Kenya - Kenyan Premier LeagueData current as of 06 September 2026

Sofapaka vs Police: match statistics

Sofapaka crest
Sofapaka
0 : 2half-time 0:0
Police crest
Police
120%(0.00)
X30%(0.00)
250%(0.00)

Analysis of the statistics clearly points to an advantage for the Police team. The hosts, Sofapaka, present catastrophic form with just a 9% win rate at home and a -7 goal difference in home matches. In the last five matches overall, this team has not achieved a single victory, conceding an average of 1.8 goals per match. Police, on the other hand, boasts a 50% away efficiency and a solid unbeaten streak in the last five matches. The visitors possess a positive goal difference (+3) on the road, maintain 40% clean sheets, and present significantly better offensive efficiency (1.1 goals on average per away match compared to 0.73 for the hosts). The difference in form and quality of play speaks decisively in favor of Police.

Sofapaka vs Police: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Sofapaka played Police in Kenyan Premier League (Kenya). The match was played on 18 February 2026. Final score: 0:2.

Current form

Sofapaka: 0-0-5, 0.00 points/match. Police: 2-3-0, 1.80 points/match.

Goal statistics

Sofapaka scores 0.71 and concedes 1.38 goals per match. Police scores 0.86 and concedes 0.67. League average: 2.07 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Sofapaka 33%, Police 33%. Over 2.5: Sofapaka 33%, Police 14%. League level: BTTS 46%, Over 2.5 35%.

xG, shots and style

Police has higher xG: 1.59 vs 1.35. Sofapaka: 9.2 shots per match, Police: 11.5.

Match halves

Sofapaka: half-time lead 14%, second-half goals 0.24. Police: half-time lead 5%, second-half goals 0.00.

Goals by minute

Sofapaka: 0-15 (7 goals). Police: 0-15 (17 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Kenyan Premier League: 2.07 goals per match, BTTS 46%, Over 2.5 35%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-0-1. Average goals 1.00, BTTS 0%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Analysis of the statistics clearly points to an advantage for the Police team. The hosts, Sofapaka, present catastrophic form with just a 9% win rate at home and a -7 goal difference in home matches. In the last five matches overall, this team has not achieved a single victory, conceding an average of 1.8 goals per match. Police, on the other hand, boasts a 50% away efficiency and a solid unbeaten streak in the last five matches. The visitors possess a positive goal difference (+3) on the road, maintain 40% clean sheets, and present significantly better offensive efficiency (1.1 goals on average per away match compared to 0.73 for the hosts). The difference in form and quality of play speaks decisively in favor of Police.

View the statistical overview

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

43Possession (%)57
SofapakaPolice
10Shots10
SofapakaPolice
2Shots on target4
SofapakaPolice
1.25xG1.5
SofapakaPolice
5Corners6
SofapakaPolice
66Dangerous attacks81
SofapakaPolice
-1Fouls-1
SofapakaPolice
-1Cards-1
SofapakaPolice

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

0.71Goals scored / match0.86
SofapakaPolice
1.38Goals conceded / match0.67
SofapakaPolice
45%Average possession50%
SofapakaPolice
3.52Shots on target / match3.9
SofapakaPolice

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

9.19Shots per match11.52
SofapakaPolice
3.52Shots on target3.9
SofapakaPolice
7.8%Shot conversion7.4%
SofapakaPolice
45%Possession50%
SofapakaPolice
1.35xG for1.59
SofapakaPolice
1.57xG against1.35
SofapakaPolice

Shooting quality

Sofapaka: BalancedPolice: Balanced
SofapakaPolice
Accuracy (shots on target)38%34%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.150.14
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.200.22

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Sofapaka
LLLLL
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
14% W24% R62% P
Season (W-D-L)
3-5-13
0.67 pts / match · goal difference -14
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-0-5
0.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
1-4-6
Last 5 at home
0-2-3
LDDLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.6Goals conceded: 2.2xG: 1.37Opponent xG: 1.80BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 60%
Police
DDWDW
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
38% W43% R19% P
Season (W-D-L)
8-9-4
1.57 pts / match · goal difference +4
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-3-0
1.80 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
5-3-2
Last 5 away
1-3-1
LDDWD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 0.6xG: 1.67Opponent xG: 1.16BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 0%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Police is 21% better for: goals scored per match.

0.71 goals / match - Sofapaka · 0.86 goals / match - Police

Police is 106% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.38 goals / match - Sofapaka · 0.67 goals / match - Police

Sofapaka scoring profile: more difficult

Sofapaka scores in 43% of matches (9 of 21 matches), while Police keeps a clean sheet in 48% (10 of 21 matches).

Police scoring profile: strong

Police scores in 62% of matches (13 of 21 matches), while Sofapaka keeps a clean sheet in 19% (4 of 21 matches).

15Goals scored (season)18
SofapakaPolice
29Goals conceded (season)14
SofapakaPolice
2.1Average goals in match1.52
SofapakaPolice
3Goals scored (last 5)6
SofapakaPolice
11Goals conceded (last 5)3
SofapakaPolice

How often they score at least...

