Kenya - Kenyan Premier LeagueData current as of 22 July 2026

Sofapaka vs Police: match statistics

Sofapaka crest
Sofapaka
0 : 2half-time 0:0
Police crest
Police
120%(0.00)
X30%(0.00)
250%(0.00)

Analysis of the statistics clearly points to an advantage for the Police team. The hosts, Sofapaka, present catastrophic form with just a 9% win rate at home and a -7 goal difference in home matches. In the last five matches overall, this team has not achieved a single victory, conceding an average of 1.8 goals per match. Police, on the other hand, boasts a 50% away efficiency and a solid unbeaten streak in the last five matches. The visitors possess a positive goal difference (+3) on the road, maintain 40% clean sheets, and present significantly better offensive efficiency (1.1 goals on average per away match compared to 0.73 for the hosts). The difference in form and quality of play speaks decisively in favor of Police.

Sofapaka vs Police: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Sofapaka play Police in Kenyan Premier League (Kenya). The match date is 18 February 2026 at 13:00. Final score: 0:2.

Current form

Sofapaka: 0-3-2, 0.60 points/match. Police: 4-1-0, 2.60 points/match.

Goal statistics

Sofapaka scores 0.54 and concedes 1.29 goals per match. Police scores 0.97 and concedes 0.62. League average: 2.01 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Sofapaka 25%, Police 31%. Over 2.5: Sofapaka 25%, Police 21%. League level: BTTS 43%, Over 2.5 33%.

xG, shots and style

Police has higher xG: 1.62 vs 1.35. Sofapaka: 9.4 shots per match, Police: 12.4.

Match halves

Sofapaka: half-time lead 11%, second-half goals 0.18. Police: half-time lead 3%, second-half goals 0.00.

Goals by minute

Sofapaka: 0-15 (7 goals). Police: 0-15 (27 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Kenyan Premier League: 2.01 goals per match, BTTS 43%, Over 2.5 33%.

Head-to-head

1 H2H matches: 0-0-1. Average goals 1.00, BTTS 0%.

Match description

Analysis of the statistics clearly points to an advantage for the Police team. The hosts, Sofapaka, present catastrophic form with just a 9% win rate at home and a -7 goal difference in home matches. In the last five matches overall, this team has not achieved a single victory, conceding an average of 1.8 goals per match. Police, on the other hand, boasts a 50% away efficiency and a solid unbeaten streak in the last five matches. The visitors possess a positive goal difference (+3) on the road, maintain 40% clean sheets, and present significantly better offensive efficiency (1.1 goals on average per away match compared to 0.73 for the hosts). The difference in form and quality of play speaks decisively in favor of Police.

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

43Possession (%)57
SofapakaPolice
10Shots10
SofapakaPolice
2Shots on target4
SofapakaPolice
1.25xG1.5
SofapakaPolice
5Corners6
SofapakaPolice
66Dangerous attacks81
SofapakaPolice
-1Fouls-1
SofapakaPolice
-1Cards-1
SofapakaPolice

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

0.54Goals scored / match0.97
SofapakaPolice
1.29Goals conceded / match0.62
SofapakaPolice
46%Average possession51%
SofapakaPolice
3.32Shots on target / match3.97
SofapakaPolice

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

9.43Shots per match12.38
SofapakaPolice
3.32Shots on target3.97
SofapakaPolice
5.7%Shot conversion7.8%
SofapakaPolice
46%Possession51%
SofapakaPolice
1.35xG for1.62
SofapakaPolice
1.52xG against1.36
SofapakaPolice

Shooting quality

Sofapaka: BalancedPolice: Balanced
SofapakaPolice
Accuracy (shots on target)35%32%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.140.13
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.160.24

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Police is 333% better for: last-5 form.

0.6 pts / match - Sofapaka · 2.6 pts / match - Police

Sofapaka
LDLDD
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
11% W29% R61% P
Season (W-D-L)
3-8-17
0.61 pts / match · goal difference -21
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-3-2
0.60 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
1-5-8
Last 5 at home
0-1-4
LLLLD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.0Goals conceded: 0.6xG: 1.49Opponent xG: 1.45BTTS: 0%Over 2.5: 0%
Police
WDWWW
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
45% W38% R17% P
Season (W-D-L)
13-11-5
1.72 pts / match · goal difference +10
Last 5 (W-D-L)
4-1-0
2.60 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
7-4-3
Last 5 away
2-2-1
DWLDW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 0.4xG: 2.00Opponent xG: 1.50BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Police is 80% better for: goals scored per match.

0.54 goals / match - Sofapaka · 0.97 goals / match - Police

Police is 108% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.29 goals / match - Sofapaka · 0.62 goals / match - Police

Sofapaka scoring profile: more difficult

Sofapaka scores in 32% of matches (9 of 28 matches), while Police keeps a clean sheet in 52% (15 of 29 matches).

Police scoring profile: strong

Police scores in 62% of matches (18 of 29 matches), while Sofapaka keeps a clean sheet in 25% (7 of 28 matches).

15Goals scored (season)28
SofapakaPolice
36Goals conceded (season)18
SofapakaPolice
1.82Average goals in match1.59
SofapakaPolice
0Goals scored (last 5)8
SofapakaPolice
3Goals conceded (last 5)2
SofapakaPolice

How often they score at least...

