Egypt - Egyptian Premier LeagueAlexandria StadiumData current as of 22 October 2026

Smouha SC vs Ceramica Cleopatra: match statistics

Smouha SC crest
Smouha SC
0 : 2half-time 0:0
Ceramica Cleopatra crest
Ceramica Cleopatra

Smouha SC vs Ceramica Cleopatra: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Smouha SC played Ceramica Cleopatra in Egyptian Premier League (Egypt). The match was played on 8 September 2026. Venue: Alexandria Stadium. Final score: 0:2.

Current form

Smouha SC: 0-1-2, 0.33 points/match. Ceramica Cleopatra: 2-0-1, 2.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

Smouha SC scores 0.00 and concedes 0.67 goals per match. Ceramica Cleopatra scores 2.00 and concedes 1.00. League average: 2.03 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Smouha SC 0%, Ceramica Cleopatra 67%. Over 2.5: Smouha SC 0%, Ceramica Cleopatra 67%. League level: BTTS 38%, Over 2.5 32%.

xG, shots and style

Ceramica Cleopatra has higher xG: 1.69 vs 0.97. Smouha SC: 7.7 shots per match, Ceramica Cleopatra: 14.3.

Match halves

Smouha SC: half-time lead 0%, second-half goals 0.00. Ceramica Cleopatra: half-time lead 100%, second-half goals 1.00.

Goals by minute

Smouha SC: 0-15 (0 goals). Ceramica Cleopatra: 0-15 (2 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Egyptian Premier League: 2.03 goals per match, BTTS 38%, Over 2.5 32%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 2 previous H2H matches were available: 0-0-2. Average goals 1.50, BTTS 0%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Ceramica Cleopatra sit 4th, while Smouha SC are only 17th, with the two teams’ records after three matches standing at 2 wins and 1 loss for the visitors, compared with 0 wins for the hosts. Smouha have scored just 1 goal in their last five matches and lost 4 of them, which contrasts sharply with Ceramica’s 7 goals over the same period. Away from home, Ceramica average 3 goals per match, record 7 shots on target and create chances worth 1.72 xG, whereas Smouha are yet to score at home despite averaging 12 shots and 1.38 xG. The hosts can rely on a solid defensive setup, having kept a clean sheet in their only home match, but Ceramica’s average 61% possession and 14 shots away from home should give the visitors the edge. An away win is the most likely outcome, although Smouha’s low scoring efficiency and defensive record to date also increase the chances of a draw.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The stronger signal is BTTS - No, as Smouha have scored just 1 goal in their last 5 matches, averaging 0.2 per game, while their BTTS rate was only 20%. The hosts do have a season xG of 1.68, but their current xG has dropped to 0.95, confirming a clear decline in chance creation. Ceramica Cleopatra have yet to keep a clean sheet this season and have recorded BTTS in 100% of their matches, but the visitors’ defence has allowed an average xG of just 1.13 over their last five appearances. The visitors are the favourites to score, having recently averaged 1.4 goals per game, while Smouha’s very low attacking efficiency remains the biggest risk to the both-teams-to-score scenario. Additionally, the league has recorded goals from both teams in only 33% of matches, with an average of 1.97 goals per game, further supporting the outcome in which at least one side fails to score.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Smouha’s latest form clearly limits the hosts’ goal-scoring potential: they have scored only 1 goal in their last 5 matches, averaging 0.2 per game, with an xG of 0.95. Ceramica are more dangerous, averaging 1.4 goals and an xG of 1.45 across their last five matches, but their attack faces a team conceding an average of 1.0 goal. Both teams have conceded 5 goals in their last 5 appearances, pointing more towards a 1:1 or 0:2 scoreline than an open, high-scoring game. Although Ceramica averaged 3.0 goals per match at the start of the season, the league averages only 1.97 goals per game, while Smouha have exceeded 2.5 goals in just 20% of their last five matches. The Under 3.5 goals line has the edge, as the projected total of 2.10 goals leaves a clear margin below four goals.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Ceramica Cleopatra are in clearly better current form: over their last five matches, they have averaged 1.4 goals and won 40% of their games, while Smouha have scored just 0.2 goals per match, failed to win any of them, and lost 80%. The hosts were level at half-time in all of their last five appearances, averaging just 0.2 goals scored in the first half. The visitors led at the break in 60% of their recent matches and averaged 0.8 goals by that point; however, the league’s cautious profile, with a goal scored before half-time in only 47% of matches, increases the likelihood of a draw at the break. After the interval, Ceramica have averaged 0.6 goals over their last five matches, while Smouha have failed to score in this period and conceded an average of 0.8. The HT/FT scenario of a draw at half-time followed by an away win, represented by X/2, best combines Smouha’s poor attacking form with Ceramica’s superior quality and efficiency, as they have averaged 3.0 goals per match this season with a 21% shot-conversion rate.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
0 : 2
2nd half

