Latvia - 1. LigaData current as of 04 November 2026

Skanste vs Metta - LU: match statistics

Skanste crest
Skanste
1 : 2half-time 1:2
Metta - LU crest
Metta - LU

Skanste vs Metta - LU: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Skanste played Metta - LU in 1. Liga (Latvia). The match was played on 31 October 2026. Final score: 1:2.

Current form

Skanste: 1-0-4, 0.60 points/match. Metta - LU: 5-0-0, 3.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

Skanste scores 1.96 and concedes 2.13 goals per match. Metta - LU scores 4.08 and concedes 0.75. League average: 3.71 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Skanste 63%, Metta - LU 50%. Over 2.5: Skanste 71%, Metta - LU 83%. League level: BTTS 62%, Over 2.5 71%.

xG, shots and style

Metta - LU has higher xG: 2.86 vs 1.54. Skanste: 10.5 shots per match, Metta - LU: 19.7.

Match halves

Skanste: half-time lead 25%, second-half goals 0.96. Metta - LU: half-time lead 75%, second-half goals 1.83.

Goals by minute

Skanste: 46-60 (15 goals). Metta - LU: 31-45+ (24 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

1. Liga: 3.71 goals per match, BTTS 62%, Over 2.5 71%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-0-1. Average goals 4.00, BTTS 100%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Metta - LU sit top of the table and have won all of their last 5 matches, scoring 19 goals and conceding just 2; during the same period, Skanste have recorded 1 win, scored 8 goals and conceded 13. Away from home, the visitors win 75% of their matches and remain unbeaten, while the hosts lose 50% of their home games. Metta have a clear edge in chance creation: their away xG is 2.44 compared with Skanste’s 1.69 at home, while their average shots on target are 8.33 and 6.18 per match, respectively. The visitors score an average of 2.83 goals and concede 0.83 away from home, while Skanste score 2 and concede 1.75 at home. Home advantage gives the hosts a chance to find the net, but form, chance quality and a more solid defence all point to a Metta - LU victory.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Metta - LU have won their last five matches, conceding just 2 goals in that run—an average of 0.4 per game—which increases the risk of Skanste failing to score. Over the same period, the hosts averaged 1.6 goals scored and 2.6 conceded, while the visitors scored 3.8 goals per match. Although Skanste average as many as 5.33 goals at home, Metta - LU keep a clean sheet in 42% of their matches, and their average xG against is just 0.95. The share of matches in which both teams scored is 42% for Skanste and 58% for Metta - LU, so these figures do not provide a clear signal in favour of BTTS - Yes. Given the visitors’ current scoring form, an away win to nil appears more likely than goals at both ends. BTTS - No means that at least one team fails to score; it does not necessarily mean a 0-0 draw.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

In their last 5 matches, Skanste conceded an average of 2.6 goals, while Metta - LU scored 3.8 goals per game, pointing to significant scoring potential from the visitors. At the same time, the hosts scored 1.6 goals per game over this period, although the visitors conceded just 0.4, so I am more cautious in estimating the hosts’ contribution to the total. Across the season, Skanste’s matches went Over 1.5 goals in 100% of cases, compared with 92% for Metta - LU. Both teams also recorded at least 3 goals in 83% of their matches, but the visitors’ recent defensive solidity adds uncertainty at higher goal lines. Over 1.5 goals therefore remains the strongest signal: even if the hosts are less effective in front of goal, Metta - LU’s attacking output gives this line a clear edge.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The strongest signal is current form: Metta - LU have won their last five matches, while Skanste have lost four of their last five. The visitors held the lead at the break in four of those five matches and averaged 2.2 goals before half-time, compared with 0.8 for the hosts. The second-half figures also favour Metta - LU: across their last five matches, they averaged 1.6 goals scored and conceded none, while Skanste conceded an average of 1.8 goals. The season-long results pose a risk to the 2/2 pick, as Skanste led at the break in 92% of matches and won 92% of them, so scenarios featuring the hosts in front remain a significant part of the forecast. Nevertheless, the visitors’ clear edge in recent results both before and after half-time makes a lead at the break followed by a win at full-time the most likely single scenario.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

1 : 2
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

-1Possession (%)-1
SkansteMetta - LU
-1Shots-1
SkansteMetta - LU
-1Shots on target-1
SkansteMetta - LU
0xG0
SkansteMetta - LU
-1Corners-1
SkansteMetta - LU
0Dangerous attacks0
SkansteMetta - LU
-1Fouls-1
SkansteMetta - LU
-1Cards-1
SkansteMetta - LU

Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.96Goals scored / match4.08
SkansteMetta - LU
2.13Goals conceded / match0.75
SkansteMetta - LU
42%Average possession51%
SkansteMetta - LU
5Shots on target / match10.25
SkansteMetta - LU

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

10.54Shots per match19.67
SkansteMetta - LU
5Shots on target10.25
SkansteMetta - LU
18.6%Shot conversion20.8%
SkansteMetta - LU
42%Possession51%
SkansteMetta - LU
1.54xG for2.86
SkansteMetta - LU
1.8xG against0.83
SkansteMetta - LU

Shooting quality

Skanste: Counter-attackingMetta - LU: Attacking
SkansteMetta - LU
Accuracy (shots on target)47%52%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.150.15
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.390.40

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Metta - LU is 400% better for: last-5 form.

0.6 pts / match - Skanste · 3 pts / match - Metta - LU

Skanste
WLLLL
Season result split
33% W8% D58% L
Season (W-D-L)
8-2-14
1.08 pts / match · goal difference -4
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-0-4
0.60 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
5-1-6
Last 5 at home
3-0-2
WWWLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 2.6xG: 1.44Opponent xG: 1.97BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%
Metta - LU
WWWWW
5 wins in a row
Season result split
83% W13% D4% L
Season (W-D-L)
20-3-1
2.63 pts / match · goal difference +80
Last 5 (W-D-L)
5-0-0
3.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
9-3-0
Last 5 away
4-1-0
WWDWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 3.8Goals conceded: 0.4xG: 2.58Opponent xG: 1.11BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 80%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Metta - LU is 108% better for: goals scored per match.

1.96 goals / match - Skanste · 4.08 goals / match - Metta - LU

Metta - LU is 184% better for: goals conceded per match.

2.13 goals / match - Skanste · 0.75 goals / match - Metta - LU

Skanste scoring profile: mixed

Skanste scores in 71% of matches (17 of 24 matches), while Metta - LU keeps a clean sheet in 50% (12 of 24 matches).

Metta - LU scoring profile: very strong

Metta - LU scores in 100% of matches (24 of 24 matches), while Skanste keeps a clean sheet in 8% (2 of 24 matches).

47Goals scored (season)98
SkansteMetta - LU
51Goals conceded (season)18
SkansteMetta - LU
4.08Average goals in match4.83
SkansteMetta - LU
8Goals scored (last 5)19
SkansteMetta - LU
13Goals conceded (last 5)2
SkansteMetta - LU

How often they score at least...

71%1 goal100%
SkansteMetta - LU
42%2 goals92%
SkansteMetta - LU
33%3 goals67%
SkansteMetta - LU
29%4 goals42%
SkansteMetta - LU

How often they concede at least...

92%1 goal50%
SkansteMetta - LU
71%2 goals21%
SkansteMetta - LU
38%3 goals4%
SkansteMetta - LU
13%4 goals0%
SkansteMetta - LU

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

62%
League average

Goal patterns

38%BTTS at half-time21%
SkansteMetta - LU
17%BTTS in both halves0%
SkansteMetta - LU
29%Scored in both halves67%
SkansteMetta - LU

BTTS and goal count

54%Min. 3 goals and BTTS50%
SkansteMetta - LU
17%Min. 3 goals without BTTS33%
SkansteMetta - LU
60%BTTS - last 540%
SkansteMetta - LU

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

79%Min. 1 goal before half-time83%
SkansteMetta - LU
54%Min. 2 goals before half-time58%
SkansteMetta - LU
25%Min. 3 goals before half-time42%
SkansteMetta - LU

2nd half

83%Min. 1 goal after half-time88%
SkansteMetta - LU
58%Min. 2 goals after half-time67%
SkansteMetta - LU
42%Min. 3 goals after half-time46%
SkansteMetta - LU

Match halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Metta - LU is 118% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.13 pts / match - Skanste · 2.46 pts / match - Metta - LU

Skanste - half-time state
25% leading38% draw38% trailing
Metta - LU - half-time state
75% leading21% draw4% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.13Points per match (1st half)2.46
SkansteMetta - LU
0.75Goals scored (1st half)2.17
SkansteMetta - LU
1Goals conceded (1st half)0.25
SkansteMetta - LU
1.75Average goals (1st half)2.42
SkansteMetta - LU
25%Clean sheet before half-time75%
SkansteMetta - LU
58%No goal before half-time21%
SkansteMetta - LU

