Latvia - 1. LigaTepera stadionsData current as of 01 September 2026

Smiltene vs Metta - LU: match statistics

Smiltene crest
Smiltene
0 : 6half-time 0:0
Metta - LU crest
Metta - LU

Smiltene vs Metta - LU: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Smiltene played Metta - LU in 1. Liga (Latvia). The match was played on 29 August 2026. Venue: Tepera stadions. Final score: 0:6.

Current form

Smiltene: 2-0-3, 1.20 points/match. Metta - LU: 4-1-0, 2.60 points/match.

Goal statistics

Smiltene scores 1.24 and concedes 2.76 goals per match. Metta - LU scores 4.18 and concedes 0.82. League average: 3.57 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Smiltene 59%, Metta - LU 53%. Over 2.5: Smiltene 65%, Metta - LU 82%. League level: BTTS 65%, Over 2.5 69%.

xG, shots and style

Metta - LU has higher xG: 3.01 vs 1.22. Smiltene: 8.9 shots per match, Metta - LU: 20.6.

Match halves

Smiltene: half-time lead 12%, second-half goals 0.82. Metta - LU: half-time lead 76%, second-half goals 1.76.

Goals by minute

Smiltene: 76-90+ (6 goals). Metta - LU: 31-45+ (18 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

1. Liga: 3.57 goals per match, BTTS 65%, Over 2.5 69%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-0-1. Average goals 8.00, BTTS 0%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Metta - LU are top of the table with a record of 14 wins, 2 draws and just 1 defeat, while Smiltene sit 13th and have won only 2 of their 17 matches. Away from home, the visitors average 2.5 goals per game, create chances worth 2.46 xG and remain unbeaten in this role, whereas Smiltene concede as many as 2.63 goals per home match. Metta’s superiority is also evident in their control of the game: they average 61% possession, 19.33 shots and 8 shots on target per match, compared with the hosts’ 46% possession and 9.75 shots. The visitors’ defence allows opponents just 0.89 xG and concedes an average of 0.75 goals away from home, while Smiltene record only 1.38 xG at home and fail to score in 25% of such matches. Despite Smiltene’s two wins in their last five games, the 14 goals they conceded during that period and Metta’s 26 goals over the same span clearly point towards an away victory.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The BTTS pick is supported by Smiltene’s very strong current momentum: in their last 5 matches, the team scored an average of 1.8 goals but conceded as many as 2.8, with both teams scoring in 80% of those fixtures. Metta - LU scored an impressive 5.2 goals per match during this period, with an xG of 3.74, so their chances of exploiting the hosts’ defensive problems are high. Smiltene have not finished a single match this season without scoring, while at home they average 3.38 xG and 15.44 shots on target, which should be enough even against a visiting side that has kept a clean sheet in 50% of its matches. The seasonal BTTS rates stand at 56% for the hosts and 50% for Metta, but recent form and the league average of 64% clearly strengthen the scenario of both teams scoring.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The match profile clearly favors goals: Over 1.5 goals landed in 100% of Smiltene’s matches and 88% of Metta’s, while the league average stands at a high 3.59 goals. In their last five matches, Metta averaged 5.2 goals scored with an xG of 3.74, while Smiltene conceded an average of 2.8 goals and allowed opponents an xG of 1.82. The home side also has a solid chance of finding the net, having scored 9 goals in their last five appearances, while both teams scored in 80% and 60% of their respective recent matches. Over 1.5 goals is the strongest pick, as just two goals would still be well below the projected total of 3.80 and the teams’ seasonal profile.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The strongest signal comes from Metta’s current form – LU: over their last five matches, they have averaged 5.2 goals scored and 1.4 conceded, winning 60% of their games, while Smiltene have lost 3 of their last 5 matches and conceded an average of 2.8 goals. The visitors start matches particularly strongly, scoring an average of 3.0 goals before half-time in this sample and leading at the break in 40% of games, whereas the hosts conceded 1.8 goals before half-time over the same period and were behind at the break in 60% of cases. Metta’s advantage should persist after the interval: their recent second-half average stands at 2.2 goals scored, and they won this period in 80% of their last five appearances. Smiltene do have very strong season-long home figures, with a lead at the break in 89% of matches and an average of 5.67 goals per game, but their recent form clearly contradicts these numbers. Therefore, the most likely HT/FT outcome is a 1/1 result, with the visitors leading at half-time and securing the win at full-time.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
0 : 6
2nd half