32%1 goal62%
SofapakaPolice
18%2 goals28%
SofapakaPolice
4%3 goals7%
SofapakaPolice
0%4 goals0%
SofapakaPolice

How often they concede at least...

75%1 goal48%
SofapakaPolice
39%2 goals14%
SofapakaPolice
14%3 goals0%
SofapakaPolice
0%4 goals0%
SofapakaPolice

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

4%BTTS at half-time0%
SofapakaPolice
0%BTTS in both halves0%
SofapakaPolice
7%Scored in both halves0%
SofapakaPolice

BTTS and goal count

18%Min. 3 goals and BTTS17%
SofapakaPolice
7%Min. 3 goals without BTTS3%
SofapakaPolice
0%BTTS - last 540%
SofapakaPolice

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

29%Min. 1 goal before half-time7%
SofapakaPolice
11%Min. 2 goals before half-time7%
SofapakaPolice
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
SofapakaPolice

2nd half

21%Min. 1 goal after half-time3%
SofapakaPolice
7%Min. 2 goals after half-time0%
SofapakaPolice
4%Min. 3 goals after half-time0%
SofapakaPolice

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Sofapaka - half-time state
11% leading75% draw14% trailing
Police - half-time state
3% leading93% draw3% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.07Points per match (1st half)1.03
SofapakaPolice
0.18Goals scored (1st half)0.07
SofapakaPolice
0.21Goals conceded (1st half)0.07
SofapakaPolice
0.39Average goals (1st half)0.14
SofapakaPolice
82%Clean sheet before half-time97%
SofapakaPolice
86%No goal before half-time97%
SofapakaPolice

After half-time (2nd half)

1.04Points per match (2nd half)0.97
SofapakaPolice
0.18Goals scored (2nd half)0
SofapakaPolice
0.18Goals conceded (2nd half)0.03
SofapakaPolice
0.36Average goals (2nd half)0.03
SofapakaPolice
86%Clean sheet after half-time97%
SofapakaPolice
89%No goal after half-time100%
SofapakaPolice

Sofapaka - second-half results

7% W82% R11% P
30
Half-time points
5
Half-time goals
-1
Goal difference (1st half)
29
Second-half points
0
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.07
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 11% of matches and wins 11%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Police - second-half results

0% W97% R3% P
30
Half-time points
2
Half-time goals
0
Goal difference (1st half)
28
Second-half points
-1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.03
PPG before half-time
Lead holding1500%

Leads at half-time in 3% of matches and wins 45%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Sofapaka - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.001.00
Goals scored / match0.00.0
Goals conceded / match0.00.0
Average goals in match0.00.0
1 goal0%0%
2 goals0%0%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet100%100%
No goal100%100%
Goal difference00
Half-time: 0% leading - 100% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 100% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 0
Police - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.001.00
Goals scored / match0.00.0
Goals conceded / match0.00.0
Average goals in match0.00.0
1 goal0%0%
2 goals0%0%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet100%100%
No goal100%100%
Goal difference00
Half-time: 0% leading - 100% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 100% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 0

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Sofapaka
ScoredConceded
7
28
0-15
2
2
16-30
1
1
31-45
0
2
46-60
2
2
61-75
3
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (7 goli). Concedes most in 0-15 (28). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.

Police
ScoredConceded
27
16
0-15
1
1
16-30
0
0
31-45
0
0
46-60
0
0
61-75
0
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (27 goli). Concedes most in 0-15 (16). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

1.71
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
0.6 : 1.1
Estimated goal split
home : away
85%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
28%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-41%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
20%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
26%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 4 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Sofapaka

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.17
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.58
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+4.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.81
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.23
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
53%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
130%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.01
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
20% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 47% come in the first quarter-hour.
20%

Police

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.26
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.09
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-11.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.65
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.74
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
98%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
61%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.88
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.1
Late goals
0% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 96% come in the first quarter-hour.
0%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Kenyan Premier League).

Teams vs league

SofapakaLigaPolice
Average goals in match 1.822.01 1.59
Both teams scored 25%43% 31%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 25%33% 21%
Clean sheets 25%36% 52%
Goal before half-time 29%21% 7%
Goal after half-time 21%22% 3%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.01
Average goals per match
43%
Both teams scored
33%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
36%
Clean sheets
1.02
Home goals / match
0.99
Away goals / match
+3%
Home attack advantage
+3%
Home defence advantage
+-2%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
21%
1 goal
8%
2 goals
2%
3 goals
1%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
22%
1 goal
11%
2 goals
2%
3 goals
0%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Sofapaka 0 - 0 - 1 Police. Average goals 1.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.

Police
1 : 0
Sofapaka

FAQ

What was the result of Sofapaka vs Police?

The Kenyan Premier League match finished Sofapaka 0:2 Police. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Sofapaka vs Police?

Sofapaka score 0.54 goals per game on average and Police 0.97. The Kenyan Premier League average is 2.01 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 33% of games. Both teams score in 25% of Sofapaka's matches and 31% of Police's.

What form are Sofapaka and Police in?

Over the last 5 games Sofapaka have a 0-3-2 record (0.60 points per game) and Police 4-1-0 (2.60 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Sofapaka vs Police?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Sofapaka vs Police: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.