Match statistics

48Possession (%)52
Smouha SCCeramica Cleopatra
9Shots5
Smouha SCCeramica Cleopatra
3Shots on target3
Smouha SCCeramica Cleopatra
1.21xG0.89
Smouha SCCeramica Cleopatra
4Corners3
Smouha SCCeramica Cleopatra
61Dangerous attacks51
Smouha SCCeramica Cleopatra
7Fouls13
Smouha SCCeramica Cleopatra
3Cards1
Smouha SCCeramica Cleopatra

Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Smouha SCCeramica Cleopatra
0Goals scored / match2
Smouha SCCeramica Cleopatra
0.67Goals conceded / match1
Smouha SCCeramica Cleopatra
45%Average possession64%
Smouha SCCeramica Cleopatra
2Shots on target / match6.33
Smouha SCCeramica Cleopatra

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

7.67Shots per match14.33
Smouha SCCeramica Cleopatra
2Shots on target6.33
Smouha SCCeramica Cleopatra
0%Shot conversion14%
Smouha SCCeramica Cleopatra
45%Possession64%
Smouha SCCeramica Cleopatra
0.97xG for1.69
Smouha SCCeramica Cleopatra
1.26xG against1.21
Smouha SCCeramica Cleopatra

Shooting quality

Smouha SC: BalancedCeramica Cleopatra: Dominant
Smouha SCCeramica Cleopatra
Accuracy (shots on target)26%44%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.130.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.000.32

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Ceramica Cleopatra is 506% better for: last-5 form.

0.33 pts / match - Smouha SC · 2 pts / match - Ceramica Cleopatra

Smouha SC
LDL
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
0% W33% D67% L
Season (W-D-L)
0-1-2
0.33 pts / match · goal difference -2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-1-2
0.33 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
0-1-0
Last 5 at home
0-1-0
D
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.0Goals conceded: 0.7xG: 0.97Opponent xG: 1.26BTTS: 0%Over 2.5: 0%
Ceramica Cleopatra
LWW
Season result split
67% W0% D33% L
Season (W-D-L)
2-0-1
2.00 pts / match · goal difference +3
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-0-1
2.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
1-0-0
Last 5 away
1-0-0
W
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.0Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.69Opponent xG: 1.21BTTS: 67%Over 2.5: 67%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Smouha SC is 49% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.67 goals / match - Smouha SC · 1 goals / match - Ceramica Cleopatra

Smouha SC scoring profile: more difficult

Smouha SC scores in 0% of matches (0 of 3 matches), while Ceramica Cleopatra keeps a clean sheet in 33% (1 of 3 matches).

Ceramica Cleopatra scoring profile: very strong

Ceramica Cleopatra scores in 100% of matches (3 of 3 matches), while Smouha SC keeps a clean sheet in 33% (1 of 3 matches).