43%1 goal62%
SofapakaPolice
24%2 goals19%
SofapakaPolice
5%3 goals5%
SofapakaPolice
0%4 goals0%
SofapakaPolice

How often they concede at least...

81%1 goal52%
SofapakaPolice
38%2 goals14%
SofapakaPolice
19%3 goals0%
SofapakaPolice
0%4 goals0%
SofapakaPolice

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

5%BTTS at half-time0%
SofapakaPolice
0%BTTS in both halves0%
SofapakaPolice
10%Scored in both halves0%
SofapakaPolice

BTTS and goal count

24%Min. 3 goals and BTTS14%
SofapakaPolice
10%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
SofapakaPolice
40%BTTS - last 560%
SofapakaPolice

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

38%Min. 1 goal before half-time10%
SofapakaPolice
14%Min. 2 goals before half-time10%
SofapakaPolice
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
SofapakaPolice

2nd half

29%Min. 1 goal after half-time5%
SofapakaPolice
10%Min. 2 goals after half-time0%
SofapakaPolice
5%Min. 3 goals after half-time0%
SofapakaPolice

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Sofapaka is 5% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.1 pts / match - Sofapaka · 1.05 pts / match - Police

Sofapaka - half-time state
14% leading67% draw19% trailing
Police - half-time state
5% leading90% draw5% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.1Points per match (1st half)1.05
SofapakaPolice
0.24Goals scored (1st half)0.1
SofapakaPolice
0.29Goals conceded (1st half)0.1
SofapakaPolice
0.52Average goals (1st half)0.19
SofapakaPolice
76%Clean sheet before half-time95%
SofapakaPolice
81%No goal before half-time95%
SofapakaPolice

After half-time (2nd half)

1.05Points per match (2nd half)0.95
SofapakaPolice
0.24Goals scored (2nd half)0
SofapakaPolice
0.24Goals conceded (2nd half)0.05
SofapakaPolice
0.48Average goals (2nd half)0.05
SofapakaPolice
81%Clean sheet after half-time95%
SofapakaPolice
86%No goal after half-time100%
SofapakaPolice

Sofapaka - second-half results

10% W76% R14% P
23
Half-time points
5
Half-time goals
-1
Goal difference (1st half)
22
Second-half points
0
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.10
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 14% of matches and wins 14%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Police - second-half results

0% W95% R5% P
22
Half-time points
2
Half-time goals
0
Goal difference (1st half)
20
Second-half points
-1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.05
PPG before half-time
Lead holding760%

Leads at half-time in 5% of matches and wins 38%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Sofapaka - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.801.00
Goals scored / match0.00.0
Goals conceded / match0.20.0
Average goals in match0.20.0
1 goal20%0%
2 goals0%0%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet80%100%
No goal100%100%
Goal difference-10
Half-time: 0% leading - 80% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 100% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 0
Police - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.001.00
Goals scored / match0.00.0
Goals conceded / match0.00.0
Average goals in match0.00.0
1 goal0%0%
2 goals0%0%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet100%100%
No goal100%100%
Goal difference00
Half-time: 0% leading - 100% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 100% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 0

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Sofapaka
ScoredConceded
7
21
0-15
2
2
16-30
1
1
31-45
0
2
46-60
2
2
61-75
3
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (7 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (21). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.

Police
ScoredConceded
17
12
0-15
1
1
16-30
0
0
31-45
0
0
46-60
0
0
61-75
0
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (17 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

1.81
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
0.7 : 1.1
Estimated goal split
home : away
87%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
33%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-45%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
27%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
22%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 5 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Sofapaka

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.22
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.45
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+0.7 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.64
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.19
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
70%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
131%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.67
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
20% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 47% come in the first quarter-hour.
20%

Police

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.24
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.05
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-6.3 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.73
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.68
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
82%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
66%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.23
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.1
Late goals
0% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 94% come in the first quarter-hour.
0%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Kenyan Premier League).

Teams vs league

SofapakaLigaPolice
Average goals in match 2.102.07 1.52
Both teams scored 33%46% 33%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 33%35% 14%
Clean sheets 19%34% 48%
Goal before half-time 38%27% 10%
Goal after half-time 29%29% 5%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.07
Average goals per match
46%
Both teams scored
35%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
34%
Clean sheets
1.02
Home goals / match
1.05
Away goals / match
+-3%
Home attack advantage
+-3%
Home defence advantage
+-7%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
27%
1 goal
10%
2 goals
2%
3 goals
1%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
29%
1 goal
15%
2 goals
3%
3 goals
1%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Sofapaka 0 - 0 - 1 Police. Average goals 1.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.

Police
1 : 0
Sofapaka

FAQ

What was the result of Sofapaka vs Police?

The Kenyan Premier League match finished Sofapaka 0:2 Police. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Sofapaka vs Police?

Sofapaka score 0.71 goals per game on average and Police 0.86. The Kenyan Premier League average is 2.07 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 35% of games. Both teams score in 33% of Sofapaka's matches and 33% of Police's.

What form are Sofapaka and Police in?

Over the last 5 games Sofapaka have a 0-0-5 record (0.00 points per game) and Police 2-3-0 (1.80 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Sofapaka vs Police?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Sofapaka vs Police: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.