Kenya - Kenyan Premier LeagueData current as of 06 September 2026

Sofapaka vs Bidco United: match statistics

Sofapaka crest
Sofapaka
1 : 1half-time 0:0
Bidco United crest
Bidco United
135%(0.00)
X40%(0.00)
225%(0.00)

Statistical analysis points to a balanced contest between two teams in poor form. Sofapaka has a dismal run in the last five matches (0.4 PPG) with just a 13% win rate at home, where they lose half of their fixtures. Bidco United performs even worse in the last five games (0.2 PPG) and has failed to score in 57% of away matches. Both teams are characterized by low offensive efficiency – Sofapaka averages 0.63 goals at home, and Bidco United 0.57 away. xG values are very close (0.88 vs 0.74), confirming a level playing field in terms of chance creation. Given the poor form of both squads, high draw percentages (38% for the hosts, 29% for the visitors), and low average goal count per match, the most probable outcome is a draw, likely goalless or 1-1.

Sofapaka vs Bidco United: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Sofapaka played Bidco United in Kenyan Premier League (Kenya). The match was played on 10 January 2026. Final score: 1:1.

Current form

Sofapaka: 0-2-3, 0.40 points/match. Bidco United: 0-1-4, 0.20 points/match.

Goal statistics

Sofapaka scores 0.73 and concedes 1.13 goals per match. Bidco United scores 0.47 and concedes 0.80. League average: 1.91 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Sofapaka 27%, Bidco United 20%. Over 2.5: Sofapaka 27%, Bidco United 20%. League level: BTTS 40%, Over 2.5 30%.

xG, shots and style

Sofapaka has higher xG: 1.37 vs 1.22. Sofapaka: 9.4 shots per match, Bidco United: 7.1.

Match halves

Sofapaka: half-time lead 20%, second-half goals 0.33. Bidco United: half-time lead 7%, second-half goals 0.20.

Goals by minute

Sofapaka: 0-15 (3 goals). Bidco United: 0-15 (3 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Kenyan Premier League: 1.91 goals per match, BTTS 40%, Over 2.5 30%.

Head-to-head

No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Statistical analysis points to a balanced contest between two teams in poor form. Sofapaka has a dismal run in the last five matches (0.4 PPG) with just a 13% win rate at home, where they lose half of their fixtures. Bidco United performs even worse in the last five games (0.2 PPG) and has failed to score in 57% of away matches. Both teams are characterized by low offensive efficiency – Sofapaka averages 0.63 goals at home, and Bidco United 0.57 away. xG values are very close (0.88 vs 0.74), confirming a level playing field in terms of chance creation. Given the poor form of both squads, high draw percentages (38% for the hosts, 29% for the visitors), and low average goal count per match, the most probable outcome is a draw, likely goalless or 1-1.

View the statistical overview

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

52Possession (%)48
SofapakaBidco United
6Shots7
SofapakaBidco United
2Shots on target4
SofapakaBidco United
1.07xG1.37
SofapakaBidco United
4Corners7
SofapakaBidco United
74Dangerous attacks88
SofapakaBidco United
-1Fouls-1
SofapakaBidco United
-1Cards-1
SofapakaBidco United

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

SofapakaBidco United
0.73Goals scored / match0.47
SofapakaBidco United
1.13Goals conceded / match0.8
SofapakaBidco United
45%Average possession47%
SofapakaBidco United
3.4Shots on target / match2.2
SofapakaBidco United

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

9.4Shots per match7.07
SofapakaBidco United
3.4Shots on target2.2
SofapakaBidco United
7.8%Shot conversion6.6%
SofapakaBidco United
45%Possession47%
SofapakaBidco United
1.37xG for1.22
SofapakaBidco United
1.5xG against1.48
SofapakaBidco United

Shooting quality

Sofapaka: BalancedBidco United: Balanced
SofapakaBidco United
Accuracy (shots on target)36%31%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.150.17
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.210.21

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Sofapaka is 100% better for: last-5 form.

0.4 pts / match - Sofapaka · 0.2 pts / match - Bidco United

Sofapaka
DLLLD
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
20% W27% R53% P
Season (W-D-L)
3-4-8
0.87 pts / match · goal difference -6
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-2-3
0.40 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
1-3-4
Last 5 at home
1-2-2
WLDLD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.0Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 1.06Opponent xG: 1.22BTTS: 0%Over 2.5: 0%
Bidco United
LLDLL
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
20% W33% R47% P
Season (W-D-L)
3-5-7
0.93 pts / match · goal difference -5
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-1-4
0.20 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
2-2-3
Last 5 away
1-2-2
DWDLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.0Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 1.18Opponent xG: 1.31BTTS: 0%Over 2.5: 0%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Sofapaka is 55% better for: goals scored per match.

0.73 goals / match - Sofapaka · 0.47 goals / match - Bidco United

Bidco United is 41% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.13 goals / match - Sofapaka · 0.8 goals / match - Bidco United

Sofapaka scoring profile: more difficult

Sofapaka scores in 40% of matches (6 of 15 matches), while Bidco United keeps a clean sheet in 47% (7 of 15 matches).

Bidco United scoring profile: mixed

Bidco United scores in 33% of matches (5 of 15 matches), while Sofapaka keeps a clean sheet in 27% (4 of 15 matches).

11Goals scored (season)7
SofapakaBidco United
17Goals conceded (season)12
SofapakaBidco United
1.87Average goals in match1.27
SofapakaBidco United
0Goals scored (last 5)0
SofapakaBidco United
4Goals conceded (last 5)4
SofapakaBidco United

How often they score at least...

