United States - MLSPayPal ParkData current as of 15 October 2026

SJ Earthquakes vs Portland Timbers: match statistics

SJ Earthquakes vs Portland Timbers: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

SJ Earthquakes played Portland Timbers in MLS (United States). The match was played on 27 September 2026. Venue: PayPal Park. Final score: 3:1.

Current form

SJ Earthquakes: 2-3-0, 1.80 points/match. Portland Timbers: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match.

Goal statistics

SJ Earthquakes scores 1.77 and concedes 1.46 goals per match. Portland Timbers scores 1.81 and concedes 1.85. League average: 3.21 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: SJ Earthquakes 62%, Portland Timbers 77%. Over 2.5: SJ Earthquakes 58%, Portland Timbers 73%. League level: BTTS 63%, Over 2.5 62%.

xG, shots and style

SJ Earthquakes has higher xG: 1.54 vs 1.53. SJ Earthquakes: 13.7 shots per match, Portland Timbers: 13.5.

Match halves

SJ Earthquakes: half-time lead 38%, second-half goals 0.88. Portland Timbers: half-time lead 27%, second-half goals 0.96.

Goals by minute

SJ Earthquakes: 0-15 (11 goals). Portland Timbers: 76-90+ (12 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

MLS: 3.21 goals per match, BTTS 63%, Over 2.5 62%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 1-0-0. Average goals 4.00, BTTS 100%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

SJ Earthquakes are unbeaten in their last five matches, recording 2 wins and 3 draws, while Portland Timbers have lost 3 of their last 5 games and collected just 4 points in that span. At home, the hosts create significantly more chances, averaging 16.62 shots and 6.38 shots on target per match, compared with 13.25 and 4.08 respectively for the visitors away from home. The quality of chances also favors San Jose, whose home xG stands at 1.84, while Portland concede as much as 2.12 xG away from home and allow an average of 1.92 goals. Timbers have failed to keep a clean sheet in any away match, and in addition, they have failed to score in 33% of such fixtures. Earthquakes also concede 1.62 goals per game at home, so a goal for the visitors is possible; however, the hosts’ superior current form and attacking potential point to a home win.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The signal for both teams to score is very strong: BTTS occurred in 86% of SJ Earthquakes matches and 67% of Portland Timbers matches, compared with a league average of 63%. The hosts score an average of 2.21 goals per match, while Portland concede 1.92, with the visitors recording a 0% clean-sheet rate. Portland score an average of 1.33 goals, while the SJ Earthquakes defence has kept a clean sheet in only 7% of matches and concedes 1.79 goals per game. In their last five appearances, the Timbers recorded BTTS in 80% of matches and scored an average of 1.8 goals, while their opponents conceded as many as 2.2 goals per game. The xG figures also support a Goal/Goal scenario, standing at 1.62 for the hosts and 1.44 for the visitors.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

SJ Earthquakes score an average of 2.21 goals at home, while Portland Timbers concede as many as 1.92 goals per away game, clearly supporting the hosts’ attacking output. The xG profile also points to an open game: 1.62 xG for SJ Earthquakes and 1.44 xG for Portland, with the visitors conceding an average of 2.12 xG. In their last five matches, Portland have scored 9 goals but also conceded 11, while 80% of their games during this period went Over 2.5 goals. At least two goals were scored in 93% of SJ Earthquakes’ matches and in every Portland fixture, making Over 1.5 goals the strongest pick. An additional argument is that both teams rarely keep clean sheets: the hosts in 7% of their matches, and the visitors in none.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

SJ Earthquakes have been clearly stronger throughout the season, averaging 2.21 goals per match and winning 50% of their games, while Portland are averaging just 0.67 points per match and have lost 67% of their fixtures. The hosts also hold a clear edge in chance quality, with an xG of 1.62, while Portland allow opponents an xG as high as 2.12. In their last five matches, Earthquakes led at the break in 60% of cases and conceded just 0.4 goals before half-time, whereas the Timbers were behind after 45 minutes in 60% of matches, conceding an average of 1.2 goals. After the interval, the hosts score an average of 1.14 goals while conceding just 0.64, reinforcing the scenario of them maintaining or extending their lead. Portland remain dangerous, scoring an average of 1.33 goals per match, but their 1.92 goals conceded and lack of clean sheets support an HT/FT prediction of SJ Earthquakes leading at half-time and securing the full-time win (1/1).

