Ireland - Premier DivisionData current as of 30 August 2026

Sligo Rovers vs Waterford: match statistics

Sligo Rovers crest
Sligo Rovers
0 : 0half-time 0:0
Waterford crest
Waterford

Sligo Rovers vs Waterford: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Sligo Rovers played Waterford in Premier Division (Ireland). The match was played on 21 August 2026. Final score: 0:0.

Current form

Sligo Rovers: 0-2-3, 0.40 points/match. Waterford: 3-2-0, 2.20 points/match.

Goal statistics

Sligo Rovers scores 0.85 and concedes 1.67 goals per match. Waterford scores 1.37 and concedes 1.78. League average: 2.76 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Sligo Rovers 48%, Waterford 59%. Over 2.5: Sligo Rovers 48%, Waterford 48%. League level: BTTS 61%, Over 2.5 51%.

xG, shots and style

Waterford has higher xG: 1.39 vs 1.09. Sligo Rovers: 9.6 shots per match, Waterford: 12.8.

Match halves

Sligo Rovers: half-time lead 26%, second-half goals 0.41. Waterford: half-time lead 26%, second-half goals 0.74.

Goals by minute

Sligo Rovers: 16-30 (6 goals). Waterford: 31-45+ (10 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Premier Division: 2.76 goals per match, BTTS 61%, Over 2.5 51%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 7 previous H2H matches were available: 4-1-2. Average goals 2.71, BTTS 29%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Waterford are in clearly better form, collecting 13 points from their last five matches through four wins and a draw, scoring 8 goals and conceding just 3. Sligo Rovers have also improved their results, recording 2 wins, 2 draws and a defeat with an 11:5 goal difference, but remain 10th overall for the season, having scored 23 goals in 27 matches. Away from home, the visitors create more chances, averaging 13.15 shots and 3.54 on target per match, compared with Sligo’s 10.85 and 2.92. The hosts’ home advantage is tempered by the fact that Waterford concede an average of as many as 2.46 goals away from home and have kept clean sheets in just 8% of matches, although their recent defensive efficiency has clearly reversed this trend. The visitors’ superior form and greater attacking potential point to a narrow victory, although Sligo scoring remains highly likely.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Seasonal BTTS indicators favor goals from both sides: they stand at 57% for Sligo Rovers and 62% for Waterford, compared with the league average of 60%. Waterford concede as many as 2.46 goals per away game on average, while Sligo score 1.36 at home, clearly strengthening the hosts’ chances of finding the net. The visitors score an average of 1.38 goals, while Sligo allow opponents an xG of 1.83, so Waterford should create enough chances to score once. Both teams have comparable attacking potential in terms of chance quality, with an xG of 1.40 for the hosts and 1.39 for the visitors. However, recent defensive form increases the risk to the pick, as the teams have conceded only 1.0 and 0.6 goals per game respectively across their last five matches. Therefore, the BTTS edge is moderate rather than decisive.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Sligo Rovers average 1.36 goals at home, while Waterford concede as many as 2.46 goals per away match, which clearly strengthens the hosts’ attacking potential. The quality-of-chances metrics support this: Sligo’s average xG stands at 1.40, while Waterford’s opponents are allowed 2.17 xG. In their last five matches, Sligo scored 11 goals, averaging 2.2 per game, and both teams finished with Over 2.5 goals in 60% of those fixtures. The 1.5 line was covered in 79% of Sligo’s matches and 85% of Waterford’s games this season, making Over 1.5 the strongest and least risky signal. An expected total of 2.75 goals suggests a realistic chance of a higher-scoring game, but the data for Over 2.5 is more balanced due to Waterford’s solid recent defensive form, with just 3 goals conceded in five matches.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Sligo Rovers held the lead at the break in 60% of their last five matches, scoring an average of 1.2 goals before half-time and conceding just 0.2. Waterford went into half-time level in as many as 60% of their recent appearances, which also supports the draw-at-half-time scenario, but the hosts have a clearly stronger first-half signal. Across the season, Waterford lost 62% of their away matches and conceded an average of 2.46 goals, keeping a clean sheet in just 8% of games. After the break, Sligo score an average of 0.86 goals and record 1.71 points per match, while their opponents concede as many as 1.46 goals in this period and collect only 0.69 points. Although Waterford have won 80% of their last five matches, the hosts' second-half advantage and the visitors' poor away defensive record make Sligo leading at half-time and winning at full-time the most likely scenario.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

49Possession (%)51
Sligo RoversWaterford
13Shots19
Sligo RoversWaterford
4Shots on target4
Sligo RoversWaterford
1.34xG1.95
Sligo RoversWaterford
6Corners7
Sligo RoversWaterford
32Dangerous attacks66
Sligo RoversWaterford
8Fouls14
Sligo RoversWaterford
0Cards3
Sligo RoversWaterford

