Latvia - 1. LigaTepera stadionsData current as of 17 October 2026

Smiltene vs Riga FC II: match statistics

Smiltene crest
Smiltene
3 : 1half-time 0:0
Riga FC II crest
Riga FC II

Smiltene vs Riga FC II: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Smiltene played Riga FC II in 1. Liga (Latvia). The match was played on 17 October 2026. Venue: Tepera stadions. Final score: 3:1.

Current form

Smiltene: 3-0-2, 1.80 points/match. Riga FC II: 2-3-0, 1.80 points/match.

Goal statistics

Smiltene scores 1.45 and concedes 2.68 goals per match. Riga FC II scores 1.55 and concedes 1.68. League average: 3.72 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Smiltene 59%, Riga FC II 59%. Over 2.5: Smiltene 68%, Riga FC II 64%. League level: BTTS 63%, Over 2.5 70%.

xG, shots and style

Riga FC II has higher xG: 1.33 vs 1.26. Smiltene: 8.8 shots per match, Riga FC II: 8.6.

Match halves

Smiltene: half-time lead 23%, second-half goals 0.86. Riga FC II: half-time lead 27%, second-half goals 0.86.

Goals by minute

Smiltene: 46-60 (7 goals). Riga FC II: 76-90+ (9 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

1. Liga: 3.72 goals per match, BTTS 63%, Over 2.5 70%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 3 previous H2H matches were available: 2-0-1. Average goals 3.33, BTTS 33%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Smiltene have home advantage, scoring an average of 1.73 goals per match at home, while Riga FC II score just 0.9 goals away and fail to find the net in 50% of their matches. The hosts have won 3 of their last 5 games, scoring 11 goals in that run but conceding 12, so their improved results have not been matched by defensive consistency. The visitors are unbeaten in their last 5 matches, conceding just 4 goals over that period, although their away record shows only a 10% win rate and a 60% loss rate. Smiltene create chances worth an average of 1.36 xG at home, compared with Riga FC II’s 1.15 xG away, strengthening the case for the hosts. I’m backing a home win, but Smiltene’s average of 2.73 goals conceded per home match means a draw or a Riga FC II win remain realistic outcomes.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Smiltene score an average of 2.08 goals per match, while Riga FC II concede 1.80, giving the hosts a solid foundation to find the net. The visitors have a lower season average of 0.90 goals and have failed to score in 50% of their matches; however, they have averaged 2.0 goals across their last five games. Over the same period, Smiltene conceded 2.4 goals per match, and both teams scored in 60% of their respective matches. The risk of the visitors failing to score remains significant, but their recent scoring form and the hosts’ defensive frailties tip the prediction towards BTTS - Yes.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The strongest signal is for at least two goals: this total was reached in 100% of Smiltene’s matches and 90% of Riga FC II’s. The hosts average 2.08 goals scored, while the visitors concede 1.80, giving Smiltene a solid scoring platform. Riga FC II has a lower season average of 0.90 goals, but has averaged 2.00 in its last five matches, while Smiltene has conceded 2.40. The projected total of 3.07 goals also supports Over 2.5, although its historical success rate is 75% for the hosts and just 50% for the visitors. Over 1.5 is therefore the safer choice than the higher lines, despite both teams’ recent form suggesting the potential for a higher-scoring game.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Smiltene have won 58% of their matches this season, compared with just 10% for Riga FC II, giving the hosts a clear edge in the full-time result outlook. Smiltene led at the break in 42% of matches, versus 10% for their opponents, and were ahead at half-time in three of their last five games, while Riga FC II did not lead at the break in any of them. The hosts average 2.08 goals per match against the visitors’ 0.90, and their average of 5.83 shots on target compared with 3.38 for Riga FC II further increases the likelihood that they will take the lead and hold on to it. The 1/1 scenario is not certain, however: Riga FC II were level at half-time in four of their last five matches and averaged 1.6 goals after the break in those games, making a half-time draw followed by a Smiltene win a significant alternative.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

-1Possession (%)-1
SmilteneRiga FC II
-1Shots-1
SmilteneRiga FC II
-1Shots on target-1
SmilteneRiga FC II
0xG0
SmilteneRiga FC II
-1Corners-1
SmilteneRiga FC II
0Dangerous attacks0
SmilteneRiga FC II
-1Fouls-1
SmilteneRiga FC II
-1Cards-1
SmilteneRiga FC II

Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

SmilteneRiga FC II
1.45Goals scored / match1.55
SmilteneRiga FC II
2.68Goals conceded / match1.68
SmilteneRiga FC II
44%Average possession48%
SmilteneRiga FC II
4.27Shots on target / match4.32
SmilteneRiga FC II

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

8.77Shots per match8.55
SmilteneRiga FC II
4.27Shots on target4.32
SmilteneRiga FC II
16.6%Shot conversion18.1%
SmilteneRiga FC II
44%Possession48%
SmilteneRiga FC II
1.26xG for1.33
SmilteneRiga FC II
2xG against1.54
SmilteneRiga FC II

Shooting quality

Smiltene: Counter-attackingRiga FC II: Efficient finishing
SmilteneRiga FC II
Accuracy (shots on target)49%51%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.140.16
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.340.36

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Smiltene
LLWWW
Season result split
23% W18% D59% L
Season (W-D-L)
5-4-13
0.86 pts / match · goal difference -27
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-0-2
1.80 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
3-2-6
Last 5 at home
2-0-3
LLLWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.2Goals conceded: 2.4xG: 1.44Opponent xG: 1.83BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 80%
Riga FC II
DWDDW
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
36% W23% D41% L
Season (W-D-L)
8-5-9
1.32 pts / match · goal difference -3
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-3-0
1.80 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
1-3-6
Last 5 away
1-2-2
WLLDD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.0Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 1.38Opponent xG: 1.07BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 40%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Riga FC II is 7% better for: goals scored per match.

1.45 goals / match - Smiltene · 1.55 goals / match - Riga FC II

Riga FC II is 60% better for: goals conceded per match.

2.68 goals / match - Smiltene · 1.68 goals / match - Riga FC II

Smiltene scoring profile: very strong

Smiltene scores in 68% of matches (15 of 22 matches), while Riga FC II keeps a clean sheet in 18% (4 of 22 matches).

Riga FC II scoring profile: very strong

Riga FC II scores in 73% of matches (16 of 22 matches), while Smiltene keeps a clean sheet in 14% (3 of 22 matches).

32Goals scored (season)34
SmilteneRiga FC II
59Goals conceded (season)37
SmilteneRiga FC II
4.14Average goals in match3.23
SmilteneRiga FC II
11Goals scored (last 5)10
SmilteneRiga FC II
12Goals conceded (last 5)4
SmilteneRiga FC II

How often they score at least...

68%1 goal73%
SmilteneRiga FC II
50%2 goals50%
SmilteneRiga FC II
23%3 goals18%
SmilteneRiga FC II
5%4 goals9%
SmilteneRiga FC II

How often they concede at least...

86%1 goal82%
SmilteneRiga FC II
68%2 goals59%
SmilteneRiga FC II
50%3 goals23%
SmilteneRiga FC II
32%4 goals5%
SmilteneRiga FC II

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

63%
League average

Goal patterns

27%BTTS at half-time32%
SmilteneRiga FC II
9%BTTS in both halves5%
SmilteneRiga FC II
23%Scored in both halves32%
SmilteneRiga FC II

BTTS and goal count

55%Min. 3 goals and BTTS50%
SmilteneRiga FC II
14%Min. 3 goals without BTTS14%
SmilteneRiga FC II
60%BTTS - last 560%
SmilteneRiga FC II

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

77%Min. 1 goal before half-time77%
SmilteneRiga FC II
50%Min. 2 goals before half-time41%
SmilteneRiga FC II
32%Min. 3 goals before half-time23%
SmilteneRiga FC II

2nd half

86%Min. 1 goal after half-time82%
SmilteneRiga FC II
64%Min. 2 goals after half-time55%
SmilteneRiga FC II
36%Min. 3 goals after half-time27%
SmilteneRiga FC II

Match halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Riga FC II is 29% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

0.95 pts / match - Smiltene · 1.23 pts / match - Riga FC II

Smiltene - half-time state
23% leading27% draw50% trailing
Riga FC II - half-time state
27% leading41% draw32% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.95Points per match (1st half)1.23
SmilteneRiga FC II
0.59Goals scored (1st half)0.68
SmilteneRiga FC II
1.23Goals conceded (1st half)0.73
SmilteneRiga FC II
1.82Average goals (1st half)1.41
SmilteneRiga FC II
36%Clean sheet before half-time41%
SmilteneRiga FC II
59%No goal before half-time50%
SmilteneRiga FC II