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

3 : 0
1st half
0 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

46Possession (%)54
SJ EarthquakesPortland Timbers
13Shots18
SJ EarthquakesPortland Timbers
8Shots on target6
SJ EarthquakesPortland Timbers
1.56xG2.07
SJ EarthquakesPortland Timbers
5Corners9
SJ EarthquakesPortland Timbers
25Dangerous attacks71
SJ EarthquakesPortland Timbers
8Fouls11
SJ EarthquakesPortland Timbers
2Cards1
SJ EarthquakesPortland Timbers

Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

SJ EarthquakesPortland Timbers
1.77Goals scored / match1.81
SJ EarthquakesPortland Timbers
1.46Goals conceded / match1.85
SJ EarthquakesPortland Timbers
49%Average possession51%
SJ EarthquakesPortland Timbers
5.12Shots on target / match4.46
SJ EarthquakesPortland Timbers

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

13.65Shots per match13.5
SJ EarthquakesPortland Timbers
5.12Shots on target4.46
SJ EarthquakesPortland Timbers
13%Shot conversion13.4%
SJ EarthquakesPortland Timbers
49%Possession51%
SJ EarthquakesPortland Timbers
1.54xG for1.53
SJ EarthquakesPortland Timbers
1.4xG against1.83
SJ EarthquakesPortland Timbers

Shooting quality

SJ Earthquakes: Efficient finishingPortland Timbers: Efficient finishing
SJ EarthquakesPortland Timbers
Accuracy (shots on target)38%33%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.350.41

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

SJ Earthquakes is 125% better for: last-5 form.

1.8 pts / match - SJ Earthquakes · 0.8 pts / match - Portland Timbers

SJ Earthquakes
DDWWD
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
46% W23% D31% L
Season (W-D-L)
12-6-8
1.62 pts / match · goal difference +8
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-3-0
1.80 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
5-3-5
Last 5 at home
1-2-2
DLLWD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.44Opponent xG: 1.16BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 40%
Portland Timbers
LWDLL
Season result split
35% W19% D46% L
Season (W-D-L)
9-5-12
1.23 pts / match · goal difference -1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-3
0.80 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
2-2-8
Last 5 away
1-1-3
LWLDL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.8Goals conceded: 2.2xG: 1.70Opponent xG: 1.33BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 80%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

SJ Earthquakes is 27% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.46 goals / match - SJ Earthquakes · 1.85 goals / match - Portland Timbers

SJ Earthquakes scoring profile: very strong

SJ Earthquakes scores in 85% of matches (22 of 26 matches), while Portland Timbers keeps a clean sheet in 4% (1 of 26 matches).

Portland Timbers scoring profile: very strong

Portland Timbers scores in 81% of matches (21 of 26 matches), while SJ Earthquakes keeps a clean sheet in 27% (7 of 26 matches).

46Goals scored (season)47
SJ EarthquakesPortland Timbers
38Goals conceded (season)48
SJ EarthquakesPortland Timbers
3.23Average goals in match3.65
SJ EarthquakesPortland Timbers
7Goals scored (last 5)9
SJ EarthquakesPortland Timbers
5Goals conceded (last 5)11
SJ EarthquakesPortland Timbers

How often they score at least...

85%1 goal81%
SJ EarthquakesPortland Timbers
50%2 goals54%
SJ EarthquakesPortland Timbers
31%3 goals19%
SJ EarthquakesPortland Timbers
8%4 goals12%
SJ EarthquakesPortland Timbers

How often they concede at least...

73%1 goal96%
SJ EarthquakesPortland Timbers
35%2 goals62%
SJ EarthquakesPortland Timbers
23%3 goals19%
SJ EarthquakesPortland Timbers
12%4 goals8%
SJ EarthquakesPortland Timbers

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

77%
Portland Timbers - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.20 of 26 matches
63%
League average

Goal patterns

31%BTTS at half-time38%
SJ EarthquakesPortland Timbers
12%BTTS in both halves8%
SJ EarthquakesPortland Timbers
27%Scored in both halves42%
SJ EarthquakesPortland Timbers

BTTS and goal count

46%Min. 3 goals and BTTS69%
SJ EarthquakesPortland Timbers
12%Min. 3 goals without BTTS4%
SJ EarthquakesPortland Timbers
60%BTTS - last 580%
SJ EarthquakesPortland Timbers

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

85%Min. 1 goal before half-time100%
SJ EarthquakesPortland Timbers
46%Min. 2 goals before half-time54%
SJ EarthquakesPortland Timbers
15%Min. 3 goals before half-time23%
SJ EarthquakesPortland Timbers

2nd half

73%Min. 1 goal after half-time81%
SJ EarthquakesPortland Timbers
42%Min. 2 goals after half-time50%
SJ EarthquakesPortland Timbers
27%Min. 3 goals after half-time19%
SJ EarthquakesPortland Timbers

Match halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

SJ Earthquakes is 44% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.5 pts / match - SJ Earthquakes · 1.04 pts / match - Portland Timbers

SJ Earthquakes - half-time state
38% leading35% draw27% trailing
Portland Timbers - half-time state
27% leading23% draw50% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.5Points per match (1st half)1.04
SJ EarthquakesPortland Timbers
0.88Goals scored (1st half)0.85
SJ EarthquakesPortland Timbers
0.69Goals conceded (1st half)1.12
SJ EarthquakesPortland Timbers
1.58Average goals (1st half)1.96
SJ EarthquakesPortland Timbers
46%Clean sheet before half-time19%
SJ EarthquakesPortland Timbers
38%No goal before half-time42%
SJ EarthquakesPortland Timbers

After half-time (2nd half)

