Tanzania - Ligi kuu BaraData current as of 07 September 2026

Singida Black Stars vs Mtibwa Sugar: match statistics

Singida Black Stars vs Mtibwa Sugar: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Singida Black Stars played Mtibwa Sugar in Ligi kuu Bara (Tanzania). The match was played on 9 May 2026. Final score: 4:0.

Current form

Singida Black Stars: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match. Mtibwa Sugar: 0-2-3, 0.40 points/match.

Goal statistics

Singida Black Stars scores 1.00 and concedes 1.08 goals per match. Mtibwa Sugar scores 0.76 and concedes 1.19. League average: 2.02 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Singida Black Stars 42%, Mtibwa Sugar 48%. Over 2.5: Singida Black Stars 31%, Mtibwa Sugar 38%. League level: BTTS 33%, Over 2.5 36%.

xG, shots and style

Singida Black Stars has higher xG: 1.37 vs 0.98. Singida Black Stars: 5.3 shots per match, Mtibwa Sugar: 3.8.

Match halves

Singida Black Stars: half-time lead 15%, second-half goals 0.50. Mtibwa Sugar: half-time lead 5%, second-half goals 0.43.

Goals by minute

Singida Black Stars: 0-15 (9 goals). Mtibwa Sugar: 76-90+ (7 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Ligi kuu Bara: 2.02 goals per match, BTTS 33%, Over 2.5 36%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 2 previous H2H matches were available: 1-0-1. Average goals 3.00, BTTS 50%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Singida Black Stars possess a clear advantage for this match: at home they win 64% of fixtures, average 10.86 shots and 4.14 on target per game, converting to 1.00 goals and xG 1.61. Mtibwa Sugar have no away wins (0), average only 4.17 shots and 2.17 on target, score 0.33 goals per away game with xG 0.82, and fail to score in 67% of away matches. In the last 5 games the hosts have scored 6 and conceded 6, with 2 wins and 1.4 pts/game, while the visitors have 3 scored and 8 conceded, 0.4 pts/game and 0 wins. Additionally, Singida display better shot conversion (11% vs 4%), superior possession (56% vs 44%), more clean sheets at home (55% vs 33%) and a more favorable home goal difference (+1 vs Mtibwa’s -7 on the road); therefore I favor the home victory.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

A strong signal against BTTS - Yes comes from the away side’s stats: Mtibwa Sugar fail to score in 67% of their matches this season, average 0.33 goals per game and have a very low shot conversion rate of 4%, which significantly reduces their scoring chances. Singida Black Stars at home have a seasonal BTTS of 58% and score 1.08 goals per game with xG 1.09, but they also concede on average 1.25 goals at home and have only 25% clean sheets, so the hosts could be the sole scorers. In the last 5 matches both teams show 60% BTTS, Mtibwa scored 3 goals in 5 fixtures (0.6 avg) but conceded 8 goals in those 5 games (1.6 per game) and had xG against of 1.46, indicating vulnerability in the away defence. Additionally, the league has a low BTTS of 33% and 82% of matches feature at least one clean sheet, which historically favors a No Goal scenario. Overall I forecast a No (clean sheet expected) signal with a 70% probability vs 30% for Yes (Goal/Goal).

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The total expected xG is about 2.49: for Singida the estimate comes from xG_for_home 1.09 and xG_against_away 1.76 (average ≈1.43), and for Mtibwa from xG_for_away 0.82 and xG_against_home 1.31 (≈1.06). Singida averages 6.78 shots with a 13% conversion (from these parameters ≈0.88 goals), Mtibwa has 4.17 shots with a 4% conversion (≈0.17 goals), and seasonal goal averages are 1.08 vs 0.33. A Poisson model with lambda=2.49 gives P(>1.5) ≈71%, P(>2.5) ≈45% and P(>3.5) ≈24%, which shows a clear edge over the 1.5 line while the chance of 3.5+ is low. Seasonal indicators confirm over 1.5 (Singida 75% of matches >1.5, Mtibwa 56%), whereas >3.5 is rare (17% for hosts, 0% for guests). Therefore the strongest and most consistent signal from the data is over 1.5 (selection: Over on the 1.5 line).