40%1 goal33%
SofapakaBidco United
27%2 goals13%
SofapakaBidco United
7%3 goals0%
SofapakaBidco United
0%4 goals0%
SofapakaBidco United

How often they concede at least...

73%1 goal53%
SofapakaBidco United
33%2 goals13%
SofapakaBidco United
7%3 goals13%
SofapakaBidco United
0%4 goals0%
SofapakaBidco United

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

40%
League average

Goal patterns

7%BTTS at half-time7%
SofapakaBidco United
0%BTTS in both halves0%
SofapakaBidco United
13%Scored in both halves0%
SofapakaBidco United

BTTS and goal count

20%Min. 3 goals and BTTS20%
SofapakaBidco United
7%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
SofapakaBidco United
0%BTTS - last 50%
SofapakaBidco United

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

47%Min. 1 goal before half-time20%
SofapakaBidco United
20%Min. 2 goals before half-time7%
SofapakaBidco United
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
SofapakaBidco United

2nd half

40%Min. 1 goal after half-time27%
SofapakaBidco United
13%Min. 2 goals after half-time13%
SofapakaBidco United
7%Min. 3 goals after half-time7%
SofapakaBidco United

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Sofapaka is 12% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.2 pts / match - Sofapaka · 1.07 pts / match - Bidco United

Sofapaka - half-time state
20% leading60% draw20% trailing
Bidco United - half-time state
7% leading87% draw7% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.2Points per match (1st half)1.07
SofapakaBidco United
0.33Goals scored (1st half)0.13
SofapakaBidco United
0.33Goals conceded (1st half)0.13
SofapakaBidco United
0.67Average goals (1st half)0.27
SofapakaBidco United
73%Clean sheet before half-time87%
SofapakaBidco United
73%No goal before half-time87%
SofapakaBidco United

After half-time (2nd half)

1.07Points per match (2nd half)1.13
SofapakaBidco United
0.33Goals scored (2nd half)0.2
SofapakaBidco United
0.33Goals conceded (2nd half)0.27
SofapakaBidco United
0.67Average goals (2nd half)0.47
SofapakaBidco United
73%Clean sheet after half-time80%
SofapakaBidco United
80%No goal after half-time87%
SofapakaBidco United

Sofapaka - second-half results

13% W67% R20% P
18
Half-time points
5
Half-time goals
0
Goal difference (1st half)
16
Second-half points
0
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.20
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 20% of matches and wins 20%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Bidco United - second-half results

13% W73% R13% P
16
Half-time points
2
Half-time goals
0
Goal difference (1st half)
17
Second-half points
-1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.07
PPG before half-time
Lead holding286%

Leads at half-time in 7% of matches and wins 20%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Sofapaka - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.000.80
Goals scored / match0.00.0
Goals conceded / match0.00.2
Average goals in match0.00.2
1 goal0%20%
2 goals0%0%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet100%80%
No goal100%100%
Goal difference0-1
Half-time: 0% leading - 100% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 80% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 0
Bidco United - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.000.80
Goals scored / match0.00.0
Goals conceded / match0.00.2
Average goals in match0.00.2
1 goal0%20%
2 goals0%0%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet100%80%
No goal100%100%
Goal difference0-1
Half-time: 0% leading - 100% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 80% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 0

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Sofapaka
ScoredConceded
3
9
0-15
2
2
16-30
1
1
31-45
0
2
46-60
2
2
61-75
3
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (3 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.

Bidco United
ScoredConceded
3
7
0-15
0
0
16-30
1
1
31-45
2
1
46-60
0
1
61-75
1
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (3 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

1.56
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
0.8 : 0.8
Estimated goal split
home : away
82%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
24%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
13%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
40%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 3 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Sofapaka

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.13
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.27
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.3 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.64
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.37
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
82%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
111%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.47
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
27% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 27% come in the first quarter-hour.
27%

Bidco United

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.26
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.07
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+2.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.75
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.68
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
46%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
90%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.73
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
14% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 43% come in the first quarter-hour.
14%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Kenyan Premier League).

Teams vs league

SofapakaLigaBidco United
Average goals in match 1.871.91 1.27
Both teams scored 27%40% 20%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 27%30% 20%
Clean sheets 27%38% 47%
Goal before half-time 47%34% 20%
Goal after half-time 40%36% 27%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

1.91
Average goals per match
40%
Both teams scored
30%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
38%
Clean sheets
0.89
Home goals / match
1.02
Away goals / match
+-13%
Home attack advantage
+-15%
Home defence advantage
+-13%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
34%
1 goal
14%
2 goals
3%
3 goals
1%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
36%
1 goal
18%
2 goals
3%
3 goals
1%
4 goals

FAQ

What was the result of Sofapaka vs Bidco United?

The Kenyan Premier League match finished Sofapaka 1:1 Bidco United. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Sofapaka vs Bidco United?

Sofapaka score 0.73 goals per game on average and Bidco United 0.47. The Kenyan Premier League average is 1.91 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 30% of games. Both teams score in 27% of Sofapaka's matches and 20% of Bidco United's.

What form are Sofapaka and Bidco United in?

Over the last 5 games Sofapaka have a 0-2-3 record (0.40 points per game) and Bidco United 0-1-4 (0.20 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Sofapaka vs Bidco United?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Sofapaka vs Bidco United: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.