Match statistics

-1Possession (%)-1
SmilteneMetta - LU
-1Shots-1
SmilteneMetta - LU
-1Shots on target-1
SmilteneMetta - LU
0xG0
SmilteneMetta - LU
-1Corners-1
SmilteneMetta - LU
0Dangerous attacks0
SmilteneMetta - LU
-1Fouls-1
SmilteneMetta - LU
-1Cards-1
SmilteneMetta - LU

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

SmilteneMetta - LU
1.24Goals scored / match4.18
SmilteneMetta - LU
2.76Goals conceded / match0.82
SmilteneMetta - LU
44%Average possession53%
SmilteneMetta - LU
4.18Shots on target / match10.88
SmilteneMetta - LU

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

8.94Shots per match20.65
SmilteneMetta - LU
4.18Shots on target10.88
SmilteneMetta - LU
13.8%Shot conversion20.2%
SmilteneMetta - LU
44%Possession53%
SmilteneMetta - LU
1.22xG for3.01
SmilteneMetta - LU
2.04xG against0.71
SmilteneMetta - LU

Shooting quality

Smiltene: Counter-attackingMetta - LU: Attacking
SmilteneMetta - LU
Accuracy (shots on target)47%53%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.140.15
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.300.38

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Metta - LU is 117% better for: last-5 form.

1.2 pts / match - Smiltene · 2.6 pts / match - Metta - LU

Smiltene
WLWLL
Season result split
12% W24% R65% P
Season (W-D-L)
2-4-11
0.59 pts / match · goal difference -26
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-0-3
1.20 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
1-2-5
Last 5 at home
1-0-4
LLWLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.8Goals conceded: 2.8xG: 1.59Opponent xG: 1.82BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 80%
Metta - LU
WWDWW
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
82% W12% R6% P
Season (W-D-L)
14-2-1
2.59 pts / match · goal difference +57
Last 5 (W-D-L)
4-1-0
2.60 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
6-2-0
Last 5 away
3-2-0
DWWDW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 5.8Goals conceded: 0.6xG: 3.43Opponent xG: 0.65BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 80%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Metta - LU is 237% better for: goals scored per match.

1.24 goals / match - Smiltene · 4.18 goals / match - Metta - LU

Metta - LU is 237% better for: goals conceded per match.

2.76 goals / match - Smiltene · 0.82 goals / match - Metta - LU

Smiltene scoring profile: mixed

Smiltene scores in 65% of matches (11 of 17 matches), while Metta - LU keeps a clean sheet in 47% (8 of 17 matches).

Metta - LU scoring profile: very strong

Metta - LU scores in 100% of matches (17 of 17 matches), while Smiltene keeps a clean sheet in 12% (2 of 17 matches).

21Goals scored (season)71
SmilteneMetta - LU
47Goals conceded (season)14
SmilteneMetta - LU
4Average goals in match5
SmilteneMetta - LU
9Goals scored (last 5)29
SmilteneMetta - LU
14Goals conceded (last 5)3
SmilteneMetta - LU

How often they score at least...

65%1 goal100%
SmilteneMetta - LU
41%2 goals88%
SmilteneMetta - LU
18%3 goals65%
SmilteneMetta - LU
0%4 goals41%
SmilteneMetta - LU

How often they concede at least...

88%1 goal53%
SmilteneMetta - LU
71%2 goals24%
SmilteneMetta - LU
53%3 goals6%
SmilteneMetta - LU
35%4 goals0%
SmilteneMetta - LU

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

65%
League average

Goal patterns

24%BTTS at half-time12%
SmilteneMetta - LU
6%BTTS in both halves0%
SmilteneMetta - LU
18%Scored in both halves71%
SmilteneMetta - LU

BTTS and goal count

53%Min. 3 goals and BTTS53%
SmilteneMetta - LU
12%Min. 3 goals without BTTS29%
SmilteneMetta - LU
80%BTTS - last 540%
SmilteneMetta - LU

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

76%Min. 1 goal before half-time82%
SmilteneMetta - LU
41%Min. 2 goals before half-time47%
SmilteneMetta - LU
29%Min. 3 goals before half-time35%
SmilteneMetta - LU

2nd half

88%Min. 1 goal after half-time88%
SmilteneMetta - LU
59%Min. 2 goals after half-time76%
SmilteneMetta - LU
35%Min. 3 goals after half-time53%
SmilteneMetta - LU

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Metta - LU is 280% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