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

I back HT/FT X/1: draw at half-time, Singida Black Stars to win. I expect a draw at the break — hosts drew at half-time in 55% of matches and visitors in 44%, while hosts led at the break in only 0% and visitors in 11%, which strongly supports an X at half-time. In the second half the hosts will have the advantage: Singida average 1.08 goals per match versus Mtibwa’s 0.33, have xG 1.09 vs 0.82, more shots (6.78 vs 4.17) and a much higher conversion rate (13% vs 4%). Additionally the hosts scored 6 goals in minutes 76–90 compared to 1 for the visitors and record an average of 1.73 points in second halves, winning 45% of second halves, which justifies a turnaround from a draw to a home win. The visitors have not won any match this season (0% wins), so scenarios with a Mtibwa victory I assess as virtually 0%.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

2 : 0
1st half
2 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

54Possession (%)46
Singida Black StarsMtibwa Sugar
18Shots7
Singida Black StarsMtibwa Sugar
9Shots on target2
Singida Black StarsMtibwa Sugar
2.68xG1.16
Singida Black StarsMtibwa Sugar
10Corners3
Singida Black StarsMtibwa Sugar
126Dangerous attacks78
Singida Black StarsMtibwa Sugar
18Fouls8
Singida Black StarsMtibwa Sugar
0Cards0
Singida Black StarsMtibwa Sugar

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Singida Black StarsMtibwa Sugar
1Goals scored / match0.76
Singida Black StarsMtibwa Sugar
1.08Goals conceded / match1.19
Singida Black StarsMtibwa Sugar
Singida Black StarsMtibwa Sugar
34%Average possession33%
Singida Black StarsMtibwa Sugar
1.77Shots on target / match1.38
Singida Black StarsMtibwa Sugar

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

5.27Shots per match3.81
Singida Black StarsMtibwa Sugar
1.77Shots on target1.38
Singida Black StarsMtibwa Sugar
19%Shot conversion20%
Singida Black StarsMtibwa Sugar
34%Possession33%
Singida Black StarsMtibwa Sugar
1.37xG for0.98
Singida Black StarsMtibwa Sugar
1.35xG against1.49
Singida Black StarsMtibwa Sugar

Shooting quality

Singida Black Stars: Counter-attackingMtibwa Sugar: Counter-attacking
Singida Black StarsMtibwa Sugar
Accuracy (shots on target)34%36%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.260.26
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.560.55

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Singida Black Stars is 250% better for: last-5 form.

1.4 pts / match - Singida Black Stars · 0.4 pts / match - Mtibwa Sugar

Singida Black Stars
LWDLW
Season result split
42% W19% R38% P
Season (W-D-L)
11-5-10
1.46 pts / match · goal difference -2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
7-0-4
Last 5 at home
2-0-3
LLLWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.34Opponent xG: 1.41BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 40%
Mtibwa Sugar
DDLLL
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
24% W38% R38% P
Season (W-D-L)
5-8-8
1.10 pts / match · goal difference -9
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-2-3
0.40 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
0-5-4
Last 5 away
0-3-2
DDLDL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.6Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 1.31Opponent xG: 1.79BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Singida Black Stars is 32% better for: goals scored per match.

1 goals / match - Singida Black Stars · 0.76 goals / match - Mtibwa Sugar

Singida Black Stars is 10% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.08 goals / match - Singida Black Stars · 1.19 goals / match - Mtibwa Sugar

Singida Black Stars scoring profile: strong

Singida Black Stars scores in 69% of matches (18 of 26 matches), while Mtibwa Sugar keeps a clean sheet in 29% (6 of 21 matches).

Mtibwa Sugar scoring profile: strong

Mtibwa Sugar scores in 57% of matches (12 of 21 matches), while Singida Black Stars keeps a clean sheet in 31% (8 of 26 matches).

