Uzbekistan - Uzbekistan Super LeagueData current as of 30 August 2026

Sogdiana vs Qizilqum: match statistics

Sogdiana crest
Sogdiana
2 : 1half-time 1:0
Qizilqum crest
Qizilqum

Sogdiana vs Qizilqum: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Sogdiana played Qizilqum in Uzbekistan Super League (Uzbekistan). The match was played on 18 August 2026. Final score: 2:1.

Current form

Sogdiana: 3-0-2, 1.80 points/match. Qizilqum: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match.

Goal statistics

Sogdiana scores 1.76 and concedes 2.06 goals per match. Qizilqum scores 0.88 and concedes 1.41. League average: 2.66 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Sogdiana 76%, Qizilqum 29%. Over 2.5: Sogdiana 76%, Qizilqum 41%. League level: BTTS 55%, Over 2.5 54%.

xG, shots and style

Sogdiana has higher xG: 1.49 vs 1.15. Sogdiana: 12.0 shots per match, Qizilqum: 9.2.

Match halves

Sogdiana: half-time lead 41%, second-half goals 1.00. Qizilqum: half-time lead 24%, second-half goals 0.29.

Goals by minute

Sogdiana: 46-60 (6 goals). Qizilqum: 0-15 (4 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Uzbekistan Super League: 2.66 goals per match, BTTS 55%, Over 2.5 54%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 3 previous H2H matches were available: 2-1-0. Average goals 2.33, BTTS 33%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Sogdiana have a clear edge in recent form: they have won 3 of their last 5 matches and averaged 1.8 points per game, while Qizilqum managed just 0.8 points per match. The hosts average 1.88 goals at home, whereas the visitors score only 0.50 away from home and have failed to find the net in as many as 63% of such matches. The difference in chance creation is reflected in Sogdiana’s average of 5.5 shots on target compared with Qizilqum’s 2.75, as well as the hosts’ xG of 1.52 versus 1.11 for the visitors. Sogdiana do concede 2.25 goals per home game, but Qizilqum’s poor away attacking output and 63% away-loss rate point towards a home win. Qizilqum may exploit their opponents’ defensive issues, but the more likely scenario is that Sogdiana will create more chances and claim all three points.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The strongest argument for BTTS - No is Qizilqum’s very low scoring efficiency throughout the season: the visitors average just 0.50 goals and failed to score in 63% of their matches. Their season BTTS rate is only 13%, clearly below Sogdiana’s 50% and the league average of 54%. The last five matches provide slightly more support for a Goal/Goal outcome, as Sogdiana scored 1.8 goals, while both teams conceded 2.0 and 1.8 goals per match respectively. Nevertheless, Qizilqum scored only 1.0 goal in this run, recording an xG of 1.01, while the hosts kept a clean sheet in 25% of their matches. Sogdiana should have good conditions to score, with opponents’ xG against them standing at 1.57, but the greater risk concerns the visitors finding the net. Therefore, the more likely scenario is that at least one team fails to score.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Sogdiana have averaged 1.8 goals scored and 2.0 conceded over their last five matches, while Qizilqum have scored 1.0 and allowed 1.8 goals, lifting the projection to around 2.45 goals. However, the hosts possess greater attacking potential: their average xG stands at 1.21, compared with Qizilqum’s 1.11, although the visitors have scored just 0.50 goals per game throughout the season. The 3.5 line remains high, as only 25% of Sogdiana’s matches and 13% of Qizilqum’s games went over four goals. In addition, Qizilqum failed to score in 63% of their matches, while both teams kept a clean sheet in 25% of games, limiting the risk of a very high-scoring outcome. The strongest selection is therefore Under 3.5 goals, as the season data and expected goal tally clearly support a result with a maximum of three goals.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The strongest scenario is a draw at half-time followed by a Sogdiana win at full-time, as Qizilqum were level at the break in 63% of their matches, including 50% of their last five. Both teams have limited attacking output before the break: Sogdiana average 0.43 goals, while Qizilqum average just 0.25, and the visitors have failed to lead at half-time in any of their last five appearances. After the interval, the advantage should shift to the hosts, who have averaged 1.4 goals in their last five matches, compared with just 0.25 for Qizilqum. Sogdiana have won 60% of their last five games and average 1.8 points per match over this period, compared with Qizilqum’s 20% win rate and 0.8 points per match. In addition, the hosts create slightly better scoring opportunities, with an average xG of 1.21 compared with their opponents’ 1.11, while the visitors’ defence allows an average xG of 1.57.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