0Goals scored (season)6
Smouha SCCeramica Cleopatra
2Goals conceded (season)3
Smouha SCCeramica Cleopatra
0.67Average goals in match3
Smouha SCCeramica Cleopatra
0Goals scored (last 5)6
Smouha SCCeramica Cleopatra
2Goals conceded (last 5)3
Smouha SCCeramica Cleopatra

How often they score at least...

0%1 goal100%
Smouha SCCeramica Cleopatra
0%2 goals67%
Smouha SCCeramica Cleopatra
0%3 goals33%
Smouha SCCeramica Cleopatra
0%4 goals0%
Smouha SCCeramica Cleopatra

How often they concede at least...

67%1 goal67%
Smouha SCCeramica Cleopatra
0%2 goals33%
Smouha SCCeramica Cleopatra
0%3 goals0%
Smouha SCCeramica Cleopatra
0%4 goals0%
Smouha SCCeramica Cleopatra

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

67%
Ceramica Cleopatra - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.2 of 3 matches
38%
League average

Goal patterns

0%BTTS at half-time0%
Smouha SCCeramica Cleopatra
0%BTTS in both halves0%
Smouha SCCeramica Cleopatra
0%Scored in both halves67%
Smouha SCCeramica Cleopatra

BTTS and goal count

0%Min. 3 goals and BTTS67%
Smouha SCCeramica Cleopatra
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
Smouha SCCeramica Cleopatra
0%BTTS - last 567%
Smouha SCCeramica Cleopatra

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

0%Min. 1 goal before half-time100%
Smouha SCCeramica Cleopatra
0%Min. 2 goals before half-time0%
Smouha SCCeramica Cleopatra
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
Smouha SCCeramica Cleopatra

2nd half

67%Min. 1 goal after half-time100%
Smouha SCCeramica Cleopatra
0%Min. 2 goals after half-time67%
Smouha SCCeramica Cleopatra
0%Min. 3 goals after half-time33%
Smouha SCCeramica Cleopatra

Match halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Ceramica Cleopatra is 200% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1 pts / match - Smouha SC · 3 pts / match - Ceramica Cleopatra

Smouha SC - half-time state
0% leading100% draw0% trailing
Ceramica Cleopatra - half-time state
100% leading0% draw0% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1Points per match (1st half)3
Smouha SCCeramica Cleopatra
0Goals scored (1st half)1
Smouha SCCeramica Cleopatra
0Goals conceded (1st half)0
Smouha SCCeramica Cleopatra
0Average goals (1st half)1
Smouha SCCeramica Cleopatra
100%Clean sheet before half-time100%
Smouha SCCeramica Cleopatra
100%No goal before half-time0%
Smouha SCCeramica Cleopatra

After half-time (2nd half)

0.33Points per match (2nd half)2
Smouha SCCeramica Cleopatra
0Goals scored (2nd half)1
Smouha SCCeramica Cleopatra
0.67Goals conceded (2nd half)1
Smouha SCCeramica Cleopatra
0.67Average goals (2nd half)2
Smouha SCCeramica Cleopatra
33%Clean sheet after half-time33%
Smouha SCCeramica Cleopatra
100%No goal after half-time33%
Smouha SCCeramica Cleopatra

Smouha SC - second-half results

0% W33% D67% L
3
Half-time points
0
Half-time goals
0
Goal difference (1st half)
1
Second-half points
-2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.00
PPG before half-time
Defence after half-time+0.7

Concedes 0.7 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Ceramica Cleopatra - second-half results

67% W0% D33% L
9
Half-time points
3
Half-time goals
+3
Goal difference (1st half)
6
Second-half points
0
Goal difference (2nd half)
3.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding67%

Leads at half-time in 100% of matches and wins 67%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time+1.0

