Smouha SC vs Ceramica Cleopatra: match statistics
Smouha SC vs Ceramica Cleopatra: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Smouha SC played Ceramica Cleopatra in Egyptian Premier League (Egypt). The match was played on 8 September 2026. Venue: Alexandria Stadium. Final score: 0:2.
Current form
Smouha SC: 0-1-2, 0.33 points/match. Ceramica Cleopatra: 2-0-1, 2.00 points/match.
Goal statistics
Smouha SC scores 0.00 and concedes 0.67 goals per match. Ceramica Cleopatra scores 2.00 and concedes 1.00. League average: 2.03 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Smouha SC 0%, Ceramica Cleopatra 67%. Over 2.5: Smouha SC 0%, Ceramica Cleopatra 67%. League level: BTTS 38%, Over 2.5 32%.
xG, shots and style
Ceramica Cleopatra has higher xG: 1.69 vs 0.97. Smouha SC: 7.7 shots per match, Ceramica Cleopatra: 14.3.
Match halves
Smouha SC: half-time lead 0%, second-half goals 0.00. Ceramica Cleopatra: half-time lead 100%, second-half goals 1.00.
Goals by minute
Smouha SC: 0-15 (0 goals). Ceramica Cleopatra: 0-15 (2 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Egyptian Premier League: 2.03 goals per match, BTTS 38%, Over 2.5 32%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 2 previous H2H matches were available: 0-0-2. Average goals 1.50, BTTS 0%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Ceramica Cleopatra sit 4th, while Smouha SC are only 17th, with the two teams’ records after three matches standing at 2 wins and 1 loss for the visitors, compared with 0 wins for the hosts. Smouha have scored just 1 goal in their last five matches and lost 4 of them, which contrasts sharply with Ceramica’s 7 goals over the same period. Away from home, Ceramica average 3 goals per match, record 7 shots on target and create chances worth 1.72 xG, whereas Smouha are yet to score at home despite averaging 12 shots and 1.38 xG. The hosts can rely on a solid defensive setup, having kept a clean sheet in their only home match, but Ceramica’s average 61% possession and 14 shots away from home should give the visitors the edge. An away win is the most likely outcome, although Smouha’s low scoring efficiency and defensive record to date also increase the chances of a draw.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
The stronger signal is BTTS - No, as Smouha have scored just 1 goal in their last 5 matches, averaging 0.2 per game, while their BTTS rate was only 20%. The hosts do have a season xG of 1.68, but their current xG has dropped to 0.95, confirming a clear decline in chance creation. Ceramica Cleopatra have yet to keep a clean sheet this season and have recorded BTTS in 100% of their matches, but the visitors’ defence has allowed an average xG of just 1.13 over their last five appearances. The visitors are the favourites to score, having recently averaged 1.4 goals per game, while Smouha’s very low attacking efficiency remains the biggest risk to the both-teams-to-score scenario. Additionally, the league has recorded goals from both teams in only 33% of matches, with an average of 1.97 goals per game, further supporting the outcome in which at least one side fails to score.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Smouha’s latest form clearly limits the hosts’ goal-scoring potential: they have scored only 1 goal in their last 5 matches, averaging 0.2 per game, with an xG of 0.95. Ceramica are more dangerous, averaging 1.4 goals and an xG of 1.45 across their last five matches, but their attack faces a team conceding an average of 1.0 goal. Both teams have conceded 5 goals in their last 5 appearances, pointing more towards a 1:1 or 0:2 scoreline than an open, high-scoring game. Although Ceramica averaged 3.0 goals per match at the start of the season, the league averages only 1.97 goals per game, while Smouha have exceeded 2.5 goals in just 20% of their last five matches. The Under 3.5 goals line has the edge, as the projected total of 2.10 goals leaves a clear margin below four goals.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Ceramica Cleopatra are in clearly better current form: over their last five matches, they have averaged 1.4 goals and won 40% of their games, while Smouha have scored just 0.2 goals per match, failed to win any of them, and lost 80%. The hosts were level at half-time in all of their last five appearances, averaging just 0.2 goals scored in the first half. The visitors led at the break in 60% of their recent matches and averaged 0.8 goals by that point; however, the league’s cautious profile, with a goal scored before half-time in only 47% of matches, increases the likelihood of a draw at the break. After the interval, Ceramica have averaged 0.6 goals over their last five matches, while Smouha have failed to score in this period and conceded an average of 0.8. The HT/FT scenario of a draw at half-time followed by an away win, represented by X/2, best combines Smouha’s poor attacking form with Ceramica’s superior quality and efficiency, as they have averaged 3.0 goals per match this season with a 21% shot-conversion rate.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Smouha SC | Ceramica Cleopatra | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 26% | 44% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.13 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.00 | 0.32 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Ceramica Cleopatra is 506% better for: last-5 form.
0.33 pts / match - Smouha SC · 2 pts / match - Ceramica Cleopatra
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Smouha SC is 49% better for: goals conceded per match.
0.67 goals / match - Smouha SC · 1 goals / match - Ceramica Cleopatra
Smouha SC scores in 0% of matches (0 of 3 matches), while Ceramica Cleopatra keeps a clean sheet in 33% (1 of 3 matches).
Ceramica Cleopatra scores in 100% of matches (3 of 3 matches), while Smouha SC keeps a clean sheet in 33% (1 of 3 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Smouha SC
Over / Under - Ceramica Cleopatra
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Ceramica Cleopatra is 200% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1 pts / match - Smouha SC · 3 pts / match - Ceramica Cleopatra
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Smouha SC - second-half results
Concedes 0.7 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Ceramica Cleopatra - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 100% of matches and wins 67%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.
Concedes 1.0 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.00 | 0.33 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.0 | 0.7 |
| Average goals in match | 0.0 | 0.7 |
| 1 goal | 0% | 67% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 0% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 100% | 33% |
| No goal | 100% | 100% |
| Goal difference | 0 | -2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 3.00 | 2.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.0 | 1.0 |
| Average goals in match | 1.0 | 2.0 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 67% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 33% |
| Clean sheet | 100% | 33% |
| No goal | 0% | 33% |
| Goal difference | +3 | 0 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Concedes most in 76-90 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (2 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Smouha SC
Ceramica Cleopatra
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Egyptian Premier League).
Teams vs league
| Smouha SC | Liga | Ceramica Cleopatra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 0.67 | 2.03 | ▲ 3.00 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 0% | 38% | ▲ 67% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 0% | 32% | ▲ 67% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 33% | 38% | ▼ 33% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 0% | 50% | ▲ 100% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 67% | 76% | ▲ 100% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (2): Smouha SC 0 - 0 - 2 Ceramica Cleopatra. Average goals 1.50, both teams scored in 0% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Smouha SC vs Ceramica Cleopatra?
The Egyptian Premier League match finished Smouha SC 0:2 Ceramica Cleopatra. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Smouha SC and Ceramica Cleopatra?
In the last 2 head-to-head matches Smouha SC won 0, Ceramica Cleopatra won 2 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 1.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Smouha SC vs Ceramica Cleopatra?
Smouha SC score 0.00 goals per game on average and Ceramica Cleopatra 2.00. The Egyptian Premier League average is 2.03 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 32% of games. Both teams score in 0% of Smouha SC's matches and 67% of Ceramica Cleopatra's.
What form are Smouha SC and Ceramica Cleopatra in?
Over the last 5 games Smouha SC have a 0-1-2 record (0.33 points per game) and Ceramica Cleopatra 2-0-1 (2.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Smouha SC vs Ceramica Cleopatra?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.


