SJ Earthquakes vs Portland Timbers: match statistics
SJ Earthquakes vs Portland Timbers: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
SJ Earthquakes played Portland Timbers in MLS (United States). The match was played on 27 September 2026. Venue: PayPal Park. Final score: 3:1.
Current form
SJ Earthquakes: 2-3-0, 1.80 points/match. Portland Timbers: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match.
Goal statistics
SJ Earthquakes scores 1.77 and concedes 1.46 goals per match. Portland Timbers scores 1.81 and concedes 1.85. League average: 3.21 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: SJ Earthquakes 62%, Portland Timbers 77%. Over 2.5: SJ Earthquakes 58%, Portland Timbers 73%. League level: BTTS 63%, Over 2.5 62%.
xG, shots and style
SJ Earthquakes has higher xG: 1.54 vs 1.53. SJ Earthquakes: 13.7 shots per match, Portland Timbers: 13.5.
Match halves
SJ Earthquakes: half-time lead 38%, second-half goals 0.88. Portland Timbers: half-time lead 27%, second-half goals 0.96.
Goals by minute
SJ Earthquakes: 0-15 (11 goals). Portland Timbers: 76-90+ (12 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
MLS: 3.21 goals per match, BTTS 63%, Over 2.5 62%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 1-0-0. Average goals 4.00, BTTS 100%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
SJ Earthquakes are unbeaten in their last five matches, recording 2 wins and 3 draws, while Portland Timbers have lost 3 of their last 5 games and collected just 4 points in that span. At home, the hosts create significantly more chances, averaging 16.62 shots and 6.38 shots on target per match, compared with 13.25 and 4.08 respectively for the visitors away from home. The quality of chances also favors San Jose, whose home xG stands at 1.84, while Portland concede as much as 2.12 xG away from home and allow an average of 1.92 goals. Timbers have failed to keep a clean sheet in any away match, and in addition, they have failed to score in 33% of such fixtures. Earthquakes also concede 1.62 goals per game at home, so a goal for the visitors is possible; however, the hosts’ superior current form and attacking potential point to a home win.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
The signal for both teams to score is very strong: BTTS occurred in 86% of SJ Earthquakes matches and 67% of Portland Timbers matches, compared with a league average of 63%. The hosts score an average of 2.21 goals per match, while Portland concede 1.92, with the visitors recording a 0% clean-sheet rate. Portland score an average of 1.33 goals, while the SJ Earthquakes defence has kept a clean sheet in only 7% of matches and concedes 1.79 goals per game. In their last five appearances, the Timbers recorded BTTS in 80% of matches and scored an average of 1.8 goals, while their opponents conceded as many as 2.2 goals per game. The xG figures also support a Goal/Goal scenario, standing at 1.62 for the hosts and 1.44 for the visitors.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
SJ Earthquakes score an average of 2.21 goals at home, while Portland Timbers concede as many as 1.92 goals per away game, clearly supporting the hosts’ attacking output. The xG profile also points to an open game: 1.62 xG for SJ Earthquakes and 1.44 xG for Portland, with the visitors conceding an average of 2.12 xG. In their last five matches, Portland have scored 9 goals but also conceded 11, while 80% of their games during this period went Over 2.5 goals. At least two goals were scored in 93% of SJ Earthquakes’ matches and in every Portland fixture, making Over 1.5 goals the strongest pick. An additional argument is that both teams rarely keep clean sheets: the hosts in 7% of their matches, and the visitors in none.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
SJ Earthquakes have been clearly stronger throughout the season, averaging 2.21 goals per match and winning 50% of their games, while Portland are averaging just 0.67 points per match and have lost 67% of their fixtures. The hosts also hold a clear edge in chance quality, with an xG of 1.62, while Portland allow opponents an xG as high as 2.12. In their last five matches, Earthquakes led at the break in 60% of cases and conceded just 0.4 goals before half-time, whereas the Timbers were behind after 45 minutes in 60% of matches, conceding an average of 1.2 goals. After the interval, the hosts score an average of 1.14 goals while conceding just 0.64, reinforcing the scenario of them maintaining or extending their lead. Portland remain dangerous, scoring an average of 1.33 goals per match, but their 1.92 goals conceded and lack of clean sheets support an HT/FT prediction of SJ Earthquakes leading at half-time and securing the full-time win (1/1).
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| SJ Earthquakes | Portland Timbers | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 38% | 33% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.35 | 0.41 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
SJ Earthquakes is 125% better for: last-5 form.
1.8 pts / match - SJ Earthquakes · 0.8 pts / match - Portland Timbers
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
SJ Earthquakes is 27% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.46 goals / match - SJ Earthquakes · 1.85 goals / match - Portland Timbers
SJ Earthquakes scores in 85% of matches (22 of 26 matches), while Portland Timbers keeps a clean sheet in 4% (1 of 26 matches).
Portland Timbers scores in 81% of matches (21 of 26 matches), while SJ Earthquakes keeps a clean sheet in 27% (7 of 26 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - SJ Earthquakes
Over / Under - Portland Timbers
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
SJ Earthquakes is 44% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.5 pts / match - SJ Earthquakes · 1.04 pts / match - Portland Timbers
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
SJ Earthquakes - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 38% of matches and wins 46%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Portland Timbers - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 27% of matches and wins 35%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 2.00 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.0 | 0.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 1.4 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 40% |
| No goal | 40% | 80% |
| Goal difference | +3 | -1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.80 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.8 | 1.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.2 | 1.0 |
| Average goals in match | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 0% | 20% |
| No goal | 60% | 20% |
| Goal difference | -2 | 0 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (11 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (12 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
SJ Earthquakes
Portland Timbers
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (MLS).
Teams vs league
| SJ Earthquakes | Liga | Portland Timbers | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | • 3.23 | 3.21 | ▲ 3.65 |
| Both teams scored | • 62% | 63% | ▲ 77% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 58% | 62% | ▲ 73% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 27% | 21% | ▼ 4% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 85% | 77% | ▲ 100% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 73% | 81% | • 81% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: SJ Earthquakes 1 - 0 - 0 Portland Timbers. Average goals 4.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of SJ Earthquakes vs Portland Timbers?
The MLS match finished SJ Earthquakes 3:1 Portland Timbers. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before SJ Earthquakes vs Portland Timbers?
SJ Earthquakes score 1.77 goals per game on average and Portland Timbers 1.81. The MLS average is 3.21 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 62% of games. Both teams score in 62% of SJ Earthquakes's matches and 77% of Portland Timbers's.
What form are SJ Earthquakes and Portland Timbers in?
Over the last 5 games SJ Earthquakes have a 2-3-0 record (1.80 points per game) and Portland Timbers 1-1-3 (0.80 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for SJ Earthquakes vs Portland Timbers?
The statistical background for SJ Earthquakes vs Portland Timbers — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.