1.27Points per match (2nd half)1.54
SJ EarthquakesPortland Timbers
0.88Goals scored (2nd half)0.96
SJ EarthquakesPortland Timbers
0.77Goals conceded (2nd half)0.73
SJ EarthquakesPortland Timbers
1.65Average goals (2nd half)1.69
SJ EarthquakesPortland Timbers
50%Clean sheet after half-time50%
SJ EarthquakesPortland Timbers
50%No goal after half-time35%
SJ EarthquakesPortland Timbers

SJ Earthquakes - second-half results

31% W35% D35% L
39
Half-time points
23
Half-time goals
+5
Goal difference (1st half)
33
Second-half points
+3
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.50
PPG before half-time
Lead holding121%

Leads at half-time in 38% of matches and wins 46%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Portland Timbers - second-half results

38% W38% D23% L
27
Half-time points
22
Half-time goals
-7
Goal difference (1st half)
40
Second-half points
+6
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.04
PPG before half-time
Lead holding130%

Leads at half-time in 27% of matches and wins 35%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.4

Defence stays stable across the full match.

SJ Earthquakes - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.001.00
Goals scored / match1.00.4
Goals conceded / match0.40.6
Average goals in match1.41.0
1 goal80%60%
2 goals20%20%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal40%80%
Goal difference+3-1
Half-time: 60% leading - 20% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 5
Portland Timbers - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.801.00
Goals scored / match0.81.0
Goals conceded / match1.21.0
Average goals in match2.02.0
1 goal100%80%
2 goals40%80%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet0%20%
No goal60%20%
Goal difference-20
Half-time: 20% leading - 20% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 100% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 4

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

SJ Earthquakes
ScoredConceded
11
7
0-15
4
5
16-30
8
6
31-45
9
7
46-60
5
3
61-75
9
10
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (11 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

Portland Timbers
ScoredConceded
6
10
0-15
10
9
16-30
6
10
31-45
5
6
46-60
8
2
61-75
12
11
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (12 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.45
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.8 : 1.6
Estimated goal split
home : away
107%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
70%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+16%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
69%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
3%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 33 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

SJ Earthquakes

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.14
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.17
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-4.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.23
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.06
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
97%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
106%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.18
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
20% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 24% come in the first quarter-hour.
20%

Portland Timbers

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.30
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.26
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-6.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.28
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.02
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
131%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
101%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.43
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
26% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 13% come in the first quarter-hour.
26%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (MLS).

Teams vs league

SJ EarthquakesLigaPortland Timbers
Average goals in match• 3.233.21▲ 3.65
Both teams scored• 62%63%▲ 77%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▼ 58%62%▲ 73%
Clean sheets▲ 27%21%▼ 4%
Goal before half-time▲ 85%77%▲ 100%
Goal after half-time▼ 73%81%• 81%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.21
Average goals per match
63%
Both teams scored
62%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
21%
Clean sheets
1.83
Home goals / match
1.38
Away goals / match
+33%
Home attack advantage
+25%
Home defence advantage
+17%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
77%
1 goal
43%
2 goals
18%
3 goals
6%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
81%
1 goal
52%
2 goals
23%
3 goals
11%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. SJ EarthquakesGoalPreston JuddAssist: Eduard Löwen
  2. SJ EarthquakesGoalEduard LöwenAssist: Beau Leroux
  3. SJ EarthquakesGoalPreston JuddAssist: Paul Marie
  4. SJ EarthquakesYellow cardPreston Judd
  5. SJ EarthquakesYellow cardReid Roberts
  6. SJ EarthquakesSubstitutionOn: Benjamin KikanovicOff: Paul Marie
  7. SJ EarthquakesSubstitutionOn: Nick FernandezOff: Timo Werner
  8. Portland TimbersYellow cardEric Miller
  9. Portland TimbersSubstitutionOn: Gage GuerraOff: Vincent Janssen
  10. Portland TimbersGoalDavid Pereira da CostaAssist: Eric Izoita
  11. SJ EarthquakesSubstitutionOn: Jack SkahanOff: Beau Leroux
  12. Portland TimbersSubstitutionOn: Alexander Ernesto Aravena GuzmánOff: Eric Miller

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: SJ Earthquakes 1 - 0 - 0 Portland Timbers. Average goals 4.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.

FAQ

What was the result of SJ Earthquakes vs Portland Timbers?

The MLS match finished SJ Earthquakes 3:1 Portland Timbers. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before SJ Earthquakes vs Portland Timbers?

SJ Earthquakes score 1.77 goals per game on average and Portland Timbers 1.81. The MLS average is 3.21 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 62% of games. Both teams score in 62% of SJ Earthquakes's matches and 77% of Portland Timbers's.

What form are SJ Earthquakes and Portland Timbers in?

Over the last 5 games SJ Earthquakes have a 2-3-0 record (1.80 points per game) and Portland Timbers 1-1-3 (0.80 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for SJ Earthquakes vs Portland Timbers?

The statistical background for SJ Earthquakes vs Portland Timbers — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.