After half-time (2nd half)

1.09Points per match (2nd half)1.32
SmilteneRiga FC II
0.86Goals scored (2nd half)0.86
SmilteneRiga FC II
1.45Goals conceded (2nd half)0.95
SmilteneRiga FC II
2.32Average goals (2nd half)1.82
SmilteneRiga FC II
27%Clean sheet after half-time50%
SmilteneRiga FC II
50%No goal after half-time45%
SmilteneRiga FC II

Smiltene - second-half results

27% W27% D45% L
21
Half-time points
13
Half-time goals
-14
Goal difference (1st half)
24
Second-half points
-13
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.95
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 23% of matches and wins 23%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Riga FC II - second-half results

36% W23% D41% L
27
Half-time points
15
Half-time goals
-1
Goal difference (1st half)
29
Second-half points
-2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.23
PPG before half-time
Lead holding133%

Leads at half-time in 27% of matches and wins 36%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Smiltene - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.001.60
Goals scored / match1.21.0
Goals conceded / match0.81.6
Average goals in match2.02.6
1 goal80%80%
2 goals80%80%
3 goals40%40%
Clean sheet40%40%
No goal40%40%
Goal difference+2-3
Half-time: 60% leading - 20% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 6
Riga FC II - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.802.20
Goals scored / match0.41.6
Goals conceded / match0.60.2
Average goals in match1.01.8
1 goal60%60%
2 goals40%40%
3 goals0%40%
Clean sheet40%80%
No goal60%40%
Goal difference-1+7
Half-time: 0% leading - 80% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 40% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Smiltene
ScoredConceded
3
7
0-15
6
9
16-30
4
11
31-45
7
12
46-60
5
7
61-75
7
13
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (7 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (13). Late-goal balance (76-90): -6 - late phases are a weakness.

Riga FC II
ScoredConceded
4
3
0-15
5
7
16-30
6
6
31-45
5
8
46-60
5
1
61-75
9
12
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (9 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.68
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.6 : 2.1
Estimated goal split
home : away
99%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
59%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-10%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
50%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
9%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 11 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Smiltene

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.74
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.49
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+4.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.19
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.68
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
70%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
161%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.94
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
22% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 9% come in the first quarter-hour.
22%

Riga FC II

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.21
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.08
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.22
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.14
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
93%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
82%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.48
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
26% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 12% come in the first quarter-hour.
26%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (1. Liga).

Teams vs league

SmilteneLigaRiga FC II
Average goals in match▲ 4.143.72▼ 3.23
Both teams scored▼ 59%63%▼ 59%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▼ 68%70%▼ 64%
Clean sheets▼ 14%20%▼ 18%
Goal before half-time• 77%76%• 77%
Goal after half-time▲ 86%83%• 82%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.72
Average goals per match
63%
Both teams scored
70%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
20%
Clean sheets
2.06
Home goals / match
1.66
Away goals / match
+24%
Home attack advantage
+19%
Home defence advantage
+9%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
76%
1 goal
46%
2 goals
25%
3 goals
6%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
83%
1 goal
60%
2 goals
34%
3 goals
13%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (3): Smiltene 2 - 0 - 1 Riga FC II. Average goals 3.33, both teams scored in 33% matches.

Riga FC II
2 : 0
Smiltene
Riga FC II
0 : 2
FK Smiltene BJSS
FK Smiltene BJSS
5 : 1
Riga FC II

FAQ

What was the result of Smiltene vs Riga FC II?

The 1. Liga match finished Smiltene 3:1 Riga FC II. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Smiltene and Riga FC II?

In the last 3 head-to-head matches Smiltene won 2, Riga FC II won 1 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 3.33 goals, with both teams scoring in 33% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Smiltene vs Riga FC II?

Smiltene score 1.45 goals per game on average and Riga FC II 1.55. The 1. Liga average is 3.72 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 70% of games. Both teams score in 59% of Smiltene's matches and 59% of Riga FC II's.

What form are Smiltene and Riga FC II in?

Over the last 5 games Smiltene have a 3-0-2 record (1.80 points per game) and Riga FC II 2-3-0 (1.80 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Smiltene vs Riga FC II?

The statistical background for Smiltene vs Riga FC II — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.