1-4
0.20 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
1-2-6
Last 5 away
1-1-3
LDWLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.2Goals conceded: 1.8xG: 1.21Opponent xG: 1.54BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 20%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

BKMA is 54% better for: goals scored per match.

0.68 goals / match - Shirak · 1.05 goals / match - BKMA

BKMA is 15% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.79 goals / match - Shirak · 1.55 goals / match - BKMA

Shirak scoring profile: mixed

Shirak scores in 42% of matches (8 of 19 matches), while BKMA keeps a clean sheet in 25% (5 of 20 matches).

BKMA scoring profile: strong

BKMA scores in 60% of matches (12 of 20 matches), while Shirak keeps a clean sheet in 21% (4 of 19 matches).

13Goals scored (season)21
ShirakBKMA
34Goals conceded (season)31
ShirakBKMA
2.47Average goals in match2.6
ShirakBKMA
0Goals scored (last 5)1
ShirakBKMA
9Goals conceded (last 5)9
ShirakBKMA

How often they score at least...

42%1 goal60%
ShirakBKMA
16%2 goals30%
ShirakBKMA
5%3 goals10%
ShirakBKMA
5%4 goals5%
ShirakBKMA

How often they concede at least...

79%1 goal75%
ShirakBKMA
53%2 goals60%
ShirakBKMA
32%3 goals15%
ShirakBKMA
11%4 goals5%
ShirakBKMA

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

11%BTTS at half-time10%
ShirakBKMA
0%BTTS in both halves5%
ShirakBKMA
11%Scored in both halves15%
ShirakBKMA

BTTS and goal count

26%Min. 3 goals and BTTS50%
ShirakBKMA
21%Min. 3 goals without BTTS5%
ShirakBKMA
0%BTTS - last 520%
ShirakBKMA

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

63%Min. 1 goal before half-time70%
ShirakBKMA
37%Min. 2 goals before half-time25%
ShirakBKMA
16%Min. 3 goals before half-time5%
ShirakBKMA

2nd half

84%Min. 1 goal after half-time80%
ShirakBKMA
32%Min. 2 goals after half-time50%
ShirakBKMA
5%Min. 3 goals after half-time20%
ShirakBKMA

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

BKMA is 24% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

0.89 pts / match - Shirak · 1.1 pts / match - BKMA

Shirak - half-time state
16% leading42% draw42% trailing
BKMA - half-time state
25% leading35% draw40% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.89Points per match (1st half)1.1
ShirakBKMA
0.32Goals scored (1st half)0.45
ShirakBKMA
0.89Goals conceded (1st half)0.6
ShirakBKMA
1.21Average goals (1st half)1.05
ShirakBKMA
47%Clean sheet before half-time50%
ShirakBKMA
79%No goal before half-time70%
ShirakBKMA

After half-time (2nd half)

0.84Points per match (2nd half)0.95
ShirakBKMA
0.37Goals scored (2nd half)0.6
ShirakBKMA
0.89Goals conceded (2nd half)0.95
ShirakBKMA
1.26Average goals (2nd half)1.55
ShirakBKMA
37%Clean sheet after half-time35%
ShirakBKMA
68%No goal after half-time55%
ShirakBKMA

Shirak - second-half results

21% W21% R58% P
17
Half-time points
6
Half-time goals
-11
Goal difference (1st half)
16
Second-half points
-10
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.89
PPG before half-time
Lead holding69%

Leads at half-time in 16% of matches and wins 11%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

BKMA - second-half results

20% W35% R45% P
22
Half-time points
9
Half-time goals
-3
Goal difference (1st half)
19
Second-half points
-7
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.10
PPG before half-time
Lead holding60%

Leads at half-time in 25% of matches and wins 15%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time+0.3

Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Shirak - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.400.20
Goals scored / match0.00.0
Goals conceded / match1.00.8
Average goals in match1.00.8
1 goal60%80%
2 goals40%0%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet40%20%
No goal100%100%
Goal difference-5-4
Half-time: 0% leading - 40% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 20% draw - 80% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 0
BKMA - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.400.20
Goals scored / match0.00.2
Goals conceded / match0.61.2
Average goals in match0.61.4
1 goal60%80%
2 goals0%20%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet40%20%
No goal100%80%
Goal difference-3-5
Half-time: 0% leading - 40% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 20% draw - 80% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 0

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Shirak
ScoredConceded
1
5
0-15
3
5
16-30
2
7
31-45
0
4
46-60
4
8
61-75
3
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (4 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.

BKMA
ScoredConceded
3
8
0-15
4
2
16-30
2
2
31-45
2
7
46-60
6
5
61-75
4
7
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (6 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.54
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.1 : 1.4
Estimated goal split
home : away
100%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
46%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-41%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
25%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
23%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 4 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Shirak

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-1.00
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.11
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+3.7 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.28
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.17
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
47%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
167%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.38
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.0
Late goals
23% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 8% come in the first quarter-hour.
23%

BKMA

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.35
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.15
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-2.9 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.23
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.08
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
98%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
107%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.60
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
19% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 14% come in the first quarter-hour.
19%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Armenian Premier League).

Teams vs league

ShirakLigaBKMA
Average goals in match 2.472.53 2.60
Both teams scored 37%45% 55%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 47%48% 55%
Clean sheets 21%32% 25%
Goal before half-time 63%70% 70%
Goal after half-time 84%80% 80%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.53
Average goals per match
45%
Both teams scored
48%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
32%
Clean sheets
1.45
Home goals / match
1.07
Away goals / match
+36%
Home attack advantage
+26%
Home defence advantage
+8%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
70%
1 goal
27%
2 goals
11%
3 goals
5%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
80%
1 goal
41%
2 goals
13%
3 goals
4%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. ShirakYellow cardSuren Tsarukyan
  2. BKMAYellow cardHarutyun Manukyan
  3. ShirakYellow cardAleksa Vidić
  4. ShirakGoalRafik Misakyan
  5. ShirakSubstitutionOn: Akila Jesse JidimaOff: Rudik Mkrtchyan
  6. BKMASubstitutionOn: Petros AleqyanOff: Artur Askaryan

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Referee context

See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.

Ashot HarutyunyanMatches officiated: 16
5.19Cards per match
0Penalties per match
1 / X / 219%Home wins31%Draws50%Away wins

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (2): Shirak 0 - 1 - 1 BKMA. Average goals 1.50, both teams scored in 50% matches.

Banaki Kentronakan Marzakan Akumb
0 : 0
Shirak FC
Banaki Kentronakan Marzakan Akumb
2 : 1
Shirak FC

FAQ

What was the result of Shirak vs BKMA?

The Armenian Premier League match finished Shirak 1:1 BKMA. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Shirak and BKMA?

In the last 2 head-to-head matches Shirak won 0, BKMA won 1 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 1.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Shirak vs BKMA?

Shirak score 0.68 goals per game on average and BKMA 1.05. The Armenian Premier League average is 2.53 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 48% of games. Both teams score in 37% of Shirak's matches and 55% of BKMA's.

What form are Shirak and BKMA in?

Over the last 5 games Shirak have a 0-1-4 record (0.20 points per game) and BKMA 0-1-4 (0.20 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Shirak vs BKMA?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Shirak vs BKMA: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.