0.65 pts / match - Smiltene · 2.47 pts / match - Metta - LU

Smiltene - half-time state
12% leading29% draw59% trailing
Metta - LU - half-time state
76% leading18% draw6% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.65Points per match (1st half)2.47
SmilteneMetta - LU
0.41Goals scored (1st half)2.29
SmilteneMetta - LU
1.35Goals conceded (1st half)0.18
SmilteneMetta - LU
1.76Average goals (1st half)2.47
SmilteneMetta - LU
35%Clean sheet before half-time82%
SmilteneMetta - LU
65%No goal before half-time24%
SmilteneMetta - LU

After half-time (2nd half)

0.94Points per match (2nd half)2.18
SmilteneMetta - LU
0.82Goals scored (2nd half)1.76
SmilteneMetta - LU
1.41Goals conceded (2nd half)0.53
SmilteneMetta - LU
2.24Average goals (2nd half)2.29
SmilteneMetta - LU
24%Clean sheet after half-time65%
SmilteneMetta - LU
53%No goal after half-time12%
SmilteneMetta - LU

Smiltene - second-half results

24% W24% R53% P
11
Half-time points
7
Half-time goals
-16
Goal difference (1st half)
16
Second-half points
-10
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.65
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 12% of matches and wins 12%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Metta - LU - second-half results

65% W24% R12% P
42
Half-time points
39
Half-time goals
+36
Goal difference (1st half)
37
Second-half points
+21
Goal difference (2nd half)
2.47
PPG before half-time
Lead holding108%

Leads at half-time in 76% of matches and wins 82%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.4

Concedes 0.4 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Smiltene - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.801.00
Goals scored / match1.00.8
Goals conceded / match1.81.0
Average goals in match2.81.8
1 goal100%80%
2 goals80%40%
3 goals60%20%
Clean sheet20%40%
No goal20%40%
Goal difference-4-1
Half-time: 20% leading - 20% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 60% - Half-time goals total: 5
Metta - LU - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.003.00
Goals scored / match3.22.6
Goals conceded / match0.40.2
Average goals in match3.62.8
1 goal80%100%
2 goals40%100%
3 goals40%80%
Clean sheet60%80%
No goal40%0%
Goal difference+14+12
Half-time: 60% leading - 20% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 100% won - 0% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 16

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Smiltene
ScoredConceded
2
7
0-15
3
7
16-30
2
9
31-45
5
9
46-60
3
5
61-75
6
10
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (6 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.

Metta - LU
ScoredConceded
11
2
0-15
12
1
16-30
18
2
31-45
9
5
46-60
9
1
61-75
12
3
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (18 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +9 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

4.50
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.0 : 3.5
Estimated goal split
home : away
126%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
56%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+78%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
65%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
0%
0:0 risk
practically zero
4+
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Smiltene

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.82
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.70
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+1.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.02
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.72
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
63%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
173%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.61
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.4
Late goals
29% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 10% come in the first quarter-hour.
29%

Metta - LU

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+2.30
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+1.06
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-5.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+1.17
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.11
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
261%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
41%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.01
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.5
Late goals
17% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 15% come in the first quarter-hour.
17%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (1. Liga).

Teams vs league

SmilteneLigaMetta - LU
Average goals in match 4.003.57 5.00
Both teams scored 59%65% 53%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 65%69% 82%
Clean sheets 12%20% 47%
Goal before half-time 76%76% 82%
Goal after half-time 88%84% 88%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.57
Average goals per match
65%
Both teams scored
69%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
20%
Clean sheets
1.98
Home goals / match
1.60
Away goals / match
+24%
Home attack advantage
+19%
Home defence advantage
+9%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
76%
1 goal
40%
2 goals
20%
3 goals
6%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
84%
1 goal
61%
2 goals
34%
3 goals
11%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Home team

Away team

Other recorded players

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Metta - LUGoalSadiq Saleh
  2. Metta - LUGoalSadiq Saleh
  3. Metta - LUGoalSadiq Saleh
  4. Metta - LUGoalSadiq Saleh

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Smiltene 0 - 0 - 1 Metta - LU. Average goals 8.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.

FAQ

What was the result of Smiltene vs Metta - LU?

The 1. Liga match finished Smiltene 0:6 Metta - LU. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Smiltene vs Metta - LU?

Smiltene score 1.24 goals per game on average and Metta - LU 4.18. The 1. Liga average is 3.57 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 69% of games. Both teams score in 59% of Smiltene's matches and 53% of Metta - LU's.

What form are Smiltene and Metta - LU in?

Over the last 5 games Smiltene have a 2-0-3 record (1.20 points per game) and Metta - LU 4-1-0 (2.60 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Smiltene vs Metta - LU?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.