1 : 0
1st half
1 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

54Possession (%)46
SogdianaQizilqum
11Shots9
SogdianaQizilqum
6Shots on target3
SogdianaQizilqum
1.46xG1.27
SogdianaQizilqum
3Corners7
SogdianaQizilqum
49Dangerous attacks68
SogdianaQizilqum
-1Fouls-1
SogdianaQizilqum
2Cards1
SogdianaQizilqum

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.76Goals scored / match0.88
SogdianaQizilqum
2.06Goals conceded / match1.41
SogdianaQizilqum
41%Average possession37%
SogdianaQizilqum
5.18Shots on target / match2.41
SogdianaQizilqum

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

12Shots per match9.18
SogdianaQizilqum
5.18Shots on target2.41
SogdianaQizilqum
14.7%Shot conversion9.6%
SogdianaQizilqum
41%Possession37%
SogdianaQizilqum
1.49xG for1.15
SogdianaQizilqum
1.44xG against1.44
SogdianaQizilqum

Shooting quality

Sogdiana: Counter-attackingQizilqum: Balanced
SogdianaQizilqum
Accuracy (shots on target)43%26%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.13
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.340.37

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Sogdiana is 29% better for: last-5 form.

1.8 pts / match - Sogdiana · 1.4 pts / match - Qizilqum

Sogdiana
LLWWW
Season result split
35% W18% R47% P
Season (W-D-L)
6-3-8
1.24 pts / match · goal difference -5
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-0-2
1.80 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
3-1-4
Last 5 at home
3-0-2
LWWLW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.8Goals conceded: 2.0xG: 1.71Opponent xG: 1.47BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 80%
Qizilqum
DLWLW
Season result split
35% W12% R53% P
Season (W-D-L)
6-2-9
1.18 pts / match · goal difference -9
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
2-1-5
Last 5 away
1-1-3
WLDLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.02Opponent xG: 1.67BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Sogdiana is 100% better for: goals scored per match.

1.76 goals / match - Sogdiana · 0.88 goals / match - Qizilqum

Qizilqum is 46% better for: goals conceded per match.

2.06 goals / match - Sogdiana · 1.41 goals / match - Qizilqum

Sogdiana scoring profile: very strong

Sogdiana scores in 88% of matches (15 of 17 matches), while Qizilqum keeps a clean sheet in 29% (5 of 17 matches).

Qizilqum scoring profile: strong

Qizilqum scores in 53% of matches (9 of 17 matches), while Sogdiana keeps a clean sheet in 12% (2 of 17 matches).

30Goals scored (season)15
SogdianaQizilqum
35Goals conceded (season)24
SogdianaQizilqum
3.82Average goals in match2.29
SogdianaQizilqum
9Goals scored (last 5)6
SogdianaQizilqum
10Goals conceded (last 5)7
SogdianaQizilqum

How often they score at least...

88%1 goal53%
SogdianaQizilqum
53%2 goals29%
SogdianaQizilqum
24%3 goals6%
SogdianaQizilqum
6%4 goals0%
SogdianaQizilqum

How often they concede at least...

88%1 goal71%
SogdianaQizilqum
65%2 goals35%
SogdianaQizilqum
29%3 goals18%
SogdianaQizilqum
18%4 goals12%
SogdianaQizilqum

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

55%
League average

Goal patterns

18%BTTS at half-time12%
SogdianaQizilqum
6%BTTS in both halves0%
SogdianaQizilqum
35%Scored in both halves12%
SogdianaQizilqum

BTTS and goal count

71%Min. 3 goals and BTTS24%
SogdianaQizilqum
6%Min. 3 goals without BTTS18%
SogdianaQizilqum
80%BTTS - last 520%
SogdianaQizilqum

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

76%Min. 1 goal before half-time65%
SogdianaQizilqum
47%Min. 2 goals before half-time41%
SogdianaQizilqum
12%Min. 3 goals before half-time6%
SogdianaQizilqum

2nd half

94%Min. 1 goal after half-time65%
SogdianaQizilqum
82%Min. 2 goals after half-time29%
SogdianaQizilqum
41%Min. 3 goals after half-time6%
SogdianaQizilqum

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Sogdiana is 37% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.53 pts / match - Sogdiana · 1.12 pts / match - Qizilqum

Sogdiana - half-time state
41% leading29% draw29% trailing
Qizilqum - half-time state
24% leading41% draw35% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.53Points per match (1st half)1.12
SogdianaQizilqum
0.76Goals scored (1st half)0.41
SogdianaQizilqum
0.65Goals conceded (1st half)0.71
SogdianaQizilqum
1.41Average goals (1st half)1.12
SogdianaQizilqum
59%Clean sheet before half-time53%
SogdianaQizilqum
47%No goal before half-time71%
SogdianaQizilqum