26Goals scored (season)16
Singida Black StarsMtibwa Sugar
28Goals conceded (season)25
Singida Black StarsMtibwa Sugar
2.08Average goals in match1.95
Singida Black StarsMtibwa Sugar
6Goals scored (last 5)3
Singida Black StarsMtibwa Sugar
6Goals conceded (last 5)8
Singida Black StarsMtibwa Sugar

How often they score at least...

69%1 goal57%
Singida Black StarsMtibwa Sugar
15%2 goals19%
Singida Black StarsMtibwa Sugar
12%3 goals0%
Singida Black StarsMtibwa Sugar
4%4 goals0%
Singida Black StarsMtibwa Sugar

How often they concede at least...

69%1 goal71%
Singida Black StarsMtibwa Sugar
35%2 goals29%
Singida Black StarsMtibwa Sugar
4%3 goals19%
Singida Black StarsMtibwa Sugar
0%4 goals0%
Singida Black StarsMtibwa Sugar

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

42%
Singida Black Stars - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.11 of 26 matches
33%
League average

Goal patterns

12%BTTS at half-time19%
Singida Black StarsMtibwa Sugar
0%BTTS in both halves0%
Singida Black StarsMtibwa Sugar
15%Scored in both halves14%
Singida Black StarsMtibwa Sugar

BTTS and goal count

27%Min. 3 goals and BTTS29%
Singida Black StarsMtibwa Sugar
4%Min. 3 goals without BTTS10%
Singida Black StarsMtibwa Sugar
60%BTTS - last 560%
Singida Black StarsMtibwa Sugar

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

38%Min. 1 goal before half-time67%
Singida Black StarsMtibwa Sugar
27%Min. 2 goals before half-time33%
Singida Black StarsMtibwa Sugar
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
Singida Black StarsMtibwa Sugar

2nd half

50%Min. 1 goal after half-time62%
Singida Black StarsMtibwa Sugar
23%Min. 2 goals after half-time14%
Singida Black StarsMtibwa Sugar
12%Min. 3 goals after half-time10%
Singida Black StarsMtibwa Sugar

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Singida Black Stars is 78% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.19 pts / match - Singida Black Stars · 0.67 pts / match - Mtibwa Sugar

Singida Black Stars - half-time state
15% leading73% draw12% trailing
Mtibwa Sugar - half-time state
5% leading52% draw43% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.19Points per match (1st half)0.67
Singida Black StarsMtibwa Sugar
0.31Goals scored (1st half)0.24
Singida Black StarsMtibwa Sugar
0.35Goals conceded (1st half)0.76
Singida Black StarsMtibwa Sugar
0.65Average goals (1st half)1
Singida Black StarsMtibwa Sugar
77%Clean sheet before half-time38%
Singida Black StarsMtibwa Sugar
73%No goal before half-time76%
Singida Black StarsMtibwa Sugar

After half-time (2nd half)

1.31Points per match (2nd half)1.29
Singida Black StarsMtibwa Sugar
0.5Goals scored (2nd half)0.43
Singida Black StarsMtibwa Sugar
0.35Goals conceded (2nd half)0.43
Singida Black StarsMtibwa Sugar
0.85Average goals (2nd half)0.86
Singida Black StarsMtibwa Sugar
69%Clean sheet after half-time67%
Singida Black StarsMtibwa Sugar
62%No goal after half-time57%
Singida Black StarsMtibwa Sugar

Singida Black Stars - second-half results

23% W62% R15% P
31
Half-time points
8
Half-time goals
-1
Goal difference (1st half)
34
Second-half points
+4
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.19
PPG before half-time
Lead holding280%

Leads at half-time in 15% of matches and wins 42%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Mtibwa Sugar - second-half results

29% W43% R29% P
14
Half-time points
5
Half-time goals
-11
Goal difference (1st half)
27
Second-half points
0
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.67
PPG before half-time
Lead holding480%