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Sligo RoversWaterford
0.85Goals scored / match1.37
Sligo RoversWaterford
1.67Goals conceded / match1.78
Sligo RoversWaterford
47%Average possession38%
Sligo RoversWaterford
2.78Shots on target / match3.89
Sligo RoversWaterford

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

9.59Shots per match12.81
Sligo RoversWaterford
2.78Shots on target3.89
Sligo RoversWaterford
8.9%Shot conversion10.7%
Sligo RoversWaterford
47%Possession38%
Sligo RoversWaterford
1.09xG for1.39
Sligo RoversWaterford
2.05xG against1.99
Sligo RoversWaterford

Shooting quality

Sligo Rovers: BalancedWaterford: Balanced
Sligo RoversWaterford
Accuracy (shots on target)29%30%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.310.35

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Waterford is 450% better for: last-5 form.

0.4 pts / match - Sligo Rovers · 2.2 pts / match - Waterford

Sligo Rovers
LLDDL
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
19% W26% R56% P
Season (W-D-L)
5-7-15
0.81 pts / match · goal difference -22
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-2-3
0.40 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
3-4-6
Last 5 at home
0-2-3
LLDLD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 2.0xG: 1.00Opponent xG: 2.24BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 60%
Waterford
WDDWW
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
22% W37% R41% P
Season (W-D-L)
6-10-11
1.04 pts / match · goal difference -11
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-2-0
2.20 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
2-3-8
Last 5 away
2-2-1
LDWWD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.8Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 1.56Opponent xG: 1.87BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Waterford is 61% better for: goals scored per match.

0.85 goals / match - Sligo Rovers · 1.37 goals / match - Waterford

Sligo Rovers is 7% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.67 goals / match - Sligo Rovers · 1.78 goals / match - Waterford

Sligo Rovers scoring profile: strong

Sligo Rovers scores in 56% of matches (15 of 27 matches), while Waterford keeps a clean sheet in 15% (4 of 27 matches).

Waterford scoring profile: very strong

Waterford scores in 67% of matches (18 of 27 matches), while Sligo Rovers keeps a clean sheet in 19% (5 of 27 matches).

23Goals scored (season)37
Sligo RoversWaterford
45Goals conceded (season)48
Sligo RoversWaterford
2.52Average goals in match3.15
Sligo RoversWaterford
6Goals scored (last 5)9
Sligo RoversWaterford
10Goals conceded (last 5)4
Sligo RoversWaterford

How often they score at least...

56%1 goal67%
Sligo RoversWaterford
30%2 goals37%
Sligo RoversWaterford
0%3 goals26%
Sligo RoversWaterford
0%4 goals7%
Sligo RoversWaterford

How often they concede at least...

81%1 goal85%
Sligo RoversWaterford
48%2 goals52%
Sligo RoversWaterford
22%3 goals22%
Sligo RoversWaterford
15%4 goals15%
Sligo RoversWaterford

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

61%
League average

Goal patterns

19%BTTS at half-time26%
Sligo RoversWaterford
0%BTTS in both halves11%
Sligo RoversWaterford
19%Scored in both halves30%
Sligo RoversWaterford

BTTS and goal count

41%Min. 3 goals and BTTS41%
Sligo RoversWaterford
7%Min. 3 goals without BTTS7%
Sligo RoversWaterford
80%BTTS - last 560%
Sligo RoversWaterford

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

70%Min. 1 goal before half-time85%
Sligo RoversWaterford
22%Min. 2 goals before half-time37%
Sligo RoversWaterford
11%Min. 3 goals before half-time19%
Sligo RoversWaterford

2nd half

74%Min. 1 goal after half-time81%
Sligo RoversWaterford
52%Min. 2 goals after half-time41%
Sligo RoversWaterford
19%Min. 3 goals after half-time33%
Sligo RoversWaterford

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Sligo Rovers is 7% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.15 pts / match - Sligo Rovers · 1.07 pts / match - Waterford

Sligo Rovers - half-time state
26% leading37% draw37% trailing
Waterford - half-time state
26% leading30% draw44% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.15Points per match (1st half)1.07
Sligo RoversWaterford
0.44Goals scored (1st half)0.63
Sligo RoversWaterford
0.59Goals conceded (1st half)0.81
Sligo RoversWaterford
1.04Average goals (1st half)1.44
Sligo RoversWaterford
52%Clean sheet before half-time37%
Sligo RoversWaterford
59%No goal before half-time52%
Sligo RoversWaterford

After half-time (2nd half)

0.81Points per match (2nd half)1.22
Sligo RoversWaterford
0.41Goals scored (2nd half)0.74
Sligo RoversWaterford
1.07Goals conceded (2nd half)0.96
Sligo RoversWaterford
1.48Average goals (2nd half)1.7
Sligo RoversWaterford
41%Clean sheet after half-time41%
Sligo RoversWaterford
67%No goal after half-time52%
Sligo RoversWaterford