After half-time (2nd half)

1.12Points per match (2nd half)1
SogdianaQizilqum
1Goals scored (2nd half)0.29
SogdianaQizilqum
1.41Goals conceded (2nd half)0.71
SogdianaQizilqum
2.41Average goals (2nd half)1
SogdianaQizilqum
24%Clean sheet after half-time53%
SogdianaQizilqum
29%No goal after half-time71%
SogdianaQizilqum

Sogdiana - second-half results

29% W24% R47% P
26
Half-time points
13
Half-time goals
+2
Goal difference (1st half)
19
Second-half points
-7
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.53
PPG before half-time
Lead holding85%

Leads at half-time in 41% of matches and wins 35%. Usually protects the lead until full-time.

Defence after half-time+0.8

Concedes 0.8 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Qizilqum - second-half results

18% W47% R35% P
19
Half-time points
7
Half-time goals
-5
Goal difference (1st half)
17
Second-half points
-7
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.12
PPG before half-time
Lead holding146%

Leads at half-time in 24% of matches and wins 35%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Sogdiana - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.001.80
Goals scored / match0.41.4
Goals conceded / match0.81.2
Average goals in match1.22.6
1 goal60%100%
2 goals20%80%
3 goals20%60%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal60%20%
Goal difference-2+1
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 0% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2
Qizilqum - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.200.60
Goals scored / match0.60.0
Goals conceded / match0.60.8
Average goals in match1.20.8
1 goal60%40%
2 goals60%20%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet60%60%
No goal60%100%
Goal difference0-4
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 60% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Sogdiana
ScoredConceded
5
3
0-15
5
3
16-30
3
5
31-45
6
9
46-60
5
6
61-75
6
9
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (6 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.

Qizilqum
ScoredConceded
4
3
0-15
2
5
16-30
4
4
31-45
1
3
46-60
1
5
61-75
3
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (4 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.05
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.6 : 1.5
Estimated goal split
home : away
115%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
53%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-24%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
47%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
6%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 17 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Sogdiana

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.05
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.35
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.27
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.62
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
124%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
166%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.56
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
20% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 17% come in the first quarter-hour.
20%

Qizilqum

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.29
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.24
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+5.7 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.27
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.03
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
71%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
99%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.22
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.1
Late goals
20% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 27% come in the first quarter-hour.
20%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Uzbekistan Super League).

Teams vs league

SogdianaLigaQizilqum
Average goals in match 3.822.66 2.29
Both teams scored 76%55% 29%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 76%54% 41%
Clean sheets 12%26% 29%
Goal before half-time 76%68% 65%
Goal after half-time 94%76% 65%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.66
Average goals per match
55%
Both teams scored
54%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
26%
Clean sheets
1.42
Home goals / match
1.24
Away goals / match
+15%
Home attack advantage
+13%
Home defence advantage
+8%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
68%
1 goal
38%
2 goals
11%
3 goals
5%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
76%
1 goal
41%
2 goals
17%
3 goals
4%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. SogdianaGoalLjupche Doriev
  2. QizilqumSubstitutionOn: Ruslan RoziyevOff: Luka Ratkovic
  3. SogdianaYellow cardNodirjon Soyibov
  4. SogdianaYellow cardSamandarjon Mavlonqulov
  5. SogdianaGoalDženan Zajmović

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (3): Sogdiana 2 - 1 - 0 Qizilqum. Average goals 2.33, both teams scored in 33% matches.

Qizilqum
1 : 3
Sogdiana
FK Sogdiana Jizak
3 : 0
Qizilqum Zarafshon PFK
Qizilqum Zarafshon PFK
0 : 0
FK Sogdiana Jizak

FAQ

What was the result of Sogdiana vs Qizilqum?

The Uzbekistan Super League match finished Sogdiana 2:1 Qizilqum. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Sogdiana and Qizilqum?

In the last 3 head-to-head matches Sogdiana won 2, Qizilqum won 0 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 2.33 goals, with both teams scoring in 33% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Sogdiana vs Qizilqum?

Sogdiana score 1.76 goals per game on average and Qizilqum 0.88. The Uzbekistan Super League average is 2.66 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 54% of games. Both teams score in 76% of Sogdiana's matches and 29% of Qizilqum's.

What form are Sogdiana and Qizilqum in?

Over the last 5 games Sogdiana have a 3-0-2 record (1.80 points per game) and Qizilqum 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Sogdiana vs Qizilqum?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.