Shooting Stars vs Nasarawa United: match statistics
Shooting Stars vs Nasarawa United: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Shooting Stars played Nasarawa United in NPFL (Nigeria). The match was played on 3 May 2026. Final score: 3:2.
Current form
Shooting Stars: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match. Nasarawa United: 2-0-3, 1.20 points/match.
Goal statistics
Shooting Stars scores 1.06 and concedes 1.06 goals per match. Nasarawa United scores 0.97 and concedes 0.80. League average: 1.96 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Shooting Stars 40%, Nasarawa United 34%. Over 2.5: Shooting Stars 34%, Nasarawa United 29%. League level: BTTS 38%, Over 2.5 32%.
xG, shots and style
Nasarawa United has higher xG: 1.67 vs 1.32. Shooting Stars: 6.9 shots per match, Nasarawa United: 8.3.
Match halves
Shooting Stars: half-time lead 31%, second-half goals 0.54. Nasarawa United: half-time lead 26%, second-half goals 0.46.
Goals by minute
Shooting Stars: 76-90+ (12 goals). Nasarawa United: 31-45+ (9 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
NPFL: 1.96 goals per match, BTTS 38%, Over 2.5 32%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-0-1. Average goals 1.00, BTTS 0%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Shooting Stars are the favorites for this match: at home they have won 76% of games, a positive goal difference of +17 and average 1.71 goals scored and 0.71 conceded per match. In attack the hosts average 11.54 shots per game (3.77 on target), have xG 1.53 and a conversion rate of 14%, while Nasarawa away record 6.22 shots (1.89 on target), xG 0.96 and 7% conversion. Defensively Shooting Stars hold a clear advantage — at home they keep 41% clean sheets and only 12% of matches without scoring, whereas the visitors away manage just 18% clean sheets and as many as 65% of matches without scoring. In the last 5 matches the hosts are 2-1-2 with 5 goals (1.4 pts/match), and Nasarawa 2-0-3 with 7 goals (1.2 pts/match), which indicates greater instability from the away side (averaging 0.47 goals/match). Considering the superiority in shots, higher xG for the hosts and Nasarawa’s offensive weakness away, I tip a Shooting Stars win.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Shooting Stars as hosts average 1.44 goals scored and concede only 0.5 goals per match this season; they also have a high xG of 2.07 and 6.5 shots on target per game, indicating superiority in chance creation. Nasarawa United score only 0.47 goals per game this season, have xG 0.96, just 1.89 shots on target and a conversion rate of 7%, so their actual chances of scoring are low. Shooting Stars kept a clean sheet in 50% of matches (Nasarawa 18%), and season BTTS rates are 39% for the home side and 29% for the away side versus the league 38%, showing that fixtures between these teams less frequently end Goal/Goal. Although Nasarawa have scored 7 goals in their last 5 matches (1.4 average), given the disparity in xG and shots (2.07/6.5 vs 0.96/1.89) and the season 0.47 away goal rate, I estimate a 75% probability for No Goal (clean sheet expected for one side) and 25% for BTTS - Yes.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
xG analysis shows 2.07 xG for Shooting Stars’ attack vs 1.62 xG for Nasarawa’s defense, yielding an expected 1.85 goals for the home side; similarly 0.96 xG for Nasarawa’s attack vs 1.23 for the home defense yields 1.09 expected goals for the away side, totaling 2.94 expected goals. Additionally, the hosts average 15.19 shots and 6.5 on target per match, while the visitors only 6.22 and 1.89, with conversion rates of 10% vs 7%, confirming Shooting Stars’ offensive superiority. Season-wide Over 2.5 occurred in 33% of home matches and 24% of away matches, but in the last 5 meetings both teams show a 40% Over 2.5 rate; note also that the hosts have 50% clean sheets, which reduces certainty. Based on this I estimate probabilities: Over 1.5 ≈79%, Over 2.5 ≈56% and Over 3.5 ≈34%; the strongest signal from the data is Over 1.5, and as a value play I recommend Over 1.5.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Shooting Stars have a clear advantage: they average 1.44 goals per match versus Nasarawa’s 0.47 and have xG of 2.07 compared to the visitors’ 0.96, while also registering 6.5 shots on target against opponents’ 1.89. At Half-Time the hosts lead in 44% of matches (8 times), scoring an average of 0.83 goals and conceding only 0.28, whereas Nasarawa scores 0.18 goals by Half-Time and leads at the break in just 6% of games (once). After Half-Time Shooting Stars are stronger as well — they score on average 0.61 goals and concede 0.22, while the visitors score 0.29 and concede 0.53, which reduces the likelihood of a turnaround. Additionally, the hosts have won 67% of home matches versus just 18% for Nasarawa, and 72% of the hosts’ halves are clean sheets, making it harder for the opponents to score before the break; therefore the 1/1 scenario receives the highest weight (48%).
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Shooting Stars | Nasarawa United | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 29% | 38% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.19 | 0.20 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.54 | 0.31 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Shooting Stars is 17% better for: last-5 form.
1.4 pts / match - Shooting Stars · 1.2 pts / match - Nasarawa United
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Shooting Stars is 9% better for: goals scored per match.
1.06 goals / match - Shooting Stars · 0.97 goals / match - Nasarawa United
Nasarawa United is 32% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.06 goals / match - Shooting Stars · 0.8 goals / match - Nasarawa United
Shooting Stars scores in 60% of matches (21 of 35 matches), while Nasarawa United keeps a clean sheet in 34% (12 of 35 matches).
Nasarawa United scores in 60% of matches (21 of 35 matches), while Shooting Stars keeps a clean sheet in 26% (9 of 35 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Shooting Stars
Over / Under - Nasarawa United
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Shooting Stars - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 31% of matches and wins 46%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Nasarawa United - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 26% of matches and wins 43%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.80 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.0 | 1.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 0.2 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 20% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 40% |
| No goal | 100% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -1 | +2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.80 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.8 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 1.0 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 40% |
| No goal | 60% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +3 | 0 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (12 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): +5 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (9 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Shooting Stars
Nasarawa United
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (NPFL).
Teams vs league
| Shooting Stars | Liga | Nasarawa United | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 2.11 | 1.96 | ▼ 1.77 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 40% | 38% | ▼ 34% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 34% | 32% | ▼ 29% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 26% | 37% | ▼ 34% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 71% | 60% | ▲ 63% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 66% | 63% | • 63% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: Shooting Stars 0 - 0 - 1 Nasarawa United. Average goals 1.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Shooting Stars vs Nasarawa United?
The NPFL match finished Shooting Stars 3:2 Nasarawa United. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Shooting Stars vs Nasarawa United?
Shooting Stars score 1.06 goals per game on average and Nasarawa United 0.97. The NPFL average is 1.96 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 32% of games. Both teams score in 40% of Shooting Stars's matches and 34% of Nasarawa United's.
What form are Shooting Stars and Nasarawa United in?
Over the last 5 games Shooting Stars have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and Nasarawa United 2-0-3 (1.20 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Shooting Stars vs Nasarawa United?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Shooting Stars vs Nasarawa United: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.