Sligo Rovers - second-half results

15% W37% R48% P
31
Half-time points
12
Half-time goals
-4
Goal difference (1st half)
22
Second-half points
-18
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.15
PPG before half-time
Lead holding73%

Leads at half-time in 26% of matches and wins 19%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time+0.5

Concedes 0.5 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Waterford - second-half results

33% W22% R44% P
29
Half-time points
17
Half-time goals
-5
Goal difference (1st half)
33
Second-half points
-6
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.07
PPG before half-time
Lead holding85%

Leads at half-time in 26% of matches and wins 22%. Usually protects the lead until full-time.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Sligo Rovers - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.600.40
Goals scored / match0.60.6
Goals conceded / match0.41.6
Average goals in match1.02.2
1 goal60%100%
2 goals20%80%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet60%0%
No goal60%60%
Goal difference+1-5
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 40% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 3
Waterford - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.201.40
Goals scored / match1.00.8
Goals conceded / match0.00.8
Average goals in match1.01.6
1 goal60%80%
2 goals20%20%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet100%40%
No goal40%60%
Goal difference+50
Half-time: 60% leading - 40% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 5

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Sligo Rovers
ScoredConceded
3
8
0-15
6
4
16-30
3
4
31-45
6
6
46-60
1
11
61-75
4
12
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (6 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): -8 - late phases are a weakness.

Waterford
ScoredConceded
3
7
0-15
4
8
16-30
10
7
31-45
5
5
46-60
6
6
61-75
9
15
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (10 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (15). Late-goal balance (76-90): -6 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.83
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.3 : 1.5
Estimated goal split
home : away
103%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
54%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-4%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
38%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
15%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 7 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Sligo Rovers

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.96
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.14
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+5.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.24
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.38
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
56%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
134%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.41
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.0
Late goals
17% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 13% come in the first quarter-hour.
17%

Waterford

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.60
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.19
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-2.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.02
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.21
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
110%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
118%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+1.16
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
24% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 8% come in the first quarter-hour.
24%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Premier Division).

Teams vs league

Sligo RoversLigaWaterford
Average goals in match 2.522.76 3.15
Both teams scored 48%61% 59%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 48%51% 48%
Clean sheets 19%24% 15%
Goal before half-time 70%74% 85%
Goal after half-time 74%78% 81%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.76
Average goals per match
61%
Both teams scored
51%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
24%
Clean sheets
1.51
Home goals / match
1.25
Away goals / match
+21%
Home attack advantage
+17%
Home defence advantage
+11%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
74%
1 goal
31%
2 goals
14%
3 goals
2%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
78%
1 goal
44%
2 goals
21%
3 goals
7%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Sligo RoversSubstitutionOn: Archie MeekisonOff: Oliver Denham
  2. Sligo RoversSubstitutionOn: Kaiyne River WooleryOff: Luke Pearce
  3. WaterfordYellow cardBenny Couto
  4. WaterfordYellow cardHayden Cann
  5. WaterfordSubstitutionOn: Blair MackenzieOff: Hayden Cann
  6. WaterfordYellow cardTom Lonergan
  7. WaterfordSubstitutionOn: Dean McMenamyOff: Noah Mawene
  8. Sligo RoversSubstitutionOn: Trey GeorgeOff: Jack Shorrock

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (7): Sligo Rovers 4 - 1 - 2 Waterford. Average goals 2.71, both teams scored in 29% matches.

Waterford
4 : 0
Sligo Rovers
Sligo Rovers
2 : 0
Waterford
Waterford
0 : 0
Sligo Rovers
Waterford FC
1 : 2
Sligo Rovers FC
Sligo Rovers FC
1 : 0
Waterford FC
Waterford FC
0 : 4
Sligo Rovers FC
Sligo Rovers FC
2 : 3
Waterford FC

FAQ

What was the result of Sligo Rovers vs Waterford?

The Premier Division match finished Sligo Rovers 0:0 Waterford. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Sligo Rovers and Waterford?

In the last 7 head-to-head matches Sligo Rovers won 4, Waterford won 2 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 2.71 goals, with both teams scoring in 29% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Sligo Rovers vs Waterford?

Sligo Rovers score 0.85 goals per game on average and Waterford 1.37. The Premier Division average is 2.76 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 51% of games. Both teams score in 48% of Sligo Rovers's matches and 59% of Waterford's.

What form are Sligo Rovers and Waterford in?

Over the last 5 games Sligo Rovers have a 0-2-3 record (0.40 points per game) and Waterford 3-2-0 (2.20 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Sligo Rovers vs Waterford?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.