Leads at half-time in 5% of matches and wins 24%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.3

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Singida Black Stars - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.402.00
Goals scored / match0.40.8
Goals conceded / match0.80.4
Average goals in match1.21.2
1 goal80%80%
2 goals40%20%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet60%60%
No goal60%40%
Goal difference-2+2
Half-time: 40% leading - 20% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 20% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 2
Mtibwa Sugar - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.800.80
Goals scored / match0.20.4
Goals conceded / match0.80.8
Average goals in match1.01.2
1 goal80%80%
2 goals20%20%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet40%40%
No goal80%60%
Goal difference-3-2
Half-time: 20% leading - 20% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 20% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Singida Black Stars
ScoredConceded
9
15
0-15
1
1
16-30
3
3
31-45
4
2
46-60
6
2
61-75
3
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (9 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (15). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.

Mtibwa Sugar
ScoredConceded
2
6
0-15
1
4
16-30
4
6
31-45
1
3
46-60
1
3
61-75
7
3
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (7 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.02
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.1 : 0.9
Estimated goal split
home : away
100%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
45%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+49%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
39%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
13%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 8 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Singida Black Stars

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.02
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.10
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+1.9 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.37
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.27
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
81%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
137%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.06
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
12% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 35% come in the first quarter-hour.
12%

Mtibwa Sugar

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.51
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.08
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+4.7 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.22
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.30
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
96%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
97%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.70
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
44% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 13% come in the first quarter-hour.
44%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ligi kuu Bara).

Teams vs league

Singida Black StarsLigaMtibwa Sugar
Average goals in match 2.082.02 1.95
Both teams scored 42%33% 48%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 31%36% 38%
Clean sheets 31%41% 29%
Goal before half-time 38%55% 67%
Goal after half-time 50%60% 62%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.02
Average goals per match
33%
Both teams scored
36%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
41%
Clean sheets
1.23
Home goals / match
0.79
Away goals / match
+56%
Home attack advantage
+36%
Home defence advantage
+22%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
55%
1 goal
27%
2 goals
6%
3 goals
1%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
60%
1 goal
24%
2 goals
11%
3 goals
2%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Home team

Other recorded players

Ande Koffi Habib CirilleA 2
Emmanuel Keyekeh⚽ 1
Lamine Diadhiou⚽ 1 · A 1
Mossi Nduwumwe⚽ 2

Away team

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Singida Black StarsGoalMossi Nduwumwe
  2. Singida Black StarsGoalMossi NduwumweAssist: Lamine Diadhiou
  3. Singida Black StarsGoalLamine DiadhiouAssist: Ande Koffi Habib Cirille
  4. Singida Black StarsGoalEmmanuel KeyekehAssist: Ande Koffi Habib Cirille

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (2): Singida Black Stars 1 - 0 - 1 Mtibwa Sugar. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 50% matches.

Mtibwa Sugar
1 : 3
Singida Black Stars
Mtibwa Sugar
2 : 0
Singida Black Stars

FAQ

What was the result of Singida Black Stars vs Mtibwa Sugar?

The Ligi kuu Bara match finished Singida Black Stars 4:0 Mtibwa Sugar. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Singida Black Stars and Mtibwa Sugar?

In the last 2 head-to-head matches Singida Black Stars won 1, Mtibwa Sugar won 1 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Singida Black Stars vs Mtibwa Sugar?

Singida Black Stars score 1.00 goals per game on average and Mtibwa Sugar 0.76. The Ligi kuu Bara average is 2.02 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 36% of games. Both teams score in 42% of Singida Black Stars's matches and 48% of Mtibwa Sugar's.

What form are Singida Black Stars and Mtibwa Sugar in?

Over the last 5 games Singida Black Stars have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and Mtibwa Sugar 0-2-3 (0.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Singida Black Stars vs Mtibwa Sugar?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Singida Black Stars vs Mtibwa Sugar: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.