Concedes 1.0 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Smouha SC - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.000.33
Goals scored / match0.00.0
Goals conceded / match0.00.7
Average goals in match0.00.7
1 goal0%67%
2 goals0%0%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet100%33%
No goal100%100%
Goal difference0-2
Half-time: 0% leading - 100% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 33% draw - 67% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 0
Ceramica Cleopatra - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match3.002.00
Goals scored / match1.01.0
Goals conceded / match0.01.0
Average goals in match1.02.0
1 goal100%100%
2 goals0%67%
3 goals0%33%
Clean sheet100%33%
No goal0%33%
Goal difference+30
Half-time: 100% leading - 0% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 67% won - 0% draw - 33% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Smouha SC
ScoredConceded
0
0
0-15
0
0
16-30
0
0
31-45
0
0
46-60
0
0
61-75
0
2
76-90

Concedes most in 76-90 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.

Ceramica Cleopatra
ScoredConceded
2
0
0-15
0
0
16-30
1
0
31-45
0
1
46-60
2
0
61-75
1
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (2 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

1.83
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
0.5 : 1.3
Estimated goal split
home : away
90%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
34%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-18%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
0%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
0%
0:0 risk
practically zero
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Smouha SC

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.29
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.38
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+1.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.97
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.59
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
0%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
61%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
0% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
0%

Ceramica Cleopatra

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.48
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.52
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.31
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.21
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
183%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
106%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
17% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 33% come in the first quarter-hour.
17%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Egyptian Premier League).

Teams vs league

Smouha SCLigaCeramica Cleopatra
Average goals in match▼ 0.672.03▲ 3.00
Both teams scored▼ 0%38%▲ 67%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▼ 0%32%▲ 67%
Clean sheets▼ 33%38%▼ 33%
Goal before half-time▼ 0%50%▲ 100%
Goal after half-time▼ 67%76%▲ 100%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.03
Average goals per match
38%
Both teams scored
32%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
38%
Clean sheets
0.94
Home goals / match
1.09
Away goals / match
+-14%
Home attack advantage
+-16%
Home defence advantage
+-3%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
50%
1 goal
18%
2 goals
6%
3 goals
0%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
76%
1 goal
41%
2 goals
12%
3 goals
0%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Ceramica CleopatraYellow cardAhmed Ramadan Mohamed
  2. Smouha SCYellow cardPape Abasse Badji
  3. Smouha SCYellow cardSamir Fekri Mohamed Ahmed
  4. Smouha SCYellow cardKone Mohamed
  5. Ceramica CleopatraAssistAhmed Belhadji
  6. Ceramica CleopatraGoalHussein Al Sayed
  7. Ceramica CleopatraSubstitutionOn: Ragab NabilOff: Nejc Gradišar
  8. Ceramica CleopatraSubstitutionOn: Fawzi El HenawiOff: Mohamed Reda
  9. Smouha SCSubstitutionOn: Hesham NabawiOff: Khaled Metwali Abdelhamid

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (2): Smouha SC 0 - 0 - 2 Ceramica Cleopatra. Average goals 1.50, both teams scored in 0% matches.

Smouha SC
0 : 2
Ceramica Cleopatra
Ceramica Cleopatra
1 : 0
Smouha SC

FAQ

What was the result of Smouha SC vs Ceramica Cleopatra?

The Egyptian Premier League match finished Smouha SC 0:2 Ceramica Cleopatra. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Smouha SC and Ceramica Cleopatra?

In the last 2 head-to-head matches Smouha SC won 0, Ceramica Cleopatra won 2 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 1.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Smouha SC vs Ceramica Cleopatra?

Smouha SC score 0.00 goals per game on average and Ceramica Cleopatra 2.00. The Egyptian Premier League average is 2.03 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 32% of games. Both teams score in 0% of Smouha SC's matches and 67% of Ceramica Cleopatra's.

What form are Smouha SC and Ceramica Cleopatra in?

Over the last 5 games Smouha SC have a 0-1-2 record (0.33 points per game) and Ceramica Cleopatra 2-0-1 (2.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Smouha SC vs Ceramica Cleopatra?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.