After half-time (2nd half)

1.13Points per match (2nd half)2.21
SkansteMetta - LU
0.96Goals scored (2nd half)1.83
SkansteMetta - LU
1.08Goals conceded (2nd half)0.42
SkansteMetta - LU
2.04Average goals (2nd half)2.25
SkansteMetta - LU
38%Clean sheet after half-time71%
SkansteMetta - LU
46%No goal after half-time17%
SkansteMetta - LU

Skanste - second-half results

29% W25% D46% L
27
Half-time points
18
Half-time goals
-6
Goal difference (1st half)
27
Second-half points
-3
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.13
PPG before half-time
Lead holding132%

Leads at half-time in 25% of matches and wins 33%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Metta - LU - second-half results

67% W21% D13% L
59
Half-time points
52
Half-time goals
+46
Goal difference (1st half)
53
Second-half points
+34
Goal difference (2nd half)
2.46
PPG before half-time
Lead holding111%

Leads at half-time in 75% of matches and wins 83%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Skanste - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.600.40
Goals scored / match0.80.8
Goals conceded / match0.81.8
Average goals in match1.62.6
1 goal60%100%
2 goals60%80%
3 goals40%40%
Clean sheet40%0%
No goal60%40%
Goal difference0-5
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 40% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 4
Metta - LU - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.602.60
Goals scored / match2.21.6
Goals conceded / match0.40.0
Average goals in match2.61.6
1 goal100%80%
2 goals100%40%
3 goals60%20%
Clean sheet60%100%
No goal0%20%
Goal difference+9+8
Half-time: 80% leading - 20% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 80% won - 20% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 11

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Skanste
ScoredConceded
12
3
0-15
6
9
16-30
6
13
31-45
15
9
46-60
4
6
61-75
4
11
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (15 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (13). Late-goal balance (76-90): -7 - late phases are a weakness.

Metta - LU
ScoredConceded
14
3
0-15
16
2
16-30
24
3
31-45
15
6
46-60
12
1
61-75
17
3
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (24 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +14 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

4.46
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.4 : 3.1
Estimated goal split
home : away
120%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
57%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-10%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
71%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
0%
0:0 risk
practically zero
4+
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Skanste

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.26
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.09
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-7.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.42
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.33
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
96%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
128%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.48
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
9% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 26% come in the first quarter-hour.
9%

Metta - LU

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+2.03
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+1.30
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-6.7 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+1.22
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.08
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
244%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
37%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.37
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.3
Late goals
17% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 14% come in the first quarter-hour.
17%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (1. Liga).

Teams vs league

SkansteLigaMetta - LU
Average goals in match▲ 4.083.71▲ 4.83
Both teams scored• 63%62%▼ 50%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)• 71%71%▲ 83%
Clean sheets▼ 8%21%▲ 50%
Goal before half-time▲ 79%77%▲ 83%
Goal after half-time• 83%83%▲ 88%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.71
Average goals per match
62%
Both teams scored
71%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
21%
Clean sheets
2.05
Home goals / match
1.67
Away goals / match
+23%
Home attack advantage
+19%
Home defence advantage
+9%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
77%
1 goal
48%
2 goals
24%
3 goals
6%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
83%
1 goal
60%
2 goals
35%
3 goals
13%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Home team

Other recorded players

—Aleks Scerbinskis⚽ 1

Away team

Other recorded players

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Metta - LUGoalSadiq Saleh
  2. Metta - LUGoalSadiq Saleh
  3. SkansteGoalAleks Scerbinskis

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Skanste 0 - 0 - 1 Metta - LU. Average goals 4.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.

FAQ

What was the result of Skanste vs Metta - LU?

The 1. Liga match finished Skanste 1:2 Metta - LU. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Skanste vs Metta - LU?

Skanste score 1.96 goals per game on average and Metta - LU 4.08. The 1. Liga average is 3.71 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 71% of games. Both teams score in 63% of Skanste's matches and 50% of Metta - LU's.

What form are Skanste and Metta - LU in?

Over the last 5 games Skanste have a 1-0-4 record (0.60 points per game) and Metta - LU 5-0-0 (3.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Skanste vs Metta - LU?

The statistical background for Skanste vs Metta - LU — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.